Precision Estimates for AASHTO Test Method T308 and the Test Methods for Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder in AASHTO Specification M320 (2005)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

32 REFERENCES: [1] Spellerberg, P.A., Savage, D.A., and Pielert, J.H., “Precision Estimates of Selected Volumetric Properties of HMA Using Non-Absorptive Aggregate,” NCHRP Web Document 54, 2003. [2] Spellerberg, P.A. and Savage, D.A., “An Investigation of the Cause of Variation in HMA Bulk Specific Gravity Test Results Using Non-Absorptive Aggregates,” NCHRP Web Document 66, 2004. [3] AASHTO, Designation M320, “Performance-Graded Asphalt Binder”, Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 24th Edition, AASHTO, Washington, DC, 2004, CD-ROM. [4] AASHTO, Designation T308, “Determining the Asphalt Binder Content of Hot-Mix Asphalt (HMA) by the Ignition Method” Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, 24th Edition, AASHTO, Washington, DC, 2004, CD-ROM. [5] Pielert, J.H. and Spellerberg, P.A., “AASHTO Materials Reference Laboratory – Thirty Years of Service to the Transportation Community,” TR News, Number 183, Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC, March-April 1996, pages 22-28. [6] AMRL Web Site: http://www.amrl.net [7] Arni, H.T., “Precision of Air-Permeability, Turbidimeter, and No. 325 Sieve Fineness Data,” Fineness of Cement, ASTM STP 473, American Society for Testing and Materials, 1970, pp 20-44. [8] Crandall, J.R. and Blaine, R. L., “Statistical Evaluation of Interlaboratory Cement Tests,” Proceedings, American Society of Testing and Materials, ASTEA, Vol. 59, 1959. [9] Youden, W.J., “Statistical Techniques for Collaborative Tests,” Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Inc., 1967: pp. 17 – 19. [10] ASTM, Designation E691-99, “Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 14.02, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001, Section 9.1.1. [11] Hoaglin, D.C., Iglewicz, B., Tukey, J. W., “Performance of Some Resistant Rules for Outlier Labeling,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, Vol. 81, No. 396 (Dec., 1986), pp. 991-999. [12] Tukey, John W., Exploratory Data Analysis, Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Reading, Mass., 1977, Chapter 2: (a) pp. 33, 43 and 44. [13] Carling, K., “Resistant Outlier Rules and the Non-Gaussian Case,” Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, Vol. 33, 2000, pp. 249-258. [14] Ku, Harry H., “Statistical Concepts in Metrology,” NIST Special Publication 300, Volume 1, 1969: p 316- 40. [15] ASTM, Designation C802-96(2002), “Standard Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Test Program to Determine the Precision of Test Methods for Construction Materials,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 4.02, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001, Section 8.4.3. [16] ASTM, Designation E177-04, “Standard Practice for Use of the Terms Precision and Bias in ASTM Test Methods,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume 4.02, ASTM, West Conshohocken, PA, 2001, Section 27.3.