Dynamic, Integrated Model System: Sacramento-Area Application, Volume 1: Summary Report (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

97 References Bowman, J., and M. Bradley. 2006. SACSIM/05: Activity-Based Travel Forecasting Model for SACOG, Featuring DaySim—the Person Day Activity and Travel Simulator. Technical Memo Number 10, DaySim05 Documentation. Prepared for Sacramento Area Council of Govern- ments, September 25. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., and ITT Industries. 2001. ITS Deployment Analysis System User’s Manual. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Uni- versity of Washington, Dowling Associates, Street Smarts, Herb Levinson, and Hesham Rakha. 2013. SHRP 2 Report S2-L03-RR-1: Analytical Procedures for Determining the Impacts of Reliability Mit- igation Strategies. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Chiu, Y.-C., M. Hickman, and M. Xyntarakis. 2014. SHRP 2 Report S2-C10B-RW-2: Dynamic, Integrated Model System: Sacramento-Area Application. Volume 2: Network Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Chiu, Y.-C., L. Zhou, and H. Song. 2010. Development and Calibration of the Anisotropic Mesoscopic Simulation Model for Uninterrupted Flow Facilities. Transportation Research Part B, Vol. 44, pp. 152–174. Lemp, J., E. Petersen, and T. Rossi. 2011. Technical Appendix—Data and Estimation Issues for DaySim’s Mode Choice Model Estimation with Variable Value of Time. SHRP 2 C10B project memorandum. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., Austin, Tex. Levinson, D., K. Harder, J. Bloomfield, and K. Winiarczyk. 2004. Weight- ing Waiting: Evaluating Perception of In-Vehicle Travel Time Under Moving and Stopped Conditions. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1898, Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., pp. 61–68. SACOG, DKS Associates, Bradley Research and Consulting, and Transportation Systems and Decision Sciences. 2008. Sacramento Activity-Based Travel Simulation Model (SACSIM07): Model Ref- erence Report (Draft). Sacramento Area Council of Governments, Calif. Sall, E., E. Bent, B. Charlton, J. Koehler, and G. Erhardt. 2010. Evaluating Regional Pricing Strategies in San Francisco—Application of the SFCTA Activity-Based Regional Pricing Model. Proc., 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Small, K., R. Noland, X. Chu, and D. Lewis. 1999. NCHRP Report 431: Valuation of Travel-Time Savings and Predictability in Congested Conditions for Highway User-Cost Estimation. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Small, K., C. Winston, and J. Yan. 2005. Uncovering the Distribution of Motorists’ Preferences for Travel Time and Reliability. Econometrica, Vol. 73, No. 4, pp. 1367–1382. Stogios, Y., H. Mahmassani, and P. Vovsha. Forthcoming. SHRP 2 Project L04: Incorporating Reliability Performance Measures in Operations and Planning Modeling Tools, Draft Final Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2012. Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator (MOVES) 2010b User Guide. Office of Transportation and Air Quality, Washington, D.C. http://www.epa.gov/otaq/models/ moves/documents/420b12001b.pdf.