National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 An Assessment of the Early Accomplishments and Likely Long-Term Outcomes and Impacts of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Network
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×

References

Abell, R.A., D.M. Olson, E. Dinerstein, P.T. Hurley, J.T. Diggs, W. Eichbaum, S. Walters, W. Wettengel, T. Allnutt, C.J. Loucks, and P. Hedao. 2000. Freshwater Ecoregions of North America: A Conservation Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

ACCCNRS (Advisory Committee on Climate Change and Natural Resource Science). 2015. Report to the Secretary of the Interior. Available at https://nccwsc.usgs.gov/sites/default/files/files/ACCCNRS_Report_2015.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

ACJV (Atlantic Coast Joint Venture). 2005. Atlantic Coast Joint Venture Waterfowl Implementation Plan. Available at http://acjv.org/planning/waterfowl-implementation-plan (accessed October 5, 2016).

ACJV. 2009. Atlantic Coast Joint Venture Strategic Plan, Updated. Available at http://acjv.org/documents/ACJV_StrategicPlan_2009update_final.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

Agee, J.K., and D.J. Johnson, Eds. 1989. Ecosystem Management for Parks and Wilderness. Seattle: University of Washington Press.

Allen, C.R., and L.H. Gunderson. 2011. Pathology and failure in the design and implementation of adaptive management. Journal of Environmental Management 92(5):1379-1384.

Alliance of National Heritage Areas. 2013. An Evaluation of 12 National Heritage Areas. Available at http://www.nationalheritageareas.us/pdf/Final-NHA.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

Axelrod, R. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Axelrod, R. 1997. The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Collaboration. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Bagstad, K.J., D.J. Semmens, S. Waage, and R. Winthrop. 2013. A comparative assessment of decision-support tools for ecosystem services quantification and valuation. Ecosystem Services 5:27-39.

Ban, N.C., M. Mills, J. Tam, C.C. Hicks, S. Klain, N. Stoeckl, M.C. Bottrill, J. Levine, R.L. Pressey, T. Satterfield, and K.M.A. Chan. 2013. A social-ecological approach for conservation planning: Embedding social considerations. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11:194-202.

Barrett, B. 2013. National Heritage Areas: Evaluating past practice as a foundation for the future. Presented at Fabos Conference on Greenways, University of Massachusetts at Amherst. Available at http://livinglandscapeobserver.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Fabos-paper-2013-Barrett.pdf (accessed September 8, 2016).

Baylis, K., J. Honey-Rosés, J. Börner, E. Corbera, D. Ezzine-de-Blas, P.J. Ferraro, R. Lapeyre, U.M. Persson, A. Pfaff, and S. Wunder. 2015. Mainstreaming impact evaluation in nature conservation. Conservation Letters 9(1):58-64. doi: 10.1111/conl.12180.

Berger, J., and S. Cain. 2014. Moving beyond science to protect a mammalian corridor. Conservation Biology 28:1142-1150.

Berkes, F., and C. Folke, Eds. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Betts, M.G., L. Fahrig, A.S. Hadley, K.E. Halstead, J. Bowman, W.D. Robinson, J.A. Wiens, and D.B. Lindenmayer. 2014. A species-centered approach for uncovering generalities in organism responses to habitat loss and fragmentation. Ecography 37(6):517-527.

Binder, L.W., H. Campbell, G. Carbone, M. Finucane, G. Garfin, H. Hartmann, K. Ingram, D. Kenney, N. Lewis, C. Simpson, S. Trainor, B. Udall, and R. Webb. 2009. RISA 2020: A RISA Community Vision for the Future Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) Efforts to Match Advances in Climate Impacts Science with the Needs of Resource Managers and Planners. Available at http://cpo.noaa.gov/sites/cpo/RISA/RISA%202009%20Vision%202020.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

Bi-State Technical Advisory Committee Nevada and California. 2013. Bi-State Action Plan—Past, Present, and Future Actions for Conservation of the Greater Sage-Grouse Bi-State Distinct Population Segment. Prepared for the Bi-State Executive Oversight Committee for Conservation of Greater Sage-Grouse, March 15, 2012.

Bodin, Ö., B. Crona, M. Thyresson, A.-L. Golz, and M. Tengö. 2014. Conservation success as a function of good alignment of social and ecological structures and processes. Conservation Biology 28:1371-1379.

Burgman, M.A. 2005. Risks and Decisions for Conservation and Environmental Management. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, p. 488.

Buzbee, W.W. 2003. Recognizing the regulatory commons: A theory of regulatory gaps. Iowa Law Review 89:1-64.

Cash, D.W., W.C. Clark, A. Alcock, N.M. Dickson, N. Eckley, D.H. Guston, J. Jager, and R.B. Mitchell. 2003. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 14:8086-8091.

Chambers, J.C., D.A. Pyke, J.D. Maestas, M. Pellant, C.S. Boyd, S.B. Campbell, S. Espinosa, D.W. Havlina, K.E. Mayer, and A. Wuenschel. 2014. Using Resistance and Resilience Concepts to Reduce Impacts of Invasive Annual Grasses and Altered Fire Regimes on the Sagebrush Ecosystem and Greater Sage-Grouse: A Strategic Multi-Scale Approach. General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-326. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 73 pp.

Clark, T.W., E.D. Amato, D.G. Whittemore, and A.H. Harvey. 1991. Policy and programs for ecosystem management in the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem: An analysis. Conservation Biology 5:412-422.

CMP (Conservation Measures Partnership). 2013. Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation. Version 3.0. Available at http://cmpopenstandards.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/CMP-OS-V3-0-Final.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×

Cook, C.N., M. Hockings, and R.W. Carter. 2010. Conservation in the dark? The information used to support management decisions. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 8(4):181-186.

Cook, C.N., M.B. Mascia, M.W. Schwartz, H. P. Possingham, and R.A. Fuller. 2013. Achieving conservation science that bridges the knowledge-action boundary. Conservation Biology 27(4):669-678.

Council on Climate Preparedness and Resilience, Climate and Natural Resources Working Group. 2014. President’s Priority Agenda: Enhancing the Climate Resilience of America’s Natural Resources, p. 16, footnote 14.

Crowder, L.B., G. Osherenko, O.R. Young, S. Airamé, E.A. Norse, N. Baron, J.C. Day, F. Douvere, C.N. Ehler, B.S. Halpern, S.J. Langdon, K.L. McLeod, J.C. Ogden, R.E. Peach, A.A. Rosenberg, and J.A. Wilson. 2006. Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance. Science 313:617-618.

Curtin, C. 2015. The Science of Open Spaces: Theory and Practice for Conserving Large, Complex Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.

De Leo, G.A., and S. Levin. 1997. The multifaceted aspects of ecosystem integrity. Conservation Ecology 1(1):3. Available at http://www.consecol.org/vol1/iss1/art3 (accessed October 5, 2016).

Doherty, K., J.D. Tack, J.S. Evans, D.E. Naugle, 2010. Mapping Breeding Densities of Greater Sage-Grouse: A Tool for Range-wide Conservation Planning. BLM Completion Report: Interagency Agreement # L10PG00911. Bureau of Land Management.

DOI (U.S. Department of the Interior). 2011. Landscape Conservation Cooperatives and Climate Science Centers Implementation Guidance. Available at: https://lccnetwork.org/resource/lcc-and-climate-science-center-implementation-guidance (accessed September 8, 2016).

Doremus, H. 2011. Adaptive management as an information problem. North Carolina Law Review 89:1455-1498.

Dunning, J.B., B.J. Danielson, and H.R. Pulliam. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos 65(1):169-175.

Eigenbrod, F., S.J. Hecnar, and L. Farhig. 2011. Sub-optimal study design has major impact on landscape-scale inference. Biological Conservation 144:298-305.

Ellis, E.C., K.K. Goldewijk, S. Siebert, D. Lightman, and N. Ramankutty. 2010. Anthropogenic transformation of the biomes, 1700 to 2000. Global Ecology and Biogeography 19:589-606.

Fischer, J., D.B. Lindenmayer, S. Barry, and E. Flowers. 2005. Lizard distribution patterns in the Tumut Fragmentation “Natural Experiment” in south-eastern Australia. Biological Conservation 123:301-315.

Foley, J.A., R. DeFries, G.P. Asner, C. Barford, G. Bonan, S.R. Carpenter, F.S. Chapin, M.T. Coe, G.C. Daily, H.K. Gibbs, J.H. Helkowski, T. Holloway, E.A. Howard, C.J. Kucharik, C. Monfreda, J.A. Patz, I.C. Prentice, N. Ramankutty, and P.K. Snyder. 2005. Global consequences of land use. Science 309:570-574.

Forman, R. 2000. Estimate of the area affected ecologically by the road system in the United States. Conservation Biology 14(1):31-35.

Frampton, G. 1996. Ecosystem management in the Clinton Administration. Duke Environmental Law & Policy Forum 7:39-48.

Franklin, J.F. 1993. Preserving biodiversity: Species, ecosystems, or landscapes? Ecological Applications 3(2):202-205.

Freeman, J., and J. Rossi. 2012. Agency coordination in shared regulatory space. Harvard Law Review 125:1131-1211.

Freitag, M., and I. Winkler. 2001. Development of cooperation in regional networks: Mechanisms of coordination and support measures. In Collaborative Strategies and Multi-Organizational Partnerships, edited by Tharsi Taillieu. Leuven, Belgium: Grant, pp. 67-72.

FWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2010. Endangered and threatened wildlife and plants; 12 month findings for petitions to list the greater sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) as threatened or endangered. Federal Register 75:13909-14014.

FWS. 2013a. A Landscape-Scale Approach to Refuge System Planning. USFWS Final Report, Washington, DC: FWS. Available at http://www.fws.gov/refuges/vision/pdfs/PlanningGuideRev10.pdf (accessed September 8, 2016).

FWS. 2013b. Greater Sage-Grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus) Conservation Objectives: Final Report, February. Denver, CO: FWS.

FWS and Environment Canada, Canadian Wildlife Service. 1986. North American Waterfowl Management Plan: A Strategy for Cooperation (May 1986).

Gallant, A.L., T.R.Whittier, D.P. Larsen, J.M. Omernik, and R.M. Hughes. 1989. Regionalization as a Tool for Managing Environmental Resources. EPA/600/3-89/060. Corvallis, OR: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Research Laboratory. 152 pp.

Game, E.T., P. Kareiva, and H.P. Possingham. 2013. Six common mistakes in conservation priority setting. Conservation Biology 27(3):480-485.

GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 2011. Performance Measurement and Evaluation: Definitions and Relationships. GAO-11-646sp. Available at gao.gov/new.items/d11646sp.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

Garton, E.O., J.W. Connelly, J.S. Horne, C.A. Hagen, A. Moser, and M.A. Schroeder. 2011. Greater sage-grouse population dynamics and probability of persistence. Studies in Avian Biology 38:293-382.

Giocomo, J.J., M. Gustafson, J.N. Duberstein, and C. Boyd. 2012. The role of Joint Ventures in bridging the gap between research and management. In Wildlife Science: Connecting Research with Management, edited by J.P. Sands, S.J. DeMaso, M.J. Schnupp, and L.A. Brennan. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, pp. 239-251.

Gleason, M., S. McGovern, M. Miller-Henson, J. Ugoretz, E. Fox, M. Merrifield, W. McClintock, P. Serpa, and K. Hoffman. 2010. Science-based and stakeholder-driven marine protected area network planning: A successful case study from north-central California. Ocean and Coastal Management 53:52-68.

Goldstein, B.E., and W.H. Butler. 2012. Collaborating for transformative resilience: Shared identity in the U.S. Fire Learning Network. In Collaborative Resilience: Moving Through Crisis to Opportunity, edited by B.E. Goldstein. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, p. 339.

González, J.A., C. Montes, J. Rodríguez, and W. Tapia. 2008. Rethinking the Galapagos Islands as a complex social-ecological system: Implications for conservation and management. Ecology and Society 13(2):13. Available at http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art13 (accessed October 5, 2016).

Gore, A. 1993. From Red Tape to Results: Creating a Government That Works Better and Costs Less. Report of the National Performance Review, pp. 52-53.

Groves, C.R. 2003. Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner’s Guide to Planning for Biodiversity. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Groves, C.R., and E.T. Game. 2015. Conservation Planning: Informed Decisions for a Healthier Planet. Englewood, CO: Roberts and Company.

Groves, C.R., D.B. Jensen, L.L. Valutis, K.H. Redford, M.L. Shaffer, J.M. Scott, J.V. Baumgartner, J.V. Higgins, M.W. Beck, and M.G. Anderson. 2002. Planning for biodiversity conservation: Putting conservation science into practice. BioScience 52(6):499-512.

Hicks, C.C., J.E. Cinner, N. Stoeckl, and T.R. McClanahan. 2015. Linking ecosystem services and human-values theory. Conservation Biology 29(5):1471-1480.

Hughson, D.L., D.E. Busch, S. Davis, S.P. Finn, S. Caicco, and P.S.J. Verburg. 2011. Natural Resource Mitigation, Adaptation and Research Needs Related to Climate Change in the Great Basin and Mojave Desert: Workshop Summary. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2011-5103, 34 pp.

Hunter, M.L., G.L. Jacobson, Jr., and T. Webb III. 1988. Paleoecology and the coarse-filter approach to maintaining biological diversity. Conservation Biology 2:375-385.

Imperial, M., E. Johnston, M. Pruett-Jones, K. Leong, and J. Thomsen. In press. Sustaining the useful life of network governance: Life-cycles and developmental challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission. 2009. Marine Spatial Planning: A Step-by-Step Approach Toward Ecosystem-Based Management, edited by R. Dahl. Paris: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×

Jacobson, C., and A.L. Robertson. 2012. Landscape Conservation Cooperatives: Bridging entities to facilitate adaptive co-governance of social-ecological systems. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17:333-343.

Kareiva. P., H. Tallis, T.H. Ricketts, G.C. Daily, and S. Polasky. 2011. Natural Capital. Theory and Practice of Mapping Ecosystem Services. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Kati, V., T. Hovardas, M. Dieterich, P.L. Ibisch, B. Mihok, and N. Selva. 2015. The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conservation Biology 29(1):260-270.

Keener, V.W., J.J. Marra, M. Finucane, D. Spooner, and M.H. Smith, eds. 2012. Climate Change and Pacific Islands: Indicators and Impacts. Report for the 2012 Pacific Islands Regional Climate Assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.

Keeney, R.L. 1992. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decision Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Knick, S.T., S.E. Hanser, and K.L. Preston. 2013. Modeling ecological minimum requirements for distribution of greater sage-grouse leks: Implications for population connectivity across their western range, U.S.A. Ecology and Evolution 3:1539-1551.

Knight, A.T., R.M. Cowling, M. Rouget, A. Balmford, A.T. Lombard, and B.M. Campbell. 2008. Knowing but not doing: Selecting priority conservation areas and the research-implementation gap. Conservation Biology 22(3):610-617.

Landau, M. 1969. Redundancy, rationality, and the problem of duplication and overlap. Public Administration Review 29(4):346-358.

Lauber, T.B., R.C. Stedman, D.J. Decker, and B.A. Knuth. 2011. Linking knowledge to action in collaborative conservation. Conservation Biology 25(6):1186-1194.

Laven, D., C. Ventriss, R. Manning, and N. Mitchell. 2010. Evaluating U.S. National Heritage Areas: Theory, methods, and application. Environmental Management 46:195-212.

Lawler, J.J., D.J. Lewis, E. Nelson, A.J. Plantinga, S. Polasky, J.C. Whitney, D.P. Helmers, S. Martinuzzi, D. Pennington, and V.C. Radeloff. 2014. Projected land-use change impacts on ecosystem services in the United States. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 111(20):7492-7497.

LCC (Landscape Conservation Cooperatives). 2014. LCC Network Strategic Plan. Available at http://lccnetwork.org/strategic-plan (accessed October 5, 2016).

LCC Network. 2011. Landscape Conservation Cooperatives: Operational Memo for Addressing Requests for Consideration of LCC Geographic Boundary Changes. December 6.

LCC Network. 2014. Mississippi River Basin/Gulf Hypoxia Conservation Design Briefing Memo. Available at https://griffingroups.com/file/view/164063/lccs-mrb-gulf-hypoxia-briefing-memo (accessed October 5, 2016).

LCC Network, LCC Science Coordinators Team. 2015. LCC Network Conservation Science Plan Version 1.0. Available at http://lccnetwork.org/resource/science-plan (accessed April 12, 2016).

Leopold, A. 1947. Draft foreword to A Sand County Almanac. In Companion to a Sand County Almanac: Interpretive and Critical Essays, edited by J. Baird Callicott. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Leu, M., S.E. Hanser, and S.T. Knick. 2008. The human footprint in the west: A large-scale analysis of anthropogenic impacts. Ecological Applications 18(5):1119-1139.

Lind, E.A., and T.R. Tyler. 1988. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum.

Lindblom, C. 1968. The Policy-Making Process. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Mace, G.M. 2014. Whose conservation? Changes in the perception and goals of nature conservation require a solid scientific basis. Nature 345:1558-1560.

Margerum, R.D. 2008. A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management 41:487-500.

Marsh, G.P. 1864. Man and Nature: Or, Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action. New York: Charles Scribner.

Marsh, W.M. 2010. Landscape Planning: Environmental Applications. Somerset, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.

Martin-Williams, S. 2007. National Heritage Areas: Developing and Specifying a Model of Inter-organizational Domain Development and Exploring the Role of the National Park Service as a Federal Partner. Morgantown: West Virginia University.

Mascia, M.B., S. Pailler, M.L. Thieme, A. Rowe, M.C. Bottrill, F. Danielsen, J. Geldmann, R. Naidoo, R.S. Pullin, and N.D. Burgess. 2014. Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biological Conservation 169:258-267.

Mayer, K.E., P. Anderson, J. Chambers, C. Boyd, T. Christiansen, D. Davis, S. Espinosa, D. Havlina, M. Ielmini, D. Kemner, L. Kurth, J. Maestas, B. Mealor, T. Milesneck, L. Niell, M. Pellant, D. Pyke, J. Tague, and J. Vernon. 2013. Wildfire and Invasive Species in the West: Challenges That Hinder Current and Future Management and Protection of the Sagebrush Steppe Ecosystem—A Gap Report. Cheyenne, WY: Western Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies.

McKinney, M., and S. Johnson. 2009. Working Across Boundaries: People, Nature, and Regions. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

McKinney, M., L. Scarlett, and D. Kemmis. 2010. Large landscape conservation: A strategic framework for policy and action. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.

MEA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Summary for decision makers. In Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 1-24.

Meadow, A., D. Ferguson, Z. Guido, A. Horangic, G. Owen, and T. Wall. 2015. Moving toward the deliberate co-production of climate science knowledge. Weather, Climate, and Society 7(2):179-191.

Millard, M.J., C.A. Czarnecki, J.M. Morton, L.A. Brandt, J.S. Briggs, F.S. Shipley, R. Sayre, P.J. Sponholtz, D. Perkins, D.G. Simpkins, and J. Taylor. 2012. A national geographic framework for guiding conservation on a landscape scale. Journal of Fish and Wildlife Management 3(1):175-183.

Milner-Gulland, E.J., J.A. McGregor, M. Agarwala, G. Atkinson, P. Gevan, T. Clements, T. Daw, K. Homewood, N. Kumpel, J. Lewis, S. Mourato, B. Palmer, M. Redshaw, J.M. Rowcliffe, S. Suon, G. Wallace, H. Washington, and D. Wilkie. 2014. Accounting for the impact of conservation on human well-being. Conservation Biology 28:1160-1166.

Mitchell, R. K., H. J. VanBuren III, M. Greenwood, and R. E. Freeman. 2015. Stakeholder inclusion and accounting for stakeholders. Prepublication version. Journal of Management Studies 52(7):851-877.

Moffett, A., and S. Sarkar. 2006. Incorporating multiple criteria into the design of conservation area networks: A minireview with recommendations. Diversity and Distributions 12:125-137.

MRGMWNTF (Mississippi River/Gulf of Mexico Watershed Nutrient Task Force). 2008. Gulf Hypoxia Action Plan 2008 for Reducing, Mitigating, and Controlling Hypoxia in the Northern Gulf of Mexico and Improving Water Quality in the Mississippi River Basin. Washington, DC: MRGMWNTF.

MRGMWNTF. 2013. Reassessment 2013: Progress Made Since 2008. Available at http://water.epa.gov/type/watersheds/named/msbasin/upload/hypoxia_reassessment_508.pdf (accessed November 20, 2015).

National Fish Habitat Action Plan. 2012. Available at http://fishhabitat.org/sites/default/files/www/NFHP_AP_Final_0.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

National Technical Assistance Team. 2008. Strategic Habitat Conservation Handbook: A Guide to Implementing the Technical Elements of Strategic Habitat Conservation, Version 1.0. Washington, DC: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.

NAWMP (North American Waterfowl Management Plan) Committee. 2012. North American Waterfowl Management Plan 2012: People Conserving Waterfowl and Wetlands. Available at http://www.dgif.virginia.gov/wildlife/waterfowl/north-american-waterfowl-management-plan-2012.pdf (accessed September 8, 2016).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×

Noss, R.F. 1987. From plant communities to landscapes in conservation inventories: A look at The Nature Conservancy (USA). Biological Conservation 41:11-37.

Noss, R.F. 2002. Context matters: Considerations for large-scale conservation. Conservation Biology in Practice 3:10-19.

NPS (National Park Service). 2011. A Call for Action: Preparing for a Second Century of Stewardship and Engagement. NPS.

NRC (National Research Council). 2003. Does Water Flow Influence Everglades Landscape Patterns? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2004. Valuing Ecosystem Services: Toward Better Environmental Decision-Making. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2005a. Assessing and Managing the Ecological Impact of Paved Roads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2005b. Re-Engineering Water Storage in the Everglades: Risks and Opportunities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC 2005c. Thinking Strategically: The Appropriate Use of Metrics for the Climate Change Science Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2007. Status of Pollinators in North America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2010. Adapting to the Impacts of Climate Change. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2011. A Review of the Use of Science and Adaptive Management in California’s Draft Bay Delta Conservation Plan. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2012a. Improving Water Quality in the Mississippi River Basin and the Northern Gulf of Mexico: Strategies and Priorities. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2012b. Sustainable Water and Environmental Management in the California Bay-Delta. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2014a. Mississippi River Water Quality and Interstate Collaboration: Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2014b. Progress Toward Restoring the Everglades: The Fifth Biennial Review. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

O’Connell, A.J. 2006. The architecture of smart intelligence: Structuring and overseeing agencies in the post-9/11 world. California Law Review 94:1655-1744.

Office of the Science Advisor. 2010. LCC Information Bulletin No. 1: Form and Function. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Available at http://www.fws.gov/southeast/LCC/pdf/LCCBulletin1FormandFunction01162010.pdf (accessed September 8, 2016).

Omernik, J.M. 1995. Ecoregions: A spatial framework for environmental management. In Biological Assessment and Criteria: Tools for Water Resource Planning and Decision Making, edited by W.S. Davis and T.P. Simon. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis, pp. 49-62.

Omernik, J.M. 2004. Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions. Environmental Management 34(Suppl. 1):S27-S38.

Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Patrizi, P., M. Lempa, E. Wilson, and L. Albright. 2009. Lessons Learned from the Pennsylvania Department of Conservation and Natural Resources Conservation Landscape Initiatives, OMG Center for Collaborative Learning, December 2009. Available at http://www.dcnr.state.pa.us/cs/groups/public/documents/document/d_001846.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

Pauley, T.K. 1993. Amphibians and reptiles of the upland forests. In Upland Forests of West Virginia, edited by S.L. Stephenson. Parsons, WV: McClain Printing Company, pp. 179-196.

Peterson, B., J. Montambault, and M. Koopman. 2014. The potential for double-loop learning to enable landscape conservation efforts. Environmental Management 54(4):782-794.

Pimm, S., C.N. Jenkins, R. Abell, T.M. Brooks, J. Gittleman, L.N. Joppa, P.H. Raven, C.M. Roberts, and J.O. Sexton. 2014. The biodiversity of species and their rates of extinction, distribution, and protection. Science 344 (6187):1246752.

Poiani, K.A., B.D. Richter, M.G. Anderson, and H.E. Richter. 2000. Biodiversity conservation at multiple scales: Functional sites, landscapes, and networks. Bioscience 50(2):133-146.

Powell, W.W. 1990. Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. Research in Organizational Behavior 12:295-336.

Pressey, R.L., and M.C. Bottrill. 2009. Approaches to landscape- and seascape-scale conservation planning: Convergence, contrasts and challenges. Oryx 43(4):464-475.

Pulwarty, R.S., C. Simpson, and C.R. Nierenberg. 2009. The Regional Integrated Sciences and Assessments (RISA) program: Crafting effective assessments for the long haul. In Integrated Regional Assessment: Challenges and Case Studies, edited by C.G. Knight and J. Jäger. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, pp. 367-393.

Redford, K.H., P. Coppolillo, E.W. Sanderson, G.A.B. Da Fonseca, E. Dinerstein, C. Groves, G. Mace, S. Maginnis, R.A. Mittermeier, R. Noss, D. Olson, L.G. Robinson, A. Vedder, and M. Wright. 2003. Mapping the conservation landscape. Conservation Biology 17(1):116-131.

Reyers, B., D.J. Roux, R.M. Cowling, A.E. Ginsburg, J.L. Nel, and P. O’Farrell. 2010. Conservation planning as a transdisciplinary process. Conservation Biology 24(4):957-965.

Sayre, N.F. 2005. Working Wilderness: The Malpai Borderlands Group and the Future of the Western Range. Tucson, AZ: Rio Nuevo Press.

Sayer, J., T. Sunderland, J. Ghazoul, J.-L. Pfund, D. Sheil, E. Meijgaard, M. Venter, A.K. Boedhihartono, M. Day, C. Garcia, C. van Oosten, and L.E. Buck. 2013. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110(21):8349-8356.

Scarlett, L. 2013. Collaborative adaptive management: Challenges and opportunities. Ecology and Society 18(3):26.

Scherr, S.J., and J.A. McNeely. 2008. Biodiversity conservation and agricultural sustainability: Towards a new paradigm of “ecoagriculture” landscapes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 363(1491):477-494.

Schwartz, M. 1999. Choosing the appropriate scale of reserves for conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 30:83-108.

SIAS (Science Investment and Accountability Schedule). 2013. SIAS 2.0: Background and Instructions. Available at https://my.usgs.gov/confluence/download/attachments/436174920/SIAS_2.0_background-and-instructions_v20131206_FINAL.pdf?api=v2 (accessed October 5, 2016).

Slocombe, D.S. 1993. Implementing ecosystem-based management. BioScience 43:612-622.

Soulé, M., and J. Terborgh. 1999. Conserving nature at regional and continental scales: A scientific program for North America. Bioscience 49(10):809-817.

South Atlantic LCC. 2015. Conservation Blueprint 2.0. Available at http://salcc.databasin.org/maps/a46404d870df478f871e1af23d8da539 (accessed October 5, 2016).

Terwilliger Consulting. 2013. Taking Action Together: Northeast Regional Synthesis for State Wildlife Actions Plans. Prepared for the Northeast Fish and Wildlife Diversity Committee.

Theobald, D. 2014. Development and applications of a comprehensive land use classification and map for the U.S. PLoS ONE 9(4):e94628.

Thomson, A.M. and J.L. Perry, 2010. Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. In: Public Administration: Concepts and Cases, edited by R.J. Stillman II. Boston: Wadsworth CENGAGE Learning.

Thomson, A.M., J.L. Perry, and T.K. Miller. 2007. Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration and Theory 19(1):23-56. Available at http://www.indiana.edu/~jlpweb/papers/Conceptualizing%20and%20Measuring%20Collab_Thomson_Perry_Miller_JPART_Dec%202007.pdf (accessed October 5, 2016).

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×

Turner, M. 1989. Landscape ecology: The effect of pattern on process. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20:171-197.

USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2008. The Gulf of Mexico Hypoxic Zone. Available at http://toxics.usgs.gov/hypoxia/hypoxic_zone.html (accessed October 5, 2016).

Walters, C.J., and C.S. Holling. 1990. Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71(6):2060-2068.

Wholey, J.S. 1996. Formative and summative evaluation: Related issues in performance measurement. American Journal of Evaluation 17(2):145-149.

Wood, D., and B. Gray. 1991. Towards a comprehensive theory of collaboration. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 27:139-162.

Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative. 2014. The Yellowstone to Yukon Vision Progress and Possibilities: Celebrating 20 Years of the Y2Y Vision. Yellowstone to Yukon Conservation Initiative.

Young, J.C., A. Jordan, K.R. Searle, A. Butler, D.S. Chapman, P. Simmons, and A.D. Watt. 2013. Does stakeholder involvement really benefit biodiversity conservation? Biological Conservation 158:359-370.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×
Page 73
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×
Page 74
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×
Page 75
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×
Page 76
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×
Page 77
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21829.
×
Page 78
Next: Appendix A: Greater Sage-Grouse: A Collaborative Conservation Effort »
A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $75.00 Buy Ebook | $59.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The United States' tradition of conserving fish, wildlife, habitats, and cultural resources dates to the mid-19th century. States have long sought to manage fish and wildlife species within their borders, whereas many early federal conservation efforts focused on setting aside specific places as parks, sanctuaries, or reserves. With advances in landscape ecology over the past quarter-century, conservation planners, scientists, and practitioners began to stress the importance of conservation efforts at the scale of landscapes and seascapes. These larger areas were thought to harbor relatively large numbers of species that are likely to maintain population viability and sustain ecological processes and natural disturbance regimes - often considered critical factors in conserving biodiversity.

By focusing conservation efforts at the level of whole ecosystems and landscape, practitioners can better attempt to conserve the vast majority of species in a particular ecosystem. Successfully addressing the large-scale, interlinked problems associated with landscape degradation will necessitate a planning process that bridges different scientific disciplines and across sectors, as well as an understanding of complexity, uncertainty, and the local context of conservation work. The landscape approach aims to develop shared conservation priorities across jurisdictions and across many resources to create a single, collaborative conservation effort that can meet stakeholder needs.

Conservation of habitats, species, ecosystem services, and cultural resources in the face of multiple stressors requires governance structures that can bridge the geographic and jurisdictional boundaries of the complex socio-ecological systems in which landscape-level conservation occurs. The Landscape Conservation Cooperatives (LCC) Network was established to complement and add value to the many ongoing state, tribal, federal, and nongovernmental efforts to address the challenge of conserving species, habitats, ecosystem services, and cultural resources in the face of large-scale and long-term threats, including climate change. A Review of the Landscape Conservation Cooperatives evaluates the purpose, goals, and scientific merits of the LCC program within the context of similar programs, and whether the program has resulted in measurable improvements in the health of fish, wildlife, and their habitats.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!