National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 Building Equitable Costing Models
Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×

6


Cash Transfers and Affordability

In a panel on cash transfers and affordability, speakers offered information on opportunities and challenges presented by the use of demand-side interventions. Cash transfers, which can be implemented in various ways, generally serve the purpose of bridging gaps in income or fee-for-service programs. They can be conditional, based on a set of requirements to receive the money or on how it can be spent, or unconditional, without any stipulations. Both approaches have shown evidence of success in various contexts. Speakers discussed the role cash transfers play in improving access to services, as well as their limitations. They also examined cash transfers in the larger context of additional inputs for systems improvements.

FAMILY INVESTMENTS1

Quentin Wodon of the World Bank introduced the session on cash transfers and affordability with some reflection on the value parents place on early childhood development. He provided qualitative evidence that most parents know the value of investing in their young children and are willing to invest but that they often cannot do so because the cost of services is too high. Work on Uganda, for example, shows that while the country has implemented free universal primary and lower secondary education, preprimary education is provided mostly by private organi-

______________

1 This section summarizes information presented by Quentin Wodon, the World Bank.

Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×

zations, and the cost of attendance is often high. Even when fees may be lower, they are not always affordable for the poor (Tsimpo and Wodon, 2015).

For low-income families, both conditional and unconditional cash transfers have proved useful in some circumstances. They are generally well designed, but not necessarily a panacea. Wodon cautioned that, where possible, it may be better to simply provide key services for free. He gave the example of Burundi, which saw a 20 percent increase in enrollment when the government made public primary schools free (Sommeiller and Wodon, 2015). At the same time, however, Wodon noted that good quality matters to increase take-up of services, as again evidenced in Uganda. When birth delivery services were provided for free, some women still did not use the services provided by health facilities in part because of quality issues both in terms of personnel and infrastructure (Tsimpo and Wodon, 2015).

Wodon also mentioned the successful experience of Muso in Mali, which has succeeded, at low cost, in reducing child mortality by a factor of 10 thanks to a network of community health workers and free care for families in need. A poster on Muso presented by Naina Wodon (2014) at the workshop summarized results from an evaluation of the impact of the project in its catchment area by Johnson et al. (2013) and provided information on the innovative financing mechanism—part of the topic for this workshop—used to fund the project. Financing for Muso came in part from a global Rotary grant managed by the Rotary Club of Washington, DC, with 24 dozen Rotary Clubs in 11 countries across 4 continents coming together to support the project.

A HUMAN DEVELOPMENT PLATFORM WITH CASH TRANSFERS AND QUALITY SERVICES2

Amarjeet Sinha of the Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar emphasized the importance of ensuring quality in services. Although cash transfers increase access, health indicators will not improve unless backed by quality services. He gave the example of Janani Suraksha Yojana, a safe motherhood intervention that aims to reduce maternal and infant mortality by bringing more women to facilities to deliver their babies. The initiative provides financial assistance for this service to women living below the poverty line. Sinha stated that deliveries in facilities did increase—between 55 and 90 percent—but that the quality of services did not change. He also spoke of a program in Bihar in which

______________

2 This section summarizes information presented by Amarjeet Sinha, principal secretary, Department of Social Welfare, Government of Bihar.

Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×

girls (and later boys) were given bicycles for enrolling in school when they reached the ninth grade. Bicycles were not only provided as an incentive to increase enrollment but also had the more practical benefit of providing children a means of transport to school and other locations. According to Sinha, therefore, to improve outcomes, there needs to be a focus on the quality and utility of the interventions and services themselves. However, he suggested that cash transfers are difficult to implement in the context of the developing child because children are very resource- and labor-intensive. It is not just about paying for services, but providing the time for parents to interact with their children, as well as meeting children’s health and nutritional needs.

Sinha proposed that a common platform for human development takes a more holistic approach to incorporate such mechanisms as cash transfers to support children and their caregivers. In the state of Bihar, Sinha pointed to a cabinet committee on human development with 16 to 18 indicators on child development, such as education, health, and age at marriage. According to him, this committee—the first of its kind in India—takes a common approach to addressing issues around children, ensuring that their cross-sectoral needs are met but avoiding redundancy in service provision. Sinha recalled that this platform was developed within the context of the MDGs and the question of what each sector’s role should be in achieving the MDGs.

With a shared set of indicators to measure these outcomes, Sinha argued that it is then easier to allocate responsibilities to specific departments. In addition, he said the use of a common platform allows for more intersectoral approaches to financing investments in young children because many outcomes are interrelated. For example, nutritional inadequacy affects learning ability over time. He suggested that a segmented approach might lack the coordination necessary to bring the sectors together but that a common platform could cut through bureaucratic red tape more easily. Although each department has its own budget to implement its programs, Sinha said those programs constitute a larger plan approved at the cabinet level.

Sinha outlined several challenges inherent in public delivery that might be easier to address with greater cohesion in the government. For example, he noted that food security is an issue in which cash transfers can be useful, but only insofar as there is actual supply of these goods. Nowhere in the world, he postulated, has human development happened without credible and functional public systems.

In response to a question about ensuring access for disabled or “differently abled” children, Sinha noted that identifying such children has been a challenge because they are not always picked up in a census. He also noted that often the solution is to increase the number of teachers

Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×
in a community, which does not address the special needs that might be present. If the goal is mainstreaming children with disabilities, fully integrating them into the school system, then the best approach might be to include a residential school with suitable accommodations for these children, he suggested.

CASH TRANSFERS, SOCIAL CARE, AND HIV PREVENTION3

Lucie Cluver of Oxford University shared a set of findings on the impact of cash transfers on HIV risk behavior. Using propensity school matching4 to simulate a randomized control trial, her team compared 6,000 adolescents whose families received a small child support grant from the South African government against those who did not (Cluver et al., 2013). They found promising results. For girls whose families received the funds, there was a 50 percent odds reduction in transactional sex5 and a 70 percent odds reduction in the risk of disparate sex.6 Both of these are big risks for girls in sub-Saharan Africa, according to Cluver.

Cluver noted that while there was success with girls, cash transfers did not have an effect on boys’ risk of contracting HIV or behaving in risky sexual ways, such as multiple partners, unprotected sex, and having sex while drunk or taking drugs. In other words, she said, the intervention had little effect on the teenagers’ risky behavior and other behaviors that are not related to having money. It did, however, give girls the ability to make decisions around who their sexual partners would be by reducing the dependence on men who might pay their school fees.

While these results were somewhat successful, Cluver noted that several stakeholders thought there might be a way to introduce an additional component to the program to improve results. What they found most effective was a system of cash plus care with care defined as positive parenting, school counseling, teacher support, or other components as determined at the country level (Cluver et al., 2014). For girls, cash plus care had an additional benefit, but for boys, while cash alone did nothing, cash plus care resulted in a 50 percent odds reduction in HIV risk behavior incidence.

In explaining the mechanism of this successful program, Cluver displayed a model with multiple points of intervention (see Figure 6-1). In the model, structural deprivation, such as living in an AIDS-affected

______________

3 This section summarizes the information presented by Lucie Cluver, Oxford University.

4 Cluver and her team matched participants on numerous characteristics and compared those in the group receiving cash transfers against those in the group who did not receive cash transfers.

5 Sex in exchange for money.

6 Sex with a partner more than 5 years older.

Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×

images

FIGURE 6-1 Cash and care: Greatest effects for highest-risk adolescents.
NOTE: P < .001 indicates high statistical significance.
SOURCE: Cluver et al., 2014.

family, an informal settlement, the context of hunger, or high community violence setting, interacts with mediators of increased psychosocial risk, such as abuse, school dropouts, psychosocial problems, and delinquency, to lead to HIV risk behavior. Cash and care not only directly impact psychosocial risk and HIV risk behavior, but they also have a moderating effect on the pathways between these elements. Because of that latter effect, Cluver indicated the program is most effective with those who are most structurally deprived—in other words, it counters the inequalities with which children start.

Cluver pointed out that cash plus care extended beyond HIV and also had effects in areas such as reduced pregnancy, school dropout rates, and criminal behavior. She also noted strong evidence that the earlier these interventions are implemented, the more impact they will have. Studies conducted in Latin America and South Africa show positive links between early child support grants and parenting programs on HIV risk reduction. But in order to maintain the most success out of a cash plus care program, Cluver stated, it needs to start early and be sustained throughout childhood. However, she acknowledged that the research is still in early stages, and more knowledge is needed. In addition, Cluver said that more analysis is needed on the cost of the intervention to determine the best way to fund it.

Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"6 Cash Transfers and Affordability." Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. 2015. Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/18993.
×
Page 42
Next: 7 Models of Financing Structures »
Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi Get This Book
×
 Financing Investments in Young Children Globally: Summary of a Joint Workshop by the Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, and The Centre for Early Childhood Education and Development, Ambedkar University, Delhi
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In January 2014, the Board on Children, Youth, and Families of the Institute of Medicine and the National Research Council, in collaboration with the IOM Board on Global Health, launched the Forum on Investing in Young Children Globally. At this meeting, the participants agreed to focus on creating and sustaining, over 3 years, an evidence-driven community of stakeholders that aims to explore existing, new, and innovative science and research from around the world and translate this evidence into sound and strategic investments in policies and practices that will make a difference in the lives of children and their caregivers.

Financing Investments in Young Children Globally is the summary of a workshop hosted by the Forum on Investing in Young Children Globally in August 2014. This workshop, on financing investments for young children, brought together stakeholders from such disciplines as social protection, nutrition, education, health, finance, economics, and law and included practitioners, advocates, researchers, and policy makers. Presentations and discussions identified some of the current issues in financing investments across health, education, nutrition, and social protection that aim to improve children's developmental potential. This report explores issues across three broad domains of financing: (1) costs of programs for young children; (2) sources of funding, including public and private investments; and (3) allocation of these investments, including cash transfers, microcredit programs, block grants, and government restructuring.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!