Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Committee wishes to thank the following people who prepared back- ground papers which were invaluable in making this report: Kenneth J. Arrow, Stanford University; L. M. K. Boelter, University of California; Robert Boguslaw, System Development Corporation; John F. Burlin- game, General Electric Company; William M. Capron, Council of Eco- nomic Advisors; Lee S. Christie, System Development Corporation; Robert H. Davis, System Development Corporation; Joseph W. Gar- barino, University of California; Lawton M. Hartman, Department of Defense; Lindsey R. Harmon, National Academy of Sciences; Walter G. Herr, Western Electric Company; Sydney B. Ingram, Bell Telephone Laboratories; William Karush, System Development Corporation; Har- old A. Linstone, Lockheed Missile and Space Company; Simon Marcson, Rutgers University; Thomas A. Marschak, University of California; Edward McCrensky, Office of Naval Research; Glenn Murphy, Iowa State University; Roy Radner, University of California; Kenneth P. Sanow, National Science Foundation; Herbert E. Striner, Upjohn In- stitute; Col. William Thybony, Department of Defense; Frank Tiller, University of Houston; William G. Torpey, Office of Emergency Plan- ning; Myron Tribus, Dartmouth University; Lester C. Van Atta, Lock- heed Missile and Space Company; Cornelius Wandmacher, University of Cincinnati; John R. Whinnery, University of California. During the course of the study, the Committee convened several panels to obtain informed judgment in various areas. The Committee wishes to thank the following individuals who served on these panels: Education PanelâVictor L. Butterfield, Wesleyan University; Thomas H. Carroll, George Washington University; John A. Hannah, Michigan State University; Franklin D. Murphy, University of California; 50
Ernst Weber, Brooklyn Polytechnic Institute. Industrial Panel Iâ John T. Connor, Merck and Company; Patrick E. Haggerty, Texas Instruments; Sydney B. Ingram, Bell Telephone Laboratories; Richard T. Kropf, Belding Heminway Company; Robert M. Mahoney, Union Carbide Corporation; Francis K. McCune, General Electric Company; Emanuel R. Piore, International Business Machines Corporation. In- dustrial Panel IIâGeorge M. Bunker, Martin-Marietta Corporation; Elmer W. Engstrom, Radio Corporation of America; H. Mansfield Horner, United Aircraft Co.; Lawrence A. Hyland, Hughes Aircraft Co.; Thomas F. Morrow, Chrysler Corporation; George E. Mueller, Na- tional Aeronautics and Space Administration; Elwood R. Quesada, Mc- Donnell Aircraft. Industrial Panel IIIâ Martin Annis, American Science and Engineering, Inc.; Walter S. Baird, Baird-Atomic; Leo L. Beranek, Bolt Beranek and Newman Inc.; General James M. Gavin, Arthur D. Little, Inc.; Kenneth J. Germeshausen, Edgerton, Germeshausen and Grier; Henry W. Harding, Laboratory for Electronics; Frederick R. Lack, Sprague Electric Co.; Frank Lyman, Jr., Cambridge Thermionic Corporation; Kenneth H. Olsen, Digital Equipment Corporation; Thomas R. Phillips, Raytheon; Denis M. Robinson, High Voltage Engineering Corporation; R. C. Sanders, Sanders Associates; William M. Wolf, Wolf Research and Development Corporation; F. Mansfield Young, Adage, Inc. Manpower Policy PanelâWilliam G. Bowen, Princeton University; J. Douglas Brown, Princeton University; John J. Corson, Princeton University; Bowen C. Dees, National Science Foundation; Allen 0. Gamble, National Aeronautics and Space Administration; Eli Ginsberg, Columbia University; Leland J. Haworth, National Science Foundation; Donald F. Hornig, Office of Science and Technology; Myron L. Joseph, Council of Economic Advisors; Edward L. Katzenbach, Department of Defense; Charles V. Kidd, National Institutes of Health; Richard A. Lester, Princeton University; Garth L. Mangum, Senate Subcommittee on Employment and Manpower; Donald G. Marquis, Massachusetts In- stitute of Technology; Peter P. Muirhead, Office of Education; Charles A. Myers, Massachusetts Institute of Technology; Arthur M. Ross, Uni- versity of California; Seymour L. Wolfbein, Department of Labor; Ed- ward Wenk, Office of Science and Technology; Jerome B. Wiesner, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Professor Myers made valuable suggestions for improving the final text of the report. The Committee has also profited from the assistance and sugges- tions of: George B. Kistiakowsky, Harvard University; Samuel N. Alex- ander, National Bureau of Standards; Kathryn S. Arnow, National Sci- ence Foundation; Harold Asher, Department of Defense; David Z. Beckler, Office of Science and Technology; Robert W. Cain, National Science Foundation; C. West Churchman, University of California; Carl Frey, Engineering Manpower Commission; Harold Goldstein, Depart- 60
ment of Labor; Melville S. Green, National Bureau of Standards; Har- old A. Foecke, Office of Education; David R. Heebner, Hughes Aircraft Co.; William L. Hooper, Office of Science and Technology; William A. Jaracz, National Science Foundation; Astrid Kraus, Department of Defense; Ray W. Mayhew, National Science Foundation; Bernard Michaels, Department of Labor; Thomas J. Mills, National Science Foundation; Richard R. Nelson, RAND Corporation; Harvey S. Perloff, Alliance for Progress; Donald Schon, Department of Commerce; Harold Smiddy; Robert L. Stern, Department of Commerce; Leo R. Werts, Department of Labor. The Committee also would like to thank the staff of the National Academy of Sciences, and particularly Mrs. Delina Halligan, Mrs. Thelma McCawley, Mrs. Audrey Stacy, and Miss Lessie Thomas. We are also indebted to Miss Ellen Packer of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Miss Katrine Stephenson of the University of Cali- fornia for their valuable secretarial assistance. Miss Elizabeth Pigott, of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, administrative assistant to the chairman, served the committee effectively in a variety of ways. While acknowledging its indebtedness to many people, the Commit- tee assumes full responsibility for the report. 61
PART TWO STUDY PAPERS