National Academies Press: OpenBook

Issues in Risk Assessment (1993)

Chapter: Credibility is Crucial

« Previous: Risk Assessors and Risk Managers Need to Communicate
Suggested Citation:"Credibility is Crucial." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×

assessment is being prepared. Interested and affected groups should be informed in advance about the risk assessment. They should have the opportunity to express their concerns and contribute information to the risk assessment process while the process is being carried out.

Issues that seem obvious to the expert scientists participating in the risk assessment might not be obvious to laypersons, but it is important for both to understand each other if there is to be effective bridging between the scientific knowledge available to the experts and the concerns of the public. As one working-group participant expressed it, "if risk assessment opens up a dialogue, then it serves an appropriate objective."

Communication between modelers, risk assessors, and managers should be mutual, iterative, timely, and flexible. Risk assessments will be valuable as support to the risk management process only if the assessments address the right problem and if the managers who are the users of the products of risk assessment understand them. One suggestion offered at the workshop is that an agency assign someone the task of being the translator, or liaison, between the group that has carried out the risk assessment and the users of the risk assessment.

Credibility is Crucial

Risk assessments will be useful to the extent that they are perceived to be effective in accomplishing a difficult task: summarizing what science can tell us about the possible consequences to an ecological system. If a risk assessment is perceived to be incomplete or biased toward a particular point of view, it will not be trusted for risk management decision-making. It is therefore essential that a risk assessment be a comprehensive and balanced summary of the applicable science.

How can comprehensiveness and balance be achieved? The recommendations on health risk issues from the 1983 report appear equally applicable to ecological risk issues:

  • Regulatory agencies should take steps to establish and maintain a clear conceptual distinction between assessment of risks and the consideration of risk management alternatives; that is, the scientific findings and policy judgments embodied in risk assessments should be explicitly distinguished from the politi-

Suggested Citation:"Credibility is Crucial." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×

cal, economic, and technical considerations that influence the design and choice of regulatory strategies.

  • Before an agency decides whether a substance [ecosystem stressor] should or should not be regulated, … a detailed and comprehensive written risk assessment should be prepared and made publicly accessible …

  • An agency's risk assessment should be reviewed by an independent science advisory panel before any major regulatory action or decision not to regulate.

In those recommendations, it might be appropriate to replace "regulatory" language with more general terms relevant to the broad range of decision alternatives available for the management of ecological risks. However, the principles embodied in the recommendations can be applied essentially unchanged: to promote credibility, establish and maintain the conceptual distinction between risk assessment and risk management; place risk assessments in a written, publicly accessible form; and subject them to peer review by outside scientists.

Suggested Citation:"Credibility is Crucial." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×
Page 335
Suggested Citation:"Credibility is Crucial." National Research Council. 1993. Issues in Risk Assessment. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/2078.
×
Page 336
Next: Appendix G Contemplations on Ecological Risk Assessment »
Issues in Risk Assessment Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $65.00
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The scientific basis, inference assumptions, regulatory uses, and research needs in risk assessment are considered in this two-part volume.

The first part, Use of Maximum Tolerated Dose in Animal Bioassays for Carcinogenicity, focuses on whether the maximum tolerated dose should continue to be used in carcinogenesis bioassays. The committee considers several options for modifying current bioassay procedures.

The second part, Two-Stage Models of Carcinogenesis, stems from efforts to identify improved means of cancer risk assessment that have resulted in the development of a mathematical dose-response model based on a paradigm for the biologic phenomena thought to be associated with carcinogenesis.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!