National Academies Press: OpenBook

A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option (2015)

Chapter: References

« Previous: 4 Community-Based Flood Insurance: Issues and Considerations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21758.
×

References

Anderson, D. R. 1974. The National Flood Insurance Program: Problems and potential. Journal of Risk and Insurance 41(4):579-599.

Asche, E. 2014. Understanding the Value of Mitigation: Evidence from FEMA’s Community Rating System Program and Elsewhere. Homeland Security, Studies and Analyses Institute. White Paper. Prepared for the Department of Homeland Security Science and Technology Directorate.

ASFPM (Association of State Floodplain Managers). 2013. Flood Mapping for the Nation: A Costs Analysis for the Nation’s Flood Map Inventory. Association of State Floodplain Managers. Available at http://www.floods.org/ace-files/documentlibrary/2012_NFIP_Reform/Flood_Mapping_for_the_Nation_ASFPM_Report_3-1-2013.pdf [accessed May 19, 2015].

Berke, P., W. Lyles, and G. Smith. 2014. Impacts of federal and state hazard mitigation policies on local land use policy. Journal of Planning Education and Research 34(1):60-76.

Brody, S. D., S. Zahran, W. E. Highfield, S. P. Bernhardt, and A. Vedlitz. 2009. Policy learning for flood mitigation: A longitudinal assessment of the Community Rating System in Florida. Risk Analysis 29:912-929.

Brody, S. D., J. E. Kang, and S. Bernhardt. 2010. Identifying factors influencing flood mitigation at the local level in Texas and Florida: The role of organizational capacity. Natural Hazards 52:167-184.

Burby, R. 2006. Hurricane Katrina and the Paradoxes of Government Disaster Policy: Bringing about Wise Governmental Decisions for Hazardous Areas. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 604(March):171-191.

Coase, R. H. 1960. The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics 3(1):1-44.

CRS (U.S. Congressional Research Service). 2012. The National Flood Insurance Program: Background, Challenges, and Financial Status. R40650. Available at http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/business/documents/health-science-NFIP-123110.pdf [accessed May 19, 2015].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21758.
×

CRS. 2013. The National Flood Insurance Program: Status and Remaining Issues for Congress. R42850. Available at https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42850.pdf [accessed May 19, 2015].

DePue, M., C. Carlton, D. Maurstad, and S. F. Wright. 2014. Community-Based Flood Insurance: Impacts on the Flood Hazard Management Cycle (PDF document). ASFPM 2014 Conference. Available at http://www.floods.org/Files/Conf2014_ppts/G3_DePue.pdf [accessed May 20, 2015].

Dixon, L., N. Clancy, S. A. Seabury, and A. Overton. 2006. The National Flood Insurance Program’s Market Penetration Rate: Estimates and Policy Implications. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

Dixon, L., N. Clancy, B. Bender, A. Kofner, D. Manheim, and L. Zakaras. 2013. Flood Insurance in New York City Following Hurricane Sandy. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

FEMA (U.S. Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2002. National Flood Insurance Program: Program Description. Available at http://www.fema.gov/media-librarydata/20130726-1447-20490-2156/nfipdescrip_1_.pdf [accessed May 20, 2015].

FEMA. 2005a. NFIP Floodplain Management Requirements. A Study Guide and Desk Reference for Local Officials. FEMA 480. Washington, DC: FEMA.

FEMA. 2005b. Joining the National Flood Insurance Program. FEMA 496. Washington, DC: FEMA.

FEMA. 2009. Severe Repetitive Loss Property Locations in FEMA Regions IV and VI. Available at http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/20130726-1709-25045-4851/2_severerepetetiveloss.pdf [accessed May 29, 2015].

FEMA. 2011a. Testimony of Craig Fugate, Administrator of Federal Emergency Management Agency before the Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, National Flood Insurance Program Reform, June 9, 2011, pp. 2.

FEMA. 2011b. NFIP Reform: Phase III Report. Washington, DC: FEMA. Available at http://www.fema.gov/pdf/business/nfip/nfip_reform_phase_III_report.pdf [accessed May 20, 2015].

FEMA. 2014a. Community Rating System Fact Sheet. Washington, DC: FEMA. Available at https://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program-community-rating-system [accessed February 2, 2015].

FEMA. 2014b. Cooperating Technical Partners Program. Available at https://www.fema.gov/cooperating-technical-partners-program [accessed on June 4, 2015].

FEMA. 2014c. FY 2014 Flood Mitigation Assistance Grant Program. Factsheet. Washington, DC: FEMA. Available at http://www.ak-prepared.com/grants/Documents/FY14%20FMA%20Fact%20Sheet%20final%204-3-14_final.pdf [accessed April 29, 2015].

FEMA. 2015a. FloodSmart.gov: The Official Site of the NFIP. Available at https://www.floodsmart.gov/floodsmart/ [accessed February 3, 2015].

FEMA. 2015b. FEMA Flood Insurance Statistics. Available at https://www.fema.gov/total-coverage-calendar-year [accessed June 8, 2015].

FEMA. 2015c. Cooperating Technical Partners: Frequently Asked Questions. Available at https://www.fema.gov/cooperating-technical-partners-program/cooperating-technical-partnersfrequently-asked-questions. [accessed June 16, 2015].

FEMA. 2015d. FY2015 Flood Mitigation Assistance. Fact Sheet. Available at http://www.fema.gov/media-library-data/1432847398289-878c470e718239eedcaadc8d52ea1823/FMAFactSheetFY2015.pdf [accessed on July 07, 2015].

FEMA. 2015e. Definitions. http://www.fema.gov/national-flood-insurance-program/definitions [accessed May 27, 2015].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21758.
×

Galloway, G. E. 1995. Learning from the Mississippi Flood of 1993: Impacts, Management Issues, and Areas for Research. U.S.-Italy Research Workshop on the Hydrometeorology, Impacts, and Management of Extreme Floods Perugia (Italy). Available at http://www.engr.colostate.edu/ce/facultystaff/salas/us-italy/papers/12galloway.pdf [accessed May 27, 2015].

GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 2010. FEMA Flood Maps: Some Standards and Processes in Place to Promote Map Accuracy and Outreach, But Opportunities Exist to Address Implementation Challenges. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2013. Flood Insurance: More Information Needed on Subsidized Properties. Report to Congressional Committees. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2014a. Overview of GAO’s Past Work on the National Flood Insurance Program. Briefing to the Subcommittee on Housing and Insurance, Committee on Financial Services, House of Representatives. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2014b. Flood Insurance Foregone premiums. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2014c. Flood Insurance: Strategies for Increasing Private Sector Involvement. Washington, DC: GAO.

GAO. 2015. Flood Insurance: Status of FEMA’s Implementation of the Biggert-Waters Act, as Amended. Washington, DC: GAO.

Harrington, S. E., and G. R. Niehaus. 2004. Risk Management and Insurance. Boston, MA: Irwin.

Hayes, T. L., and D. A. Neal. 2011. National Flood Insurance Program: Actuarial Rate Review: In Support of the Recommended Oct 1, 2011, Rate and Rule Changes. Washington, DC: FEMA.

Illinois Energy Management Agency. 2014. Disster Mitigation Act of 2000. Available at https://www.illinois.gov/iema/Mitigation/Pages/Planning.aspx [accessed May 25, 2015].

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Thinking Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Keybridge Research. 2011. Reforming the National Flood Insurance Program: A Qualitative Analysis of Policy Alternatives. Prepared for FEMA NFIP Reform Working Group.

Kousky, C., and L. Shabman. 2014. Pricing Flood Insurance. Washington, DC: Resource For the Future.

Kundzewicz, Z. W., S. Kanae, S. I. Seneviratne, J. Handmer, N. Nicholls, P. Peduzzi, R. Mechler, L. M. Bouwer, N. Arnell, K. Mach, R. Muir-Wood, G. R. Brakenbridge, W. Kron, G. Benito, Y. Honda, K. Takahashi, and B. Sherstyukov. 2014. Flood risk and climate change: Global and regional perspectives. Hydrological Sciences Journal 59(1):1-28.

Kunreuther, H., and E. Michel-Kerjan. 2013a. Implementing the National Flood Insurance Reform Act in a New Era of Catastrophes. Issue Brief. Penn Wharton Public Policy Initiative (1)9. Available at http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/2013WPPI_NFIP-brief.pdf [accessed April 22, 2015].

Kunreuther, H., and E. Michel-Kerjan. 2013b. A Proposal for Insuring Public Facilities and Infrastructure Against Disaster Losses. The Huffington Post Business. Available at http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/oped2013Oct29_HuffPost_InsuringPublicFacilities.pdf [accessed April 20, 2015].

Kunreuther, H., S. Gupta, V. Bosetti, R. Cooke, V. Dutt, M. Ha-Duong, H. Held, J. Llanes-Regueiro, A. Patt, E. Shittu, and E. Weber. 2014. Integrated Risk and Uncertainty Assessment of Climate Change Response Policies. In: Climate Change 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Edenhofer, O., R. Pichs-Madruga, Y. Sokona, E. Farahani, S. Kadner, K. Seyboth, A. Adler, I. Baum, S. Brunner, P. Eickemeier, B. Kriemann, J. Savolainen, S. Schlömer, C. von Stechow, T. Zwickel and J.C. Minx (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.

Langbein, W. B. 1953. Flood Insurance. Land Economics (29)4:232-330.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21758.
×

Lee, A. 2012. Sandy Catches Northeasterners without Flood Coverage. The Sun Herald. Available at http://www.weather.com/news/sandy-northeasterners-no-insurance-201211 [accessed April 22, 2015].

Lyles, W., P. Berke, and G. Smith. 2014. A comparison of local hazard mitigation plan quality in six states, USA. Landscape and Urban Planning 122:89-99.

Michel-Kerjan, E., S. Lemoyne de Forges, and H. Kunreuther. 2012. Policy tenure under the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program. Risk Analysis 32(4):644-658.

Milly, P. C. D., J. Betancourt, M. Falkenmark, R. M. Hirsch, Z. W. Kundzewicz, D. P. Lettenmaier, and R. J. Stouffer. 2008. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 319:513-514.

New Orleans Times Picayune. 2013. St. Charles town hall meeting on FEMA flood maps draws huge crowds eager to voice concerns. April 16.

NRC (National Research Council). 2013. Levees and the National Flood Insurance Program: Improving Policies and Practices. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

NRC. 2015. Affordability of National Flood Insurance Program Premiums—Report 1. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Peterson, T. C., R. R. Heim Jr., R. Hirsch, D. P. Kaiser, H. Brooks, N. S. Diffenbaugh, R. M. Dole, J. P. Giovannettone, K. Guirguis, T. R. Karl, R. W. Katz, K. Kunkel, D. Lattenmaier, G. J. McCabe, C. J. Paciorek, K. R. Ryberg, S. Schubert, V. B. S. Silva, B. C. Stewart, A. V. Vecchia, G. Villarini, R. S. Vose, J. Walsh, M. Wehner, D. Wolock, K. Wolter, C. A. Woodhouse, and D. Wuebbles. 2013. Monitoring and Understanding Changes in Heat Waves, Cold Waves, Floods and Droughts in the United States: State of knowledge. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 94(June):821-834.

Pratt, J. W., and R. J. Zeckhauser. 1985. Principals and Agents: The Structure of Business. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

Rejda, G. E., and M. McNamara. 2014. Principles of Risk Management and Insurance. 12th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Staff, Subcommittee on Economic Development, Public Buildings, and Emergency Management. 2015. Committee Hearing on “Rebuilding after the Storm: Lessening Impacts and Speeding Recovery.” Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, U.S. House of Representatives. Washington, DC.

Stocker, T. F., D. Qin, G. K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex, and P. M. Medgley (eds.). 2013. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change-Abstract for decision makers: (Groupe d’expers intergovernmental sur l’evolution du climat/Intergovernment Panel on Climate Change-IPCC, C/O World Meteorological Organization, 7 bis Avenue de la Paix, CP 2300 CH-1211. Geneva 2 (Switzerland).

Task Force on Federal Flood Control Policy. 1966. A Unified Program for Managing Flood Losses. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Tiebout, C. M. 1956. A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy 64(5):416-424.

Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. judgment under uncertainty, heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157):1124-1131.

Van Zandt, S., W.G. Peacock, D. Henry, H. Grover, W. Highfield, and S. Brody. 2012. Mapping Social vulnerability to enhance housing and neighborhood resilience. Housing Policy Debate 22(1):29-55.

Zhao, W., H. Kunreuther, and J. Czajkowski. 2015. Affordability of the National Flood Insurance Program: A Case Study of Charleston County, South Carolina, Wharton Risk Management Center Working Paper #2015-03. Available at http://opim.wharton.upenn.edu/risk/library/WP201503_Affordability-of-Flood-Insurance-South-Carolina.pdf [accessed April 19, 2015].

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21758.
×
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21758.
×
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21758.
×
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2015. A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21758.
×
Page 76
Next: Appendix A Guest Speakers at Committee Meetings »
A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $54.00 Buy Ebook | $43.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

River and coastal floods are among the nation's most costly natural disasters. One component in the nation's approach to managing flood risk is availability of flood insurance policies, which are offered on an individual basis primarily through the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP). Established in 1968, the NFIP is overseen by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and there are about 5.4 million individual policies in the NFIP. The program has experienced a mixture of successes and persistent challenges. Successes include a large number of policy holders, the insurance of approximately $1.3 trillion of property, and the fact that the large majority of policy holders - 80% - pay rates that are risk based. NFIP challenges include large program debt, relatively low rates of purchase in many flood-prone areas, a host of issues regarding affordability of premiums, ensuring that premiums collected cover payouts and administrative fees, and a large number of properties that experience severe repetitive flood losses.

At the request of FEMA, A Community-Based Flood Insurance Option identifies a range of key issues and questions that would merit consideration and further analysis as part of a community-based flood insurance program. As the report describes, the community-based option certainly offers potential benefits, such as the prospect of providing coverage for all (or nearly all) at-risk residents and properties in flood-prone communities. At the same time, many current challenges facing the NFIP may not necessarily be resolved by a community-based approach. This report discusses these and other prominent issues to be considered and further assessed.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!