National Academies Press: OpenBook

Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators (2013)

Chapter: Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted

« Previous: Appendix A: Glossary
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×

TABLE B-1 Previously Published Criteria for Selected Groups of Measures

Category for Criteria NQF, 2012: Measure evaluation criteria: Criteria for evaluation once measure meets criteria for consideration (NQF, 2012b) HHS SAC, 2011: Operation criteria for selection of LHIs (HHS, 2008, 2013) IOM, 2010: Future directions for the national quality Criteria for selecting measures (IOM, 2010) IOM, 2003b: Priority areas for National Action Criteria for identifying priority areas for health care quality efforts (IOM, 2003)
Criteria that apply to the condition(s) or outcome(s) to be measured
Impact (Importance) • Impact: Priority (measure addresses identified priority or has high impact on patients) • Central: important as a determinant of health status• Instinctive: easily recognized as intimate to health status• Immutable: convey a sense of the obligation to act • Importance: high-impact based on potential population impact, high cost, variation in quality, low performance levels, or existing disparities• Applicability to national priorities: Does it measure progress in at least one of the national priority areas for improving the quality of health care and eliminating disparities? • Impact: the extent of the burden—disability, mortality, and economic costs—imposed by a condition, including effects on patients, families, communities, and societies. • Inclusiveness: the relevance of an area to a broad range of individuals with regard to age, gender, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity/race (equity) ... and the breadth of change effected through such strategies across a range of health care settings and providers (reach).
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×

Improvability • Impact: opportunity for improvement (i.e., performance gap)• Impact: evidence (measure focus is health outcome or is evidence-based)• Usability and use: extent to which potential audiences are using or could use performance results for both accountability and performance improvement • Actionable: convey a sense of the possibility to act • Improvability: is there evidence (not limited to RCTs) that improvement can be made?• Value: does the measure have the potential to increase health care value by narrowing a defined quality gap?• If criteria are met, select measure for use based on its ranking to improve population health and equity • Improvability: the extent of the gap between current practice and evidence-based best practice and the likelihood that the gap can be closed and condition improved through change in an area; and the opportunity to achieve dramatic improvement in the six national quality aims identified in the Quality Chasm report (safety, effectiveness, patient-centeredness, timeliness, efficiency, and equity).• Inclusiveness: the generalizability of associated quality improvement strategies to many types of conditions and illnesses across the spectrum of health care (representativeness); and the breadth of such strategies across a range of health care settings and providers (reach).
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×

TABLE B-l

Category for Criteria NQF, 2012: Measure evaluation criteria: Criteria for evaluation once measure meets criteria for consideration (NQF, 2012b) HHS SAC, 2011: Operation criteria for selection of LHIs (HHS, 2008, 2013) IOM, 2010: Future directions for the national quality Criteria for selecting measures (IOM, 2010) IOM, 2003b: Priority areas for National Action Criteria for identifying priority areas for health care quality efforts (IOM, 2003)
Criteria that apply to the condition(s) or outcome(s) to be measured
Scientific soundness • Validity• Reliability: measure is well defined and precisely specified and produces same results when repeated• Comparison to related measures to ensure harmonization • Sound measure available: Have scientifically sound measures been developed to assess this area?
     
Geographic, temporal, and population coverage • Divisible: into key sub-populations• Translatable: to the national, state, community, and individual levels• Measurable: at a point in time, over time • Equity: does the measure document significant inequities in care by race, ethnicity, language need, or socioeconomic status?• Geographic and health systems equity: does the measure document • Inclusiveness: the relevance of an area to a broad range of individuals with regard to age, gender, socioeconomic status, and ethnicity/race (equity) … and the breadth of change effected through such strategies across a range of health care settings and providers (reach).
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×

geographic or health system variation in performance?
     
Data availability • Feasibility: data are readily available or could be captured without undue burden and can be implemented for performance measurement • Data availability: Does an appropriate national data source exist that would support assessment of performance overall as well as among disparity populations?
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×
Page 99
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×
Page 100
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×
Page 102
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×
Page 103
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Sample Criteria Consulted." Institute of Medicine. 2013. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18339.
×
Page 104
Next: Appendix C: Meeting Agenda »
Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators Get This Book
×
 Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators
Buy Paperback | $42.00 Buy Ebook | $33.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) Committee on Quality Measures for the Healthy People Leading Health Indicators was charged by the Office of the Assistant Secretary for Health to identify measures of quality for the 12 Leading Health Indicator (LHI) topics and 26 Leading Health Indicators in Healthy People 2020 (HP2020), the current version of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) 10-year agenda for improving the nation's health.

The scope of work for this project is to use the nine aims for improvement of quality in public health (population-centered, equitable, proactive, health promoting, risk reducing, vigilant, transparent, effective, and efficient) as a framework to identify quality measures for the Healthy People Leading Health Indicators (LHIs). The committee reviewed existing literature on the 12 LHI topics and the 26 Leading Health Indicators. Quality measures for the LHIs that are aligned with the nine aims for improvement of quality in public health will be identified. When appropriate, alignments with the six Priority Areas for Improvement of Quality in Public Health will be noted in the Committee's report. Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators also address data reporting and analytical capacities that must be available to capture the measures and for demonstrating the value of the measures to improving population health.

Toward Quality Measures for Population Health and the Leading Health Indicators provides recommendations for how the measures can be used across sectors of the public health and health care systems. The six priority areas (also known as drivers) are population health metrics and information technology; evidence-based practices, research, and evaluation; systems thinking; sustainability and stewardship; policy; and workforce and education.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!