Appendix B
Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions1
First Meeting: March 18–20, 2012
Washington, DC 20001
AGENDA
Monday, March 19, 2012 | |
1:00 PM | Discussion of Study Goals with Sponsors |
Joel Kupersmith, Chief Research and Development Officer, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs Patrick Glynn, Senior Technical Policy Advisor, Office of the Deputy Director for Science Programs, Office of Science, Department of Energy Linda Gundersen, Director, Office of Science Quality and Integrity, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior |
___________________
1 In addition to the open sessions in which the committee heard from outside experts, the study process also included closed sessions during the meetings listed here, plus several meetings and numerous conference calls toward the latter part of the process that only involved committee members and staff.
James Kroll, Head of Administrative Investigations, Office of the Inspector General, National Science Foundation John Galland, Director, Division of Education and Integrity, Office of Research Integrity, Department of Health and Human Services |
|
3:15 PM | Discussion with Invited Experts |
Carrie Wolinetz, Associate Vice President for Federal Relations, Association of American Universities Heather Pierce, Senior Director, Science Policy and Regulatory Counsel, Association of American Medical Colleges Francesca Grifo, Senior Scientist and Director, Scientific Integrity Program, Union of Concerned Scientists Ivan Oransky, Executive Editor, Reuters Health, and Co-Founder, Retraction Watch |
|
5:00 PM | Comments from Other Experts and the Public (if needed) |
Second Meeting: July 8–10, 2012
Palo Alto, California
AGENDA
Monday, July 9, 2012 | |
8:45 AM | Challenges and Tasks for Scientific Journals in Ensuring Research Integrity |
Drummond Rennie, UCSF (deputy editor, JAMA) Donald Kennedy, Stanford University (former editor, Science) Philip Campbell, Nature (by videoconference) |
|
10:45 AM | Learning from the Duke Case and the IOM Translational Omics Report |
Keith Baggerly, MD, Anderson Cancer Center Gilbert Omenn, University of Michigan Robert Califf, Duke University Medical Center (by videoconference) |
|
12:30 PM | Working Lunch: IOM Conflict of Interest Study |
Bernard Lo, Greenwall Foundation |
|
2:00 PM | Digitization and New Scientific Methods: Implications for Research Integrity |
Mark Liberman, Penn David Donoho, Stanford University Sergey Fomel, University of Texas at Austin |
|
4:00 PM | Lessons and Experiences from the Project A Collegial Defense Against Irresponsible Science |
Joan Sieber, California State University–East Bay |
|
5:00 PM | The Federal Research Misconduct Definition |
Arthur Bienenstock, Stanford University |
|
6:30 PM | Dinner: Perspectives on Research Integrity |
Keith Yamamoto, UCSF |
Third Meeting: August 14–15, 2012
Washington, DC
AGENDA
Tuesday, August 14, 2012 | |
8:40 AM | Industry Perspectives on Research Integrity—Part One |
Ellen Williams, BP (by videoconference) Gillian Woollett, Avalere Health LLC |
|
9:45 AM | Research Misconduct: Discovery, Reporting, and Assessing Impacts |
Carolyn Phinney, Consultant, Counselor of Whistle-Blowers Thomas Evans, Montana State University Mary Allen, University of Colorado |
|
11:25 AM | Institutional Perspective |
Claude Canizares, MIT (by videoconference) |
|
12:15 PM | Working Lunch: Funder Perspectives |
Rod Ulane, NIH James Kroll, NSF-IG (invited) Susan Garfinkel, ORI Brendan Godfrey, DOD |
|
2:30 PM | Industry Perspectives on Research Integrity—Part Two |
Richard Kuntz, Medtronic Mark Wegman, IBM |
|
3:35 PM | Society and Association Effort to Foster Research Integrity |
Mark Frankel, AAAS Daniel Denecke, CGS Cathee Johnson Phillips, NPA |
Fostering Responsible Research: A Roundtable Discussion with Societies
December 13, 2012 (Thursday)
Washington, DC
AGENDA
9:00 AM | Welcome, Introductions, and Update on the Responsible Science Study |
9:20 AM | General Perspectives on Responsible Science |
10:00 AM | Societies and Standards |
11:00 AM | Society Participation in National Academies Studies |
11:30 AM | Societies and Scholarly Communication |
12:30 PM | Lunch |
1:00 PM | Societies and Education, Training, and Mentorship |
1:40 PM | Concluding Discussion and Possible Next Steps |
2:30 PM | Adjourn |
This page intentionally left blank.