National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 12 Suggested Annoyance Survey Protocol
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"13 Annoyance References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Research Methods for Understanding Aircraft Noise Annoyances and Sleep Disturbance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22352.
×
Page 40
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"13 Annoyance References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Research Methods for Understanding Aircraft Noise Annoyances and Sleep Disturbance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22352.
×
Page 41

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

13 Annoyance References AAPOR. (2011) Standards Definitions, Final Dispositions of Case Codes and Outcome Rates for Surveys, Revised 2011, American Association of Public Opinion Research. Last accessed on March 5, 2011 at http://aapor.org/Content/NavigationMenu/AboutAAPOR/StandardsampEthics/StandardDefini tions/StandardDefinitions2011.pdf American National Standard (ANSI). (2008) “Quantities and Procedures for Description and Measurement of Environmental Sound – Part 6: Methods for Estimation of Awakenings Associated with Outdoor Noise Events Heard in Homes”, ANSI S12.9-2008 / Part 6. Available through http://webstore.ansi.org/default.aspx Battaglia, M. P., Link, M. W., Frankel, M. R., Osborn, L., and Mokdad, A. H. (2008) “An Evaluation of respondent selection methods for household mail surveys”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 72: 459–469. Brick, J. M., Montaquila, J., Hagedorn, M. C., Roth, S. B., and Chapman, C. (2005) “Implications for RDD Design from an Incentive Experiment”, Journal of Official Statistics, 21: 571–589. Brink, M., Wirth, K., Schierz, C. (2006) “Effects of early morning aircraft overflights on sleep and implications for policy making”, Proceedings EuroNoise 2006, Tampere, Finland. Brink, M., Wirth, K., Schierz, C., Thomann, G., and Bauer, G. (2008) Annoyance Responses to Stable and Changing Aircraft Noise Exposure, J.Acoust.Soc.Am., 124 (5): 2930–2941. Curtin, R., Presser, S., and Singer, E. (2005) “Changes in Telephone Nonresponse Over the last Quarter Century”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 69: 87–98. de Leeuw, E. (2005) “To Mix or Not to Mix Data Collection Modes in Surveys”, Journal of Official Statistics 21: 233–255. Fidell, S. and Silvati, L. (2004) Parsimonious alternatives to regression analysis for characterizing prevalence rates of aircraft noise annoyance, Noise Control Eng. J., 52: 56–68. Groves, R., Fowler, F., Couper, M., Lepkowski, J., Singer, E., and Tourangeau, R. (2004) Survey Methodology, Hoboken,NJ: Wiley. Groves, R. M. (2006) “Nonresponse rates and nonresponse bias in household surveys”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 70: 646–675. Janssen, S., Vos, H., van Kempen, E., Breugelmans, O., and Miedema, H. (2011) Trends in aircraft noise annoyance: The role of study and sample characteristics, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 129: 1953–1962. 36

Messer, B. L. and Dillman, D.A. (2011) Surveying the general public over the internet using address-based sampling and mail contact procedures, Public Opinion Quarterly, 75(3): 429– 457. Langer, G. (May/June 2003) About response rates: Some unresolved questions. Public Perspective, 16–18, available at http://abcnews.go.com/images/pdf/responserates.pdf Montaquila, J. M., Brick, J. M., Hagedorn, M. C., Williams, D. (May 2010) “Maximizing response in a two-phase survey with mail as the primary mode”, Paper presented at the American Association for Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL. Oehlert, G. M. (2000) A First Course in Design and Analysis of Experiments, New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. Pew (2013) Pew Internet & American Life Project. Last accessed on February 3, 2014 at http://libraries.pewinternet.org/2013/08/28/who-has-home-broadband-new-data-and- resources/#fn-2429-1 Rizzo, L., Brick, J. M., and Park, I. (2004) “A Minimally Intrusive Method for Sampling Persons in Random Digit Dial Surveys”, Public Opinion Quarterly, 68: 267–274. Schultz, T. J. (1978) “Synthesis of Social Surveys on Noise Annoyance”, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 64: 377–405. Simonoff, J. (2003) Analysis of Categorical Data. New York: Springer-Verlag. TNO and RIVM. (1998) Annoyance, sleep disturbance, health, perceived risk and residential satisfaction around Schiphol airport: results of a questionnaire survey. Report 98.039, TNO- PG, Leiden, The Netherlands/Report No. 441520010, RIVM, Bilthoven, The Netherlands, www.rivm.nl/dsresource?objectid=rivmp:14751&type=org&disposition=inline&ns_nc=1 Tourangeau, R., Conrad, F. G. and Couper, M.P. (2013) The Science of Web Surveys. New York, NY: Oxford Woodward, J. M.; Friscoe, L. L.; and Dunholter, P. (2009) ACRP 15: Aircraft Noise: a Toolkit for Managing Community Expectations. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C. World Health Organization (WHO). (2009) “Night Noise Guidelines for Europe”, accessed July 18, 2012.http://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/43316/E92845.pdf Yamada, I., Kaku, J., Yokota, T., Namba, S., and Ogata, S. (2008) A New Method of Social Survey on Transportation Noise Using the Internet and GIS, The 9th Congress of the International Commission on the Biological Effects of Noise, Foxwoods, Connecticut, USA. JPN-616. 37

Next: 14 Sleep Disturbance Literature Review »
Research Methods for Understanding Aircraft Noise Annoyances and Sleep Disturbance Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s Airport Cooperative Research Program (ACRP) Web-Only Document 17: Research Methods for Understanding Aircraft Noise Annoyances and Sleep Disturbance explores the development and validation of a research protocol for a large-scale study of aircraft noise exposure-annoyance response relationships across the U.S. The report also highlights alternative research methods for field studies to assess the relationship between aircraft noise and sleep disturbance for U.S. airports.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!