National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 OBSERVATIONS AND UNANSWERED QUESTIONS
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×

REFERENCES

Bae et al. 2011. A Brief Understanding of Korean Educational Policy. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.

Ball, D. L., and D. Cohen. 1999. Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. Pp. 3–22 in Teaching as the Learning Profession: Handbook of Policy and Practice, L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes, eds. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

Clements, D. 2007. Curriculum research: Toward a framework for “research-based curricula.” Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 38(1):35–70.

Cobb, P., and E. Yackel. 1996. Constructivist, emergent, and sociocultural perspectives in the context of developmental research. Educational Psychologist 31:175–190. [Reprinted as pp. 208–226 in Classics in Mathematics Education Research, L. Darling-Hammond and G. Sykes, eds. 2004. Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.]

Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences. 2012. The Mathematical Education of Teachers II. Providence, RI, and Washington, DC: American Mathematical Society and Mathematical Association of America.

Council of Chief State School Officers and National Governors Association. 2010. Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.

Empson, S. 2011. On the idea of learning trajectories: Promises and pitfalls. The Mathematics Enthusiast 8:571–596.

Gardner, D. P. 1983. A Nation at Risk. Washington, DC: The National Commission on Excellence in Education, US Department of Education.

Ham, S. 2011. Collegiality as Uncertainty Management: Multilevel Contexts of Collaborative Teacher Interactions. Ph.D. dissertation. Michigan State University.

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Honegger, S. D. 2010. Revenues and Expenditures for Public Elementary and Secondary School Districts: School Year 2007–08 (Fiscal Year 2008) (NCES 2010-323). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.

Hord, S. M. 1997. Professional Learning Communities: Communities of Continuous Inquiry and Improvement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×

Huh, K. 2007. School Curriculum in Korea. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.

Kaiser, G. 1999. Comparative studies on teaching mathematics in England and Germany. Pp. 140–150 in International Comparisons in Mathematics Education, G. Kaiser, E. Luna, and I. Huntley, eds. Philadelphia: Falmer Press.

Kilpatrick, J., J. Swafford, and B. Findell. 2001. Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Kim, D., and M. K. Ju. 2012. A changing trajectory of proof learning in the geometry inquiry classroom. ZDM Mathematics Education 44:149–160.

Kim, E. 2009. Understanding Korean Educational Policy: Teacher Policy (vol. 8). Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.

Kim, E., K. Kim, D. Kim, and E. Kim. 2008. Improving School Leadership: Country Background Report for Korea. Seoul: Korean Educational Development Institute.

Kim, R. Y. 2012. The quality of non-textual elements in mathematics textbooks: An exploratory comparison between South Korea and the United States. ZDM Mathematics Education 44:175–187.

Korea Institute for Curriculum and Evaluation. n.d. Education in Korea. Seoul: Author.

Kwon, O. N., and M. K. Ju. 2012. Standards for professionalization of mathematics teachers: Policy, curricula, and national teacher employment test in Korea. ZDM Mathematics Education 44:211–222.

Kwon, O. N., and S. J. Cho. 2012. Balance between foundations and creativity: Features of Korean mathematics education. ZDM Mathematics Education 44:105–108.

Lave, J. 1988. Cognition in Practice: Mind, Mathematics and Culture in Everyday Life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lave, J., and E. Wenger. 1991. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Lew, H. C., W. Cho, H. Koh, and J. Paek. 2012. New challenges in the 2011 revised middle school curriculum of South Korea: Mathematics processes and mathematical attitude. ZDM Mathematical Education 44:109–119.

Lortie, D. 1975. Schoolteacher: A Sociological Study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ma, L. 1999. Knowing and Teaching Elementary Mathematics: Teachers’ Understanding in China and the United States. Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×

Ma, L. 2013. A critique of the structure of U.S. elementary school mathematics. Notices of the American Mathematical Society 60(10):1282–1296.

Marshall, M. L. 2004. Examining School Climate: Defining Factors and Education Influences. Georgia State University Center for School Safety, School Climate and Classroom Management.

Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. 2011. National Curriculum: Mathematics (vol. 8) [in Korean]. Seoul: Author.

Ministry of Education, Science, and Technology. 2014. 2014 Report on School Violence: Survey and Analysis [in Korean]. Seoul: Author.

National Academy of Sciences. 2010. Preparing Teachers: Building Sound Evidence for Sound Policy. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 1989. Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2000. Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2006. Curriculum Focal Points for Prekindergarten through Grade 8 Mathematics: A Quest for Coherence. Reston, VA: Author.

National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 2009. Focus in High School Mathematics: Reasoning and Sense Making. Reston, VA: Author.

National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future. 2003. No Dream Denied: A Pledge to America’s Children. Washington, DC: Author.

National Research Council. 2011. Incentives and Test-based Accountability in Education. M. Hout and S. Elliot, eds., Board on Testing and Assessment. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Nebres, B. F. 2006. Philippine perspective on the ICMI comparative study. Pp. 277–284 in Mathematics Education in Different Cultural Traditions: A Comparative Study of East Asia and the West, F. K. S. Leung, F. Graf, and J. Lopez-Real, eds. New York: Springer.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2010. PISA 2009 Results: Executive Summary. Paris: Author.

Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2014. PISA 2012 Results in Focus. Paris: Author.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×

Pahlke, E., J. S. Hyde, and J. E. Mertz. 2013. The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on mathematics and science achievement: Data from Korea. Journal of Educational Psychology 105(2):444–452.

Pang, J. 2012. Changing teaching practices toward effective mathematics instruction in the Korean context: Characteristics and implications. ZDM Mathematics Education 44:137–148.

Pang, J. S. 2014. Changes to the Korean mathematics curriculum: Expectations and challenges. Pp. 261–277 in Mathematics Curriculum in School Education, Y. Li and G. Lappan, eds. Dordrecht: Springer.

Park, K. M. 1997. School mathematics curriculum in Korea. Journal of the Korea Society of Mathematical Education Series D: Research in Mathematical Education 1(1):43–59.

Pepin, B. 1999. The influence of national cultural traditions on pedagogy: Classroom practices in England, France and Germany. Learners and Pedagogy 237–252.

Sadler, M. E. 1900. How Far Can We Learn Anything of Practical Value from the Study of Foreign Systems of Education? Guildford, England: Surrey Advertiser Office.

Schmidt, W., et al. 2007. The Preparation Gap: Teacher Education for Middle School Mathematics in Six Countries. East Lansing, MI: Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education, Michigan State University.

Schmidt, W., R. Houang, and L. Cogan. 2012. Preparing primary teachers in the United States: Balancing selection and preparation. ZDM Mathematics Education 44:265–276.

Schmidt, W., H. Wang, and C. McKnight. 2005. Curriculum coherence: An examination of US mathematics and science content standards from an international perspective. Journal of Curriculum Studies 37(5):525–559.

Schoenfeld, A. H. 1994. A discourse on methods. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 25(6):697–710.

Schoenfeld, A. H. 1999. Looking toward the 21st century: Challenges of educational theory and practice. Educational Researcher 28(7):4–14.

Shulman, L. 1986. Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15(2):4–14.Simon, M. A. 1995. Reconstructing mathematics pedagogy from a constructivist perspective. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education 26:114–145.

Son, J. W. 2011. A global look at math instruction. Teaching Children Mathematics 17(6):360–370.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×

Son, J. W. 2012. A cross-national comparison of reform curricula in Korea and the US in terms of cognitive complexity: The case of fraction addition and subtraction. ZDM Mathematics Education 44:161–174.

Stein, M. K., and G. Kim. 2009. The role of mathematics curriculum materials in large-scale urban reform: An analysis of demands and opportunities for teacher learning. Pp. 37–55 in Mathematics Teachers at Work: Connecting Curriculum Materials and Classroom Instruction, J. T. Remillard, B. A. Herbel-Eisenmann, and G. M. Lloyd, eds. New York: Routledge.

Stein, M. K., J. Remillard, and M. Smith. 2007. How curriculum influences student learning. Pp. 319–369 in Second Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning, F. Lester, ed. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

Stein, M. K., M. Smith, M. Henningsen, and E. Silver. 2000. Implementing Standards-based Mathematics Instruction. New York: Teachers College.

Stillman, L., and R. Blank. 2009. Key State Education Policies on PK–12 Education: 2008. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.

Supovitz, J. A. 2002. Developing communities of instructional practice. Teachers College Record 104(8):1591–1626.

Winsløw, C. 2007. Didactics of mathematics: An epistemological approach to mathematics education. Curriculum Journal 18(4):523–536.

Wong, N.-Y., W. Y. Wong, and E. W. Y. Wong. 2012. What do the Chinese value in (mathematics) education? ZDM Mathematics Education 44:9–19.

Wu, H. H. 2011. Phoenix rising: Bringing the Common Core State Mathematics Standards to life. American Educator 35(3):3–13.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"REFERENCES." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21753.
×
Page 72
Next: Appendix A-- U.S.South Korea Math Education Workshop Agenda »
Mathematics Curriculum, Teacher Professionalism, and Supporting Policies in Korea and the United States: Summary of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $44.00 Buy Ebook | $35.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

On July 15-17, 2012 the United States National Commission on Mathematics Instruction and Seoul National University held a joint Korea-U.S. workshop on Mathematics Teaching and Curriculum. The workshop was organized to address questions and issues related to math teaching and curriculum that were generated by each country, including the following: What are the main concerns in the development of the curriculum? What issues have been discussed or debated among curriculum developers, teachers, teacher educators, and scholars regarding the curriculum? How have textbooks been developed for the curriculum? How are curricular tasks designed and what criteria are used? What is the role of learning trajectories in the development of curriculum? This report summarizes the presentations and discussions at the workshop.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!