FIRST MEETING
JULY 29-31, 2014
CONVENTION CENTER
PUEBLO, COLORADO
Objective: To introduce required administrative procedures set forth by the National Research Council; conduct the composition and balance discussion; read the committee statement of task and background review with committee sponsor; receive briefing presentations on the demilitarization process at the Pueblo Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant; review preliminary report outline and report-writing process; confirm committee writing assignments and discuss next steps and future meeting dates.
Safety Briefing and Site Tour of the Pueblo Chemical Agent Destruction Pilot Plant
Study Origin and Context, Bruce Huenefeld, PCAPP site project manager
PCAPP Project Overview, Bret Griebenow, PCAPP deputy project manager
PCAPP’s Agent Treatment Process, Bill Steedman, PCAPP senior process engineer
Committee Approach to Soliciting Stakeholder Input, Judith Bradbury, Committee on Hydrolysate, member
Stakeholder Interests and Views on Offsite Shipment of Hydrolysate: Key Issues at the Site in Past, Miguel Monteverde, public affairs specialist, PEO ACWA, and Sandy Romero, PCAPP communications manager
Stakeholder Interests and Views on Offsite Shipment of Hydrolysate, Irene Kornelly, chair, Citizens’ Advisory Commission
Biotreatment Process: Cradle to Grave, Paul Usinowicz, PCAPP technical advisor; Yakup Nurdogan, PCAPP lead industrial wastewater treatment engineer
Biotreatment Risk Mitigation Activities, Don Guzzetti, PCAPP start-up field supervisor, and Dave deLesdernier, Battelle support
RCRA Permit Structure and Potential Modifications for Offsite Shipment of Hydrolysate, Ron Entz, PCAPP environmental permitting manager
Other Regulatory Requirements and Notifications Applicable to Offsite Shipment of Hydrolysate, Paul Warbington, PCAPP environmental manager
PCD RCRA Permit from Perspective of the CDPHE Regulatory and Other Requirements and Notifications Applicable to Offsite Shipment, Doug Knappe, permitting unit leader for PCAPP, and Joe Schieffelin, Hazardous Waste Management Program manager, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
GB Bomblet Disposal at Rocky Mountain Arsenal: A Case History, Laurence Gottschalk, director, Recovered Chemical Materiel Directorate (remote presentation)
Internal Army Requirements That May Apply If Hydrolysate Is Sent Offsite, and Case Studies of Offsite Shipment of Hydrolysate, Amy Dean, environmental engineer, Office of the Program Manager for the Elimination of Chemical Weapons (remote presentation)
Downstream Impacts to Plant Operations If Offsite Shipment Is Required (Discussion), Facilitator: George Lecakes, PCAPP chief scientist
CITIZENS’ ADVISORY COMMISSION
PERMITTING WORKING GROUP MEETING
JULY 30, 2014
DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S CONFERENCE ROOM
PUEBLO, COLORADO
Becca Haffenden and Nia Johnson
CITIZENS’ ADVISORY COMMISSION
MONTHLY MEETING
JULY 30, 2014
OLDE TOWNE CARRIAGE HOUSE
PUEBLO, COLORADO
National Research Council, Committee on Hydrolysate
Committee Approach to Soliciting Stakeholder Input, Robert A. Beaudet, chair, and Judith Bradbury, member, Committee on Hydrolysate
Committee on Hydrolysate members
TELECONFERENCE WITH PCAPP
PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE
SEPTEMBER 5, 2014
Participants in Teleconference with Public Affairs Personnel:
Judith Bradbury, member, Committee on Hydrolysate
Hank Jenkins-Smith, member, Committee on Hydrolysate
Irene Kornelly, Chair, Colorado Citizens’ Advisory Commission
Jeannine Natterman, Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
John Norton, member, Colorado Citizens’ Advisory Commission
Sandy Romero, PCAPP communications manager
Nancy Schulte, study director, NRC
Thomas Schultz, public affairs specialist, PCAPP
SECOND MEETING
SEPTEMBER 9-11, 2014
NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Objective: Conduct committee deliberations, discuss report, and discuss adequacy of data gathering to date; formulate plan to complete any necessary data gathering; decide and agree on findings and recommendations, conduct report drafting to achieve a preconcurrence draft, and make any necessary work assignments.
THIRD MEETING
NOVEMBER 5-6, 2014
KECK CENTER
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Objective: Conduct committee deliberations, discuss report, and develop and review any additional text as may be deemed necessary to complete the report; reach concurrence on report findings and recommendations; describe NRC peer review process as performed for DEPS/BAST reports.
This page intentionally left blank.
