National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: References
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21844.
×

A

Meeting Agendas

First Meeting of the
2015 Committee to Review NASA’s Evidence Reports
on Human Health Risks

Web Conference

May 4, 2015

OPEN SESSION

12:00 – 12:05 p.m. Welcome and Opening Remarks
Carol Scott-Conner, Committee Chair
 
12:05 – 12:45 p.m. Official Committee Charge and Discussion of First and Second Letter Reports
Mark Shelhamer, Chief Scientist, Human Research Program, NASA
 
Discussion of Statement of Task and 2015 Reports with the Committee
Facilitator: Carol Scott-Conner, Committee Chair
 
12:45 p.m.
Adjourn Open Session
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21844.
×

Second Meeting of the
2015 Committee to Review NASA’s Evidence Reports
on Human Health Risks

Keck Center of the National Academies
500 Fifth Street, NW, Room 101
Washington, DC

June 22-23, 2015
Keck 101

OPEN SESSION

June 22, 2015

9:00 – 9:15 a.m. Welcome
Carol Scott-Conner, Committee Chair
 
9:15 – 10:45 a.m. Panel 1: EVA and DCS
 
  • Risk of Compromised EVA Performance and Crew Health Due to Inadequate EVA Suit Systems
  • DCS – Risk of Decompression Sickness
 
Facilitator: Jack Stuster
 
9:15 – 10:15 Presentations
  • EVA
    • Michael Lopez-Alegria, MLA Space LLC (via WebEx)
  • Decompression Sickness
    • Neal Pollock, Duke University
 
10:15 – 10:45 Discussion with the Committee
 
10:45 – 11:00 a.m.
BREAK
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21844.
×
11:00 a.m. –
12:30 p.m.
Panel 2: Orthostatic, Aerobic, and Muscle
  • Ortho – Risk of Orthostatic Intolerance During Re-exposure to Gravity
  • Aerobic – Risk of Reduced Physical Performance Capabilities Due to Reduced Aerobic Capacity
  • Muscle – Risk of Impaired Performance Due to Reduced Muscle Mass, Strength, and Endurance
 
Facilitator: Jim Pawelczyk
 
11:00 – 12:00 Presentations
  • Aerobic
    • Ben Levine, University of Texas Southwestern (Attending via WebEx)
  • Muscle
    • Bob Fitts, Marquette University (Attending)
  • Orthostatic Intolerance
    • Victor Convertino, U.S. Army Institute of Surgical Research (Attending via WebEx)
12:00 – 12:30 Discussion with the Committee
 
12:30 – 1:15 p.m. Lunch - Keck Atrium
(Committee members and speakers have blue lunch tickets – please sign the ticket and turn it in to the cashier)
 
1:15 – 2:30 p.m. Panel 3: Food and Nutrition
  • Risk of Performance Decrement and Crew Illness Due to an Inadequate Food System
  • Nutrition – Risk Factor of Inadequate Nutrition
 
Facilitator: Dan Masys
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21844.
×
1:15 – 2:15 Presentations
  • Scott Montain and Betty Davis, U.S. Army (Attending via WebEx)
  • Alice Lichtenstein, Tufts University
  • Nancy Turner, Texas A&M University (Attending via WebEx)
 
2:15 – 2:30 Discussion with the Committee
 
2:30 – 2:45 p.m. BREAK
 
2:45 – 4:00 p.m. Discussion–Interactions of Risks
 
4:00 – 4:20 p.m. Public Comment
 
4:20 – 4:30 p.m. Closing Remarks
Dan Masys, Committee Vice Chair
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21844.
×
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21844.
×
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21844.
×
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A: Meeting Agendas." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21844.
×
Page 64
Next: Appendix B: Committee Biographical Sketches »
Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report Get This Book
×
 Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks: 2015 Letter Report
Buy Paperback | $62.00 Buy Ebook | $49.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Review of NASA's Evidence Reports on Human Health Risks 2015 Letter Report is the third in a series of five reports from the Institute of Medicine that will independently review more than 30 evidence reports that the National Aeronautics and Space Administration has compiled on human health risks for long-duration and exploration space flights. This report builds on the 2008 IOM report Review of NASA's Human Research Program Evidence Books: A Letter Report, which provided an initial and brief review of the evidence reports.

This letter report reviews seven evidence reports and examines the quality of the evidence, analysis, and overall construction of each report; identifies existing gaps in report content; and provides suggestions for additional sources of expert input. The report analyzes each evidence report's overall quality, which included readability; internal consistency; the source and breadth of cited evidence; identification of existing knowledge and research gaps; authorship expertise; and, if applicable, response to recommendations from the 2008 IOM letter report.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!