Appendix D: Presentations and Committee Meetings
Washington, DC, January 16-17, 2012
• Proliferation Risk Assessments: A Policy-Maker’s Observations, Dunbar Lockwood, National Nuclear Security Administration, DOE, Office of Nonproliferation and International Security, NA-24
• DOE/NE Perspectives on the National Academies Proliferation Risk Assessment Project, Andrew Griffith, Office of Nuclear Energy, DOE
• Phase One Workshop Overview: Policy-Side Perspective, Sharon Squassoni, Center for Strategic and International Studies
• Phase One Workshop Overview: Technical Perspective, William Charlton, Texas A&M University
• Overview of Proliferation Risk Methodologies, William Charlton, Texas A&M University
• Assessing Proliferation Risk: Approaches from Quantitative Political Science, Jeff Kaplow, University of California, San Diego
Washington, DC, March 26-27, 2012
• Recent Nonproliferation Policy Decisions, Joyce Connery, Nuclear Energy Office of International Economics, National Security Council
• Progress and Application of Proliferation Risk Reduction to the Design of a Reprocessing Facility, John Herzceg, Office of Fuel Cycle Technologies, Office of Nuclear Energy
• Nonproliferation Decision-Making Within Congress, Mary Beth Nikitin, Congressional Research Service
• Government Agencies Outside of DOS and DOE Using Proliferation Risk Assessments, Ray Richardson, U.S. Central Intelligence Agency
Stanford, CA, May 11, 2012
• Host State Intentions: Political Science Perspectives, Christopher Way, Cornell University
• Determinants of Nuclear Proliferation, Erik Gartzke, Department of Political Science, University California, San Diego
• Thoughts on Proliferation Risk Assessment, Chris Whipple, ENVIRON
• Proliferation Analysis: Methodologies, Assessments, and Warning Indicators, Lisa Owens Davis, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Livermore, CA, May 22-23, 2012
• TAMU’s TPRA [Technical Proliferation Resistance Assessments]Methodology and TPRAs State of the Art, William Charlton, Texas A&M University
• Proliferation Resistance Assessment: GIF, INPRO, and IAEA Safeguards, Jon R. Phillips, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
• Gen IV Working Group PR&PP Methodology, Robert Bari, Brookhaven National Laboratory
• Nuclear Energy Materials Applied to Nuclear Weapons, Vladimir Georgevich, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
• LLNL Z-Division Proliferation Events, Mary Beth Ward, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
• LLNL Z-Division Host State Assessments for Government Decisions, Lisa Owens Davis, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
Albuquerque, NM, July 9-10, 2012
• Technical Assessments of Proliferation Risk and the Nuclear Supplier’s Group Review of Dual Use Technology List, Jeff Bedell, Los Alamos National Laboratory
• Probabilistic Effectiveness Methodology (PEM) for the Domestic Nuclear Detection Office (DNDO), A Transportation Pathways Risk Assessment, James Smith, Los Alamos National Laboratory
• DNDO’s Global Nuclear Detection Architecture Adversary Risk Model, Steven Streetman, Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, Department of Homeland Security
• Probabilistic Risk Analysis Background and Applications, David Johnson, ABS Consulting
• Threat Assessments for Cyber-Security, Rafail Ostrovsky, University of California, Los Angeles
Washington, DC, September 12-13, 2012
• Utilization of Prioritization Methodologies by Policymakers, Phillip Dolliff, Office of Cooperative Threat Reduction, Department of State
• International Aspects of the Tasking and Safeguards, Kory Budlong-Sylvester, Los Alamos National Laboratory
• Improving the Assessment of Proliferation Risk of Nuclear Fuel Cycles, Michael Rosenthal, past member of International Atomic Energy Agency’s Standing Advisory Group on Safeguards Implementation
• SILEX Risk Assessment Panel with Global Laser Enrichment Evaluation Team, Donald M. Kerr, George Mason University; Susan Koch, independent consultant; and Gordon Oehler, Potomac Institute for Policy Studies
• How to Develop Complex Nuclear Risk Messages for the Public, Hank Jenkins-Smith, Oklahoma State University
• Models on Countries’ Intent, Brian Lessenberry
