National Academies Press: OpenBook

Fostering Integrity in Research (2017)

Chapter: Appendix E: Bibliography

« Previous: Appendix D: Detailed Case Histories
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Appendix E

Bibliography

AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science). 2012. Connecting Science, Engineering, Ethics and Human Rights: Beyond Human Subjects Research. Workshop report. Washington, DC: AAAS. Available at: https://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/migrate/uploads/Workshop-Intersection-Science-Ethics-Human-Rights.pdf.

AAMC (Association of American Medical Colleges). 2006. Compact Between Postdoctoral Appointees and Their Mentors. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/49852/data/postdoccompact.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2013.

AAMC. 2008. Compact Between Biomedical Graduate Students and Their Research Advisors. Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/49868/data/gradcompact.pdf. Accessed July 15, 2013.

Aarts, A. A. C. J. Anderson, J. Anderson, M. A. L. M. van Assen, P. R. Attridge, A. S. Attwood, J. Axt, et al. 2015. Reproducibility Project: Psychology. Open Science Framework. December 8. Retrieved from osf.io/ezcuj.

Abbott, B. P., et al. 2016. Observation of gravitational waves from a binary black hole merger. Physical Review Letters 116; doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.061102.

Academy of Medical Sciences, Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council, Medical Research Council, and Wellcome Trust. 2015. Reproducibility and Reliability of Biomedical Research: Improving Research Practice. London: Academy of Medical Sciences. Available at: https://acmedsci.ac.uk/viewFile/56314e40aac61.pdf.

Adams, D., and K. D. Pimple. 2005. Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity. Accountability in Research 12(3): 225-240.

Agnew, R. 1992. Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology 30: 47-87.

Agnew, R. 2006. General strain theory: Current status and directions for further research. Pp. 101-123 in Taking Stock: The Status of Criminological Theory. Edison, NJ: Transaction.

Akers, R. L. 1985. Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Akers, R. L., and J. K. Cochran. 1985. Adolescent marijuana use: A test of three theories of deviant behavior. Deviant Behavior 6: 323-346.

Alberts, B., J. Halpern, P.H. Raven, D.D. Brown, J.E. Dowling, I.M. Singer, and M.F. Dresselhaus for the Council of the National Academy of Sciences. 1996. Letter to William Raub (March 15). Released by the National Academy of Sciences.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Alberts, B. 2012. The end of “small science”? Science 337(6102): 1583.

Alberts, B. 2013. Impact factor distortions. Science 340(6134): 787.

Alberts, B. M., M. W. Kirschner, S. Tilghman, and H. Varmus. 2014. Rescuing US biomedical research from its systemic flaws. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111(16): 5773-5777.

Alberts, B., R. J. Cicerone, S. E. Fienberg, A. Kamb, M. McNutt, R. M. Nerem, R. Schekman, R. Shiffrin, V. Stodden, S. Suresh, M. T. Zuber, B. K. Pope, and K. H. Jamieson. 2015. Self-correction in science at work. Science 348(6242): 1420-1422.

Allen, J. 2008. Can of worms. On Wisconsin 109(1): 28-33, 63.

Altman, E., and P. Hernon (eds). 1997. Research Misconduct: Issues, Implications, and Strategies. Greenwich, CT: Ablex.

Altman, L., and W. J. Broad. 2005. Global trend: More science, more fraud. New York Times, December 20, pp. F1, F6.

America COMPETES Reauthorization Act of 2015, H.R. 1806, 114th Congress, 1st Session. Available at: www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/1806/text. Accessed December 17, 2015.

American Innovation and Competitiveness Act of 2016, H.R. 3084, 114th Congress. Available at: https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/3084.

American Law Institute. 1985. Model Penal Code: Official Draft and Explanatory Notes. Philadelphia, PA: American Law Institute.

Anderson, G., H. Sprott, and B. R. Olsen. 2013. Opinion: Publish negative results. The Scientist. January 15. Available at: http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/33968/title/Opinion--Publish-Negative-Results/.

Anderson, M. S. 2007. Collective openness and other recommendations for the promotion of research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(4): 387-394.

Anderson, M. S., A. S. Horn, K. R. Risbey, E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B. C. Martinson. 2007a. What do mentoring and training in the responsible conduct of research have to do with scientists’ misbehavior? Findings from a National Survey of NIH-funded scientists. Academic Medicine 82(9): 853-860.

Anderson, M., E. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B. Martinson. 2007b. The perverse effects of competition on scientists’ work and relationships. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(4): 437-461.

Anderson, M. S., E. A. Ronning, R. De Vries, and B. C. Martinson. 2010. Extending the Mertonian norms: Scientists’ subscription to norms of research. Journal of Higher Education 81: 366-393.

Antes, A. L., R. P. Brown, S. T. Murphy, E. P. Waples, M. D. Mumford, S. Connelly, and L. D. Davenport. 2007. Personality and ethical decision-making in research: The role of perceptions of self and others. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 2(4): 15-34.

Antes, A., S. T. Murphy, E. P. Waples, M. D. Mumford, R. P. Brown, S. Connelly, and L. D. Devenport. 2009. A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics & Behavior 19(5): 379-402.

Antes, A. L., X. Wang, M. D. Mumford, R. P. Brown, S. Connelly, and L. D. Devenport. 2010. Evaluating the effects that existing instruction on responsible conduct of research has on ethical decision making. Academic Medicine 85(3): 19-26.

APS (American Physical Society). 2004. Ethics Case Studies: A Set of Ethics Case Studies from Physics Research, with an Activity and Discussion Guide for Courses and Seminars in Science Ethics. Available at: http://www.aps.org/programs/education/ethics/upload/Ethics-Case-Studies-Student-Edition.pdf.

Ariely, D. 2012. The (Honest) Truth About Dishonesty: How We Lie to Everyone—Especially Ourselves. New York: Harper.

ASCB (American Society for Cell Biology). 2012. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment (DORA). Available at: http://am.ascb.org/dora/. Accessed December 15, 2014.

AUTM (Association of University Technology Managers). 2013. AUTM U.S. Licensing Activity Survey Highlights. Washington, DC: AUTM.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

AUTM. 2014. AUTM Annual Report. Washington, DC: AUTM.

Azoulay, P., J. S. Graff Zivin, and G. Manso. 2011. Incentives and creativity: Evidence from the academic life source. RAND Journal of Economics 42(3): 527-554.

Bandura, A. 1979. The social learning perspective: Mechanisms of aggression. In The Psychology of Crime and Criminal Justice. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Bannerman, D. 2014. VHA Handbook 1058.02 Research Misconduct [PowerPoint slides]. Available at: http://www.va.gov/ORO/Docs/Presentations/vhahb1058_02_pres.pdf.

Baumeister, R. F., M. Muraven, and D. M. Tice. 2000. Ego depletion: A resource model of volition, self-regulation, and controlled response. Social Cognition 18: 130-150.

Baumeister, J., and R. Tierney, 2011. Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength. New York: Penguin Books.

Beall, J. 2016. Scholarly Open Access: Critical analysis of scholarly open-access publishing. Blog. Available at: https://scholarlyoa.com/.

Beasley, M. R., S. Datta, H. Kogelnik, H. Kroemer, and D. Monroe. 2002. Report of the Investigation Committee on the Possibility of Scientific Misconduct in the Work of Hendrik Schön and Coauthors. Lucent Technologies. Available at: http://doc.sciencenet.cn/upload/file/2011922112725742.pdf.

Bebeau, M. J. 2002. The defining issues test and the four component model: Contributions to professional education. Journal of Moral Education 31(3): 271-295.

Bebeau, M. .J., K. D. Pimple, and K. M. T. Muskavitch. 1995. Moral Reasoning in Scientific Research: Cases for Teaching and Assessment. I. University, Editor. Bloomington: University of Indiana. https://eric.edu.gov/?id=ED39483.

Begley, C. G., and L. M. Ellis. 2012. Raise standards for preclinical cancer research. Nature 483: 531-533.

Begley, C. G., and J. P. Ioannidis. 2015. Reproducibility in science: Improving the standard for basic and preclinical research. Circulation Research 116(1):116-126.

Benjamini, Y., and Y. Hochberg. 1995. Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 57(1): 289-300.

Ben-Yehuda, N. 1986. Deviance in science: Towards the criminology of science. British Journal of Criminology 26(1), 1-27.

Benos, D. J., E. Bashari, J. M. Chaves, A. Gaggar, N. Kapoor, M. LaFrance, R. Mans, D. Mayhew, S. McGowan, A. Polter, Y. Qadri, S. Sarfare, K. Schultz, R. Splittgerber, J. Stephenson, C. Tower, R. G. Walton, and A. Zotov. 2007. The ups and downs of peer review. Advances in Physiology Education 31: 145-152.

Berger, E., and T. Ackerman. 2012. Cancer agency agrees to freeze new grants. Houston Chronicle. December 19.

Bienenstock, A. 2012. The Federal Research Misconduct Definition. Presentation to the Committee, Palo Alto, CA, July 9.

Bierer, B., M. Barnes, IRB/RIO/IO Working Group. 2014. Research misconduct involving noncompliance in human subjects research supported by the Public Health Service: Reconciling separate regulatory systems. Hastings Center Report 44(4): S2-S26.

BioMed Central. 2017. Publication Ethics. Available at: https://www.biomedcentral.com/getpublished/writing-resources/publication-ethics.

Bonito, A. J., C. Eicheldinger, N. Lenfestey, B. Munoz, D. Plotner, and F. Yu. 2009. The Research Integrity Officer (RIO) Study. Report submitted to ORI. Available at ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/RIOstudy.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2015.

Bonito, A. J., C. Eicheldinger, A. M. Greene, N. Lenfestey, J. Li, B. Munoz, D. Plotner, and F. Yu. 2010. Evaluating the Effectiveness of Institutional Efforts to Educate Staff on Their Policies for Dealing with Research Misconduct and Research Integrity. Report to ORI. Available at: ori. hhs.gov/images/ddblock/EvaluatingEffectivenessInstituions.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2015.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Bornemann-Cimenti, H., I. S. Szilagyi, and A. Sandner-Kiesling. 2015. Perpetuation of retracted publications using the example of the Scott S. Reuben case: Incidences, reasons and possible improvements. Science and Engineering Ethics 22(4): 1063-1072.

Bosch, X., and J. Ross. 2012. Ghostwriting: Research misconduct, plagiarism, or fool’s gold? American Journal of Medicine 125(4): 324-326.

Bouri, S., M. J. Shun-Shin, G. D. Cole, J. Mayet, and D. P. Francis. 2013. Meta-analysis of secure randomised controlled trials of β-blockade to prevent perioperative death in non-cardiac surgery. Heart 100: 456-464.

BPC (Bipartisan Policy Center). 2009. Improving the Use of Science in Regulatory Policy: Final Report. Available at: http://bipartisanpolicy.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/default/files/BPC%20Science%20Report%20fnl.pdf.

Brand, A., L. Allen, M. Altman, M. Hlava, and J. Scott. 2015. Beyond authorship: attribution, contribution, collaboration, and credit. Learned Publishing 28: 151-155.

Braunschweiger, P., and K. W. Goodman. 2007. The CITI program: An international online resource for education in human subjects protection and the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine 82(9): 861-864.

Brent, E., and C. Atkisson. 2011. Accounting for cheating: An evolving theory and emergent themes. Research in Higher Education 52: 640-658.

Broad, W., and N. Wade. 1983. Betrayers of the Truth. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Brummel, B. J., C. K. Gunsalus, K. L. Anderson, and M. C. Loui. 2010. Development of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics 16: 573-589.

Buchkowsky, S. S., and P. J. Jewesson. 2004. Industry sponsorship and authorship of clinical trends over 20 years. Annals of Pharmacotherapy 38(4): 579-585.

Buckheit, J. B., and D. L. Donoho. 1995. WaveLab and reproducible research. Pp. 55-81 in Wavelets and Statistics, A. Antoniadis and G. Oppenheim, eds. New York: Springer.

Bunton, S. A., and W. T. Mallon. 2007. The continued evolution of faculty appointment and tenure policies at U.S. medical schools. Academic Medicine 82: 281-289.

Butler, D. 2010. Journals step up plagiarism policing. Nature 466(7303): 167.

Butler, D. 2012. Hyped GM maize study faces growing scrutiny. Nature 490: 158.

Buyse, M., S. L. George, S. Evans, N. L. Geller, J. Ranstam, B. Scherrer E. Lesaffre, G. Murray, L. Edler, J. Hutton, T. Colton, P. Lachenbruch, and B. L. Verma. 1999. The role of biostatistics in the prevention, detection and treatment of fraud in clinical trials. Statistics in Medicine 18(24): 3435-3451.

Buzzelli, D. E. 1993. The definition of misconduct in science: A view from NSF. Science 259(5095): 584-585.

Cain, D. M., G. Loewenstein, and D. A. Moore. 2005. The dirt on coming clean: Perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Legal Studies 34(1): 1-25.

Cain, D. M., G. Loewenstein, and D. A. Moore. 2011. When sunlight fails to disinfect: Understanding the perverse effects of disclosing conflicts of interest. Journal of Consumer Research 37(5): 836-857.

Canary, H. E., and J. R. Herkert. 2012. Assessing ethics education in programs and centers: Challenges and strategies. Pp 38-43 in Practical Guidance on Science and Engineering Ethics Education for Instructors and Administrators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Carey, B. 2015. Science, now under scrutiny itself. New York Times. June 15. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/16/science/retractions-coming-out-from-under-science-rug.html.

Carpenter, S. 2012. Government sanctions Harvard psychologist. Science 337(610): 1283.

Cartlidge, E. 2012. Prison terms for L’Aquila experts shock scientists. Science 338(6106): 451-452.

Cartlidge, E. 2014. Updated: Appeals court overturns manslaughter convictions of six earthquake scientists. Science Insider. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2014/11/updated-appeals-court-overturns-manslaughter-convictions-six-earthquake-scientists.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Casadevall, A., and F. C. Fang. 2012. Reforming science: Methodological and cultural reforms. Infection and Immunity 80(3): 891-896.

CASRAI. 2016. Project CRediT. Available at: http://docs.casrai.org/CRediT.

Castelvecchi, D. 2015. Physics paper sets record with more than 5,000 authors. Nature. May 15.Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/physics-paper-sets-record-with-more-than-5-000-authors-1.17567.

CCA (Council of Canadian Academies). 2010. Honesty, Accountability and Trust: Fostering Research Integrity in Canada. Ottawa. Available at: http://www.scienceadvice.ca/en/assessments/completed/research-integrity.aspx.

CGS (Council of Graduate Schools). 2012. Research and Scholarly Education in Graduate Education. Washington, DC: CGS.

Chalmers, M. 2015. Forsaken pentaquark particle spotted at CERN. Nature 523(7560): 267-268.

Chen, R., N. R. Desai, J. S. Ross, W. Zhang, K. H. Chau, and B. Wayda. 2016. Publication and reporting of clinical trial results: Cross sectional analysis across academic medical centers. BMJ 352: i637.

Chopra, V., and K. A. Eagle. 2012. Perioperative mischief: The price of academic misconduct. American Journal of Medicine 125(10): 953-955.

CHPS Consulting. 2000. Analysis of Institutional Policies for Responding to Allegations of Scientific Misconduct. Report submitted to Office of Research Integrity. Available at: ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/institutional_policies.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2015.

Clarke, R. V. 1995. Situational crime prevention. Crime and Justice 19: 91-150.

Clarkeburn, H., J. R. Downie, and B. Matthew. 2002. Impact of an ethics programme in a life sciences curriculum. Teaching in Higher Education 7: 65-79.

Clayton, S., and S. Opotow (eds.). 2003. Identity and the Natural Environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Cloward, R. A., and L. E. Ohlin. 1960. Delinquency and Opportunity. New York: Free Press.

Cohen, A. K. 1965. The sociology of the deviant act: Anomie theory and beyond. American Sociological Review 30: 5-14.

Collins, F. 2010. Opportunities for research and NIH. Science 327(5961): 36.

Colquitt, J. A., D. E. Conlon, M. J. Wesson, C. O. L. H. Porter, and K. Y. Ng. 2001. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology 86(3): 425-445.

Commission on Research Integrity. 1995. Integrity and Misconduct in Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service.

COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics). 2011. Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/files/Code_of_conduct_for_journal_editors_Mar11.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2013.

COPE. 2017. eLearning course on Publication Ethics. Available at: https://publicationethics.org/resources/e-learning.

Cope, M. B., and D. B. Allison. 2010. White hat bias: A threat to the integrity of scientific reporting. Acta Paediatrica 99: 1615-1617.

COS (Center for Open Science). 2015. Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines. Available at: https://cos.io/top/#signatories.

Cossins, D. 2013. Settlement reached in misconduct case. The Scientist. April 19. Available at: http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/35216/title/Settlement-Reached-in-Misconduct-Case/.

Couzin, J., and K. Unger. 2006. Cleaning up the paper trail. Science 312: 38-43.

Couzin-Frankel, J. 2013. Fraudster blog author outed and comes clean. Science. Available at: http://news.sciencemag.org/2013/01/fraudster-blog-author-outed-and-comes-clean.

Crain, A. L., B. C. Martinson, and C. R. Thrush. 2013. Relationships between the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC) and self-reported research practices. Science and Engineering Ethics 19(3): 835-850.

Cressey, D. 2013. “Rehab” helps errant researchers return to the lab. Nature 493(7431): 147.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

CSE (Council of Science Editors). 2012a. CSE Publication Certificate Program. Available at https://www.councilscienceeditors.org/resource-library/cse-publication-certificate-program/.

CSE. 2012b. CSE’s White Paper on Promoting Integrity in Scientific Journal Publications. Available at: http://www.councilscienceeditors.org/i4a/pages/index.cfm?pageid=3331. Accessed August 6, 2013.

Cyranoski, D. 2005. Stem-cell pioneer accused of faking data. Nature. December 15. doi:10.1038/news051212-14.

Cyranoski, D. 2014a. Stem-cell pioneer blamed media ‘bashing’ in suicide note. Nature. August 13. Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/stem-cell-pioneer-blamed-media-bashing-in-suicide-note-1.15715.

Cyranoski, D. 2014b. Stem-cell method faces fresh questions. Nature 507(7492): 283.

Cyranoski, D. 2014c. Stem-cell scientist found guilty of misconduct. Nature News. April 1. Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/stem-cell-scientist-found-guilty-of-misconduct-1.14974.

Davis, G. 2005. Doctors without orders. American Scientist 93(3, Suppl.). Available at: http://postdoc.sigmaxi.org/results/.

Davis, M., and A. Feinerman. 2010. Assessing graduate student progress in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 18: 351-367.

Davis, M., and K. Riley. 2008. Ethics across the graduate engineering curriculum: An experiment in teaching and assessment. Teaching Ethics 9(1): 25-42.

Davis, M. S., M. Riske-Morris, and S. R. Diaz. 2007. Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics 13: 395-414.

DCSD (Danish Committees on Scientific Dishonesty). 2002. Annual Report 2001. Available at: ufm. dk/en/publications/2002/files-2002/annual-report-2001-the-danish-committees-on-scientific-d. pdf. Accessed April 19, 2015.

DCSD. 2009. Guidelines for Good Scientific Practice. Copenhagen.

DCSD. 2014. The Danish Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Copenhagen.

DCSD. 2015. DCSD Website. Available at: ufm.dk/en/research-and-innovation/councils-and-commissions/the-danish-committees-on-scientific-dishonesty. Accessed April 19, 2015.

Derrick, E. G., H. J. Falk-Krzesinski, and M. R. Roberts (eds.). 2012. Facilitating Interdisciplinary Research and Education: A Practical Guide. Washington, DC: AAAS. Available at http://www.aaas.org/cspsp/interdisciplinary/guide.

Devereaux, M. L. 2014. Rethinking the meaning of ethics in RCR education. Journal of Microbiology Education 15(2): 165-168.

Ding, W. W., S. G. Levin, P. E. Stephan, and A. E. Winkler. 2010. The impact of information technology on academic scientists’ productivity and collaboration patterns. Management Science 56(9): 1439-1461.

DOD (Department of Defense). 2004. Research integrity and Misconduct. Instruction No. 3210.7. Available at: http://www.dtic.mil/whs/directives/corres/pdf/321007p.pdf.

DOE-OIG (Department of Energy Office of Inspector General). 2014. Audit Report: Office of Science’s Management of Research Misconduct Allegations. Available at: https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/08/f18/OAS-M-14-09_0.pdf.

DOI (Department of the Interior). 2010. Evaluation Report: Interior Lacks a Scientific Integrity Policy. Report No. WR-EV-MOA-0014-2009. Available at: https://www.doioig.gov/sites/doioig.gov/files/ScientificIntegrityPolicy.pdf.

DOI. 2014. Integrity of scientific and scholarly activities. Chapter 3 in Department of the Interior Departmental Manual: Departmental Science Efforts. Available at: http://elips.doi.gov/ELIPS/DocView.aspx?id=4056.

DOI. 2015. Integrity of Scientific and Scholarly Activities: Closed Cases. Available at: https://www.doi.gov/scientificintegrity/closed-cases.

DOI-OIG (Department of the Interior, Office of Inspector General). 2016. Inspection of Scientific Integrity Incident at USGS Energy Geochemistry Laboratory. Available at: https://www.doioig.gov/sites/doioig.gov/files/2016EAU010Public.pdf. Accessed March 16, 2016.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Donoho, D. 2012. Digitization and New Scientific Methods: Implications for Research Integrity. Presentation to the committee, Palo Alto, CA, July 9.

Donoho, D., A. Maleki, I. Rahman, M. Shahram, and V. Stodden. 2008. 15 Years of Reproducible Research in Computational Harmonic Analysis. Available at: https://statweb.stanford.edu/~donoho/Reports/2008/15YrsReproResch-20080426.pdf.

Dörner, D. 1996. The Logic of Failure: Recognizing and Avoiding Error in Complex Situations. New York: Basic Books.

Dresser, R. 1993. Sanctions for research misconduct: A legal perspective. Academic Medicine 68: S39-S43.

DuBois, J. M., J. M. Dueker, E. E. Anderson, and J. Campbell. 2008. The development and assessment of an NIH-funded research ethics training program. Academic Medicine 83(6): 596-603.

DuBois, J. M., E. E. Anderson, and J. Chibnall. 2013a. Assessing the need for a research ethics remediation program. Clinical Translational Science 6(3): 209-213.

DuBois, J. M., E. E. Anderson, J. Chibnall, K. Carroll, T. Gibb, C. Ogbuka, and T. Rubbelke. 2013b. Understanding research misconduct: A comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 20(5-6): 320-338.

DuBois, J. M., J. T. Chibnall, R. Tait, and J. Vander Wal. 2016. Misconduct: Lessons from researcher rehab. Nature 534:175.

DUO (Education Executive Agency, Ministry of Education of The Netherlands). 2013. Code of Conduct with Respect To International Student in Dutch Higher Education. Available at: https://www.nuffic.nl/en/study-and-work-in-holland/code-of-conduct.

DVA (Department of Veterans Affairs). 2014. VHA Handbook 1058.02: Research Misconduct.. Available at: http://www.va.gov/vhapublications/ViewPublication.asp?pub_ID=2982.

DVA. 2015. Congressional Submission FY 2016 Funding and FY 2017 Advance Appropriations. Available at: http://www.va.gov/budget/docs/summary/Fy2016-VolumeII-MedicalProgramsAndInformationTechnology.pdf.

Dyer, C. 2011. The fraud squad. BMJ 342(June); doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4017.

Economist, The. 2011. An array of errors. September 10. Available at: http://www.economist.com/node/21528593.

Edsall, J. 1975. Scientific freedom and responsibility. Science 188(4189): 687-693.

Elliott, D., and J. Stern. 1996. Evaluating teaching and students’ learning of academic research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 2(3): 345-366.

Elsevier. 2017. Publishing Ethics Resource Kit (PERK) for Editors. Available at: https://www.elsevier.com/editors/perk.

Enserink, M. 2012. Final report on Stapel also blames field as a whole. Science 338: 1270-1271.

Enserink, M. 2014. Sabotaged scientist sues Yale and her lab chief. Science 343: 1065-1066.

EPA (Environmental Protection Agency). 2006. Policy and Procedures for Addressing Research Misconduct. EPA Order 3120.5. Available at: http://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/epapolicy.pdf.

EPA. 2012. Scientific Integrity Policy. Available at: http://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-02/documents/scientific_integrity_policy_2012.pdf.

Epskamp, S., and M. B. Nuijten. 2016. Statcheck: Extract statistics from articles and recompute p values. Available at: http://CRAN.Rproject.org/package=statcheck (R package version 1.2.2).

EQUATOR (Enhancing the QUAlity and Transparency of health Research) http://www.equator-network.org/.

ESF-ALLEA (European Science Foundation and All European Academies). 2011. The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Available at: www.esf.org/fileadmin/Public_documents/Publications/Code_Conduct_ResearchIntegrity.pdf. Accessed April 18, 2015.

Evetts, J. 2013. Professionalism: Value and ideology. Current Sociology 61(5-6): 778-796.

Fanelli, D. 2009. How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLOS ONE 4(5): e5738.

Fanelli, D. 2010. Do pressures to publish increase scientists’ bias? An empirical support from US states data. PLOS ONE 5(4): e10271; doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010271.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Fanelli, D. 2012. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries. Scientometrics 90: 891-904.

Fang, F. C., R. G. Steen, and A. Casadevall. 2012. Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109(42): 17028-17033.

Feeley, J. 2012. Pfizer paid $896 million in Prempro settlements. Bloomberg Business Week. June 19.

Ferrer-Negron, J., W. Frey, E. O’Neill-Carrillo, D. Valdes, and C. Rios-Valazquez. 2009. Graduate Education in Research Ethics for Scientists and Engineers: Final Report. Available at: http://scholarworks.umass.edu/esence/376.

Fienberg, S., M. E. Martin, and M. L. Straff (eds.). 1985. Sharing Research Data. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Fischer, B. A., and M. J. Zigmond. 2001. Promoting responsible conduct in research through “survival skills” workshops: Some mentoring is best done in a crowd. Science and Engineering Ethics 7(4): 563-587.

Fischman, J. 2012. Fake peer reviews, the latest form of scientific fraud, fool journals. Chronicle of Higher Education. September 30.

Fitch, A. 2004. Public and private ethics in service learning for chemistry. Abstracts of Papers of the American Chemical Society 227: U667-U667.

Folger, R. G., and R. Cropanzano. 1998. Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.

Frankel, M. S., and S. J. Bird. 2003. The role of scientific societies in promoting research integrity. Science and Engineering Ethics 9(2): 139-140.

Freeman, R. B., and A. M. Gelber. 2006. Optimal Inequality/Optimal Incentives: Evidence from a Tournament. National Bureau of Economic Research. Available at: http://www.nber.org/papers/w12588. Accessed October 10, 2012.

Freeman, R. B., E. Weinstein, E. Marincola, J. Rosenbaum, and F. Solomon 2001a. Careers and Rewards in Bio Sciences: The Disconnect Between Scientific Progress and Career Progression. Bethesda, MD: American Society for Cell Biology.

Freeman, R., E. Weinstein, E. Marincola, J. Rosenbaum, and F. Solomon 2001b. Competition and careers in biosciences. Science 294: 2293-2294.

Freedman, L. P., I. M. Cockburn, and T. S. Simcoe. 2015. The economics of reproducibility in preclinical research. PLOS Biology 13(6); doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1002165.

Frische, S. 2012. It is time for full disclosure of author contributions. Nature 489(7417): 475.

Frugoli, J. 2002. Using “ethics labs” to set a framework for ethical discussion in an undergraduate science course. Presented at 11th Annual Meeting of Association for Practical and Professional Ethics, Cinncinati, OH.

Fugh-Berman, A. J. 2010. The haunting of medical journals: How ghostwriting sold “HRT.” PLOS Medicine 7(9): e1000335.

Galipeau, J., D. Moher, B. Skidmore, C. Campbell, P. Hendry, D. W. Cameron, P. C. Hébert, and A. Palepu. 2013. Systematic review of the effectiveness of training programs in writing for scholarly publication, journal editing, and manuscript peer review (protocol). Systematic Reviews 2(41). June. Available at: http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/2/1/41#B1. Accessed August 12, 2013.

Gardner, W. 2006. The social cost of scientific misconduct and questionable research practices. Presentation at the ORI Research on Research Integrity (RRI) Conference.

Garfinkel, S. 2012. Handling Cases: From Allegations to Closure, Problems to Avoid. Presentation to the committee. August 14.

GBSI (Global Biological Standards Institute). 2015. The Case for Standards in Life Science Research. Washington, DC: GBSI.

Gino, F., and D. Ariely. 2011. The Dark Side of Creativity: Original Thinkers Can Be More Dishonest. Harvard Business School NOM Unit Working Paper No. 11-064. January 11.

Gino, F., S. Ayal, and D. Ariely. 2009. Contagion and differentiation in unethical behavior: The effect of one bad apple on the barrel. Psychological Science 20(3): 393-398.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Gino, F., M. Schweitzer, N. Mead, and D. Ariely. 2011. Unable to resist temptation: How self-control depletion promotes unethical behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 115(2): 191-203.

Glazer, S. 1997. Combating scientific misconduct. CQ Researcher 7: 1-24. Retrieved from http://library.cqpress.com/.

Gluckman, P. 2014. Policy: The art of science advice to government. Nature 507(7491): 163-165.

Godfrey, B. B. 2007. Investigation of Alleged Research Misconduct by Lincoln Laboratory Members of 1998-5 POET Study Team. Available at: https://orgchart.mit.edu/sites/default/files/ltc/pdf/InvestigationReport01292007.pdf.

Godlee, F., J. Smith, and H. Marcovitch.. 2011. Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. BMJ (Jan. 5): 342. Available at: http://www.bmj.com/content/342/bmj.c7452. Accessed November 12, 2016.

Gold, B. D. 1993. Congressional activities regarding misconduct and integrity in science. In Responsible Science, Vol. II. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

Goldenring, James R. 2010. Perspective: Innocence and due diligence: managing unfounded allegations of scientific misconduct. Academic medicine 85: 527-530.

Goodman, S. 2016. Robert De Niro pulls anti-vaccine documentary from Tribeca Film Festival. New York Times. March 26.

Goodstein, D. 2010. On Fact and Fraud. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Goodwin, M., A. Bonham, A. Mazzaschi, H. Alexander, and J. Krakower. 2011. Sponsored program salary support to medical school faculty in 2009. AAMC Analysis in Brief 11(1). Available at: https://www.aamc.org/download/170836/data/aibvol11_no1.pdf.

Gorman, E. H., and R. L. Sandefur. 2011. “Golden Age,” quiescence, and revival: How the sociology of professions became the study of knowledge-based work. Work and Occupations 38(3): 275-302.

Graf, C., L. Deakin, M. Docking, J. Jones, S. Joshua, T. McKerahan, M. Ottmar, A. Stevens, E. Wates, and D. Wyatt. 2015. Essay on Best Practice Guidelines on Publishing Ethics: A Publisher’s Perspective, 2nd ed. Advanced Materials 27: 370-387.

GRC (Global Research Council). 2013. Statement of Principles on Research Integrity. Available at: http://grc.s2nmedia.com/statement-principles-research-integrity. Accessed August 15, 2013.

Greenberg, D. F. 1988. The Construction of Homosexuality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Greene, A. M., A. J. Bonito, J. Amoozegar, C. Eicheldinger, N. Lenfestey, and D. Plotner. 2011. Whistleblowers in Research Misconduct Cases: RIOs Preparation of Whistleblowers and Their Reports on Questions Whistleblowers Raised. Report Submitted to ORI. Available at: https://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/Whistleblower.pdf. Accessed December 17, 2015.

Greenland, P., and P. B. Fontanarosa. 2012. Ending honorary authorship. Science 337(6098): 1019.

Grens, K. 2013a. Rampant plagiarism in two journals. The Scientist. May 22.

Grens, K. 2013b. What to do about “Clare Francis.” The Scientist. September 14.

Grieneisen, M. L., and M. Zhang. 2012. A comprehensive survey of retracted articles from the scholarly literature. PLOS ONE 7(10): e44118.

Grifo, F. 2013. Federal Agency Scientific Integrity Policies. Union of Concerned Scientists. http://www.ucsusa.org/our-work/center-science-and-democracy/promoting-scientific-integrity/federal-agency-si-policies.html#.VkNSn3arSUl.

Grinnell, F. 2014. The interrelationship between research integrity, conflict of interest, and the research environment. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 15(2): 162-164.

Gunsalus, C. K. 1993 Institutional structure to ensure research integrity. Academic Medicine 68(9): S33-S38.

Gunsalus, C. K. 1997. Rethinking Unscientific Attitudes About Scientific Misconduct. Chronicle of Higher Education. March 28.

Gunsalus, C. K. 1998a. How to blow the whistle and still have a career afterwards. Science and Engineering Ethics 4(1): 51-64.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Gunsalus, C. K. 1998b. Preventing the need for whistleblowing: Practical advice for university administrators. Science and Engineering Ethics 4(1): 75-93.

Gustafsson, B., G. Hermerén, and B. Petersson. 2006. Good Research Practice—What Is It? Stockholm: Swedish Research Council.

GUSTO Investigators. 1993. An international randomized trial comparing four thrombolytic strategies for acute myocardial infarction. New England Journal of Medicine 329: 673-682.

Hackett, E. J. 1994. A social control perspective on scientific misconduct. Journal of Higher Education 65(3): 242-260.

Hames, I. 2013. COPE Ethical Guidelines for Peer Reviewers. COPE Council. Available at: http://publicationethics.org/files/Ethical_guidelines_for_peer_reviewers_0.pdf.

Hanson, B., A. Sugdon, and B. Alberts. 2011. Making data maximally available. Science 331(6018):649.

Harris, C. E. 2008. The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 13: 153-164.

Harvard Medical School. 1999. Authorship Guidelines. Available at: https://hms.harvard.edu/sites/default/files/assets/Sites/Ombuds/files/AUTHORSHIP%20GUIDELINES.pdf.

Heitman, E., and S. Litewka. 2011. International perspectives on plagiarism and considerations for teaching international trainees. Urologic Oncology 29(1): 104-108.

Heitman, E., and J. Petty. 2010. Preparing students to navigate cross-national differences in the research environment: The role of research integrity education. Pp. 201-214 in International Research Collaborations: Much to Be Gained, Many Ways to Get in Trouble, M. S. Anderson and N. H. Steneck, eds. New York: Routledge.

Heitman, E., C. H. Olsen, L. Anestidou, and R. E. Bulger. 2007. New graduate students’ baseline knowledge of the responsible conduct of research. Academic Medicine 82(9): 838-845.

Hellweg, B. 2015. At med school, grants provide uncertain salary. Yale Daily News, April 9.

HHMI (Howard Hughes Medical Institute). 2007. Research Policies: Scientific Misconduct. Available at www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/About/Policies/sc_200.pdf. Accessed April 19, 2015.

HHS (Department of Health and Human Services). 2000. Public Health Service standards for the protection of research misconduct whistleblowers. Federal Register 65: 70830-70841.

HHS. 2005. Title 42: Public Health Service (PHS). Part 93: Policies on Research Misconduct. Code of Federal Regulations. June.

HHS. 2009. Title 45: Public welfare. Part 46: Protection of human subjects. Code of Federal Regulations. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html.

HHS. 2011a. ANPRM for Revision to Common Rule. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/anprm2011page.html.

HHS. 2011b. Responsibility of applicants for promoting objectivity in research for which public health service funding is sought and responsible prospective contractors; final rule. Federal Register 76(165): 53256-53293. Available at: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-08-25/pdf/2011-21633.pdf.

HHS. 2012. Food and Drug Administration disqualification of a clinical investigator. Federal Register 77(83): 25353-25361.

HHS. 2014a. Findings of research misconduct. Notice No. NOT-OD-11-070. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-11-070.html.

HHS. 2014b. Fiscal 2015 Budget Justification. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/budget/fy2015/fy-2015-hhs-congressional-budget-justification.pdf, Accessed December 20, 2015.

HHS. 2016. NPRM for Revisions to the Common Rule: HHS Announces Proposal to Improve Rules Protecting Human Research Subjects. NPRM 2015—Summary. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/index.html.

Hirschi, T. 1969. Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Holdren, J. 2010. Scientific Integrity. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. December 17. Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy. Available at https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/scientific-integrity-memo-12172010.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Holdren, J. P. 2013. Increasing Access to the Results of Federally Funded Scientific Research. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies. February 22. Executive Office of the President, Office of Science and Technology Policy. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ostp/ostp_public_access_memo_2013.pdf.

Hornyak, T. 2012. Did Higgs yield the most authors in a science study? CNET. September 10. Available at: http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-57509551-1/did-higgs-yield-the-most-authors-in-a-science-study/. Accessed March 28, 2013.

Hutchins, W. J. 1982. The evolution of machine translation systems. In Practical Experience of Machine Translation, V. Lawson, ed. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Available at: http://www.mt-archive.info/Aslib-1981-Hutchins-1.pdf.

IAC (InterAcademy Council). 2010. Climate Change Assessments: Review of the Processes and Procedures of the IPCC. Amsterdam: IAC.

IAC-IAP (InterAcademy Council and InterAcademy Panel). 2012. Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise: A Policy Report. Amsterdam: IAC-IAP.

IAP (InterAcademy Partnership). 2016. Doing Global Science: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in the Global Research Enterprise. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

IAP (InterAcademy Panel on International Issues). 2005. IAP Statement on Biosecurity. Available at: http://www.interacademies.net/File.aspx?id=5401.

ICB (Irish Council for Bioethics). 2010. Recommendations for Promoting Research Integrity. Dublin: ICB.

ICMJE (International Committee of Medical Journal Editors). 2013a. Defining the Role of Authors and Contributors. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html.

ICMJE. 2013b. Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals: Ethical Considerations in the Conduct and Reporting of Research: Conflicts of Interest. Available at: http://www.icmje.org/ethical_4conflicts.html. Accessed July 23, 2013.

Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2005. Why most published research findings are false. PLOS Medicine 2(8): e124.

Ioannidis, J. P. A. 2012. Why science is not necessarily self-correcting. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6): 645-654.

IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2009. Conflict of Interest in Medical Research, Education, and Practice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

IOM. 2015. Sharing Clinical Trial Data: Maximizing Benefits, Minimizing Risks. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

IOM-NRC (Institute of Medicine and National Research Council). 2002. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Iqbal, N., W. A. Bhatti, and A. Zaheer. 2013. Corporate Ethical values, group creativity, job commitment and performance: The effect of work response on work context. Management and Marketing 8: 1. January. Available at: http://www.managementmarketing.ro/pdf/articole/302.pdf.

Ishii, S., A. Iwama, H. Koseki, Y. Shinkai, T. Taga, and J. Watanabe. 2014. Report on STAP Cell Research Paper Investigation. RIKEN. Available at: www3.riken.jp/stap/e/f1document1.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2015.

Iverson, M., M. S. Frankel, and S. Siang. 2003. Scientific societies and research integrity: What are they doing and how well are they doing it? Science and Engineering Ethics 9(2): 141-158.

James, W. H. 1995. Fraud and hoaxes in science. Nature 377: 474.

Jaschik, S. 2015. Who gets credit? Inside Higher Ed. August 24. Available at: https://www.inside-highered.com/news/2015/08/24/research-reveals-significant-share-scholarly-papers-have-guest-or-ghost-authors.

Jayaraman, K. S. 1994. Fossil inquiry finds Indian geologist guilty of plagiarism. Nature 369: 698.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Jha, A. 2012. False positives: Fraud and misconduct are threatening scientific research. The Guardian. September 13. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/science/2012/sep/13/scientific-research-fraud-bad-practice.

Jogalekar, A. S. 2015. Social media, peer review, and responsible conduct of research (RCR) in chemistry: Trends, pitfalls, and promises. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 22(6): 402-430.

John, L. K., G. Loewenstein, and D. Prelac. 2012. Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling. Psychological Science 23(5): 524-532.

Joppa, L. N., G. McInerny, R. Harper, L. Salido, K. Takeda, K. O’Hara, D. Gavaghan, and S. Emmott. 2013. Troubling trends in scientific software use. Science 340(6134): 814-815.

Jordan, T. 2013. Lessons of L’Aquila for operational earthquake forecasting. Seismological Research Letters 84(1): 4-7.

JSA (Japan Society of Anesthesiologists). 2012. The Results of Investigation into Dr.Yoshitaka Fujii’s papers. Available at: http://www.anesth.or.jp/english/pdf/news20120629.pdf (accessed January 13, 1012).

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

Kahneman, D. 2012. A proposal to deal with questions about priming effects. Open Letter. Available at: http://www.nature.com/polopoly_fs/7.6716.1349271308!/suppinfoFile/Kahneman%20Letter.pdf.

Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47(2): 263-291.

Kaiser, J. 1997. The “Gallo case”: Popovic strikes back. Science 275(5302): 920-921.

Kalb, P. E., and K. G. Koehler. 2002. Legal issues in scientific research. JAMA 287(1): 85-91.

Kalichman, M. W. 2012. Why teach research ethics? Pp 5-16 in Practical Guidance on Science and Engineering Ethics Education for Instructors and Administrators. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Kalichman, M. W., and P. J. Friedman. 1992. A pilot study of biomedical trainees’ perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine 67(11): 769-775.

Kalichman, M. W., and D. K. Plemmons. 2007. Reported goals for responsible conduct of research courses. Academic Medicine 82(9): 846-852.

Kaufman, M. 2012. Journal retreats from controversial arsenic paper. The Washington Post. July 8.

Kevles, D. 1998. The Baltimore Case: A Trial of Politics, Science and Character. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

Keystone Center. 2012. Improving the Use of Science in Regulatory Decision-Making: Dealing with Conflict of Interest and Bias in Scientific Advisory Panels, and Improving Systematic Scientific Reviews. September 18. Available at: https://www.keystone.org/images/keystone-center/spp-documents/Health/Research%20Integrity%20Rountable%20Report.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2013.

King, C. 2013. Single-author papers: A waning share of output, but still providing the tools for progress. Science Watch. September. Available at: sciencewatch.com/articles/single-author-papers-waning-share-output-still-providing-tools-progress. Accessed December 19, 2014.

KNAW (Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences). 2013. Responsible Research Data Management and the Prevention of Scientific Misconduct. Amsterdam: KNAW.

Koch, C., and C. Schmidt. 2010. Disclosing conflicts of interest—Do experience and reputation matter? Accounting, Organizations and Society 35(1): 95-107.

Kornfeld, D. S. 2012. Research misconduct: The search for a remedy. Academic Medicine 87(7): 877-882.

Krohn, M. 1995. Control and deterrence theories of crime. In Criminology: A Contemporary Handbook. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Kuhn, T. S. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Kunst, F. et al. 1997. The complete genome sequence of the Gram-positive bacterium Bacillus subtilis. Nature 390: 249-256.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Kuta, S. 2014. CU-Boulder scientists speak out on research misconduct claim. Boulder Daily Camera. February 7.

LaCour, M. J., and D. P. Green. 2014. When contact changes minds: An experiment on transmission of support for gay equality. Science 346(6215): 1366-1369. RETRACTED.

Landis, S. C., S. G. Amara, K. Asadullah, C. P. Austin, R. Blumenstein, E. W. Bradley, and S. D. Silberberg. 2012. A call for transparent reporting to optimize the predictive value of preclinical research. Nature 490(7419): 187-191.

Lang, J. M. 2013. Cheating Lessons: Learning from Academic Dishonesty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Leape, L. L. 2010. Transparency and Public Reporting Are Essential for a Safe Health Care System. The Commonwealth Fund. Available at: http://www.commonwealthfund.org/publications/perspectives-on-health-reform-briefs/2010/mar/transparency-and-public-reporting-are-essential-for-a-safe-health-care-system.

Lesser, L. I., C. B. Ebbeling, M. Goozner, D. Wypij. and D. S. Ludwig. 2007. Relationship between funding source and conclusion among nutrition-related scientific articles. PLOS Medicine 4(1): e5. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040005.

Levelt, W. J. M., P. Drenth, and E. Noort (eds.). 2012. Flawed Science: The Fraudulent Research Practices of Social Psychologist Diederik Stapel. Tilburg University, University of Amsterdam, and University of Groningen. available at: https://www.tilburguniversity.edu/upload/3ff904d7-547b-40ae-85fe-bea38e05a34a_Final%20report%20Flawed%20Science.pdf.

Levine, A. S., R. J. Alpern, N. C. Andrews, K. Antman, J. R. Balser, J. M. Berg, P. B. Davis, J. G. Fitz, R. N. Goldman, J. L. Jameson, V. S. Lee, K. S. Polonsky, M. S. Rappley, E. A. Reece, P. B. Rothman, D. A. Schwinn, L. J. Shapiro, and A. M. Spiegel. 2015. Research in academic medical centers: Two threats to sustainable support. Science Translational Medicine 7(289): 289fs22.

Liberman, M. 2012. Lessons for Responsible Science from DARPA’s Programs in Human Language Technology, Presentation to the Committee. July 9.

Lock S., F. Wells, M. Farthing, and S. Evans. 2001. Statistical aspects of the detection of fraud. In Fraud and Misconduct in Medical Research, 3rd ed., S. Lock, F. Wells, and M. Farthing eds. London: BMJ.

Loewenstein, G., D. M. Cain, and S. Sah. 2011. The limits of transparency: Pitfalls and potential of disclosing conflicts of interest. American Economic Review: Papers and Proceedings 101(3): 423-428.

Long, T. C., M. Errami, A. C. George, Z. Sun, and H. R. Garner. 2009. Responding to possible plagiarism. Science 323(5919): 1293-1294.

Louis, K. S., M. S. Anderson, and L. Rosenberg. 1995. Academic misconduct and values: The department’s influence. Review of Higher Education 18(4): 393-422.

Lowry, Paul Benjamin, Gregory D. Moody, and James Gaskin, et. al. Evaluating Journal Quality and the Association for Information Systems (AIS) Senior Scholars’ Journal Basket Via Bibliometric Measures: Do Expert Journal Assessments Add Value? (2013). MIS Quarterly Vol. 37(4), 993–1012. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2186798

Lubalin, J., M.-A. E. Ardini, and J. Matheson, J.. 1995. Consequences of Whistleblowing for the Whistleblower in Misconduct in Science Cases. Prepared for the Office of Research Integrity. Washington, DC: Research Triangle Institute.

Macrina, F. L. 2007. Scientific societies and promotion of the responsible conduct of research: Codes, policies, and education. Academic Medicine 82(9): 865-869.

Maher, B. 2010. Research integrity: Sabotage! Nature 467: 516-518.

Mani, A., S. Mullainathan, E. Shafir, and J. Zhao. 2013. Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science 341: 976-980.

Maron, D. F. 2015. Spreading measles outbreak also takes heavy economic toll. Scientific American. February 5.

Martin, A. 2012. Building a showcase campus, using an I.O.U. New York Times. December 13.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, and R. de Vries. 2005. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 435: 737-738.

Martinson, B. C., M. S. Anderson, A. L. Crain, and R. de Vries. 2006. Scientists’ perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 1(1): 51-66.

Martinson, B. C., A. L. Crain, M. S. Anderson, and R. de Vries. 2009. Institutions’ expectations for researchers’ self-funding, federal grant holding and private industry involvement: Manifold drivers of self-interest and researcher behavior. Academic Medicine 84: 1491-1499.

Martinson, B. C., A. L. Crain, R. de Vries, and M. S. Anderson. 2010. The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 5: 67-83.

Martinson, B. C., C. R. Thrush and A. L. Crain. 2013. Development and validation of the Survey of Organizational Research Climate (SORC). Science and Engineering Ethics 19(3): 813-834.

Marušić, A., L. Bošnjak. and A. Jerončić. 2011. A systematic review of research on the meaning, ethics and practices of authorship across scholarly disciplines. PLOS ONE 6(9): e23477. Available at: http://www.plosone.org/article/info%253Adoi%252F10.1371%252Fjournal.pone.0023477. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Matza, D. 1964. Delinquency and Drift. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Matza, D. 1969. Becoming Deviant. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

May, T. 2013. Embedding research integrity in graduate education—Michigan State University. Presentation at the World Conference on Research Integrity, Montreal. May 8.

Mazar, N., and D. Ariely. 2015. Dishonesty in scientific research. Journal of Clinical Investigation 125(11): 3993-3996.

Mazar, N., O. Amir, and D. Ariely. 2008. The dishonesty of honest people: A theory of self-concept maintenance. Journal of Marketing Research 45(6): 633-644.

McCook, A. 2015. How long does it take to retract a paper? A look at the Eric Poehlman record. Retraction Watch. Available at: http://retractionwatch.com/2015/09/09/how-long-does-it-take-to-retract-a-paper-a-look-at-the-eric-poehlman-record/.

McCormack, W. T., and C. W. Garvan. 2014. Team-based learning instruction for responsible conduct of research positively impacts ethical decision-making. Accountability in Research 21(1): 34-49.

McCormick, J. B., A. M. Boyce, J. M. Ladd, and M. K. Cho. 2012. Barriers to considering ethical and societal implications of research: Perceptions of life scientists. AJOB Primary Research 3(3): 40-50.

McKenzie, F. 2014. Complex Adaptive Systems: Implications for Leaders, Organizations, Government and Citizens. Australian Futures Project. http://australianfutures.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/AFP-PB1-Complex-Adaptive-Systems-140514.pdf.

McNaull, A. D. 2014. PCAST discusses data reproducibility issues. AIP Bulletin 32 (March 5). Available at: http://www.aip.org/fyi/2014/pcast-discusses-data-reproducibility-issues. Accessed August 4, 2014.

McNutt, M. 2015. Expression of concern on LaCour and Green, Science 346(6215), 1366-1369. Science 348(6239): 1100.

Medawar P. 1996. The Strange Case of the Spotted Mice and Other Classic Essays on Science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Medeiros, K. E., J. T. Mecca, C. Gibson, V. D. Giorgini, M. D. Mumford, L. Devenport, and S. Connelly. 2014. Biases in ethical decision making among university faculty. Accountability in Research 21(4): 218-240.

Merton, R. K. 1938. Social structure and anomie. American Sociological Review 3: 672-682.

Merton, R. K. 1973. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Mervis, J. 2013. NSF audit of successful proposals finds numerous cases of alleged plagiarism. Science Insider. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2013/03/nsf-audit-successful-proposals-finds-numerous-cases-alleged-plagiarism.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Michalek, A. M., A. D. Hutson, C. P. Wicher, and D. L. Trump. 2010. The costs and underappreciated consequences of research misconduct: A case study. PLOS Medicine 7(8): e1000318; doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000318.

Mitroff, I. I. 1974. Norms and counter-norms in a select group of the Apollo moon scientists: A case study of the ambivalence of scientists. American Sociological Review 39(4): 579-595.

MPG (Max Planck Society). 2009. Rules of good scientific practice. Munich.

Mumford, M. D., S. T. Murphy, S. Connelly, J. H. Hill, A. L. Antes, R. P. Brown, and L. D. Devenport. 2007. Environmental influences on ethical decision making: Climate and environmental predictors of research integrity. Ethics & Behavior 17(4): 337-366.

Mumford, M. D., S. Connelly, R. P. Brown, S. T. Murphy, J. H. Hill, A. L. Antes, E. P. Waples, and L. D. Devenport. 2008. A sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics & Behavior 18(4): 315-339.

NAE (National Academy of Engineering). 2003-17. Online Ethics Center. Available from: http://www.onlineethics.org/about/18848.aspx.

NAE. 2009. Ethics Education and Scientific and Engineering Research: What’s Been Learned? What Should Be Done? Summary of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NAS (National Academy of Sciences). 1989. On Being a Scientist, 1st Ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NAS-NAE-IOM (National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, and Institute of Medicine). 1992. Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NAS-NAE-IOM. 1995. On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in Research, 2nd Ed. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

NAS-NAE-IOM. 2009a. Ensuring the Integrity, Accessibility and Stewardship of Research Data. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NAS-NAE-IOM. 2009b. On Being a Scientist: A Guide to Responsible Conduct in Research, 3rd Ed. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NAS-NAE-IOM. 2014. The Postdoctoral Experience Revisited. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Nath, I., and E. L. Winnacker. 2012. Responsible research conduct. Science 338(6109): 863.

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Optimizing The Nation’s Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

National Institutes of Health Revitalization Act of 1993. 1993. Pub. L. No. 103-43, § 161, 107 Stat. 122, 140-41 (codified as amended at 42 U.S.C. § 289b (2000)).

Nature. 2005. Timeline of a controversy: A chronology of Woo Suk Hwang’s stem-cell research. December 19. doi:10.1038/news051219-3.

Nature. 2009. Editorial: Authorship policies. Nature (458)1078. April 29. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v458/n7242/full/4581078a.html. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Nature. 2013. Authors and Referees: Editorial Policies: Availability of Data and Materials. Available at: http://www.nature.com/authors/policies/availability.html.

Nature. 2014. Retraction challenges. Nature 514(5). October 2. Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/retraction-challenges-1.16023.

Nature. 2015a. Announcement: Time to tackle cells’ mistaken identity (Editorial). 520: 264. April 15.

Nature. 2015b. Challenges in Irreproducible Research. Article Archive. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nature/focus/reproducibility/index.html.

Neale, A. V., J. Northrup, R. Dailey, E. Marks, and J. Abrams. 2007. Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(1): 5-24. March.

Neurology. 2016. Information for Authors. Available at: m.neurology.org/site/misc/auth2.xhtml#AUTHORSHIP. Accessed June 16, 2016.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

NHMRC-ARC-UA (National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Research Council, and Universities Australia). 2007. Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research. Canberra: Australian Government.

Nicholson, J. M., and J. P. A. Ioannidis. 2012. Research grants: Conform and be funded. Nature 492: 34-36. December 6.

Nielsen, M. 2012. Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

NIH (National Institutes of Health). 2009. Update on the Requirement for Instruction in the Responsible Conduct of Research. November 24. Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/not-od-10-019.html.

NIH. 2011. Responsibility of applicants for promoting objectivity in research for which PHS funding sought (42 CFR Part 50 Subpart F). Available at: http://grants.nih.gov/grants/policy/coi/coi_faqs.htm#3152.

NIH. 2012a. A Guide to Handling Research Misconduct Allegations. Available at: http://sourcebook.od.nih.gov/ResEthicsCases/NIH%20Misconduct2.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2013.

NIH. 2012b. Biomedical Research Workforce Working Group Report. Bethesda, MD: NIH.

NIH. 2014. Update: New Biographical Sketch Format Required for NIH and AHRQ Grant Applications Submitted for Due Dates on or after May 25, 2015. December 5. Available at: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-15-032.html.

NIH. 2015. NIH Databook. Available at: https://report.nih.gov/nihdatabook/. Accessed March 1, 2016.

NIH. 2016. NIH Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information. Notice No. NOT-OD-16-149.

Normile, D. 2012. Commission spreads blame for “manmade” disaster. Science 337(6091): 143. July 12.

Norris, K. A. 2011. Letter to Jerome Rosenberg. September 20. Available at: old.post-gazette.com/pg/pdf/201305/norris_2011_letter_to_rosenberg.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2015.

Norris, K. A., and H. Kling. 2014. Plaintiffs’ Complaint, U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. January 27.

Nosek, B. A., J. R. Spies, and M. Motyl. 2012. Scientific utopia: II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6): 615-631.

Nosek, B. A., G. Alter, G. C. Banks, D. Borsboom, S. D. Bowman, S. J. Breckler, … T. Yarkoni. 2015. Promoting an open research culture. Science 348(6242): 1422-1425.

NPA (National Postdoctoral Association). 2013. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) for Post Docs. Available at: http://www.nationalpostdoc.org/publications/124-rcr. Accessed August 1.

NRC (National Research Council). 1966. Language and Machines: Computers in Translation and Linguistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2003. Sharing Publication-Related Data and Materials: Responsibilities of Authorship in the Life Sciences. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2010. NAKFI Synthetic Biology: Building a Nation’s Inspiration: Interdisciplinary Research Team Summaries. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2011. America’s Climate Choices. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2012a. Research Universities and the Future of America: Ten Breakthrough Actions Vital to Our Nation’s Prosperity and Security. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC. 2012b. Using Science as Evidence in Public Policy. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NSB (National Science Board). 1996. Science and Engineering Indicators 1996. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

NSB. 2012. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

NSB. 2014a. Report to the National Science Board on the National Science Foundation’s Merit Review Process Fiscal Year 2014. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2015/nsb201514.pdf. Accessed December 13, 2015.

NSB. 2014b. Science and Engineering Indicators 2014. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

NSB. 2014c. Reducing investigators’ administrative workload for federally funded researchArlington, VA: National Science Foundation

NSB. 2016. Science and Engineering Indicators 2016. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.

NSF (National Science Foundation). 2002. Research misconduct policy. Federal Register 67: 11937. March 18.

NSF. 2009. NSF’s Implementation of Section 7009 of the America COMPETES Act, 2009. Federal Register 74(160): 42126-42128.

NSF3. 2014. Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/pubs/policydocs/pappguide/nsf15001/gpg_print.pdf.

NSF-OIG (National Science Foundation, Office of the Inspector General). 2013. Case Closeout Memorandum A13010012. Available at: https://www.nsf.gov/oig/case-closeout/A13010012.pdf.

NSF-OIG. 2015. Case Closeout Memoranda. Available at: www.nsf.gov/oig/case-closeout.jsp. Accessed December 16, 2015.

NSF-OIG. Various Years. Semi-Annual Report to Congress. Arlington, VA: NSF.

Nuzzo, R. 2014. Scientific method: Statistical errors. Nature 506(7847). Available at: http://www.nature.com/news/scientific-method-statistical-errors-1.14700.

NWC (National Whistleblowers Center). 2016. False Claims Act/Qui Tam. Available at http://www.whistleblowers.org/index.php?Itemid=64#What%20About%20State.

Nylenna, M., and S. Simonsen. 2006. Scientific misconduct: A new approach to prevention. The Lancet 367(9526): 1882-1884.

Obama, B. M. 2009a. Memorandum for the Heads of Executive Departments and Agencies: Scientific Integrity. March 9.

Obama, B. M. 2009b. Remarks by the President at the National Academy of Sciences Annual Meeting. April 27.

Obama, B. M. 2013. Executive Order 13642-Making Open and Machine Readable the New Default for Government Information. Available at: www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/DCPD-201300318/content-detail.html. Accessed December 20, 2015.

Obokata, Haruko; Sasai, Yoshiki; Niwa, Hitoshi, et. Al. “Bidirectional developmental potential in reprogrammed cells with acquired pluripotency”. Nature. 505 (7485): 676–687. PMID 24476891. doi:10.1038/nature12969.

Obokata, H., Wakayama, T., Sasai, Y., et al. (2014b) Stimulus-Triggered Fate Conversion of Somatic Cells into Pluripotency. Nature, 505, 641-647. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature12968

OECD (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development). 2007. Best Practices for Ensuring Scientific Integrity and Preventing Misconduct. Paris: OECD.

OECD. 2009. Investigating Research Misconduct Allegations in International Collaborative Research Projects: A Practical Guide. Paris: OECD.

OECD. 2015. Research and Development Statistics. Available at: stats.oecd.org/ (accessed December 26, 2014).

Omenn, G. 2012. Evolution of Translational Omics: Lessons Learned and the Path Forward. Presentation to the committee, July 9.

Oransky, I. 2015. Lawsuit involving PubPeer unmasks commenter as pseudonymous whistleblower Clare Francis. Retraction Watch. April 13.

Oransky, I., and A. Marcus. 2010. Why write a blog about retractions? Retraction Watch. August 3.

ORI (Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity). 1994. ORI policy on plagiarism. Office of Research Integrity Newsletter 3(1).

ORI. 2011. Historical Background. Available at: ori.hhs.gov/historical-background. Accessed January 5, 2016.

ORI. 2012-2013. Office of Research Integrity Annual Report. Washington, DC.

ORI. 2012. Office of Research Integrity Annual Report 2011. Washington, DC.

ORI. 2013. Office of Research Integrity Annual Report 2012. Washington, DC.

ORI. 2014. ORI Newsletter. November.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

ORI. 2016. 5 Ways Supervisors Can Promote Research Integrity (Infographic). Available at: https://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/2_Supervisor_tips.pdf.

OSC (Open Science Collaborative). 2015. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science 349(6251); doi: 10.1126/science.aac4716. August 28.

OSF (Open Science Framework). 2013. Reproducibility Project. Available at: http://openscienceframework.org/project/EZcUj/wiki/home. Accessed March 28, 2013.

OSTP (Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President). 2000. Federal policy on research misconduct. Federal Register 65: 76260-76264.

OSTP. 2013. Scientific Integrity. Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/eop/ostp/library/scientificintegrity. Accessed January 10, 2013.

Pain, E. 2014. Paul Brookes: Surviving as an outed whistleblower. Science. March 10. Available at: http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_magazine/previous_issues/articles/2014_03_10/caredit.a1400061.

Parrish, D.M. 2005. On Identifying Research Misconduct Respondents (Letter). Science and Engineering Ethics 11, 171-172.Pascal, C. B. 1999. The history and the future of the Office of Research Integrity: Scientific misconduct and beyond. Science and Engineering Ethics 5(2): 183-198.

Peng, R. D. 2011. Reproducible research in computational science. Science 334(6060): 1226 1227.

Penslar, R. L. 1995. Research Ethics: Cases and Materials. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Peterson, R. A. 2012. Regnerus Inquiry Report. Memo. August 24. Available at: http://www.utexas.edu/opa/wordpress/news/files/Regnerus-Inquiry-Report.pdf. Accessed January 11, 2013.

Pfeffer, J., and N. Langton. 1993. The effect of wage dispersion on satisfaction, productivity, and working collaboratively: Evidence from college and university faculty. Administrative Science Quarterly 38(3): 382-407.

Phillips, C. J. 2012. Responsible Conduct of Research: Concerns for Postdocs. Presentation to the committee. August 14.

PhRMA (Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America). 2014. Principles on Conduct of Clinical Trials and Communication of Clinical Trial Results. Available at: http://phrma-docs.phrma.org/sites/default/files/pdf/042009_clinical_trial_principles_final_0.pdf.

Pimple, K. 2001-7. Assessing Student Learning in the Responsible Conduct of Research. Available at: http://poynter.indiana.edu/tre/kdp-assessing.pdf.

Planned Parenthood Minn., N.D., S.D. v. Rounds, 686 F.3d 889, 906 (8th Cir. 2012).

Plemmons, D. K., S. A. Brody, and M. W. Kalichman. 2006. Student perceptions of the effectiveness of education in the responsible conduct of research. Science and Engineering Ethics 12(3): 571-582.

PNAS (Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences). 2013. PNAS Information for Authors, Revised July 2013. Available at: http://www.pnas.org/site/misc/iforc.pdf. Accessed August 1, 2013.

Popper, K. 1999. All Life Is Problem Solving. New York: Routledge.

Porter, A. L., and I. Rafols. 2009. Is science becoming more interdisciplinary? Measuring and mapping six research fields over time. Scientometrics 81: 719-745.

Powell, S., M. Allison, and M. Kalichman. 2007. Effectiveness of a responsible conduct of research course: A preliminary study. Science and Engineering Ethics 13(2): 249-264..

Price, A. R. 2013. Research misconduct and its federal regulation: The origin and history of the Office of Research Integrity—with personal views by ORI’s former associate director for investigative oversight. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance. 20: 5-6, 291-319.

Pritchard, M. S. 2000. Service-learning and engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics 6(3): 413-422.

Proctor, R. N. 2011. Golden Holocaust: Origins of the Cigarette Catastrophe and the Case for Abolition. Berkeley: University of California Press.

PSAC (President’s Science Advisory Committee). 1960. Scientific Progress, the Universities, and the Federal Government. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

PubMed Commons. 2015. PubMed Commons Website. Available at: www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed-commons/guidelines. Accessed December 16, 2015.

RCUK (Research Councils UK). 2013. RCUK Policy and Guidelines on Governance of Good Research Conduct. February. Available at: www.rcuk.ac.uk/RCUK-prod/assets/documents/reviews/grc/RCUKPolicyandGuidelinesonGovernanceofGoodResearchPracticeFebruary2013.pdf. Accessed April 19, 2015.

Reardon, S. 2015. US vaccine researcher sentenced to prison for fraud. Nature 523(7559): 138-139.

Reason, J. 2000. Human error: Models and management. BMJ 320: 768-770.

Redman, B. K. 2013. Research Misconduct Policy in Biomedicine: Beyond the Bad-Apply Approach. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Redman, B. K., and J. F. Merz. 2008. Scientific misconduct: Do the punishments fit the crime? Science 321(5890): 775.

Reiser, S. J. 1993. Overlooking ethics in the search for objectivity and misconduct in science. Academic Medicine 68: S84-S87.

Rekdal, O. B. 2014. Academic urban legends. Social Studies of Science 44(4): 638-654.

Rennie, D., and C. K. Gunsalus. 1993. Scientific misconduct: New definition, procedures, and office—perhaps a new leaf. JAMA 269(7): 915-917.

Rennie, D., and C. K. Gunsalus. 2001. Regulations on scientific misconduct: Lessons from the US experience, Pp. 13-31 in Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, 3rd Ed., S. Lock, F. Wells and M. Farthing, eds. London: BMJ Books.

Rennie, D., and C. K. Gunsalus. 2008. What is research misconduct? Pp. 29-51 in Fraud and Misconduct in Biomedical Research, F. Wells and M. Farthing, eds. London: Royal Society of Medicine Press.

Resnik, D. B. 2013. Plagiarism among collaborators. Accountability in Research 20(1): 1-4.

Resnik, D. B., and Z. Master. 2013. Policies and initiatives aimed at addressing research misconduct in high-income countries. PLOS Medicine 10: 3 March 26. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001406.

Resnik, D. B., T. Neal, A. Raymond, and G. E. Kissling. 2015. Research misconduct definitions adopted by U.S. research institutions. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 22(1): 14-21.

Rick, S., and G. Loewenstein. 2008. Hypermotivation. Journal of Marketing Research 45(6): 645-648.

Rose, G. 1985. Sick individuals and sick populations. International Journal of Epidemiology 14: 32-38.

Rosenberg, J. L. 2011. Letter to Karen A. Norris. November 17. Available at: old.post-gazette.com/pg/pdf/201305/rosenberg_letter.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2015.

Rosenthal, R. 1979. The “file drawer problem” and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin 86(3): 638-641.

Ross, J. S., C. P. Gross, M. M. Desai, Y. Hong, A. O. Grant, S. R. Daniels, V. C. Hachinski, R. J. Gibbons, T. J. Gardner, and H. M. Krumholz. 2006. Effect of blinded peer review on abstract acceptance. JAMA 295(14): 1675-1680.

Rossner, M. 2006. How to guard against image fraud. The Scientist. http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/23749/title/How-to-Guard-Against-Image-Fraud/.

Roth, M. 2013. University of Pittsburgh clears top researcher of alleged misconduct. Pittsburgh Post Gazette. http://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2013/07/11/University-of-Pittsburgh-clears-top-researcher-of-alleged-misconduct/stories/201307110302.

Roth, M. 2014. Pitt research team sues over patent. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. January 28. http://www.post-gazette.com/local/city/2014/01/27/University-of-Pittsburgh-researchers-sue-over-lung-infection-vaccine-patent/stories/201401270141.

Roth, M. 2015. Federal patent office rules against two Pitt doctors on vaccine application. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. September 11. http://www.postgazette.com/news/health/2015/09/11/Federal-patent-office-rules-against-two-Pittdoctors-on-vaccine-application/stories/201509110323.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Roth, M., and B. Schackner. 2013. Pitt scientist Jay Kolls faces another investigation. Pittsburgh Post-Gazette. http://www.post-gazette.com/news/education/2013/05/26/Pitt-scientist-Jay-Kolls-faces-another-investigation/stories/201305260225.

Royal Society Science Policy Center. 2012. Science as an Open Enterprise. Final Report. London: Royal Society. Available at: https://royalsociety.org/~/media/Royal_Society_Content/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-SAOE.pdf.

Ruedy, N. E., F. Gino, C. Moore, and M. E. Schweitzer. 2013. The cheater’s high: The unexpected affective benefits of unethical behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 105(4): 531-548.

Sampson, R. J., and J. H. Laub. 1992. Crime in the Making. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Sauermann, H., and M. Roach. 2012. Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PLOS ONE 7(5): e36307.

Scargle, J. 2000. Publication bias: The “file-drawer” problem in scientific inference. Journal of Scientific Exploration 14(1): 91-106.

Schachman, H. K. 1993. What is misconduct in science. Science 261(5118):148-149.

Schillebeeckx, M., B. Maricque, and C. Lewis. 2013. The missing piece to changing the university culture. Nature Biotechnology 31: 938-941.

Schmaling, K. B., and A. W. Blume. 2009. Ethics instruction increases graduate students’ responsible conduct of research knowledge but not moral reasoning. Accountability in Research: Policies & Quality Assurance 16(5): 268-283.

Schneider, S. L., K. K. Ness, S. Rockwell, and K. Shaver. 2012. 2012 Faculty Workload Survey: Research Report. Washington, DC: Federal Demonstration Partnership. Available at: sites. nationalacademies.org/cs/groups/pgasite/documents/webpage/pga_087667.pdf. Accessed December 26, 2014.

Schwartz, L. M., S. Woloshin, A. Andrews, and T. A. Stukel. 2011. Influence of medical journal press releases on the quality of associated newspaper coverage: Retrospective cohort study. BMJ 344: d8164.

Science. 2011. Dealing with Data (Special Issue). 331:6018. February 11, 2011.

Science. 2012. Newsmakers. 335(6066): 270-271. January 20.

Seife, C. 2015. Research misconduct identified by the US Food and Drug Administration: Out of sight, out of mind, out of the peer-reviewed literature. JAMAJAMA Internal Medicine 175(4): 567-577.

Seiler, S. N., B. J. Brummel, K. L. Anderson, K. J. Kim, S. W. Wee, C. K. Gunsalus, and M. C. Loui. 2011. Outcomes assessment of role-play scenarios for teaching responsible conduct of research. Accountability in Research 18: 217-246.

Servick, K. 2015. Michigan judge asks PubPeer to turn over anonymous user information. Science. http://news.sciencemag.org/people-events/2015/03/michigan-judge-asks-pubpeer-turn-over-anonymous-user-information.

SfN (Society for Neuroscience). 2010. Guidelines for Responsible Conduct Regarding Scientific Communication. Available at: http://www.sfn.org/Member-Center/Professional-Conduct/Guidelines-for-Responsible-Conduct-Regarding-Scientific-Communication. Accessed July 23, 2013.

Shea, C. 2012. The data vigilante. The Atlantic. December.

Sieber, J. E. 2005. Misconceptions and realities about teaching online. Science and Engineering Ethics 11(3): 329-340.

Siegrist, J. 2001. A theory of occupational stress. In Stress in the Workplace: Past, Present and Future, J. Dunham, ed.). London: Whurr.

Siegrist, J., N. Wege, F. Pühlhofer, and M. Wahrendorf. 2008. A short generic measure of work stress in the era of globalization: Effort-reward imbalance. International Archives of Occupational and Environmental Health 82(8): 1005-1013.

Simonsohn, U. 2013. Just post it: The lesson from two cases of fabricated data detected by statistics alone. Psychological Science 24: 1875-1888.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Singapore Statement on Research Integrity. 2010. 2nd World Conference on Research Integrity. Available at http://www.singaporestatement.org/index.html. Accessed July 26, 2012.

Smith, E., and B. Williams-Jones. 2012. Authorship and responsibility in health sciences research: A review of procedures for fairly allocating authorship in multi-author studies. Science and Engineering Ethics 18(2): 199-212.

Smith, K., D. Wueste, and J. Frugoli. 2007. Using “ethics labs” to set a framework for ethical discussion in an undergraduate science course. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education 35: 332-336.

Smith, R. 2000. What is research misconduct? Pp. 7-11 in The COPE Report 2000: Annual Report of the Committee on Publication Ethics, C. White, ed. London: BMJ Books.

Smith, R. 2006. Research misconduct: The poisoning of the well. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine 99(5): 232-237.

Smith, R. 2013. Should scientific fraud be a criminal offense? BMJ Blog. December 9. Available at: blogs.bmj.com/bmj/2013/12/09/richard-smith-should-scientific-fraud-be-a-criminal-offence/. Accessed December 17, 2015.

Sovacool, B. 2008. Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 5(4): 271-282.

Sox, H. C., and D. Rennie. 2006. Research misconduct, retraction, and cleansing the medical literature: Lessons from the Poehlman case. Annals of Internal Medicine 144(8): 609-613.

SPSP (Society for Personality and Social Psychology). 2012. Report of the SPSP Task Force on Responsible Conduct in Research. June 10.

SRCR (Secretariat on Responsible Conduct of Research). 2016. Tri-Agency Framework: Responsible Conduct of Research. Available at: http://www.rcr.ethics.gc.ca/eng/policy-politique/framework-cadre/.

Steen, R. G. 2011. Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics 37(4): 249-253.

Steen, R. G., A. Casadevall, and F. C. Fang. 2013. Why has the number of scientific retractions increased? Plosone8.e68397.10.1371/journal.pone.0068397.

Steinbrook, R., and R. F. Redberg. 2015. Reporting research misconduct in the medical literature. JAMA Internal Medicine 175(4): 492-493.

Steneck, N. H. 1994. Research universities and scientific misconduct—history, policies, and the future. Journal of Higher Education 65(3): 310-330.

Steneck, N. H. 2004. ORI Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Steneck, N. H. 2006. Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics 12(1): 53-74.

Steneck, N. H. 2007. Introduction to the Responsible Conduct of Research. Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Stephan, P. 2012a. How Economics Shapes Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Stephan, P. 2012b. Research efficiency: Perverse incentives. Nature 484: 29-31. April.

Sterman, J. D. 1994. Learning in and about complex systems. System Dynamics Review 10(2-3): 291-330.

Stern, S., and T. Lemmens. 2011. Legal remedies for medical ghostwriting: Imposing fraud liability on guest authors of ghostwritten articles. PLOS Medicine 8(8): e1001070.

Stodden, V. 2009. Enabling reproducible research: Licensing scientific innovation. International Journal of Communications Law & Policy 13(Winter): 22-46.

Stodden, V. 2010. Open science: Policy implications for the evolving phenomenon of user-led scientific innovation. Journal of Science Communication 9(1): 1-8.

Stroebe, W., T. Postmes, and R. Spears. 2012. Scientific misconduct and the myth of self-correction in science. Perspectives on Psychological Science 7(6): 670-688.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Strohmetz, D. B. 1992. The use of role-play in teaching research ethics: A validation study. Teaching of Psychology 19(2): 106.

TAFC (Tenure and Academic Freedom Committee, University of Pittsburgh). 2013. Letter to Karen A. Norris. March 4. Available at: old.post-gazette.com/pg/pdf/201305/tafc_letter_to_norris.pdf. Accessed December 16, 2015.

Taichman, D. B., J. Backus, C. Baethge, H. Bauchner, P. W. de Leeuw, J. M. Drazen, J. Fletcher, F. A. Frizelle, T. Groves, A. Haileamlak, A. James, C. Laine, L. Peiperl, A. Pinborg, P. Sahni, and S. Wu. 2016. Sharing clinical trial data: A proposal from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. JAMA 315(5): 467-468.

Tatsioni, A., N. G. Bonitsis, and J. P. A. Ioannidis. 2007. Persistence of contradicted claims in the literature. JAMA 298(21): 2517-2526.

Taylor, B., E. Miller, C. P. Farrington, M. C. Petropoulos, I. Favot-Mayaud, J. Li, and P. A. Waight. 1999. Autism and measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine: No epidemiologic evidence for a causal association. The Lancet 353: 2026-2029.

Teitelbaum, M. S. 2008. Structural disequilibria in biomedical research. Science 321(5859): 644-645.

TENK (National Advisory Board on Research Ethics). 2002. Good Scientific Practice and Procedures for Handling Misconduct and Fraud in Science. Finland.

Thaler, R. H., and C. R. Sunstein. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Thiese, M. S., Z. C. Arnold, and S. D. Walker. 2015. The misuse and abuse of statistics in biomedical research. Biochemia Medica (Zagreb) 25(1): 5-11.

Titus, S. L., and J. M. Ballou. 2014. Ensuring PhD development of responsible conduct of research behaviors: Who’s responsible? Science and Engineering Ethics. 20(1): 221-235.

Titus, S. L., J. A. Wells, and L. J. Rhoades. 2008. Repairing research integrity. Nature 453: 980-982.

Triggle, N. 2010. MMR doctor struck from register. BBC News. May 24. Available at: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/health/8695267.stm. Accessed November 12, 2016.

Tyersky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1974. Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science 185(4157): 1124-1131.

Tyler, T. R., and S. L. Blader. 2003. The Group Engagement Model: Procedural justice, social identity, and cooperative behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review 7(4): 349-361.

UK GMC (United Kingdom General Medical Council). 2010. Fitness to Practice Panel Hearing. 28 January.

UKRIO (United Kingdom Research Integrity Office). 2009. Code of Practice for Research: Promoting Good Practice and Preventing Misconduct. London: UKRIO.

UKRIO. 2017. About Us. Available at: http://ukrio.org/about-us/.

University of Illinois. 2009. Policy and Procedures on Integrity in Research and Publication.

University of Kansas. 2013. Public Censure Notice. December 11. Available at: news.ku.edu/2013/12/11/public-censure. Accessed December 17, 2015.

UUK (Universities UK). 2012. The Concordat to Support Research Integrity. Available at: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2012/the-concordat-to-support-research-integrity.pdf.

Van Noorden, R. 2011. The trouble with retractions. Nature 478: 26-28.

Vaughan, D. 1999. The dark side of organizations: Mistake, misconduct, and disaster. Annual Review of Sociology 25: 271-305.

Vogel, G., and D. Normile. 2014. Exclusive: Nature reviewers not persuaded by initial STAP stem cell papers. Science. September 11. Available at: http://news.sciencemag.org/asiapacific/2014/09/exclusive-nature-reviewers-not-persuaded-initial-stap-stem-cell-papers.

Wager, E. 2014. Defining and responding to plagiarism. Learned Publishing 27: 33-42.

Wager, E. 2015a. How should journal editors respond to cases of suspected misconduct? Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education 15(2): 146-150.

Wager, E. 2015b. Why are retractions so difficult? Science Editing 2(1): 32-34.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

Wager E., and S. Kleinert. 2012. Cooperation Between Research Institutions and Journals on Research Integrity Cases: Guidance from the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). www.publicationethics.org.

WAME (World Association of Medical Editors). 2007. Authorship. Available at: www.wame.org/about/policy-statements#Authorship, Accessed June 16, 2016.

Wansink, B., and K. van Ittersum. 2006. The visual illusions of food: Why plates, bowls, and spoons can bias consumption volume. FASEB Journal 20: A618.

Washington University. 2009. Washington University Policy for Authorship on Scientific and Scholarly Publications. Available at: http://research.wustl.edu/PoliciesGuidelines/Pages/Authorship-Policy.aspx.

Wasserstein, R. L., and N. A. Lazar. 2016. The ASA’s statement on p-values: context, process, and purpose. American Statistician 70(2): 129-133.

Weed, D. L. 1998. Preventing scientific misconduct. American Journal of Public Health 88(1): 125-129.

Wells, J. A., C. R. Thrush, B. C. Martinson, T. A. May, M. Stickler, E. C. Callahan, and K. L. Klomparens. 2014. Survey of organizational research climates in three research intensive, doctoral granting universities. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics 9(5): 72-88.

Wester, K. L., J. T. Willse, and M. S. Davis. 2008. Responsible conduct of research measure: Initial development and pilot study. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance 15(2): 87-104.

White, C. 2005. Suspected research fraud: Difficulties of getting at the truth. BMJ 331(7511): 281-288.

White, P. F., H. Kehlet, and S. Liu. 2009. Perioperative analgesia: What do we still know? Anesthesia & Analgesia 108(5): 1364-1367.

Wickenden, W. E. 1949. A Professional Guide for Young Engineers. Engineers’ Council for Professional Development. Available at: http://www.scribd.com/doc/58348312/A-Professional-Guide-for-Young-Engineers-William-E-Wickenden#scribd. Accessed March 22, 2015.

Wilhite, A. W., and E. A. Fong. 2012. Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science 335(6068): 542-543.

Williams, E. 2012. Industry Perspectives on Research Integrity—Part One. Presentation to the Committee. August 14.

Wislar, J. E., A. Flanagin, and P. B. Fontanarosa. 2011. Honorary and ghost authorship in high impact biomedical journals: A cross sectional survey. BMJ 343: d6128.

Wolfe-Simon, F., J. S. Blum, T. R. Kulp, G. W. Gordon, S. E. Hoeft, J. Pett-Ridge, J. F. Stolz, S. M. Webb, P. K. Weber, P. C. W. Davies, A. D. Anbar, and R. S. Oremland. 2011. A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus. Science 332(6034): 1163-1166.

Woolston, C. 2002. When a mentor becomes a thief. Science Magazine (Online). Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2002/05/when-mentor-becomes-thief.

Wright, D. E., S. L. Titus, and J. B. Cornelison. 2008. Mentoring and research misconduct: An analysis of research mentoring in closed ORI cases. Science and Engineering Ethics 14(3): 323-336. September.

Wuchty, S., B. F. Jones, and B. Uzzi. 2007. The increasing dominance of teams in production of knowledge. Science 316: 1036-1039.

Yank, V., and D. Rennie. 1999. Disclosure of researcher contributions: A study of original articles in The Lancet. Annals of Internal Medicine 130(8): 661-670.

Yap, A. J., A. S. Wazlawek, B. J. Lucas, A. J. C. Cuddy, and D. R. Carney. 2013. The ergonomics of dishonesty: The effect of incidental posture on stealing, cheating, and traffic violations. Psychological Science 24(11): 2281-2289.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×

This page intentionally left blank.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 287
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 288
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 289
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 290
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 291
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 292
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 293
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 294
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 295
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 296
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 297
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 298
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 299
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 300
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 301
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 302
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 303
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 304
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 305
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 306
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 307
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 308
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 309
Suggested Citation:"Appendix E: Bibliography." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Fostering Integrity in Research. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/21896.
×
Page 310
Fostering Integrity in Research Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $54.00 Buy Ebook | $43.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The integrity of knowledge that emerges from research is based on individual and collective adherence to core values of objectivity, honesty, openness, fairness, accountability, and stewardship. Integrity in science means that the organizations in which research is conducted encourage those involved to exemplify these values in every step of the research process. Understanding the dynamics that support – or distort – practices that uphold the integrity of research by all participants ensures that the research enterprise advances knowledge.

The 1992 report Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process evaluated issues related to scientific responsibility and the conduct of research. It provided a valuable service in describing and analyzing a very complicated set of issues, and has served as a crucial basis for thinking about research integrity for more than two decades. However, as experience has accumulated with various forms of research misconduct, detrimental research practices, and other forms of misconduct, as subsequent empirical research has revealed more about the nature of scientific misconduct, and because technological and social changes have altered the environment in which science is conducted, it is clear that the framework established more than two decades ago needs to be updated.

Responsible Science served as a valuable benchmark to set the context for this most recent analysis and to help guide the committee’s thought process. Fostering Integrity in Research identifies best practices in research and recommends practical options for discouraging and addressing research misconduct and detrimental research practices.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!