National Academies Press: OpenBook
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

BULK COLLECTION OF
SIGNALS
INTELLIGENCE

      TECHNICAL OPTIONS

Committee on Responding to Section 5(d) of
Presidential Policy Directive 28:
The Feasibility of Software to Provide Alternatives to
Bulk Signals Intelligence Collection

Computer Science and Telecommunications Board

Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences

NATIONAL RESEARCH COUNCIL
                   OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS

Washington, D.C.

www.nap.edu

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS     500 Fifth Street, NW     Washington, DC 20001

NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance.

Support for this project was provided by the Office of the Director for National Intelligence, Contract Number 2014-14041100003-001. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations or agencies that provided support for the project.

International Standard Book Number 13: 978-0-309-32520-2
International Standard Book Number 10: 0-309-32520-X
Library of Congress Control Number: 2015933164

This report is available from

Computer Science and Telecommunications Board
National Research Council
500 Fifth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001

Additional copies of this report are available from the National Academies Press, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Keck 360, Washington, DC 20001; (800) 624-6242 or (202) 334-3313; http://www.nap.edu.

Copyright 2015 by the National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved.

Printed in the United States of America

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES

Advisers to the Nation on Science, Engineering, and Medicine

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. Upon the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences.

The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president of the National Academy of Engineering.

The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, upon its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Victor J. Dzau is president of the Institute of Medicine.

The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council.

www.national-academies.org

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

COMMITTEE ON RESPONDING TO SECTION 5(D) OF
PRESIDENTIAL POLICY DIRECTIVE 28:
THE FEASIBILITY OF SOFTWARE TO PROVIDE ALTERNATIVES
TO BULK SIGNALS INTELLIGENCE COLLECTION

ROBERT F. SPROULL, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Chair

FREDERICK R. CHANG, Southern Methodist University

WILLIAM H. DUMOUCHEL, Oracle Health Sciences

MICHAEL KEARNS, University of Pennsylvania

BUTLER W. LAMPSON, Microsoft Corporation

SUSAN LANDAU, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

MICHAEL E. LEITER, Leidos

ELIZABETH RINDSKOPF PARKER, University of the Pacific, McGeorge School of Law

PETER J. WEINBERGER, Google, Inc.

Staff

ALAN SHAW, Air Force Studies Board, Study Director

HERBERT S. LIN, Chief Scientist, CSTB

JON EISENBERG, Director, CSTB

ERIC WHITAKER, Senior Program Assistant, CSTB

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

COMPUTER SCIENCE AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS BOARD

ROBERT F. SPROULL, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Chair

LUIZ ANDRÉ BARROSO, Google, Inc.

STEVEN M. BELLOVIN, Columbia University

ROBERT F. BRAMMER, Brammer Technology, LLC

EDWARD FRANK, Brilliant Lime and Cloud Parity

SEYMOUR E. GOODMAN, Georgia Institute of Technology

LAURA HAAS, IBM Corporation

MARK HOROWITZ, Stanford University

MICHAEL KEARNS, University of Pennsylvania

ROBERT KRAUT, Carnegie Mellon University

SUSAN LANDAU, Worcester Polytechnic Institute

PETER LEE, Microsoft Corporation

DAVID E. LIDDLE, US Venture Partners

BARBARA LISKOV, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

JOHN STANKOVIC, University of Virginia

JOHN A. SWAINSON, Dell, Inc.

ERNEST J. WILSON, University of Southern California

KATHERINE YELICK, University of California, Berkeley

Staff

JON EISENBERG, Director

VIRGINIA BACON TALATI, Program Officer

SHENAE BRADLEY, Senior Program Assistant

RENEE HAWKINS, Financial and Administrative Manager

HERBERT S. LIN, Chief Scientist

LYNETTE I. MILLETT, Associate Director

ERIC WHITAKER, Senior Program Assistant

For more information on CSTB, see its Web site at http://www.cstb.org, write to CSTB, National Research Council, 500 Fifth Street, NW, Washington, DC 20001, call (202) 334-2605, or e-mail the CSTB at cstb@nas.edu.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

Preface

In January 2014, the President addressed the nation and the broader global community to explain U.S. policy regarding the collection of foreign intelligence. Shortly thereafter, the White House released Presidential Policy Directive 28 (PPD-28), in which Section 5(d) requested the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) to “assess the feasibility of creating software that would allow the IC more easily to conduct targeted information acquisition [of signals intelligence] rather than bulk collection.”1

The Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) then asked the National Academies to form a committee to study this question, and discussions led to the charge to the committee shown in Box P.1. Note that the charge does not request recommendations, and the analysis and conclusions of the Committee on Responding to Section 5(d) of Presidential Policy Directive 28: The Feasibility of Software to Provide Alternatives to Bulk Signals Intelligence Collection are made with this in mind.

The committee assembled for this study included individuals with expertise in national security law; counterterrorism operations; privacy and civil liberties as they relate to electronic communications; data mining; large-scale systems development; software development; Intelligence Community (IC) needs as they relate to research and development; and networking and social media. See Appendix C for biographical information.

______________

1 The White House, Presidential Policy Directive/PPD-28, “Signals Intelligence Activities,” Office of the Press Secretary, January 17, 2014, http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2014sigint_mem_ppd_rel.pdf.

Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

BOX P.1
The Charge to the Committee

A committee appointed by the National Research Council will assess “the feasibility of creating software that would allow the U.S. intelligence community more easily to conduct targeted information acquisition rather than bulk collection,” as called for in section 5(d) of Presidential Policy Directive 28. To the extent possible, it will consider the efficacy, practicality, and privacy implications of alternative software architectures and uses of information technology, and explore tradeoffs among these aspects in the context of representative “use cases.” The study will consider a broad array of communications modalities, e.g., phone, email, instant message, and so on. It will not address the legality or value of signals intelligence collection. The study will identify and assess options and alternatives but will not issue recommendations.

Specifically, the committee will address the following:

1. What are a small set of representative use cases within which one can explore alternative software architectures and uses of information technology, and consider trade-offs?

2. What is the current state of the software technology to support targeted information acquisition? What are feasible and likely trajectories for future relevant software development; near, mid, and far term? What are possible technology alternatives to bulk collection in the context of the use cases?

3. What are relevant criteria or metrics for comparing bulk collection to targeted collection (e.g. effectiveness, response time, cost, efficacy, practicality, privacy impacts)?

4. What tradeoffs arise with the technology alternatives analyzed in the context of the use cases and criteria/metrics?

5. How might requirements for information collection be altered in light of this analysis?

6. What uncertainties are associated with the assumptions and analyses, and how might they affect the basis for decisions?

With 5 months from study inception to delivery, the study committee was not blessed with a luxury of time. The committee sought to be responsive to the context in which the report was requested. In general terms, the committee saw its mission as exploring whether technological software-based alternatives to bulk collection might be identified in order to retain, to the extent possible, current intelligence capabilities while intruding less on parties that are not of known or potential interest to the IC. The legal protections provided by the Fourth Amendment and legislation such as the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act distinguish between foreign and U.S. persons; a factor that informed the committee’s thinking.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

The technological focus of this report is not limited to the metadata of domestic telephone communications, even though most public controversy has been pointed in this direction. Nor is the legal environment presumed to be only that governed by Section 215 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act—the legal authority under which the collection of telephone metadata has occurred. This report addresses the question of alternatives to bulk collection, without regard to the specific authorities and restrictions that control the various types of bulk collection. The types of communications of potential interest include any type of electronic communication. In the committee’s view, signals intelligence has come to embrace almost any data stored on an electronic device. In a future that contains the Internet of Things, the scope will be even greater.

Furthermore, the committee chose to interpret its technological mandate broadly by considering a variety of approaches to reducing the degree of intrusiveness into the affairs of parties that are not of interest for intelligence purposes. Broadly, these approaches include the following:

• Collecting and/or storing less information,

• Better protecting the information that is collected or stored against theft or compromise, and

• Rigorously enforcing the rules governing use of collected or stored information.

Following its charge, the committee tried to confine its attention to technical aspects of signals intelligence and to avoid straying into legal and policy matters as much as possible. Despite this focus, there are areas of overlap and interdependence. For example, the more complex the rules and regulations established by policy and law, the more difficult it is to use automation to enforce them.

The situation with respect to bulk collection was a moving target during the time the report was written. During the final several weeks when the committee was responding to reviewers’ comments, the Senate considered the USA Freedom Act (S.2685); this bill would have changed the collection of bulk business records. Providing value in this report meant focusing on collection options and their implications, rather than more narrowly tailoring the discussion to what the law presently provides. Thus the committee did not attempt, for example, to discuss what the implications of the proposed legislation might be on collection.

ODNI requested an unclassified report, with a classified annex if necessary. Nothing learned in classified briefings changed the committee’s view or provided information essential to understanding the most important points of this report. The committee thus produced an entirely unclassified report, with no classified annex. The committee believes this

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

unclassified report suffices to answer its charge to the best of its ability. One consequence of this approach is that some details must be omitted to protect sources and methods that the IC rightly guards with care.

An unclassified report risks being overtaken by newly declassified material. As this report was being finalized, documents were being declassified by the IC (see http://icontherecord.tumblr.com/) and released as a result of Freedom of Information Act requests. As a result, numerous omissions are bound to appear in the report; these omissions are not expected to change the committee’s fundamental arguments, although new information may change details along the way.

The committee met six times in person, with the first meeting in mid-June 2014, and held numerous conference calls. Open sessions during its meetings were devoted to briefings from outside parties, and closed sessions were devoted to committee deliberations.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The complexity and classified aspects of the issues explored in this report meant that the committee had much to learn from its briefers. The committee is grateful to many parties for presentations on:

June 30-July 2, 2014. Joel Brenner (Joel Brenner LLC, the Chertoff Group, and former Inspector General, National Security Agency [NSA]), Carmen Medina (Deloitte Consulting LLP and former Deputy Director for Intelligence, Central Intelligence Agency [CIA]), Mark Maybury (The MITRE Corporation), General Keith B. Alexander (retired), Chris Inglis (former Deputy Director, National Security Agency), Wesley Wilson (ODNI/National Counterterrorism Center), Robert Brose (ODNI), William Crowell (Alsop-Louie Partners), Stephanie O’Sullivan (ODNI), David Honey (ODNI), and Marjory Blumenthal (Office of Science and Technology Policy).

August 4-6, 2014. Jeff Jonas (IBM), Mark Lowenthal (Intelligence and Security Academy), and Philip Mudd (New America Foundation, Mudd Management, and former Deputy Director, CIA Counterterrorism Center).

August 27-29, 2014. David Grannis (Senate Select Committee on Intelligence) and Kate Martin (Center for National Security Studies).

September 8-10, 2014. Alexander Joel (ODNI), J.C. Smart (Georgetown University), Peter Highnam (Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity), and members of the Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

The committee requested but did not receive comments from the American Civil Liberties Union, the Electronic Frontier Foundation, and the Electronic Privacy Information Center.

The committee appreciates the support of David Honey (Assistant Deputy Director of National Intelligence for Science and Technology [ADDNI/S&T]), Steven D. Thompson (Senior S&T Advisor), John C. Granger (Senior Advisor to the ADDNI/S&T), and their colleagues from ODNI who helped make this study possible and the many officials of ODNI and NSA who briefed the committee or answered its questions. In addition, the committee acknowledges the intellectual contributions of its staff, Alan Shaw (Study Director, Air Force Studies Board), Herbert S. Lin (Chief Scientist, Computer Science and Telecommunications Board [CSTB]), and Jon Eisenberg (Director, CSTB); consultants Alex Gliksman (AGI Consulting, LLC), M. Anthony Fainberg (Institute for Defense Analyses), and Allan Friedman (George Washington University); and Eric Whitaker (Senior Program Assistant, CSTB), who provided administrative support.

THE COMMITTEE’S PERSPECTIVE ON ITS CHARGE

This report is part of the national discussion about the balance between the powers of government and the rights of the governed, as the government tries to carry out its constitutionally mandated responsibilities. As indicated above, the committee was asked a question about technology. Accordingly, this report emphasizes technology but also attends to the need for effective and trustworthy processes, even as more sophisticated technologies are developed. But neither technology nor process—alone or together—can guarantee the proper balance between collective and individual security.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

Acknowledgment of Reviewers

This report has been reviewed in draft form by individuals chosen for their diverse perspectives and technical expertise, in accordance with procedures approved by the National Research Council’s Report Review Committee. The purpose of this independent review is to provide candid and critical comments that will assist the institution in making its published report as sound as possible and to ensure that the report meets institutional standards for objectivity, evidence, and responsiveness to the study charge. The review comments and draft manuscript remain confidential to protect the integrity of the deliberative process. We wish to thank the following individuals for their review of this report:

Steven M. Bellovin, Columbia University,

Joel F. Brenner, Joel Brenner LLC,

Fred H. Cate, Indiana University,

George R. Cotter, Isologic, LLC,

William P. Crowell, Alsop Louie Partners,

Michael V. Hayden, Chertoff Group,

Raymond Jeanloz, University of California, Berkeley,

Anita K. Jones, University of Virginia,

Orin S. Kerr, George Washington University,

Peter Lee, Microsoft Research,

Kate Martin, Center for National Security Studies, and

Cynthia Storer, Coastal Carolina University.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

Although the reviewers listed above have provided many constructive comments and suggestions, they were not asked to endorse the report’s conclusions, nor did they see the final draft of the report before its release. The review of this report was overseen by Samuel H. Fuller, Analog Devices, Inc., and William H. Press, University of Texas, Austin. Appointed by the National Research Council, they were responsible for making certain that an independent examination of this report was carried out in accordance with institutional procedures and that all review comments were carefully considered. Responsibility for the final content of this report rests entirely with the authoring committee and the institution.

Page xviii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R1
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R2
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R3
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R4
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R5
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R6
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R7
Page viii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R8
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R9
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R10
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R11
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R12
Page xiii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R13
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R14
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R15
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R16
Page xvii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R17
Page xviii Cite
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Research Council. 2015. Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/19414.
×
Page R18
Next: Summary »
Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Bulk Collection of Signals Intelligence: Technical Options study is a result of an activity called for in Presidential Policy Directive 28 (PPD-28), issued by President Obama in January 2014, to evaluate U.S. signals intelligence practices. The directive instructed the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) to produce a report within one year "assessing the feasibility of creating software that would allow the intelligence community more easily to conduct targeted information acquisition rather than bulk collection." ODNI asked the National Research Council (NRC) -- the operating arm of the National Academy of Sciences and National Academy of Engineering -- to conduct a study, which began in June 2014, to assist in preparing a response to the President. Over the ensuing months, a committee of experts appointed by the Research Council produced the report.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!