National Academies Press: OpenBook

On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data (1995)

Chapter: On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data

Suggested Citation:"On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data." National Research Council. 1995. On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18769.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data." National Research Council. 1995. On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18769.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data." National Research Council. 1995. On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18769.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data." National Research Council. 1995. On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18769.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data." National Research Council. 1995. On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18769.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data." National Research Council. 1995. On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18769.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data." National Research Council. 1995. On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18769.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data." National Research Council. 1995. On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18769.
×
Page R8

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

ON THE FULL AND OPEN EXCHANGE OF SCIENTIFIC DATA Committee on Geophysical and Environmental Data National Research Council Washington, D.C. 1995

Q179.9J.G46 1995 c.l On the full and open exchange of scientific data /

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. This report has been reviewed by a group other than the authors according to procedures approved by a Report Review Committee consisting of members of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Bruce Alberts is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Robert M. White is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Kenneth I. Shine is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy's purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Bruce Alberts and Dr. Robert M. White are chairman and vice-chairman, respectively, of the National Research Council. Support for this project was provided by CENR agencies. Copies of the report are available from Committee on Geophysical and Environmental Data Board on Earth Sciences and Resources National Research Council 2101 Constitution Avenue, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20418 Copyright 199S by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America

Preface A growing trend to restrict the international exchange of scientific data is an issue of considerable concern within the U.S. environmental science research community. For example, a proposal now before the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) to change the basis for the exchange of weather and climate data and information could drastically affect the way the scientific community conducts research on weather, climate, and global environmental variability and change. Recognizing the concerns of the scientific community, the State Department has requested that the National Research Council's Committee on Geophysical and Environmental Data (CGED) report on how proposed restrictions on the exchange of environmental data could affect international collaboration in programs of high priority to the United States. The CGED is charged with providing guidance to the U.S. government and World Data Centers (WDC-A)* on the management of environmental data and information from the perspective of the scientific community. Although this report focuses on data pertaining to global environmental change in general and the WMO proposal in particular, the issues discussed have relevance to all types of environmental data. Francis Bretherton Chair, CGED * The WDC-A is the U.S. component of the International Council of Scientific Unions (ICSU) World Data Center system. The World Data Center system was created after the International Geophysical Year for worldwide dissemination of scientific information and is a recognized vehicle for the U.S. Global Change Research Program and international programs such as the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP).

Summary To address issues of the global environment, it is essential to have a sound scientific understanding of the Earth and its constituent elements. The research required to attain that understanding vitally depends on observations and processed data on all aspects of the system and from all parts of the globe. Such research has been facilitated by an international system of full and open exchange of scientific data and information. In May 1995, however, a proposal will be considered by the Congress of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO), originating in its working group on commercialization. This proposal would restrict the availability of environmental data, information, and relevant products, seriously affecting the ability of scientists to conduct research on global- or regional-scale problems. Current international practices guaranteeing the full and open exchange of scientific data should, if anything, be expanded, not restricted. The Need for Full and Open Exchange The Earth's atmosphere, oceans, and biosphere form an integrated system that transcends national boundaries. To understand the elements of the system, the way they interact, and how they have changed with time, it is necessary to collect and analyze environmental data from all parts of the world. Studies of the global environment require international collaboration for many reasons: • to address global issues, it is essential to have global data sets and products derived from these data sets; • it is more efficient and cost-effective for each nation to share its data and information than to collect everything it needs independently; and • the implementation of effective policies addressing issues of the global environment requires the involvement from the outset of nearly all of the nations in the world. International programs for global change research and environmental monitoring crucially depend on the principle of full and open exchange (i.e., data and information are made available without restriction, on a non-discriminatory basis, for no more than the cost of reproduction and distribution; see Attachment 1, OECD [1994]). Commonly, observations collected for a specific, narrow purpose have had unforeseen, yet crucial application to research activities of widely differing scope and magnitude. Since it is difficult to predict what data may be important for environmental issues in the future, as much data as possible must be made available to scientists. Moreover, prompt feedback on the quality and completeness of distributed data is essential for building quality data sets of all types. The quality of remotely-sensed data, for example, is only assured through immediate use of the data; problems uncovered a year or more after the data are collected could result in extensive gaps in time-series data sets. For these reasons, an international system of full and open exchange has been and remains the best means of supporting essential environmental research.

Experience has shown that increased access to scientific data, information, and related products has often led to significant scientific discoveries and the opportunity for educational enhancement. For example, the declassification of GEOSAT (a U.S. Navy geodetic satellite) data below 30 degrees south latitude led to a breakthrough in the study of global ocean floor topography and ocean sediment thickness (Smith and Sandwell, 1994a). The researchers also produced a global sea floor topography map that is being distributed internationally through the World Data Center system (Smith and Sandwell, 1994b). An example where not only the scientific community but the general public was engaged, was the near-real-time monitoring of Shoemaker-Levy comet fragments colliding with Jupiter. Impact phenomena observed by individual scientists from around the world were shared over the Internet, allowing astronomers an unprecedented opportunity to continuously modify their plans to make the optimal observations (Kerr, 1994). A third example concerns the transmission of real-time weather information into elementary and high schools with the goal of fostering science education. A one-year pilot program organized by the American Meteorological Society was so successful in engaging teachers and students on problems ranging from science to social studies that it will be expanded to include other types of environmental information (Geer et al., 1995). In contrast, international agreements and actions that restrict the flow of data and information limit the ability of scientists to conduct research and develop adequate predictive tools to advise their governments on global issues. Unreasonable financial charges, restrictions on further distribution — especially when the burden of enforcement rests on individual scientists or data centers — or undue delays in obtaining data are deleterious to scientific enterprise, particularly in economically developing countries. For example, the commercialization of Landsat put the cost of Thematic Mapper data beyond the reach of many scientists and greatly diminished data sharing with foreign countries (e.g., Gabrynowicz, 1993; Goward, 1989). An example where delays in obtaining data allowed a calibration error to go undetected for months concerns the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) satellite. Misinterpretation of these data led to erroneous estimates of global warming (Reynolds, 1993). The Proposal for a Change in WMO Policy The free and unrestricted exchange1 of weather and climate data and information under the aegis of the WMO has long been a shining example of global international scientific collaboration, to the mutual benefit of all participating nations. Studies of weather, its interannual and interdecadal variability, and its long-term trends are key to understanding climate and the underlying causes of global change. Such understanding is essential for making effective policies that address issues of the global environment. A critical requirement for such research programs is the acquisition and assimilation of a complete spectrum of meteorological and hydrological observations, from hourly ' It is the understanding of the CGED that the terms "full and open exchange" and "free and unrestricted exchange" are effectively equivalent (see Attachment 2).

to multi-annual, with global geographical coverage at high spatial resolution. Such observations are necessary for developing and creating the requisite information products. In order to understand climate processes, it is necessary to document the daily progression of weather on a global basis. The WMO provides a mechanism for exchanging global weather observations among its Member nations. Much of these data are collected for operational purposes, but they are also integral to climate research. Climate research is thus built scientifically, culturally, and institutionally upon a foundation provided by the weather services of the world. All participating nations, whether or not they maintain vigorous climate research programs, have an abiding interest in the equitable and effective access to raw and processed data, information, and climate and weather-related products. Developing countries rely on these products for building scientific expertise on environmental issues. Access to the products has been facilitated by the free and unrestricted exchange policy advocated by the WMO (see Attachment 2). There is now a proposal before the WMO Congress from its working group on commercialization to replace the present principle of free and unrestricted exchange of meteorological and related data and information with a two-tiered data exchange system (WMO, 1994). Tier 1 would include a minimum list of types of data, information, and products that are available for free and unrestricted exchange, plus any data that originating countries so designate (Attachment 2). Tier 2 would include all remaining data; these are subject to restrictions to prevent their use for commercial purpose other than by the originating Member. An analysis of the reasoning behind the proposed change is given in White (1994). According to a representative of a proponent Member nation, "...such a Resolution is required in order to ensure the harmonious co-existence within the framework of WMO of Meteorological or Hydrometeorological Services (NMSs)* and the private sector in countries with different general policies about the funding of the infrastructure, on which all operational and research meteorology, hydrology and related environmental services depend. Currently, certain factors arising from these general policies are seriously affecting some NMSs and are leading to the breakdown of data and product exchange under WMO auspices" (Hunt, 1994). The intent of the resolution is to exempt data, information, and products for research and education programs (WMO, 1994). In spite of this disclaimer, the CGED feels for reasons listed below that a change to a two-tiered system will result in restricted access to and degradation of data, information, and products that are crucial to global environmental research: 1. Since the data and information exchanged through the WMO are used for both scientific and commercial purposes, there is no satisfactory way to divide the data into categories with different restrictions. Governments must therefore determine whether their interests in commercialization undermine their goals of understanding and monitoring the global environment. 1 NMSs are the hydrometeorological organizations in various countries; they are presumed to represent their governments in forming and implementing WMO policy.

2. Individual countries have considerable freedom to decide what data and information are placed in Tier 1 (i.e., unrestricted). The aggregation of complete global data sets requires that all Member nations exercise this freedom in a similar manner. Given the motivation toward commercialization, it is likely that for purposes of scientific research, Tier 1 will be incomplete. According to Annex 2 to draft Resolution 11.4, there is no requirement that climatological data, high-resolution satellite data and products, and global model products are placed in Tier 1 (Attachment 3, paragraphs 3, 4, and 7). Even if Tier 1 were to include all data and information traditionally regarded as "climate," that would not be sufficient for implementing global programs like the World Climate Research Program and the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme. 3. Publication of Tier 2 (i.e., restricted) data constitutes re-export under the terms of the proposal. According to Annex 2, paragraph 10 of the WMO proposal, "The new practice introduces no restrictions on access to, or re-export of, Tier 1 and Tier 2 data and products for research and education programmes having non-commercial purposes." Nevertheless, the nature of restrictions on Tier 2 data and information prevent publication of such data as the basis of a scientific conclusion (see Attachment 3, paragraphs 12, 13, and 15a). Dependence on proprietary data that cannot be subject to public scrutiny destroys credibility in science. 4. Under the same provision, such data and information cannot be made available to scientists in other countries; their aggregation into global data sets is prohibited. There is no credible mechanism that allows effective data sharing among scientists for research and educational purposes but precludes its use for commercial purposes. 5. The scientific community and data centers would have to enforce proprietary restrictions on the further distribution of Tier 2 data (see Attachment 3, paragraphs 22 and 23). In particular, the World Data Centers, which hold only unrestricted data, would be unable to exchange any Tier 2 data, and thus could not function as a primary means of data exchange for global environmental programs. 6. Restrictions on access to WMO-exchanged satellite data will make it more difficult to prevent unacceptable gaps in the climate record. Since satellite data and products can be placed in Tier 2 (Appendix 3, paragraph 4), there is no guarantee that the raw data will be scrutinized by the scientific user community in sufficient time to detect any degradation in data quality. Environmental research and monitoring require uninterrupted, high-quality time series data and information. 7. It is difficult to imagine a commercially-driven system that does not raise the cost to the scientific user community. With limited research budgets, the apparent price to the user has considerable impact on which data sets and products are actually utilized for research. This impact is likely to be greatest for education and small research programs, particularly in developing countries.

On the Full and Open Exchange of Scientific Data Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF
  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!