National Academies Press: OpenBook
Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Guidance for Managing NEPA-Related and Other Risks in Project Delivery, Volume 2: Expediting NEPA Decisions and Other Practitioner Strategies for Addressing High Risk Issues in Project Delivery. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22377.
×
Page R1
Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Guidance for Managing NEPA-Related and Other Risks in Project Delivery, Volume 2: Expediting NEPA Decisions and Other Practitioner Strategies for Addressing High Risk Issues in Project Delivery. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22377.
×
Page R2

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. On the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, on its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. C. D. Mote, Jr., are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. The Transportation Research Board is one of six major divisions of the National Research Council. The mission of the Transporta- tion Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation innovation and progress through research and information exchange, conducted within a setting that is objective, interdisciplinary, and multimodal. The Board’s varied activities annually engage about 7,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individu- als interested in the development of transportation. www.TRB.org www.national-academies.org

Acknowledgments  This study was conducted for the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,  with funding provided through the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project  20‐24 (71), Expediting NEPA Decisions and other Practitioner Strategies for Addressing High Risk Issues  in Project Delivery. The NCHRP is supported by annual voluntary contributions from the state  Departments of Transportation. Project 20‐24 is intended to fund quick response studies on behalf of  AASHTO and state DOT leadership.  The report was prepared by Howard P. Wood of Parsons  Brinckerhoff, Inc.  The other authors of this report were Hal Kassoff, Senior Vice President, Parsons  Brinckerhoff; Travis McGrath, PhD, PE, Managing Principal, Golder Associates Inc.; William G. Malley,  Managing Partner, Perkins Coie LLP; David C. Rose, PhD, Vice President, Parsons Brinckerhoff; and Nancy  Skinner, Senior Project Manager, Parsons Brinckerhoff. The project was managed by Andrew C. Lemer,  PhD, NCHRP Senior Program Officer.    Copyright Information  Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written  permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or  copyrighted material used herein.    Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for  classroom and not‐for‐profit purposes.  Permission is given with the understanding that none of the  material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, FAA, FHWA, FMCSA, FTA, Transit Development Corporation,  or AOC endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing  the material in this document for educational and not‐for‐profit uses will give appropriate  acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material.  For other uses of the material,  request permission from CRP.  Disclaimer  The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied are those of the research agency that performed the  research and are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board or its sponsoring agencies.  This report has not been reviewed or accepted by the Transportation Research Board Executive  Committee or the Governing Board of the National Research Council.  

Next: Report Contents »
Guidance for Managing NEPA-Related and Other Risks in Project Delivery, Volume 2: Expediting NEPA Decisions and Other Practitioner Strategies for Addressing High Risk Issues in Project Delivery Get This Book
×
 Guidance for Managing NEPA-Related and Other Risks in Project Delivery, Volume 2: Expediting NEPA Decisions and Other Practitioner Strategies for Addressing High Risk Issues in Project Delivery
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 183: Guidance for Managing NEPA-Related and Other Risks in Project Delivery, Volume 2: Expediting NEPA Decisions and Other Practitioner Strategies for Addressing High Risk Issues in Project Delivery is designed to help in the management of the legal risks in the environmental review process for transportation projects, particularly highway projects, as part of a comprehensive approach to project risk management.

For the purposes of this report, the term “legal risk” includes any risks related to legal requirements, including permitting delays as well as litigation-related delays.

The guidance focuses on early identification and assessment of legal risks, and on methods for managing legal risks. A supplemental 12-page pull-out guide accompanies the report.

Guidance for Managing NEPA-Related and Other Risks in Project Delivery, Volume 1: Guide for Managing NEPA-Related and Other Risks in Project Delivery is a guide on the use of risk management as a means to help support the early identification of key issues during the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process; the effective application of management action and other resources to avoid or mitigate schedule delays, cost escalation, and quality problems; and sound decision making in project planning, programming, and development.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!