Guide for Communicating Emergency Response Information for Natural Gas and Hazardous Liquids Pipelines (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

32 1. Hall, Sam, T. Butters, and L. Armstrong. A Hidden Threat: Pipe- line Emergency Planning and Response Tools for the Emer - gency Response Community. Fire Rescue Magazine, January 2012, pp. 40–45. 2. Association of Oil Pipe Lines. Pipelines Retain Leading Role Transporting American Crude Oil and Petroleum Products. Feb- ruary 7, 2012. http://www.aopl.org/pdf/AOPL_Shift_Report_ Press_Release_Feb_7_2012.pdf. 3. Miesner, Thomas, and W. Leffler. Oil and Gas Pipelines in Non- technical Language. PennWell Corporation, Tulsa, OK, 2006, pp. 63–64, 71–72, 101. 4. U.S. Department of Transportation. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Leak Detection Study—DTPH56- 11-D-000001. Final Report 12-173. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, December 10, 2012, pp. 2–10. 5. Noll, Gregory, and Michael Hildebrand. Pipeline Emergencies. First Edition, Red Hat Publishing, Chester, MD, January 1, 2004. 6. Noll, Gregory, and Michael Hildebrand. Pipeline Emergencies. Sec- ond Edition, National Association of State Fire Marshalls. Cheyenne, WY, July 14, 2011. 7. National Transportation Safety Board. Natural Gas Service Line Break and Subsequent Explosion and Fire Bergenfield, NJ, 12/13/2005. NTSB/PAB-07/01. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, May 1, 2007, pp. 4–6, 11. 8. National Transportation Safety Board. Natural Gas Pipeline Rup- ture and Fire Carlsbad, NM, 8/19/2000. NTSB/PAR-03/01. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, February 11, 2003, p. 9. http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2003/PAR0301.pdf. 9. National Transportation Safety Board. Enbridge Incorporated Haz- ardous Liquid Pipeline Rupture and Release, Marshall, MI, 7/25/2010. NTSB/PAR-12/01. United States Government Printing Office, Wash- ington, DC, July 10, 2012, p. 103. 10. Nickerson, R. S. Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises. Review of General Psychology, Vol. 2, no. 2, 1998, pp. 175–220. 11. Slovic, P. Perceived Risk, Trust and Democracy. Risk Analysis, 13 (6), 1993, pp. 675–682. 12. Fischhoff, B., P. Slovic, S. Lichtenstein, S. Read, and B. Combs. How Safe is Safe Enough? A Psychometric Study of Attitudes Towards Technological Risks and Benefits. Earthscan Publications, London, England and Sterling, VA, 2000. 13. Slovic, P. The Perception of Risk. Earthscan Publications, London, England, and Sterling, VA, 2000, p. 99. 14. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Advisory Bulletin Docket No. PHMSA-2012-0201. 2012. Federal Register 77, no. 197, October 11, 2012. 15. National Transportation Safety Board. Pipeline Accident Report. Pacific Gas and Electric Company Natural Gas Transmission Pipeline Rupture and Fire, San Bruno, CA, 9/9/2010. NTSB/PAR-11/01. United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, August 30, 2011. http://www.ntsb.gov/doclib/reports/2011/PAR1101.pdf. 16. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Code of Fed- eral Regulations. Title 49. Pipeline Safety, Regulatory Certainty, and Job Creation Act of 2011. Public Law 112-90. January 3, 2012. 17. Fleming, Susan A. Pipeline Safety: Better Data and Guidance Could Improve Operators’ Responses to Incidents. Testimony before the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation, U.S. Senate. January 28, 2013. 18. Federal Emergency Management Agency. IS-100.HE: Introduction to Incident Command System, ICS for Higher Education. Novem- ber 2008, pp. 6–8. http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/IS100HE/ IG_PDF/L6_ICS100HigherED_IG.pdf. 19. National Association of Pipeline Safety Representatives. Compen- dium of State Pipeline Safety Requirements and Initiatives Provid- ing Increased Public Safety Levels Compared to the Code of Federal Regulations. Second Edition, September 30, 2011. http://www. phmsa.dot.gov/staticfiles/PHMSA/DownloadableFiles/Files/Pipe line/Compendium.pdf. 20. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Code of Fed- eral Regulations. Title 40. Protection of Environment. Part 300. National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan. October 11, 2013. 21. U.S. National Archives and Records Administration. Code of Fed- eral Regulations. Title 40. Protection of Environment. Part 112. Oil Pollution Prevention. July 1, 2012. 22. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2013. Reporting Requirements—Oil Spills and Hazardous Substance Releases. http://www.epa.gov/oem/content/reporting/#oil. Accessed Septem- ber 16, 2013. 23. National Emergency Number Association (NENA). Pipeline Emergency Operations Standard/Model Recommendation. Docu- ment 56-007, November 11, 2010. 24. U.S. Department of Transportation. Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. ADB-12-09: Communications Dur- ing Emergency Situations. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, October 11, 2012. 25. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Developing and Main- taining Emergency Operations Plans: Comprehensive Prepared- ness Guide, CPG 101. Version 2.0. November 2010. References

33 26. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Overview of the National Planning Frameworks. May 2013. 27. McCormick Taylor, Inc. TCRP Report 86/NCHRP Report 525 Trans- portation Security, Volume 9: Guidelines for Transportation Emer- gency Training Exercises. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 2006. 28. U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Welcome to SAFECOM. 2013. http://www.safecomprogram.gov/interoperability/Default. aspx. Accessed November 5, 2013. 29. Federal Emergency Management Agency. IS-700. A: National Inci- dent Management System, An Introduction, Student Manual. January 2009, pp. 4.3–4.4.