National Academies Press: OpenBook

Determining Highway Maintenance Costs (2011)

Chapter: Bibliography

« Previous: References
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2011. Determining Highway Maintenance Costs. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/14535.
×
Page 36

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

36 California Department of Finance. State’s Full Cost Recovery Policy. Presentation, August 2002. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. VTrans Asset Management Vision and Work Plan. Vermont Agency of Transportation, 2002. Circular A-87: Cost Principles for State, Local, and Indian Tribal Gov- ernments. Office of Management and Budget (OMB), Washington, D.C., 2004. http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/circulars/a087/a87_ 2004.pdf. Accessed December 15, 2009. Competing for Highway Maintenance: Lessons for Washington State. Washington Policy Center, Seattle, Washington, 1998. Competing for Highway Maintenance: Lessons for Washington State – Part II. Washington Policy Center, Seattle, Washington, 1999. Competitive Contracting and Privatization Options in Wisconsin State Government. Wisconsin Policy Research Institute, Thiensville, Wis- consin, April 2004. Competitive Neutrality: Ensuring a Level Playing Field in Managed Com- petitions. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, California, 1998. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report. Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2008. Comprehensive Annual Financial Report for the Fiscal Year Ended June 30, 2008. Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Ari- zona, 2008. Contracting for Road and Highway Maintenance. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, California, 2003. Department of Transportation Highways and Rail Programs Perfor- mance Audit. State of Washington Joint Legislative Audit and Re- view Committee, Olympia, Washington, 1998. Evaluation of Transportation Organization Outsourcing: Decision-making Criteria for Outsourcing Opportunities. Midwest Regional University Transportation Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 2002. Field Operations Manual. Alabama Department of Transportation, Montgomery, Alabama. FY 2007 Indirect Cost Rate Proposal. State of Washington Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, 2006. Highway Robbery: How Contracting-Out the Design, Engineering, Inspec- tion & Management of Federally-Funded Transportation Projects Produces Problems with Cost, Quality, Safety & Accountability. Na- tional Association of State Highway and Transportation Unions, Sacramento, California, 2002. How to Compare Costs Between In-House and Contracted Services. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, California, 1993. Indirect Cost Allocation Plan FY 2008–2009. Office of Comptroller, Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, Florida, 2008. Infrastructure Outsourcing: Leveraging Concrete, Steel, and Asphalt with Public-Private Partnerships. Reason Public Policy Institute, Los Angeles, California, 2000. In-House Versus Consultant Design Cost Study. Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, 1998. Maintenance & Traffic FY 08 Expenditure Report. Missouri Department of Transportation, Jefferson City, Missouri, 2008. Maintenance Contract Manual. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 2006. Maintenance Management Information System (MMIS) User Manual. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 2002. Maintenance Management Manual. Texas Department of Transporta- tion, Austin, Texas, 2008. Maintenance Work Operating Numbers. Washington State DOT, Olympia, Washington, 2007. NCHRP Web Document 59: Outsourcing of State DOT Capital Program Delivery Functions [Project 20-24(18)]. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. Ninety-Seventh Annual Report. Alabama Department of Transporta- tion, Montgomery, Alabama, Fiscal Year 2008. Outsourcing Versus In-House Highway Maintenance: Cost Comparison and Decision Factors. South Carolina Department of Transporta- tion, Columbia, South Carolina, 2006. Performance Guideline – PeGS. Arizona DOT, Phoenix, Arizona, 2002. Proposed Administrative Indirect Cost Rates for Use During Septem- ber 1, 2008 Through August 31, 2009. Texas Department of Trans- portation, Austin, Texas, 2008. Review of VDOT’s Administration of the Interstate Asset Management Contract. Joint Legislative Audit and Review Commission of the Virginia General Assembly, Richmond, Virginia, 2001. Spaulding, W., MATS: Managing Assets on Transportation Systems. 2008. Synopsis of WSDOT’s Review of Highway Maintenance “Outsourcing” Experience. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, Washington, 2004. TxDOT FIMS Report, Maintenance Direct and Indirect Expenditures by Activity,FY2009.TexasDepartmentofTransportation, Austin, Texas. TxDOT Glossary. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, Texas, 2010. The Use of Highway Maintenance Management Systems in State Highway Agencies. Applied Pavement Technology, Inc., Urbana, Illinois, 2006. Vermont Agency of Transportation. Policy Manual. Subj: Assets Capi- talization, Identifier 4020, August 2, 2001. Warne, T. R. NCHRP Synthesis 313: State DOT Outsourcing and Private- Sector Utilization. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003. Bibliography

Next: Glossary »
Determining Highway Maintenance Costs Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 688: Determining Highway Maintenance Costs presents a process for determining a highway agency’s full costs associated with performing highway maintenance.

The process described in the report can be applied to any specific maintenance activity and is designed to help ensure that the resulting full cost incorporates a fair share of both maintenance program and enterprise support costs.

The report also documents the application of the full-cost determination process for a number of highway agencies and different maintenance activities to demonstrate the types of options, exceptions, and decisions that would be needed in order to perform the full-cost calculation.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!