National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: University of Idaho
Suggested Citation:"University of Utah." National Academy of Engineering. 2012. Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18184.

SPIRALed Engineering Education

Lead Institution: University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT

Collaborating Institutions: Olin College of Engineering, the University of Texas at Austin, Virginia Tech, community colleges in Utah

Category: Capstone, Course/Curricular

Date Implemented: August 2008




Program Description: The purpose of this program is to improve students’ abilities to solve practical, open-ended engineering problems by improving their critical thinking skills and their knowledge of engineering hardware, science, and modeling and simulation tools. We are doing this (1) in a manner applicable to large public institutions with inadequate resources, (2) for incoming students with limited knowledge of engineering and declining science and math skills, and (3) in the face of burgeoning enrollments. For place-based educational institutions, now challenged by online education, we have asked three questions concerning how we can maintain the excellence of the education of engineers in the USA. How can we (1) best utilize the revolutionary technological advances affecting education, (2) complement them to improve our students’ education, and (3) do so economically in large, public institutions? Our approach is to develop coordinated sequences of courses that involve (1) SPIRALing the students’ education (Student-driven Pedagogy of Integrated, Reinforced, Active Learning) by reinforcing and extending their knowledge in a coordinated series of classes (vs. the inoculation approach of isolated lecture classes); (2) teaching by design to motivate learning via open-ended projects that involve modeling, simulation and construction, and competitions with finished devices, while also developing teamwork and communication skills; (3) tailoring projects to each course’s technical material; (4) providing laboratory experiences that build towards the students’ designs; and (5) using video lectures to complement textbooks so that class time can be better used for active learning. We have begun incorporating these elements into two, two-course sequences. The first-year sequence has a mechatronics and robotics theme and emphasizes engineering spreadsheet calculations, software skills, hardware, manufacturing skills, and programming and controls. The sophomore year sequence has a sustainability theme and emphasizes numerical methods and thermodynamics. Our emphasis is on developing a strong basis for spiraling knowledge into our junior level courses, particularly mechatronics, which has a year-long design project, and into our senior capstone design project course. We plan to have complete documentation of the guidelines needed for an instructor anywhere to self-start our new courses and once developed, these electronic/hardcopy manuals will be continually updated as our courses evolve.

Anticipated and Actual Outcomes: We are tracking three outcomes: (a) final exams (pre- and post-introduction of revised classes), (b) retention of knowledge, measured via exams at the start of the junior year, and (c) retention, tracking the names of students receiving upper-division status in the Mechanical Engineering program. The primary goal of the four new courses is to teach students the skills needed to develop, apply, and evaluate engineering models when designing engineering systems. Within each course, students learn and integrate the modeling, mathematical, experimental, programming and manufacturing techniques needed to complete a project. Modeling predictions are compared to the performance of the students’ devices during the final competitions. Professional engineering skills to be improved are: (a) design methodology skills, i.e., ability to organize, manage and complete engineering projects, including problem definition, creativity, appropriate analysis, system integration, follow-through to construction and completion, economic considerations, design under uncertainty, testing and evaluation; (b) communication and teamwork skills developed through multiple design projects, which are natural vehicles for proposals, memos, design reviews, final reports and co-operative learning; and c) awareness of social, ethical, and environmental concerns.

Assessment Information: These courses are under development so full evaluation is not yet possible. Preliminary evidence from (a) final exam performance, (b) retention of knowledge, and (c) retention of students indicates that the students are learning the material better as measured by their final exam performance, that they are retaining knowledge better as measured at the beginning of their junior year, and that the new classes are helping us with retention of students. It must be emphasized that this information is very preliminary, with lots of confounding variables, and that eventual evaluation of its success can only come after the courses are more fully developed and refined, and evaluations performed using much more sophisticated tools, especially when evaluating our long-term goal of improving higher-level thinking skills.

Funding/Sustainability: Development of the first two course sequences was funded by a 3-year NSF CCLI grant of $200,000 ($148,480 in direct costs) used to hire graduate student TAs to help develop the materials. The Mechanical Engineering Department provided an additional TA every semester for development and implementation (~$20,000/year) and allowed reduced teaching/additional instructor time during course development. The Senior Vice-President for Academic Affairs provided $11,000 of flexible funding. We have worked closely with the College of Engineering’s CLEAR program (Communication, Leadership, Education and Research), which provides communication instructors who help students with oral presentations, memos and reports, teamwork, and the required end-of-semester self-assessment exercises. CLEAR originated in Mechanical Engineering and spread throughout the college with a William and Flora Hewlett Foundation grant, which led to permanent funding from the University.

Suggested Citation:"University of Utah." National Academy of Engineering. 2012. Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18184.
Page 12
Next: West Virginia University »
Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education Get This Book
Buy Ebook | $9.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The aim of this report is to encourage enhanced richness and relevance of the undergraduate engineering education experience, and thus produce better-prepared and more globally competitive graduates, by providing practical guidance for incorporating real world experience in US engineering programs. The report, a collaborative effort of the National Academy of Engineering (NAE) and Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD), builds on two NAE reports on The Engineer of 2020 that cited the importance of grounding engineering education in real world experience. This project also aligns with other NAE efforts in engineering education, such as the Grand Challenges of Engineering, Changing the Conversation, and Frontiers of Engineering Education.

This publication presents 29 programs that have successfully infused real world experiences into engineering or engineering technology undergraduate education. The Real World Engineering Education committee acknowledges the vision of AMD in supporting this project, which provides useful exemplars for institutions of higher education who seek model programs for infusing real world experiences in their programs. The NAE selection committee was impressed by the number of institutions committed to grounding their programs in real world experience and by the quality, creativity, and diversity of approaches reflected in the submissions. A call for nominations sent to engineering and engineering technology deans, chairs, and faculty yielded 95 high-quality submissions. Two conditions were required of the nominations: (1) an accredited 4-year undergraduate engineering or engineering technology program was the lead institutions, and (2) the nominated program started operation no later than the fall 2010 semester. Within these broad parameters, nominations ranged from those based on innovations within a single course to enhancements across an entire curriculum or institution.

Infusing Real World Experiences into Engineering Education is intended to provide sufficient information to enable engineering and engineering technology faculty and administrators to assess and adapt effective, innovative models of programs to their own institution's objectives. Recognizing that change is rarely trivial, the project included a brief survey of selected engineering deans concern in the adoption of such programs.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook,'s online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!