National Academies Press: OpenBook

Fostering Integrity in Research (2017)

Chapter: Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions

« Previous: Appendix A: Biographical Information on the Committee and Staff
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Appendix B

Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions
1

First Meeting: March 18–20, 2012
Washington, DC 20001

AGENDA

Monday, March 19, 2012
1:00 PM Discussion of Study Goals with Sponsors

Joel Kupersmith, Chief Research and Development Officer, Office of Research and Development, Department of Veterans Affairs

Patrick Glynn, Senior Technical Policy Advisor, Office of the Deputy Director for Science Programs, Office of Science, Department of Energy

Linda Gundersen, Director, Office of Science Quality and Integrity, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior

___________________

1 In addition to the open sessions in which the committee heard from outside experts, the study process also included closed sessions during the meetings listed here, plus several meetings and numerous conference calls toward the latter part of the process that only involved committee members and staff.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

James Kroll, Head of Administrative Investigations, Office of the Inspector General, National Science Foundation

John Galland, Director, Division of Education and Integrity, Office of Research Integrity, Department of Health and Human Services

3:15 PM Discussion with Invited Experts

Carrie Wolinetz, Associate Vice President for Federal Relations, Association of American Universities

Heather Pierce, Senior Director, Science Policy and Regulatory Counsel, Association of American Medical Colleges

Francesca Grifo, Senior Scientist and Director, Scientific Integrity Program, Union of Concerned Scientists

Ivan Oransky, Executive Editor, Reuters Health, and Co-Founder, Retraction Watch

5:00 PM Comments from Other Experts and the Public (if needed)

Second Meeting: July 8–10, 2012
Palo Alto, California

AGENDA

Monday, July 9, 2012
8:45 AM Challenges and Tasks for Scientific Journals in Ensuring Research Integrity

Drummond Rennie, UCSF (deputy editor, JAMA)

Donald Kennedy, Stanford University (former editor, Science)

Philip Campbell, Nature (by videoconference)

10:45 AM Learning from the Duke Case and the IOM Translational Omics Report

Keith Baggerly, MD, Anderson Cancer Center

Gilbert Omenn, University of Michigan

Robert Califf, Duke University Medical Center (by videoconference)

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
12:30 PM Working Lunch: IOM Conflict of Interest Study

Bernard Lo, Greenwall Foundation

2:00 PM Digitization and New Scientific Methods: Implications for Research Integrity

Mark Liberman, Penn

David Donoho, Stanford University

Sergey Fomel, University of Texas at Austin

4:00 PM Lessons and Experiences from the Project A Collegial Defense Against Irresponsible Science

Joan Sieber, California State University–East Bay

5:00 PM The Federal Research Misconduct Definition

Arthur Bienenstock, Stanford University

6:30 PM Dinner: Perspectives on Research Integrity

Keith Yamamoto, UCSF

Third Meeting: August 14–15, 2012
Washington, DC

AGENDA

Tuesday, August 14, 2012
8:40 AM Industry Perspectives on Research Integrity—Part One

Ellen Williams, BP (by videoconference)

Gillian Woollett, Avalere Health LLC

9:45 AM Research Misconduct: Discovery, Reporting, and Assessing Impacts

Carolyn Phinney, Consultant, Counselor of Whistle-Blowers

Thomas Evans, Montana State University

Mary Allen, University of Colorado

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
11:25 AM Institutional Perspective

Claude Canizares, MIT (by videoconference)

12:15 PM Working Lunch: Funder Perspectives

Rod Ulane, NIH

James Kroll, NSF-IG (invited)

Susan Garfinkel, ORI

Brendan Godfrey, DOD

2:30 PM Industry Perspectives on Research Integrity—Part Two

Richard Kuntz, Medtronic

Mark Wegman, IBM

3:35 PM Society and Association Effort to Foster Research Integrity

Mark Frankel, AAAS

Daniel Denecke, CGS

Cathee Johnson Phillips, NPA

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Fostering Responsible Research: A Roundtable Discussion with Societies

December 13, 2012 (Thursday)
Washington, DC

AGENDA

9:00 AM Welcome, Introductions, and Update on the Responsible Science Study
9:20 AM General Perspectives on Responsible Science
10:00 AM Societies and Standards
11:00 AM Society Participation in National Academies Studies
11:30 AM Societies and Scholarly Communication
12:30 PM Lunch
1:00 PM Societies and Education, Training, and Mentorship
1:40 PM Concluding Discussion and Possible Next Steps
2:30 PM Adjourn
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 239
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 240
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 241
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 242
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 243
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Agendas of Committee Meeting Public Sessions." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 244
Next: Appendix C: Assessing the Effectiveness of Responsible Conduct of Research Training: Key Findings and Viable Procedures »
Fostering Integrity in Research Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $54.00 Buy Ebook | $43.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support – or distort – practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge.

The 1992 report Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated.

Responsible Science served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee’s thought process. Fostering Integrity in Research identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!