Integrating MTS Commerce Data with Multimodal Freight Transportation Performance Measures to Support MTS Maintenance Investment Decision Making (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

74 1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory. “Channel Portfolio Tool (CPT).” Available at http://chl.erdc.usace. army.mil/chl.aspx?p=s&a=Spotlight;9 as of May 29, 2014. 2. Cambridge Systematics. National Rail Freight Infrastructure Capacity and Investment Study. Prepared for the Association of American Railroads, September 2007. Accessed at http://www. camsys.com/pubs/AAR_Nat_%20Rail_Cap_Study.pdf as of Feb- ruary 12, 2014. 3. Committee on the Marine Transportation System, Office of the Executive Secretariat, U.S. DOT. Available at http://www.cmts.gov/ Background/Index.aspx, accessed February 7, 2014. 4. Waterborne Commerce of the United States, Part 5—National Summaries, Calendar Year 2011. Waterborne Commerce Statistics Center, Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alexandria, Virginia. 5. Gordon Proctor & Associates, Cambridge Systematics Inc., Ameri- can Transportation Research Institute, StarIsis Corporation, and Council of Supply Chain Management Professionals. NCFRP Report 10: Performance Measures for Freight Transportation. Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2011. Available at http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/ncfrp/ ncfrp_rpt_010.pdf as of May 29, 2014. 6. Mitchell, K. N., B. X. Wang, and M. Khodakarami. “Selection of Dredging Projects for Maximizing Waterway System Performance.” In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2330, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2013, pp. 39–46. Available at http://trb.metapress.com/content/xk52q85m36p0662v/fulltext. pdf as of February 12, 2014. 7. Adams, T., and E. Wittwer. “Performance Measures for Evaluat- ing Multi-State Projects,” CFIRE MAFC-11. National Center for Freight & Infrastructure Research & Education, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, College of Engineering, University of Wisconsin–Madison, September 2011. 8. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. “Ohio River Mainstem System Study Integrated Main Report.” May 2006. Available at http://pbadupws. nrc.gov/docs/ML0810/ML081000184.pdf as of February 12, 2014. 9. Schrank, D., B. Eisele, and T. Lomax. 2012 Urban Mobility Report. Texas A&M Transportation Institute. December 2012. Accessed at http://mobility.tamu.edu/ums/. 10. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. “Dredging Program.” Available at http://www.navigationdatacenter.us/dredge/dredge.htm as of May 29, 2014. 11. Waterborne Commerce of the United States, Part 1–Waterways and Harbors, Atlantic Coast. Compiled under the supervision of the Institute for Water Resources, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Alex- andria, Virginia. Accessible at http://www.navigationdatacenter.us/ wcsc/wcsc.htm as of February 19, 2014. References