Factors Contributing to Median Encroachments and Cross-Median Crashes (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

67 14. Kniuman, M. W., F. M. Council, and D. W. Reinfurt, “Association of Median Width and Highway Accident Rates,” Transportation Research Record 1401, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993. 15. Mason, J. M., et al., Median Safety Study (Interstates and Express- ways), FHWA-PA-2001-009-97-04, Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, June 2001. 16. Donnell, E. T., et al., “Cross-Median Collisions on Pennsylvania Interstates and Expressways,” Transportation Research Record 1784, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Wash- ington, D.C., 2002. 17. Donnell, E. T. and J. M. Mason, “Predicting the Frequency of Median Barrier Crashes on Pennsylvania Interstates,” Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 38, No. 3, May 2006. 18. Donnell, E. T. and J. M. Mason, “Predicting the Severity of Median- Related Crashes in Pennsylvania by Using Logistic Regression,” Transportation Research Record 1897, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004. 19. Donnell, E. T. and J. M. Mason, “Methodology to Develop Median Barrier Warrant Criteria,” Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 132, No. 4, American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, May 2006. 20. Ulfarsson, G. F. and V. N. Shankar, “Accident Count Model Based on Multiyear Cross-Sectional Roadway Data with Serial Correla- tion,” Transportation Research Record 1840, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003. 21. Noyce, D. A. and R. J. McKendry, Analysis of Median Crossover Crashes in Wisconsin. Report No. 2005-01, Traffic Operations and Safety Laboratory, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, July 2005, http://www.topslab.wisc.edu/projects/documents/11_ Research_Report_08-23-05.pdf 22. Fitzpatrick, K., D. Lord, and B. J. Park, “Accident Modification Factors for Medians on Freeways and Multilane Rural Highways in Texas,” Transportation Research Record 2083, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2008. 23. Torbic, D. J., et al., NCHRP Report 641: Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips, Transpor- tation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2009. 24. Griffith, M. S., “Safety Evaluation of Rolled-In Continuous Shoul- der Rumble Strips Installed on Freeways,” Transportation Research Record 1665, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999. 1. Graham, J. L., et al., Median Cross-Section Design for Rural Divided Highways, Final Report, NCHRP Project 22-21, MRIGlobal, 2011. 2. Hutchinson, J. W. and T. W. Kennedy, “Safety Considerations in Median Design,” Highway Research Record 162, Highway Research Board, 1967. 3. Cooper, P., “Analysis of Roadside Encroachments—Single-Vehicle Run-off-Road Accident Data Analysis for Five Provinces,” B.C. Research, Vancouver, British Columbia, March 1980. 4. Miaou, S. P., R. Bligh, and D. Lord, “Developing Median Barrier Installation Guidelines: Benefit-Cost Analysis Using Texas Data,” Transportation Research Record 1904, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2005. 5. Davis, G. A. and P. M. Morris, “Reanalysis of Hutchinson and Ken- nedy’s Encroachment Frequency Data,” Transportation Research Record 1953, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2006. 6. Sanderson, R. W., “Investigation of Single Vehicle Run-Offs in Can- ada,” Transportation Research Circular 341, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988. 7. Miaou, S.-P., “Estimating Roadside Encroachment Rates with the Combined Strengths of Accident and Encroachment-Based Approaches,” FHWA-RD-01-124, FHWA, 2001. 8. Miaou, S.-P., A. Lu, and H. S. Lum, “Pitfalls of Using R-Squared to Evaluate Goodness of Fit of Accident Prediction Models,” Trans- portation Research Record 1542, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996. 9. Miaou, S.-P., “Estimated Vehicle Roadside Encroachment Frequen- cies by Using Accident Prediction Models,” Transportation Research Record 1599, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. 10. Sicking, D. L., et al., “Guidelines for Implementation of Cable Median Barrier,” Transportation Research Record 2120, Transpor- tation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2009. 11. Crosby, J. R., “Cross-Median Accident Experience on the New Jersey Turnpike,” Highway Research Board Bulletin 266, Highway Research Board, 1960. 12. Garner, G. R. and R. C. Deen, “Elements of Median Design in Rela- tion to Accident Occurrence,” Highway Research Record 432, High- way Research Board, 1973[I15]. 13. Foody, T. J. and T. B. Culp, “A Comparison of the Safety Potential of the Raised Versus Depressed Median Design,” Transportation Research Record 514, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1974. References

68 25. Patel, R. B., F. M. Council, and M. S. Griffith, “Estimating the Safety Benefits of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Two Lane Rural Highways in Minnesota: An Empirical Bayes Observational Before–After Study,” Transportation Research Record 2019, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2007. 26. Carrasco, O., et al., “Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Rural Multi-Lane Divided Highways in Minne- sota,” presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2004. 27. Ligon, C. M., et al., Effects of Shoulder Textured Treatments on Safety, FHWA/RD-85/027, FHWA, U.S.DOT, 1985. 28. Chaudoin, J. H. and G. Nelson, Interstate Routes 15 and 40 Shoulder Rumble Strips, Report Caltrans-08-85-1, California DOT, August 1985. 29. Annino, J. M., Rumble Strips in Connecticut: A Before/After Analysis of Safety Benefits, Connecticut DOT, 2003. 30. Stutts, J. C., NCHRP Synthesis 287: Sleep Deprivation Counter measures for Motorist Safety, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. 31. Gårder, P. and J. Alexander, Continued Research on Continuous Rumble Strips. Final Report, Technical Report 94-4, Maine DOT, December 1995. 32. Morena, D. A., The Nature and Severity of Drift-Off-Road Crashes on Michigan Freeways, and the Effectiveness of Various Shoulder Rumble Strip Designs, presented at the 82nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, January 2003. 33. Marvin, R. R. and D. J. Clark, An Evaluation of Shoulder Rumble Strips in Montana, Montana DOT, 2003. 34. Perrillo, K., The Effectiveness and Use of Continuous Shoulder Rum- ble Strips, FHWA, Albany, NY, 1998. 35. Hickey, J. J., Jr., “Shoulder Rumble Strip Effectiveness, Drift-Off- Road Accident Reductions on the Pennsylvania Turnpike,” Trans- portation Research Record 1573, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997. 36. Tennessee Department of Transportation, Statewide Installation of Shoulder Rumble Strips on Tennessee’s Interstates, http://www.tdot. state.tn.us/rumble/release.htm, accessed September 2005. 37. Cheng, E. Y. C., E. Gonzalez, and M. O. Christensen, “Application and Evaluation of Rumble Strips on Highways,” Utah Department of Transportation, Compendium of Technical Papers, 64th ITE Annual Meeting, Dallas, Texas, 1994. 38. Chen, C., E. O. Darko, and T. N. Richardson, “Optimal Continuous Shoulder Rumble Strips and the Effects on Highway Safety and the Economy,” ITE Journal, Vol. 73, No. 5, May 2003. 39. Harwood, D. W., NCHRP Synthesis 191: Use of Rumble Strips to Enhance Safety, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993. 40. Harkey, D. L., et al., NCHRP Report 617: Accident Modification Fac- tors for Traffic Engineering and ITS Improvements, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2008. 41. Spainhour, L. K. and A. Mishra, “Analysis of Fatal Run-Off-the- Road Crashes Involving Overcorrection,” Transportation Research Record 2069, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2008. 42. MS Transportation Systems, Inc., “Road Safety Audit-I-195 Westport- Major Highway Median Cross-Over Crashes,” MassHighway, Sep- tember 2008. 43. Wilson, E. M., and M. E. Lipinski, NCHRP Synthesis 336: Road Safety Audits, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004. 44. SRF Consulting Group, Inc., Wisconsin Cross Median Crash Road Safety Audit Report, Wisconsin DOT, October 2008. 45. CTC and Associates LLC, “Putting the Brakes on Crossover Crashes: Median Barrier Research and Practice in the U.S.,” Transporta- tion Synthesis Report, Wisconsin Department of Transportation, Bureau of Project Development, 2007. 46. AASHTO, Roadside Design Guide, Washington, D.C., 2006. 47. Donnell, E. T. and W. E. Hughes, “State Transportation Agency Median Design Practices: Results from a Survey,” presented at the 85th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Wash- ington, D.C., January 2011. 48. AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design for Highways and Streets, Washington, D.C., 2000. 49. AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design for Highways and Streets, Washington, D.C., 2004. 50. AASHTO, A Policy on Geometric Design for Highways and Streets, Washington, D.C., 2011. 51. Harwood, D. W., et al., Safety Analyst: Software Tools for Safety Management of Specific Highway Sites, FHWA-HRT-10-063, FHWA, July 2010. 52. Qiu, L. and W. A. Nixon, “Effects of Adverse Weather on Traffic Crashes,” Transportation Research Record 2055, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2008. 53. Andrey, J., D. Hambly, B. Mills, and S. Afrin, “Insights into Driver Adaptation to Inclement Weather in Canada,” Journal of Transport Geography, 2012. 54. AASHTO, A Policy on Design Standards Interstate System, Washing- ton, D.C., January 2005. 55. AASHTO, Roadside Design Guide, Washington, D.C., 2011. 56. Mak, K. K. and D. L. Sicking, NCHRP Report 492: Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP)—Engineer’s Manual, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2003. 57. RoadSafe LLC, Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) Update, Appendix A: User’s Manual, Version 3.0.0, Final Report of NCHRP Project 22-27, http://rsap.roadsafellc.com, 2012. 58. RoadSafe LLC, Roadside Safety Analysis Program (RSAP) Update, Appendix B: Engineer’s Manual, Version 3.0.0, Final Report of NCHRP Project 22-27, http://rsap.roadsafellc.com, 2012. 59. Bonneson, J. A., et al., “Chapter 19: Freeways,” draft HSM chapter presenting safety prediction method for freeway segments, Final Report of NCHRP Project 17-45, Texas Transportation Institute, Washington, D.C., 2012. 60. AASHTO, Highway Safety Manual, Washington, D.C., 2010. 61. Elvik, R. and T. Vaa, The Handbook of Road Safety Measures, 2004. 62. Griffin, L. I. and R. N. Reinhardt, A Review of Two Innovative Pave- ment Patterns That Have Been Developed to Reduce Traffic Speeds and Crashes, AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, D.C., 1996. 63. Katz, B. J., D. E. Duke, and H. A. Rakha, “Design and Evaluation of Peripheral Transverse Bars to Reduce Vehicle Speed,” presented at the 85th Annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 2006. 64. Godley, S., et al., Perceptual Countermeasures: Experimental Research, Report No. CR182, Australian Transport Safety Bureau, Commonwealth Department of Transport and Regional Services, Canberra, Australia, 1999. 65. Alexander, G. and H. Lunenfeld, Positive Guidance in Traffic Con- trol, FHWA, 1975. 66. Lerner, N., et al., NCHRP Web-Only Document 70: Comprehensive Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004. 67. McGee, H. W., et al., Decision Sight Distance for Highway Design and Traffic Control Requirements, FHWA-RD-78-78, FHWA, 1978.

69 Contrasts and Centrifugation on Driver Performance and Behavior, FHWA-RD-77-165 and -166, FHWA, 1977. 74. Maroney, S. and R. E. Dewar, “Alternatives to Enforcement in Modifying Speeding Behavior of Drivers,” Transportation Research Record 1111, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987. 75. McCoy, P. T., J. A. Bonneson, and J. A. Kollbaum, “Speed Reduction Effects of Speed Monitoring Displays with Radar in Work Zones on Interstate Highways,” Transportation Research Record 1509, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washing- ton, D.C., 1995. 76. VanHouten, R. and P. Nau, “A Comparison of the Effects of Posted Feedback and Increased Police Surveillance on Highway Speeding,” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 14, No. 261, 1981. 77. Rämä, P., “Effects of Weather-Controlled Variable Speed Limits and Warning Signs on Driver Behavior,” Transportation Research Record 1689, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999. 68. McNees, R. W., “In Situ Study Determining Lane-Maneuvering Dis- tance for Three- and Four-Lane Freeways for Various Traffic Volume Conditions,” Transportation Research Record 869, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982. 69. Chang, M., et al., “Evaluation of Driver’s Psychophysiological Load at Freeway Merging Area,” presented at the 80th annual meeting of the Transportation Research Board, 2001. 70. Kahlberg, V. P., “Reflector Post—Signs of Danger?” Transportation Research Record 1403, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993. 71. Bahar, G., et al., NCHRP Report 518: Safety Evaluation of Perma- nent Raised Pavement Markers, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2004. 72. Potts, I. B., et al., Benefit/Cost Evaluation of MoDOT’s Total Striping and Delineation Program: Phase II, Report No. RI06043, Missouri DOT, 2011. 73. Allen, R. W., J. F. O’Hanlon, and D. T. McRuer, Drivers’ Visibility Requirements for Roadway Delineation, Volumes I and II: Effects of