National Academies Press: OpenBook

Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters (2014)

Chapter: Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results

« Previous: References
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 33
Page 34
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 34
Page 35
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 35
Page 36
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 36
Page 37
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 37
Page 38
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 38
Page 39
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 39
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 40
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 41
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 42
Page 43
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 43
Page 44
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 44
Page 45
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 45
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 46
Page 47
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 47
Page 48
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 48
Page 49
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 49
Page 50
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 50
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 51
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 52
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 53
Page 54
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 54
Page 55
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 55
Page 56
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 56
Page 57
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 57
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 58
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 59
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 60
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 61
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 62
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 63
Page 64
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 64
Page 65
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 65
Page 66
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 66
Page 67
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 67
Page 68
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 68
Page 69
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 69
Page 70
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 70
Page 71
Suggested Citation:"Appendix A - Detailed Model Estimation Results." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2014. Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22384.
×
Page 71

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

33 a p p E N D I x a Detailed Model Estimation Results Each table contains estimated coefficients and t-statistics for three models: • A model estimated on the Sacramento region 2000 house- hold travel survey data (the basis for the revised SACSIM AB model implementation); • A model estimated on the Tampa region 2009 NHTS (weekday) survey data; and • A model estimated on the Jacksonville region 2009 NHTS (weekday) survey data. There are six columns with t-statistics that gauge the signifi- cance of the differences between the estimated parameters: • The Jacksonville coefficient minus the Tampa coefficient, with the difference divided by the standard error from the Tampa model; • The Jacksonville coefficient minus the Tampa coefficient, with the difference divided by the standard error from the Jacksonville model; • The Tampa coefficient minus the Sacramento coefficient, with the difference divided by the standard error from the Sacramento model; • The Tampa coefficient minus the Sacramento coefficient, with the difference divided by the standard error from the Tampa model; • The Jacksonville coefficient minus the Sacramento coeffi- cient, with the difference divided by the standard error from the Sacramento model; and • The Jacksonville coefficient minus the Sacramento coeffi- cient, with the difference divided by the standard error from the Jacksonville model. Other notes relevant to the model estimation results include the following: • The t-statistic columns in the tables are shaded accord- ing to their difference from zero, with red for negative values or differences, green for positive values or differ- ences, and darker shades for values that are farther from zero. • In general, the darker the shading in the six columns on the right side of the tables, the more significant the differences between the coefficient estimates in question. Overall, there are a large number of significant differ- ences, although somewhat fewer when comparing the two Florida regions than when comparing them each to the Sacramento region. This may be partly a function of sample sizes. • “Cons” in the t-statistic column indicates that the coefficient was constrained at a particular value rather than estimated. This was often because there were not enough observations to estimate the particular variable from the data. (For exam- ple, in the mode choice models, there were very few observa- tions in the Florida NHTS where “bike” or “transit” were chosen, so many of those parameters could not be estimated for the Florida regions.)

34 35 Table A.1. Household Auto Ownership Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 3942 -5314.6 0.1623 -0.3572 2517 -3242.1 0.1997 -0.2979 1335 -1805.2 0.1598 -0.2866 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Alternative Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat 0 autos HH has 1Driver -3.68981 -7.6 -2.01018 -4.12 -2.89972 -4.08 -1.82 -1.25 3.46 3.44 1.63 1.11 2 autos HH has 1Driver -1.89173 -15.68 -0.66439 -5.35 -1.03707 -5.77 -3 -2.07 10.17 9.88 7.08 4.76 3 autos HH has 1Driver -3.01751 -16.61 -2.18802 -10.73 -2.1159 -8.28 0.35 0.28 4.57 4.07 4.96 3.53 4+ autos HH has 1Driver -4.48541 -12.9 -3.63433 -9.22 -2.98298 -8.23 1.65 1.8 2.45 2.16 4.32 4.14 0 autos HH has 2Driving Age Members -4.42927 -9.11 -3.3324 -6.55 -3.25433 -4.41 0.15 0.11 2.26 2.16 2.42 1.59 1 auto HH has 2Driving Age Members -1.63925 -9.57 -1.38138 -6.41 -1.18758 -5.18 0.9 0.84 1.51 1.2 2.64 1.97 3 autos HH has 2Driving Age Members -1.39816 -12.85 -1.61315 -10.23 -1.30819 -6.57 1.93 1.53 -1.98 -1.36 0.83 0.45 4+ autos HH has 2Driving Age Members -2.22857 -13.74 -2.51952 -9.46 -2.36345 -7.92 0.59 0.52 -1.79 -1.09 -0.83 -0.45 0 autos HH has 3Driving Age Members -3.82535 -5.57 -2.39406 -2.97 -2.81661 -2.72 -0.52 -0.41 2.08 1.78 1.47 0.97 1 auto HH has 3Driving Age Members -1.3697 -5.24 -1.44864 -3.87 -1.59785 -3.11 -0.4 -0.29 -0.3 -0.21 -0.87 -0.44 2 autos HH has 3Driving Age Members -0.36387 -1.78 -0.19898 -0.67 -0.28579 -0.81 -0.29 -0.25 0.81 0.56 0.38 0.22 4+ autos HH has 3Driving Age Members -0.51589 -2.53 -1.12126 -3.16 -0.83316 -2.18 0.81 0.75 -2.97 -1.71 -1.56 -0.83 0 autos HH has 4OrMoreDriving Age Members -5.1334 -4.21 -1.20381 -1.15 -2.28249 -1.63 -1.03 -0.77 3.22 3.74 2.34 2.04 1 auto HH has 4OrMoreDriving Age Members -1.81829 -4.62 -2.14852 -2.51 -1.8183 cons 0.39 cons -0.84 -0.39 0 cons 2 autos HH has 4OrMoreDriving Age Members -1.10945 -3.67 -0.4346 -0.86 -2.43968 -2.25 -3.98 -1.85 2.23 1.34 -4.4 -1.23 3 autos HH has 4OrMoreDriving Age Members -1.09279 -3.61 -0.26026 -0.54 -0.72169 -1.28 -0.96 -0.82 2.75 1.74 1.23 0.66 0–4+ Household has at least as many cars as workers 0.39954 3.21 0.80353 3.6 0.83236 2.47 0.13 0.09 3.24 1.81 3.47 1.28 0 autos HH PartTimeWorkers per Driving Age Member 0.69903 1.73 -1.22138 -1.61 -0.42788 -0.38 1.05 0.71 -4.77 -2.53 -2.8 -1.01 1 auto HH PartTimeWorkers per Driving Age Member 0.32485 1.59 0.31851 1.36 0.79582 2.12 2.03 1.27 -0.03 -0.03 2.31 1.26 4+ autos HH PartTimeWorkers per Driving Age Member -0.43856 -1.38 -1.37266 -2.1 -0.43244 -0.74 1.44 1.61 -2.94 -1.43 0.02 0.01 1 auto HH RetiredAdults per Driving Age Member 0.23902 2.01 1.28307 10.26 0.42824 2.3 -6.84 -4.6 8.8 8.35 1.59 1.02 3 autos HH RetiredAdults per Driving Age Member -0.30116 -1.91 -0.23992 -1.24 -0.655 -2.64 -2.14 -1.67 0.39 0.32 -2.25 -1.43 4+ autos HH RetiredAdults per Driving Age Member -0.56374 -2.23 -0.6008 -1.71 -0.70967 -1.83 -0.31 -0.28 -0.15 -0.11 -0.58 -0.38 1 auto HH UniversityStudents per Driving Age Member 0.3196 1.4 0.93908 0.98 2.52138 2.13 1.66 1.34 2.71 0.65 9.63 1.86 3 autos HH UniversityStudents per Driving Age Member 0.57069 2.02 1.31205 1.28 1.965 1.89 0.64 0.63 2.62 0.72 4.93 1.34 0 autos HH DrivingAgeStudents per Driving Age Member 2.92501 2.28 -0.19238 -0.08 0 cons 0.08 cons -2.43 -1.3 -2.28 cons 1 auto HH DrivingAgeStudents per Driving Age Member 1.29697 2.34 1.79045 1.96 2.27422 2.1 0.53 0.45 0.89 0.54 1.77 0.9 4+ autos HH DrivingAgeStudents per Driving Age Member -2.59112 -3.82 -0.5699 -0.54 0.53073 0.48 1.03 1 2.98 1.9 4.61 2.84 0 autos HH HomeBasedPersons per Driving Age Member -1.06364 -1.58 -0.38232 -0.49 -0.51774 -0.41 -0.17 -0.11 1.01 0.88 0.81 0.44 1 auto HH HomeBasedPersons per Driving Age Member -0.53661 -1.87 -0.07281 -0.24 -0.25303 -0.56 -0.59 -0.4 1.62 1.51 0.99 0.63 3 autos HH HomeBasedPersons per Driving Age Member 0.28589 1.06 0.40553 1.31 0.36296 0.9 -0.14 -0.1 0.44 0.39 0.29 0.19 4+ autos HH HomeBasedPersons per Driving Age Member 0.64784 1.73 0.33032 0.61 0.63164 1.08 0.55 0.52 -0.85 -0.58 -0.04 -0.03 3 autos HH ChildrenUnder5 per Driving Age Member -0.47289 -1.63 -0.70904 -1.56 0.00979 0.04 1.58 2.58 -0.81 -0.52 1.66 1.73 4+ autos HH ChildrenUnder5 per Driving Age Member -1.73045 -2.87 -0.20003 -0.31 -0.02176 -0.05 0.28 0.44 2.54 2.38 2.84 4.17

36 37 Table A.2. Household Auto Ownership Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 3942 -5314.6 0.1623 -0.3572 2517 -3242.1 0.1997 -0.2979 1335 -1805.2 0.1598 -0.2866 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Alternative Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat 0 autos HH has 0To15KIncome 2.07181 8.25 1.73681 6.31 1.40195 3.32 -1.22 -0.79 -1.33 -1.22 -2.67 -1.59 1 auto HH has 0To15KIncome 0.60728 3.35 0.58676 2.94 0.11689 0.46 -2.36 -1.84 -0.11 -0.1 -2.7 -1.92 3 autos HH has 0To15KIncome -0.71462 -2.23 -0.23001 -0.58 -0.18436 -0.43 0.11 0.11 1.51 1.22 1.66 1.23 4+ autos HH has 0To15KIncome -1.43568 -2.51 -1.22827 -1.17 -0.71098 -0.91 0.49 0.66 0.36 0.2 1.27 0.92 0 autos HH has 50To75KIncome -1.4535 -3.6 -1.22785 -2.26 -2.37103 -2.26 -2.11 -1.09 0.56 0.42 -2.27 -0.87 1 auto HH has 50To75KIncome -1.09308 -8.65 -0.39049 -2.5 -1.45695 -5.69 -6.82 -4.16 5.56 4.49 -2.88 -1.42 3 autos HH has 50To75KIncome 0.14078 1.17 0.53502 2.77 0.08068 0.32 -2.36 -1.82 3.27 2.04 -0.5 -0.24 4+ autos HH has 50To75KIncome 0.18861 1.11 0.24994 0.76 0.09669 0.27 -0.46 -0.43 0.36 0.19 -0.54 -0.26 0 autos HH has 75KPlusIncome -0.58492 -1.49 -0.95563 -2.07 -1.96118 -2.52 -2.18 -1.29 -0.94 -0.8 -3.51 -1.77 1 auto HH has 75KPlusIncome -1.00587 -6.32 -1.14041 -6.96 -1.76366 -7.19 -3.81 -2.54 -0.85 -0.82 -4.76 -3.09 3 autos HH has 75KPlusIncome 0.2256 1.66 0.38606 2.24 0.54305 2.6 0.91 0.75 1.18 0.93 2.34 1.52 4+ autos HH has 75KPlusIncome 0.34302 1.85 0.48696 1.79 0.60123 2.02 0.42 0.38 0.78 0.53 1.39 0.87 0 autos HH has MissingIncome -0.53538 -1.16 0.12366 0.36 0.66496 1.46 1.56 1.19 1.42 1.9 2.6 2.63 1 auto HH has MissingIncome -0.52697 -2.41 -0.38855 -2.12 -0.69626 -2.51 -1.68 -1.11 0.63 0.75 -0.77 -0.61 3 autos HH has MissingIncome 0.21518 0.87 -0.09768 -0.33 -0.17509 -0.45 -0.26 -0.2 -1.27 -1.06 -1.58 -1 4+ autos HH has MissingIncome -0.97821 -1.75 0.08618 0.19 -0.41403 -0.64 -1.08 -0.77 1.9 2.3 1.01 0.87 0 autos (workTourModeLog-sumWithFullCarOwnership - workTourModeLog-sumWithNoCarOwnership) -0.42496 -4.56 -0.01056 -0.15 0.02297 0.17 0.48 0.25 4.45 5.98 4.81 3.38 autos < HH adults (workTourModeLog-sumWithFullCarOwnership - workTourModeLog-sumWithNoCarOwnership) -0.11124 -5.76 -0.08817 -3.63 -0.06545 -1.89 0.94 0.66 1.19 0.95 2.37 1.32 0 autos (schoolTourModeLog-sumWithFullCarOwnership - schoolTourModeLog-sumWithNoCarOwnership) -1.26275 -1.09 -1.2627 cons -1.2627 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons 0 autos LN(distance To Nearest Transit Stop) -0.18288 -1.99 -0.41522 -3.85 -0.2651 -1.86 1.39 1.05 -2.53 -2.15 -0.9 -0.58 autos < HH adults LN(1 + Residence Parcel Buffer 1 Transit Stops) 0.14811 2.47 -0.01352 -0.21 0.18335 1.47 3.04 1.58 -2.69 -2.5 0.59 0.28 0 autos Residence Parcel Buffer 1 Off Street Paid Parking Daily Price 0.00071 3.74 -0.21937 -0.61 0.00774 0.12 0.63 3.46 -1153.06 -0.61 36.81 0.11 0 autos LN(1 + Residence parcel Buffer1 Food empl. + Retail empl. + Service empl. + Medical empl.) 0.29598 3.75 0.10363 1.08 0.22079 1.77 1.22 0.94 -2.44 -2 -0.95 -0.6 1 auto LN(1 + Residence parcel Buffer1 Food empl. + Retail empl. + Service empl. + Medical empl.) 0.19796 5.8 0.19055 3.18 0.14362 2.26 -0.78 -0.74 -0.22 -0.12 -1.59 -0.86 0 autos (workTourModeLog-sumWithFullCarOwnership - workTourModeLog-sumWithNoCarOwnership) in Rural areas 0.27817 1.56 -0.3276 -2.17 0.07015 0.54 2.64 3.04 -3.4 -4.02 -1.17 -1.59 0 autos HH in rural area -0.77256 -1.7 0.0259 0.1 -0.39566 -0.8 -1.58 -0.85 1.76 3 0.83 0.76

38 39 Table A.3. Person Exact Number of Tours Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 10030 -3788 0.6562 -0.1373 3820 -1543.7 0.6322 -0.0412 2195 -855.2 0.6454 -0.0937 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Alternative Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat 2+ work tours FulltimeWorker -0.07383 -0.46 0.69935 2.07 -1.36038 -3.16 -6.11 -4.78 4.83 2.29 -8.04 -2.99 2+ work tours 0To25KIncome 0.17678 0.86 0.31134 0.74 -0.81078 -0.75 -2.68 -1.04 0.66 0.32 -4.82 -0.91 2+ work tours Female Adult No ChildrenUnder16 -0.30075 -2.01 -0.09655 -0.37 -0.01406 -0.04 0.32 0.21 1.36 0.78 1.91 0.72 2+ work tours Female Adult ChildrenUnder5 -0.70169 -1.7 -0.69932 -0.87 -0.08205 -0.07 0.76 0.54 0.01 0 1.5 0.54 2+ work tours AgeIsBetween18And25 -0.4212 -1.43 0.37939 0.68 -0.4604 -0.54 -1.5 -0.99 2.72 1.43 -0.13 -0.05 2+ work tours AgeIsBetween26And35 -0.38146 -1.77 0.34419 0.82 -1.09434 -0.98 -3.43 -1.29 3.37 1.73 -3.31 -0.64 2+ work tours WorksAtHome 1.47171 4.35 0.80531 1.68 1.52377 2.28 1.5 1.08 -1.97 -1.39 0.15 0.08 2 work tours Mode choice log-sum to usual work location 0.32053 4.11 0.41746 2.69 0.26556 1.3 -0.98 -0.74 1.24 0.63 -0.71 -0.27 3+ work tours Mode choice log-sum to usual work location 0.0731 0.26 -0.37298 -1.08 -0.79821 -1.16 -1.23 -0.62 -1.62 -1.29 -3.16 -1.27 2+ work tours Pattern includes SchoolTours -0.08565 -0.19 0 cons 0 cons cons cons 0.19 cons 0.19 cons 2+ work tours Pattern includes EscortTours 0.25692 1.8 0.15273 0.45 0.48305 1.16 0.97 0.79 -0.73 -0.31 1.58 0.54 2+ work tours Pattern includes WorkStops 0.12535 1.9 0.3521 2.86 0.30708 1.77 -0.37 -0.26 3.44 1.84 2.75 1.05 2+ work tours Pattern includes PersonalBusinessStops 0.25789 3.49 0.12097 0.35 -0.00385 -0.01 -0.36 -0.24 -1.85 -0.4 -3.54 -0.5 2+ work tours Pattern includes MealStops -0.34399 -2.02 0.01203 0.05 -0.84085 -1.54 -3.51 -1.56 2.09 1.46 -2.91 -0.91 2 work tours Constant -3.01657 -13.32 -3.71592 -8.74 -2.15068 -4.07 3.68 2.96 -3.09 -1.65 3.82 1.64 3+ work tours Constant -5.45259 -9.78 -6.13485 -8.85 -4.76227 -4.38 1.98 1.26 -1.22 -0.98 1.24 0.64 2+ school tours PartTimeWorker -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ school tours UniversityStudent 1.29702 4.4 1.48341 1.26 0 cons -1.26 cons 0.63 0.16 -4.4 cons 2+ school tours DrivingAgeStudent 0.72981 2.08 1.31793 1.75 0.44401 0.37 -1.16 -0.72 1.67 0.78 -0.81 -0.24 2+ school tours ChildUnder5 -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ school tours 0To25KIncome 0.80278 3.02 0.62302 0.55 1.42246 1.19 0.71 0.67 -0.68 -0.16 2.33 0.52 2+ school tours cars Per Adult in HH 0.59354 2.11 -0.42205 -0.57 -0.29558 -0.27 0.17 0.11 -3.62 -1.38 -3.17 -0.8 2 school tours Mode choice log-sum to usual school location 0.22409 1.1 0.2241 cons 0.2241 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons 3+ school tours Mode choice log-sum to usual school location 0.47204 0.73 0.472 cons 0.472 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons 2+ school tours Pattern includes SchoolStops 0.50142 1.38 0.98189 0.86 0 cons -0.86 cons 1.33 0.42 -1.38 cons 2 school tours Constant -4.23143 -12.85 -3.56034 -4.4 -3.86323 -3.44 -0.37 -0.27 2.04 0.83 1.12 0.33 3+ school tours Constant -6.90105 -9.72 -6.901 cons -6.901 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons 2+ escort tours NonworkingAdult 0.39173 1.93 0.57252 1.25 0.3663 0.79 -0.45 -0.44 0.89 0.39 -0.13 -0.05 2+ escort tours 0To25KIncome 0.3066 1.51 0.6296 1.43 -0.97352 -1.41 -3.63 -2.31 1.59 0.73 -6.31 -1.85 2+ escort tours 25To45KIncome 0.27156 1.43 0.20408 0.55 0.48964 0.93 0.77 0.54 -0.35 -0.18 1.15 0.41 2+ escort tours Female Adult ChildrenAge5Through15 1.37145 7.06 0.95089 2.34 0.99252 2.34 0.1 0.1 -2.16 -1.03 -1.95 -0.89 2+ escort tours Male Adult ChildrenAge5Through15 0.80961 3.33 0.97404 1.6 -0.31357 -0.44 -2.12 -1.79 0.68 0.27 -4.62 -1.56 (continued on next page)

40 41 Table A.3. Person Exact Number of Tours Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 10030 -3788 0.6562 -0.1373 3820 -1543.7 0.6322 -0.0412 2195 -855.2 0.6454 -0.0937 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Alternative Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat 2+ escort tours AgeIsBetween18And25 -0.58586 -1.45 1.0596 0.73 0 cons -0.73 cons 4.06 1.13 1.45 cons 2+ escort tours AgeIsBetween26And35 -0.4927 -1.89 1.12139 2.08 -0.98508 -1.34 -3.91 -2.86 6.2 2.99 -1.89 -0.67 2+ escort tours AgeIsBetween51And65 -0.1663 -0.78 0.00445 0.01 -0.46437 -0.94 -1.04 -0.95 0.8 0.38 -1.4 -0.61 2+ escort tours WorksAtHome 0.25268 0.86 2.3827 3.89 1.35257 2.22 -1.68 -1.69 7.24 3.48 3.74 1.8 2 escort tours Aggregate mode/destination log-sum for escort tour 0.10853 2.1 0.08311 0.66 0.08734 0.56 0.03 0.03 -0.49 -0.2 -0.41 -0.14 3+ escort tours Aggregate mode/destination log-sum for escort tour 0.02898 0.33 0.02749 0.11 0.20881 0.76 0.7 0.66 -0.02 -0.01 2.03 0.66 2+ escort tours Pattern includes WorkTours -0.89626 -5.05 -0.19409 -0.4 -0.18138 -0.38 0.03 0.03 3.96 1.44 4.03 1.5 2+ escort tours Pattern includes SchoolTours -1.5884 -4.05 1.1365 0.8 -0.70538 -1 -1.29 -2.61 6.95 1.91 2.25 1.25 2 escort tours Constant -2.28521 -4.27 -2.94873 -2.08 -2.34545 -1.33 0.43 0.34 -1.24 -0.47 -0.11 -0.03 3+ escort tours Constant -3.01209 -3.54 -4.17115 -1.48 -5.16402 -1.69 -0.35 -0.32 -1.36 -0.41 -2.53 -0.7 (continued)

42 43 Table A.4. Person Exact Number of Tours Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 10030 -3788 0.6562 -0.1373 3820 -1543.7 0.6322 -0.0412 2195 -855.2 0.6454 -0.0937 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Alternative Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat 2+ pers.bus. tours DrivingAgeStudent 0.41799 0.69 0 cons 0 cons cons cons -0.69 cons -0.69 cons 2+ pers.bus. tours ChildAge5Through15 -0.73146 -1.22 0 cons -1.53433 -1.4 cons -1.4 1.22 cons -1.34 -0.73 2+ pers.bus. tours 0To25KIncome -0.57008 -2.7 -0.37536 -0.94 0.35932 0.74 1.85 1.51 0.92 0.49 4.41 1.91 2+ pers.bus. tours OnlyAdult in HH 0.24623 1.16 0.46813 1.36 0.18276 0.42 -0.83 -0.65 1.05 0.65 -0.3 -0.14 2+ pers.bus. tours Female Adult No ChildrenUnder16 0.29086 1.83 0.2601 0.85 -0.13557 -0.38 -1.29 -1.1 -0.19 -0.1 -2.68 -1.18 2+ pers.bus. tours Female Adult ChildrenUnder5 0.01841 0.04 0.23383 0.28 0 cons -0.28 cons 0.43 0.26 -0.04 cons 2 pers.bus. tours Aggregate mode/destination log-sum for pers.bus. tour 0.06154 1.08 -0.09394 -0.77 0.02931 0.24 1.01 0.99 -2.73 -1.27 -0.57 -0.26 3+ pers.bus. tours Aggregate mode/destination log-sum for pers.bus. tour 0.08327 0.57 0.07282 0.23 -0.26954 -0.64 -1.07 -0.81 -0.07 -0.03 -2.43 -0.83 2+ pers.bus. tours Pattern includes WorkTours -0.77291 -3.59 0.4511 1.2 0.48833 1.1 0.1 0.08 5.69 3.26 5.86 2.83 2+ pers.bus. tours Pattern includes SchoolTours -0.87761 -1.74 0 cons -0.58877 -0.53 cons -0.53 1.74 cons 0.57 0.26 2+ pers.bus. tours Pattern includes EscortTours -0.30648 -2.09 -0.34402 -0.74 -0.92918 -1.39 -1.26 -0.87 -0.26 -0.08 -4.25 -0.93 2+ pers.bus. tours Pattern includes ShoppingTours -0.35587 -1.89 0.41066 1.78 -0.65265 -1.55 -4.61 -2.52 4.07 3.32 -1.58 -0.7 2+ pers.bus. tours Pattern includes PersonalBusinessStops 0.29444 4.05 0.17605 0.75 0.11603 0.38 -0.26 -0.2 -1.63 -0.51 -2.45 -0.58 2 pers.bus. tours Constant -2.39212 -3.47 -1.11611 -0.73 -2.0238 -1.34 -0.59 -0.6 1.85 0.83 0.53 0.24 3+ pers.bus. tours Constant -4.70753 -2.68 -5.1013 -1.26 -1.47196 -0.3 0.9 0.75 -0.22 -0.1 1.84 0.67 2+ shopping tours FulltimeWorker 0.33855 1.12 0.09811 0.25 -0.03336 -0.07 -0.33 -0.29 -0.8 -0.61 -1.23 -0.82 2+ shopping tours ChildAge5Through15 -1.11201 -1.06 0.39313 0.56 -0.35095 -0.3 -1.06 -0.63 1.44 2.15 0.73 0.64 2+ shopping tours 75KPlusIncome 0.06802 0.23 0.46403 1.83 0.04037 0.12 -1.67 -1.28 1.34 1.56 -0.09 -0.08 2+ shopping tours OnlyAdult in HH 0.3117 1.18 0.32773 1.4 -0.56976 -1.48 -3.83 -2.33 0.06 0.07 -3.35 -2.29 2+ shopping tours Female Adult ChildrenAge5Through15 -0.03681 -0.08 -0.27218 -0.57 -1.4052 -1.34 -2.37 -1.08 -0.53 -0.49 -3.1 -1.31 2+ shopping tours Male Adult ChildrenAge5Through15 0.98636 2.45 0.6273 1.14 0.02836 0.03 -1.09 -0.72 -0.89 -0.65 -2.38 -1.16 2+ shopping tours AgeIsBetween26And35 -0.88291 -1.4 0.75453 1.66 0 cons -1.66 cons 2.6 3.6 1.4 cons 2+ shopping tours WorksAtHome 0.51157 1.25 -0.19678 -0.35 -0.6857 -1.01 -0.88 -0.72 -1.73 -1.28 -2.93 -1.76 2 shopping tours Aggregate mode/destination log-sum for shopping tour 0.45304 3.1 -0.04329 -0.46 0.07813 0.55 1.28 0.86 -3.4 -5.25 -2.57 -2.65 3+ shopping tours Aggregate mode/destination log-sum for shopping tour 0.79727 1.45 0.2591 0.81 0.68696 1.36 1.33 0.84 -0.98 -1.67 -0.2 -0.22 2+ shopping tours Pattern includes WorkTours -1.66969 -3.63 -0.83084 -1.49 -0.73576 -1.23 0.17 0.16 1.82 1.51 2.03 1.56 2+ shopping tours Pattern includes PersonalBusinessTours -0.00865 -0.04 0.05247 0.23 0.35083 1.2 1.33 1.02 0.29 0.27 1.7 1.22 2+ shopping tours Pattern includes EscortStops -0.0616 -0.22 -0.36313 -0.81 0 cons 0.81 cons -1.07 -0.67 0.22 cons 2+ shopping tours Pattern includes PersonalBusinessStops -0.07629 -0.55 0.0742 0.35 -0.71472 -1.43 -3.73 -1.58 1.08 0.71 -4.56 -1.28 2+ shopping tours Pattern includes ShoppingStops 0.14783 1.45 0.02902 0.34 -0.00078 -0.01 -0.35 -0.23 -1.16 -1.39 -1.46 -1.13 2+ shopping tours Pattern includes Social/recreationStops 0.50826 2.26 -0.30815 -0.76 -0.07271 -0.13 0.58 0.43 -3.63 -2.02 -2.58 -1.07 2 shopping tours Constant -6.85138 -4.93 -1.74547 -1.81 -2.52591 -1.69 -0.81 -0.52 3.68 5.29 3.12 2.89 3+ shopping tours Constant -12.54953 -2.36 -7.20691 -2.13 -10.72217 -1.93 -1.04 -0.63 1.01 1.58 0.34 0.33

44 45 Table A.5. Person Exact Number of Tours Choice Model—Part 3 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 10030 -3788 0.6562 -0.1373 3820 -1543.7 0.6322 -0.0412 2195 -855.2 0.6454 -0.0937 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Alternative Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat 2+ meal tours FulltimeWorker -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ meal tours PartTimeWorker -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ meal tours UniversityStudent -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ meal tours DrivingAgeStudent -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ meal tours ChildAge5Through15 -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ meal tours ChildUnder5 -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ meal tours 0To25KIncome 0.66047 1.27 -1.65433 -1.49 0 cons 1.49 cons -4.45 -2.08 -1.27 cons 2+ meal tours OnlyAdult in HH -1.29954 -1.65 1.20593 1.85 -0.98081 -0.9 -3.35 -2 3.19 3.84 0.41 0.29 2+ meal tours Pattern includes WorkTours -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ meal tours Pattern includes SchoolTours -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ meal tours Pattern includes EscortTours -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2 meal tours Constant -2.29922 -7.51 -1.61965 -4.12 -2.01494 -5.35 -1.01 -1.05 2.22 1.73 0.93 0.76 3+ meal tours Constant -20 cons -20 cons -20 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ social/rec tours ChildUnder5 -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons 2+ social/rec tours OnlyAdult in HH 0.79501 2.76 0.51519 2.21 -0.03369 -0.08 -2.36 -1.37 -0.97 -1.2 -2.88 -2.06 2+ social/rec tours Female Adult ChildrenUnder5 -0.91545 -0.85 0.05134 0.06 -0.14956 -0.18 -0.25 -0.25 0.9 1.19 0.71 0.94 2+ social/rec tours Female Adult ChildrenAge5Through15 -1.3686 -1.74 -0.41886 -0.7 -1.07931 -1.27 -1.1 -0.78 1.21 1.58 0.37 0.34 2+ social/rec tours AgeIsBetween18And25 0.48229 1.15 0 cons -0.93647 -0.88 cons -0.88 -1.15 cons -3.39 -1.33 2+ social/rec tours AgeIsBetween26And35 0.57329 1.09 0.23183 0.46 1.61365 2.77 2.73 2.37 -0.65 -0.67 1.98 1.78 2+ social/rec tours AgeIsBetween51And65 0.44917 1.58 0.1658 0.71 0.48299 1.45 1.35 0.95 -1 -1.21 0.12 0.1 2+ social/rec tours Pattern includes WorkTours -1.67622 -3.6 -1.23291 -3.49 -0.86771 -1.91 1.03 0.8 0.95 1.25 1.73 1.78 2+ social/rec tours Pattern includes EscortTours 0.62325 3 0.11557 0.52 0.07929 0.18 -0.16 -0.08 -2.44 -2.29 -2.62 -1.21 2+ social/rec tours Pattern includes MealStops 0.02536 0.09 -0.44821 -1.55 0.51389 1.32 3.33 2.47 -1.67 -1.64 1.72 1.25 2+ social/rec tours Pattern includes Social/recreationStops 0.70204 3.76 -0.04794 -0.22 -0.19207 -0.45 -0.65 -0.34 -4.02 -3.4 -4.79 -2.11 2 social/rec tours Constant -2.87126 -14.8 -2.4718 -16.34 -2.19189 -9.14 1.85 1.17 2.06 2.64 3.5 2.83 3+ social/rec tours Constant -5.63127 -11.87 -4.47713 -15.38 -4.2919 -9.51 0.64 0.41 2.43 3.97 2.82 2.97

46 47 Table A.6. Nonmandatory-Tour Destination Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 6224 -7606.5 0.6853 0.5101 2912 -1584.2 0.8295 0.7759 1601 -1526.5 0.7001 0.5601 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat sampling AdjustmentFactor 1 cons 1 cons 1 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons HomeBasedTour * timePressure 14.64626 6.8 0.06927 0.83 0.87644 0.3 9.71 0.27 -6.77 -175.38 -6.4 -4.64 _secondary * _workOrSchoolPattern * distanceFromOrigin0 0.22201 0.86 -1.92165 -4.84 -1.4713 -2.82 1.13 0.86 -8.32 -5.4 -6.57 -3.24 _secondary * _otherPattern * distanceFromOrigin5 -0.02815 -0.1 -1.11415 -2.85 -0.74437 -1.34 0.95 0.67 -3.67 -2.78 -2.42 -1.29 _secondary * _otherPattern * distanceFromOrigin0 0.09804 0.32 0.03483 0.09 -0.37464 -0.72 -1.1 -0.79 -0.21 -0.17 -1.55 -0.91 _secondary * _otherPattern * distanceFromOrigin3 0.42673 3.01 -0.68976 -4.28 -0.13116 -0.65 3.46 2.77 -7.89 -6.92 -3.94 -2.76 WorkBasedTour * distanceFromOriginLog -1.79699 -6.3 -1.41449 -2.41 -1.58152 -2.18 -0.29 -0.23 1.34 0.65 0.76 0.3 household.has0To15KIncome * distanceFromOriginLog 1.43513 6.52 0.92587 3.08 -0.21638 -0.57 -3.8 -3 -2.31 -1.69 -7.5 -4.33 household.hasMissingIncome * distanceFromOriginLog 0.75753 2.85 0.07643 0.28 0.60816 1.49 1.95 1.31 -2.56 -2.5 -0.56 -0.37 person.IsRetiredAdult * distanceFromOriginLog -0.30291 -2.21 -0.17968 -1.12 0.4865 2.33 4.14 3.2 0.9 0.77 5.76 3.79 person.IsChildAge5Through15 * distanceFromOriginLog -0.87304 -3.16 -0.76747 -1.84 -0.38203 -0.99 0.92 1 0.38 0.25 1.78 1.27 person.IsChildUnder5 * distanceFromOriginLog -1.05054 -3.56 -1.0505 cons -1.0505 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons HomeBasedTour * distanceFromSchoolLog -0.48293 -2.52 -0.4829 cons -0.4829 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons distanceFromWorkLog -0.23955 -2.15 -0.60694 -3.1 -0.10764 -0.51 2.55 2.36 -3.3 -1.88 1.19 0.62 carCompetition * destinationParcel.ParkingSufficiency 1.81085 5.1 0 cons 0 cons cons cons -5.1 cons -5.1 cons noCarCompetition * destinationParcel.ParkingSufficiency 0.83659 2.86 -1.33107 -0.49 0 cons 0.49 cons -7.4 -0.79 -2.86 cons escortPurpose * tourLog-sum 0.62608 9.43 0.58528 7.19 0.76091 6.57 2.16 1.52 -0.61 -0.5 2.03 1.16 escortPurpose * distanceFromOrigin4 -10.57176 -4.9 -6.48564 -1.38 -10.94478 -1.67 -0.95 -0.68 1.89 0.87 -0.17 -0.06 escortPurpose * distanceFromOrigin8 -3.55337 -7.29 -5.27019 -5.47 -1.64587 -1.15 3.76 2.54 -3.52 -1.78 3.91 1.34 escortPurpose * distanceFromOrigin9 -2.28678 -8.01 -1.58901 -3.25 -2.49718 -4.18 -1.86 -1.52 2.44 1.43 -0.74 -0.35 escortPurpose * householdhasChildren * STUDK12B 0.20799 9.07 0.30163 7.12 0.18758 3.93 -2.69 -2.39 4.09 2.21 -0.89 -0.43 escortPurpose * EMPTOT_B -0.13975 -5.6 0.00622 0.11 -0.09163 -1.52 -1.72 -1.62 5.85 2.57 1.93 0.8 personalBusiness * tourLog-sum 0.83837 5.73 0.47208 2.45 0.31217 1.9 -0.83 -0.97 -2.5 -1.9 -3.6 -3.2 personalBusiness * distanceFromOrigin4 -11.87891 -5.45 -31.06448 -7.66 -24.46566 -5.16 1.63 1.39 -8.81 -4.73 -5.78 -2.66 personalBusiness * distanceFromOrigin8 -3.26071 -6.66 -3.50759 -3.62 -2.78047 -2.33 0.75 0.61 -0.5 -0.25 0.98 0.4 personalBusiness * distanceFromOrigin9 -1.81429 -7.67 -2.82518 -7.15 -2.65313 -6.1 0.44 0.4 -4.27 -2.56 -3.54 -1.93 personalBusiness * distanceFromOrigin3 -0.43998 -2.8 -0.85989 -3.45 -0.93792 -4.71 -0.31 -0.39 -2.67 -1.68 -3.16 -2.5 personalBusiness * EMPEDU_B 0.14322 5.83 0.10013 2.29 -0.00148 -0.03 -2.32 -1.79 -1.75 -0.98 -5.89 -2.55 personalBusiness * EMPSVC_B -0.14827 -4.89 -0.33581 -5.91 0.06472 0.89 7.05 5.53 -6.18 -3.3 7.02 2.94 personalBusiness * EMPMED_B 0.18526 8.32 0.43281 8.1 0.21562 3.96 -4.06 -3.99 11.12 4.63 1.36 0.56 personalBusiness * HOUSES_B // also psrc -0.10345 -3.75 -0.08722 -1.73 -0.19716 -2.94 -2.18 -1.64 0.59 0.32 -3.39 -1.4 personalBusiness * STUDUNIB 0.0751 4.6 0.03976 1.22 -0.08218 -1.96 -3.74 -2.91 -2.16 -1.08 -9.63 -3.76 shoppingPurpose * tourLog-sum 1.11264 6.11 1.30258 6.86 0.04975 0.26 -6.6 -6.65 1.04 1 -5.84 -5.64 shoppingPurpose * distanceFromOrigin4 -9.37239 -4.27 3.1472 0.82 -10.66871 -2.2 -3.61 -2.85 5.7 3.27 -0.59 -0.27 shoppingPurpose * distanceFromOrigin8 -7.00238 -13.26 -3.14909 -4.22 -7.16374 -7.5 -5.38 -4.2 7.3 5.17 -0.31 -0.17 shoppingPurpose * distanceFromOrigin9 -2.0972 -7.26 -2.47964 -7.11 -3.29737 -8.26 -2.34 -2.05 -1.32 -1.1 -4.15 -3.01 shoppingPurpose * distanceFromOrigin3 -0.26816 -1.27 -0.1683 -0.67 -1.69105 -6.83 -6.03 -6.15 0.47 0.4 -6.74 -5.75 shoppingPurpose * EMPEDU_B // also psrc -0.13917 -6.34 -0.01581 -0.53 -0.08059 -1.98 -2.18 -1.59 5.62 4.16 2.67 1.44 shoppingPurpose * EMPRET_B // also psrc 0.51094 15.65 0.34667 8.59 0.51425 9.78 4.15 3.19 -5.03 -4.07 0.1 0.06

48 49 Table A.7. Nonmandatory-Tour Destination Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 6224 -7606.5 0.6853 0.5101 2912 -1584.2 0.8295 0.7759 1601 -1526.5 0.7001 0.5601 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat mealPurpose * tourLog-sum 0.71812 4.24 0.17722 0.55 0.19886 0.79 0.07 0.09 -3.2 -1.68 -3.07 -2.06 mealPurpose * distanceFromOrigin4 -15.74356 -5.85 -1.7355 -0.24 -15.71537 -2.31 -1.93 -2.06 5.2 1.93 0.01 0 mealPurpose * distanceFromOrigin8 -5.06528 -7.53 -4.11032 -3.29 -4.74658 -3.15 -0.51 -0.42 1.42 0.77 0.47 0.21 mealPurpose * distanceFromOrigin9 -2.19232 -7.02 -3.95944 -7.4 -3.28931 -6.12 1.25 1.25 -5.65 -3.3 -3.51 -2.04 mealPurpose * distanceFromOrigin3 -0.38055 -1.95 -1.34318 -3.25 -1.37643 -4.45 -0.08 -0.11 -4.92 -2.33 -5.09 -3.22 mealPurpose * EMPFOO_B // psrc 0.18771 5.19 0.49464 7.61 0.29752 3.9 -3.03 -2.58 8.49 4.72 3.04 1.44 socialRecreationPurpose * tourLog-sum 0.75868 4.05 0.36155 2.77 0.13872 0.94 -1.71 -1.52 -2.12 -3.05 -3.31 -4.22 socialRecreationPurpose * distanceFromOrigin4 -14.07822 -5.96 -24.34818 -6.99 -29.6412 -7.42 -1.52 -1.32 -4.35 -2.95 -6.59 -3.9 socialRecreationPurpose * distanceFromOrigin8 -3.7711 -6.41 -2.76691 -2.42 -3.83512 -3.78 -0.93 -1.05 1.71 0.88 -0.11 -0.06 socialRecreationPurpose * distanceFromOrigin9 -1.76811 -6.11 -2.64753 -8.61 -3.28212 -8.17 -2.06 -1.58 -3.04 -2.86 -5.23 -3.77 socialRecreationPurpose * distanceFromOrigin3 -0.23281 -1.23 -0.8396 -4.27 -1.12164 -5.39 -1.43 -1.36 -3.22 -3.09 -4.71 -4.28 socialRecreationPurpose * EMPOFC_B // also psrc 0.21263 5.25 0.39804 11.98 0.21955 3.72 -5.37 -3.02 4.58 5.58 0.17 0.12 socialRecreationPurpose * EMPSVC_B // also psrc 0.43456 9.84 0.05718 1.26 0.34194 5.25 6.27 4.37 -8.55 -8.31 -2.1 -1.42 socialRecreationPurpose * HOUSES_B // also psrc -0.77182 -17.23 -0.61114 -11.01 -0.58065 -9.5 0.55 0.5 3.59 2.89 4.27 3.13 socialRecreationPurpose * STUDUNIB // psrc 0.07733 3.74 0.13494 5.12 0.03824 1 -3.67 -2.54 2.79 2.19 -1.89 -1.03 log size function coefficient 0.28212 24.7 0.15498 44.8 0.24399 10.34 25.73 3.77 -11.13 -36.75 -3.34 -1.62 escort * no Children in HH * EmploymentEducation escort * no Children in HH * EmploymentFood -3.71465 -3.31 -19.28149 -3.46 -8.71438 -1.8 1.9 2.18 -13.86 -2.8 -4.45 -1.03 escort * no Children in HH * EmploymentGovernment -2.36825 -1.87 -203.7442 0 -30 cons 0 cons -158.83 0 -21.79 cons escort * no Children in HH * EmploymentOffice -2.61357 -3.79 -11.69547 -6.05 -3.90557 -1.73 4.03 3.45 -13.16 -4.69 -1.87 -0.57 escort * no Children in HH * EmploymentRetail -3.2784 -4 -13.03137 -5.74 -0.44557 -0.18 5.55 5.14 -11.91 -4.3 3.46 1.16 escort * no Children in HH * EmploymentService -2.78645 -3.8 -30 cons -2.94714 -1.09 cons 10.04 -37.11 cons -0.22 -0.06 escort * no Children in HH * EmploymentMedical -2.43974 -2.72 -19.08671 -9.55 1.13304 0.53 10.11 9.42 -18.53 -8.32 3.98 1.66 escort * no Children in HH * EmploymentIndustrial&Construction -3.86182 -5.03 -10.98948 -4.81 -30 cons -8.32 cons -9.29 -3.12 -34.07 cons escort * no Children in HH * Households -21.72185 -15.58 -30 cons -22.76468 -6.52 cons 2.07 -5.94 cons -0.75 -0.3 escort * Children in HH * EmploymentEducation -1.01264 -1.4 -15.0962 -5.05 5.80841 3.09 7 11.11 -19.45 -4.72 9.42 3.62 escort * Children in HH * EmploymentGovernment -5.17664 -2.3 -30 cons -30 cons cons cons -11.01 cons -11.01 cons escort * Children in HH * EmploymentOffice -2.28857 -3.9 -16.33829 -8.61 -0.27331 -0.14 8.46 8.34 -23.96 -7.4 3.44 1.05 escort * Children in HH * EmploymentRetail -3.40027 -4.71 -92.88962 -0.11 -0.37365 -0.18 0.11 43.8 -123.99 -0.1 4.19 1.43 escort * Children in HH * EmploymentService -1.58241 -2.91 -102.1336 -0.03 0.50669 0.26 0.03 52.1 -184.65 -0.03 3.84 1.06 escort * Children in HH * EmploymentMedical -3.84726 -4.24 -21.95375 -10.48 -3.36234 -1.18 8.87 6.53 -19.95 -8.64 0.53 0.17 escort * Children in HH * EmploymentIndustrial&Construction -3.10312 -5.02 -12.20641 -6.95 -5.0416 -2.39 4.08 3.39 -14.74 -5.18 -3.14 -0.92 escort * Children in HH * Households -19.56042 -16.2 -30 cons -15.9122 -5.72 cons 5.06 -8.64 cons 3.02 1.31 escort * Children in HH * StudentsK12

50 51 Table A.8. Nonmandatory-Tour Destination Choice Model—Part 3 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 6224 -7606.5 0.6853 0.5101 2912 -1584.2 0.8295 0.7759 1601 -1526.5 0.7001 0.5601 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat personalBusiness * EmploymentEducation -5.39983 -6.29 -30 cons -30 cons cons cons -28.67 cons -28.67 cons personalBusiness * EmploymentFood -17.42194 -4.83 -30 cons -16.08799 -3.6 cons 3.11 -3.49 cons 0.37 0.3 personalBusiness * EmploymentOffice -10.16155 -11.71 -30 cons -30 cons cons cons -22.87 cons -22.87 cons personalBusiness * EmploymentRetail -0.87415 -2.31 4.83537 6.35 -1.99018 -1.81 -8.96 -6.2 15.06 7.5 -2.94 -1.01 personalBusiness * EmploymentService -0.7408 -1.88 -4.36368 -3.14 -0.25596 -0.24 2.95 3.79 -9.19 -2.6 1.23 0.45 personalBusiness * EmploymentMedical personalBusiness * EmploymentIndustrial&Construction -10.78006 -11.06 -30 cons -58.64131 -0.09 cons -0.04 -19.71 cons -49.08 -0.07 personalBusiness * Households -17.5983 -18.63 -30 cons -17.37736 -8.08 cons 5.87 -13.13 cons 0.23 0.1 personalBusiness * StudentsK12 -7.33999 -7.61 -9.90852 -2.07 -6.93527 -2.69 0.62 1.15 -2.66 -0.54 0.42 0.16 shoppingPurpose * EmploymentFood -11.81349 -10.18 -30 cons -6.23217 -4.93 cons 18.82 -15.67 cons 4.81 4.42 shoppingPurpose * EmploymentOffice -12.07073 -15.33 -30 cons -12.52164 -7.44 cons 10.39 -22.77 cons -0.57 -0.27 shoppingPurpose * EmploymentRetail shoppingPurpose * EmploymentService -11.32857 -14.55 -17.84246 -10.98 -7.57843 -6.04 6.32 8.17 -8.37 -4.01 4.82 2.99 mealPurpose * EmploymentFood mealPurpose * EmploymentOffice -12.62362 -10.16 -30 cons -30 cons cons cons -13.99 cons -13.99 cons mealPurpose * EmploymentTotal -12.93674 -18.22 -30 cons -15.01772 -8.16 cons 8.14 -24.03 cons -2.93 -1.13 mealPurpose * Households -21.74874 -9.65 -30 cons -30 cons cons cons -3.66 cons -3.66 cons socialRecreationPurpose * EmploymentFood -1.1771 -0.99 -2.47949 -1.12 3.15843 2.12 2.54 3.79 -1.09 -0.59 3.64 2.91 socialRecreationPurpose * EmploymentGovernment -1.09149 -0.48 7.91663 4.02 -43.51275 -0.04 -26.13 -0.05 3.97 4.58 -18.69 -0.04 socialRecreationPurpose * EmploymentOffice -6.63967 -5.02 -13.95761 -2.9 0.17376 0.11 2.94 9.2 -5.53 -1.52 5.15 4.44 socialRecreationPurpose * EmploymentRetail -6.16801 -4.02 -13.08579 -2.5 1.27374 0.64 2.74 7.18 -4.51 -1.32 4.85 3.72 socialRecreationPurpose * EmploymentService -2.92876 -3.63 -30 cons 3.6241 3.33 cons 30.9 -33.53 cons 8.12 6.02 socialRecreationPurpose * Households socialRecreationPurpose * StudentsUniversity socialRecreationPurpose * StudentsK12 -5.43682 -2 8.55463 2.12 -30 cons -9.57 cons 5.14 3.47 -9.03 cons

52 53 Table A.9. Work-Based Sub-Tour Generation Choice Model Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 2386 -1566.3 0.318 -0.1382 513 -301.2 0.3418 -0.1631 331 -207.9 0.2941 -0.1722 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat work sub-tour Constant -0.22601 -0.98 -0.53745 -0.58 0.04704 0.05 0.63 0.6 -1.35 -0.34 1.18 0.28 school sub-tour Constant -2.18949 -3.53 -2.23639 -1.58 -2.0895 cons 0.1 cons -0.08 -0.03 0.16 cons escort sub-tour Constant -3.13634 -6.28 -4.26504 -3.07 -2.65778 -1.98 1.16 1.2 -2.26 -0.81 0.96 0.36 pers. bus. sub-tour Constant -1.40037 -5.95 -2.03245 -2.2 -0.68694 -0.72 1.46 1.4 -2.69 -0.68 3.03 0.74 shopping sub-tour Constant -1.79618 -7.37 -2.37389 -2.68 -1.81157 -1.94 0.63 0.6 -2.37 -0.65 -0.06 -0.02 meal sub-tour Constant -0.27147 -1.22 -1.03982 -1.16 0.21157 0.23 1.39 1.34 -3.46 -0.86 2.18 0.52 social/rec sub-tour Constant -1.72975 -6.55 -2.58374 -2.7 -1.30415 -1.31 1.34 1.28 -3.23 -0.89 1.61 0.43 no more sub-tours One or more sub-tours already simulated 1.57466 11.31 2.70959 5.97 2.62145 5.65 -0.19 -0.19 8.15 2.5 7.52 2.26 no more sub-tours LN(# of home-based tours in pattern) 0.37706 3.4 0.27456 0.9 0.11999 0.33 -0.51 -0.43 -0.92 -0.34 -2.32 -0.71 no more sub-tours Pattern has 2+ work tours 0.73553 4.5 1.32597 2.92 1.09163 1.54 -0.52 -0.33 3.61 1.3 2.18 0.5 no more sub-tours No cars in HH 0.0289 0.06 0.0289 cons 0.37977 0.28 cons 0.26 0 cons 0.78 0.26 no more sub-tours Cars in HH, but fewer cars than adults 0.02831 0.24 0.24425 0.61 0.02037 0.04 -0.56 -0.43 1.85 0.54 -0.07 -0.02 no more sub-tours Aggregate mode/destination log-sum for work-based sub-tours -0.05502 -2.08 -0.10397 -1.09 0.00647 0.06 1.15 1.1 -1.85 -0.51 2.32 0.61 escort sub-tour Buffer 1 K–12 school enrollment 0.11888 1.32 0.18673 0.84 0.07979 0.32 -0.48 -0.43 0.75 0.3 -0.43 -0.16 all—upper level Log-sum across all stop purposes vs no more stops 1.33662 13.51

54 55 Table A.10. Work-Tour-Mode Choice Model Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 3313 -3185.9 0.4457 -0.4349 844 -576.7 0.6052 -0.4469 506 -343 0.5739 -0.4735 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Parking cost utility 0.52879 2.76 0.5288 cons -188.13417 -1.45 cons -1.46 0 cons -986.16 -1.46 All Path type model log-sum 0.55879 5.84 0.4422 1.99 1.09404 1.51 2.94 0.9 -1.22 -0.53 5.59 0.74 drive to transit Constant -1.60381 -2.16 -10 cons -1.6038 cons cons cons -11.3 cons 0 cons drive to transit No cars in HH -2 cons -2 cons -2 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons drive to transit Cars in HH, but fewer cars than workers -1.01072 -0.95 -1 cons -1.0107 cons cons cons 0.01 cons 0 cons walk to transit Constant -1.91816 -1.73 3.01303 1.05 -1.9182 cons -1.73 cons 4.44 1.73 0 cons hov3 Constant -0.96958 -1.34 2.99452 1 4.69404 0.8 0.57 0.29 5.49 1.32 7.84 0.96 hov3,hov2 #HH children under age 5 0.32332 2.22 0.70998 1.41 -0.14078 -0.41 -1.69 -2.46 2.66 0.77 -3.19 -1.34 hov3,hov2 #HH children age 5–15 0.27883 3.35 0.33712 1.19 0.07227 0.45 -0.94 -1.64 0.7 0.21 -2.48 -1.28 hov3,hov2 LN(hov path auto distance) -0.13582 -2.42 -0.47008 -1.68 -0.09662 -0.56 1.33 2.18 -5.96 -1.19 0.7 0.23 hov3 One person HH -0.61753 -1.98 -1 cons -0.6175 cons cons cons -1.22 cons 0 cons hov3 Two person HH -1.24533 -5.84 -1.4901 -2.98 -0.74351 -1.72 1.49 1.73 -1.15 -0.49 2.35 1.16 hov2 Constant -0.43668 -0.61 3.59657 1.2 5.22651 0.89 0.54 0.28 5.63 1.35 7.91 0.96 hov3,hov2 No cars in HH -3.10628 -3.8 -2.08923 -1.12 -4.88763 -1.34 -1.49 -0.77 1.24 0.54 -2.18 -0.49 hov3,hov2 Cars in HH, but fewer cars than adults 0.43342 2.59 0.49302 0.91 -0.79197 -1.41 -2.38 -2.29 0.36 0.11 -7.32 -2.18 hov2 One person HH -0.39332 -1.62 -0.26393 -0.46 -1.12006 -1.39 -1.48 -1.06 0.53 0.22 -2.99 -0.9 sov Constant 2.20033 2.55 6.01696 1.53 7.28401 1.24 0.32 0.22 4.42 0.97 5.89 0.86 sov Cars in HH, but fewer cars than workers -1.27744 -4.46 -3.21419 -1.84 -1.57557 -1.35 0.94 1.41 -6.77 -1.11 -1.04 -0.26 sov HH income less than 25K -0.17415 -1.11 -0.44942 -0.85 -0.72538 -1.35 -0.52 -0.51 -1.76 -0.52 -3.52 -1.03 bike Constant -9.5721 -5.79 -10 cons -9.5721 cons cons cons -0.26 cons 0 cons bike Male 0.76617 2.2 0.7662 cons 0.7662 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons bike Age over 50 -0.66188 -1.84 -0.6619 cons -0.6619 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons walk Male -0.65971 -2.02 -0.6597 cons 2.50599 1.42 cons 1.79 0 cons 9.69 1.79 transit origin parcel buffer 1 mixed-use density 2.00231 2 17.74557 0.78 2.0023 cons -0.69 cons 15.72 0.69 0 cons transit destination parcel buffer 1 net intersections 0.01099 1.94 -0.03423 -0.78 0.011 cons 1.03 cons -7.99 -1.03 0 cons transit destination parcel buffer 1 total employment 0.0001 4.25 0.0001 cons 0.0001 cons cons cons 0.08 cons 0.08 cons sov escort stops per tour in the pattern -2.21704 -3.36 48.77236 0.02 -2.217 cons -0.02 cons 77.32 0.02 0 cons sov other stops per tour in the pattern -0.03177 -0.38 0.26661 0.43 31.48649 0.01 50.57 0.01 3.59 0.48 378.73 0.01 hov3,hov2 escort stops per tour in the pattern 3.7031 4.79 58.28783 0.02 3.7031 cons -0.02 cons 70.61 0.02 0 cons hov3,hov2 other stops per tour in the pattern 0.24299 2.51 0.45109 0.7 31.70606 0.01 48.27 0.01 2.15 0.32 325.32 0.01 bike fraction of distance on class 2 bike lanes 0.47993 2.01 0.4799 cons 0.4799 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons bike origin parcel buffer 2 mixed-use density 2.40963 3.13 2.4096 cons 2.4096 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons bike destination parcel buffer 2 total employment 0.00015 4.96 0.0002 cons 0.0002 cons cons cons 1.51 cons 1.51 cons bike destination parcel buffer 2 mixed-use density 7.17103 4.73 7.171 cons 7.171 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons walk destination parcel buffer 1 mixed-use density 0.92527 1.74 2.74796 1.43 4.1059 1.17 0.71 0.39 3.43 0.95 5.98 0.91 all mode nest log-sum 0.95969 6.41 0.74871 2.05 1.19739 6.36 1.23 2.38 -1.41 -0.58 1.59 1.26

56 57 Table A.11. School-Tour-Mode Choice Model Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 1568 -2400.4 0.1218 -0.2427 211 -277.8 0.2177 -0.1999 166 -226.3 0.1633 -0.2714 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Parking cost utility 0.08271 0.43 0.0827 cons 3.22511 0.02 cons 0.02 0 cons 16.44 0.02 All Path type model log-sum 1.02204 4.88 0.71517 2.72 2.20936 3.91 5.68 2.64 -1.46 -1.17 5.67 2.1 school bus Constant -1.19447 -3.57 6.96913 2.69 -1.83695 -2.15 -3.39 -10.31 24.42 3.15 -1.92 -0.75 school bus Child under 5 -0.37388 -0.58 -0.3739 cons -0.3739 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons school bus University student -2.15522 -2.83 -1.88077 -1.73 -2.90766 -2.69 -0.95 -0.95 0.36 0.25 -0.99 -0.7 walk to transit Constant -3.89062 -2.19 -10 cons -3.8906 cons cons cons -3.45 cons 0 cons walk to transit No cars in HH 1.02925 1.8 0 cons 1.0292 cons cons cons -1.8 cons 0 cons walk to transit Cars in HH, but fewer cars than adults 0.28476 0.86 0 cons 0.2848 cons cons cons -0.86 cons 0 cons walk to transit Child under 5 -5 cons -5 cons -5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons walk to transit University student 1.61893 2.9 0 cons 1.6189 cons cons cons -2.9 cons 0 cons walk to transit Driving age student 1.44186 3.01 0 cons 1.4419 cons cons cons -3.01 cons 0 cons hov3 Constant -0.43633 -1.81 6.67228 2.57 -1.91634 -2.24 -3.31 -10.06 29.56 2.74 -6.16 -1.73 hov3 Two person HH -1.17062 -3.81 -1.73007 -1.62 -1.54996 -1.41 0.17 0.16 -1.82 -0.52 -1.23 -0.34 hov2 One person HH -0.50005 -0.68 -2 cons -0.5001 cons cons cons -2.03 cons 0 cons hov2 Constant -1.07632 -4.43 6.10585 2.35 -2.56567 -3 -3.34 -10.12 29.55 2.77 -6.13 -1.74 hov3,hov2 No cars in HH -1.74511 -2.57 -1.7451 cons -1.7451 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons hov3,hov2 HH income less than 25K -0.26427 -1.55 0.08631 0.14 -2.02942 -2.35 -3.47 -2.45 2.05 0.58 -10.35 -2.04 hov3,hov3 HH income 25–50K -0.26347 -1.99 0.23261 0.59 -0.16303 -0.34 -1 -0.84 3.74 1.25 0.76 0.21 hov3,hov4 Child under 5 1.37562 2.73 1.3756 cons 1.3756 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons sov Constant 1.21451 3 8.76969 3.28 -0.27177 -0.25 -3.38 -8.47 18.68 2.82 -3.68 -1.39 sov Cars in HH, but fewer cars than adults -1.01886 -3.48 -0.93431 -1.64 -1.81686 -1.97 -1.55 -0.96 0.29 0.15 -2.73 -0.87 sov HH income less than 25K -0.78348 -2.55 -1 cons -0.7835 cons cons cons -0.7 cons 0 cons sov HH income over 75K 0.30803 1.23 -0.66362 -1.19 0.19524 0.27 1.55 1.2 -3.89 -1.75 -0.45 -0.16 sov Driving age student -1.56467 -4.06 -1.10778 -1.94 -0.61499 -0.79 0.86 0.63 1.19 0.8 2.47 1.21 bike Constant -3.5144 -5.81 4.01366 1.41 -3.17964 -1.99 -2.53 -4.5 12.45 2.65 0.55 0.21 bike Male 0.16084 0.64 -0.65262 -0.5 1.27223 0.97 1.48 1.46 -3.24 -0.62 4.42 0.84 bike University student 0.51494 1.12 2.80857 1.9 0.5149 cons -1.55 cons 4.99 1.55 0 cons walk University student -0.00738 -0.02 0 cons -0.0074 cons cons cons 0.02 cons 0 cons transit LN(origin parcel buffer 1 transit stops) 0.41911 1.63 0 cons 0.4191 cons cons cons -1.63 cons 0 cons transit destination parcel buffer 1 mixed-use density 2.58949 1.53 0 cons 2.5895 cons cons cons -1.53 cons 0 cons sov escort stops per tour in the pattern -1.78375 -2.33 -1 cons -1.7837 cons cons cons 1.02 cons 0 cons sov other stops per tour in the pattern 0.21961 1.81 0.69368 1.3 -1.53659 -2.28 -4.18 -3.32 3.9 0.89 -14.45 -2.61 hov3,hov2 escort stops per tour in the pattern 1.28842 3.28 0.29592 0.47 1.2884 cons 1.58 cons -2.53 -1.58 0 cons hov3,hov2 other stops per tour in the pattern 0.22136 2.48 0.45737 1.5 -0.16187 -0.75 -2.03 -2.86 2.64 0.77 -4.29 -1.77 (continued on next page)

58 59 Table A.11. School-Tour-Mode Choice Model Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 1568 -2400.4 0.1218 -0.2427 211 -277.8 0.2177 -0.1999 166 -226.3 0.1633 -0.2714 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat bike fraction of distance on class 1 bike paths 1.07764 3.36 1.0776 cons 1.0776 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons bike fraction of distance on class 2 bike lanes 0.8818 2.35 0.8818 cons 0.8818 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons bike fraction of distance on “gauntlet” links -1.15327 -3.07 -1.1533 cons -1.1533 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons bike origin parcel buffer 2 mixed-use density 0.93583 1.67 0.90448 0.3 1.53678 0.74 0.21 0.3 -0.06 -0.01 1.07 0.29 bike destination parcel buffer 2 total employment 0.00018 2.78 0 cons -0.00019 -0.1 cons -0.1 -2.78 cons -5.73 -0.19 bike destination parcel buffer 2 mixed-use density 0.21171 0.34 -1.40269 -0.51 -2.06128 -0.7 -0.24 -0.22 -2.56 -0.59 -3.6 -0.77 walk destination parcel buffer 1 mixed-use density 0.18728 0.87 4.02265 2.25 -0.4031 -0.48 -2.47 -5.32 17.89 2.14 -2.75 -0.71 all mode nest log-sum 1 4.13 (continued) Table A.12. Escort-Tour-Mode Choice Model Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 1432 -1248 0.4392 -0.1203 353 -305.5 0.438 -0.0353 229 -213.5 0.3887 -0.078 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Log-sum from the path type choice model 3.3416 14.96 0.9562 8.43 1.09069 4.23 1.19 0.52 -10.68 -21.02 -10.07 -8.73 hov3 Constant -2.18009 -6.74 -4.23173 -8.51 -5.14627 -7.4 -1.84 -1.31 -6.35 -4.13 -9.17 -4.26 hov3 Number of HH children under age 5 1.1668 8.93 0.4204 1.42 1.7387 3.87 4.47 2.93 -5.71 -2.53 4.37 1.27 hov3 Number of HH children age 5–15 0.48228 8.9 0.41088 3.13 0.4372 3.44 0.2 0.21 -1.32 -0.54 -0.83 -0.35 hov3 Number of HH children age 16+ 0.07773 0.57 -0.52813 -1.37 0.0631 0.15 1.54 1.39 -4.45 -1.57 -0.11 -0.03 hov2 Constant -1.30159 -4.01 -3.59873 -7.26 -4.11953 -6.07 -1.05 -0.77 -7.08 -4.64 -8.68 -4.16 hov3,hov2 No cars in HH -5.914 cons -5.914 cons -5.914 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons hov3,hov2 Cars in HH, fewer cars than adults -0.03257 -0.24 -0.39563 -1.53 0.11937 0.3 1.99 1.3 -2.67 -1.41 1.12 0.38 sov Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons bike Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons walk Age over 50 -2.3805 -3.36 -6.56808 -5.34 -2.65183 -2.84 3.18 4.19 -5.91 -3.4 -0.38 -0.29 walk Destination parcel buffer 1 net intersections 0.00151 0.15 -0.14041 -4.38 -0.15356 -3.12 -0.41 -0.27 -14.43 -4.42 -15.76 -3.15 walk Number of HH children under age 5 0.915 3.22 0.64675 0.47 1.43404 1.84 0.57 1.01 -0.94 -0.19 1.83 0.66 walk Number of HH children age 5–15 -0.02723 -0.19 -1.12771 -2.34 -1.1189 -2.81 0.02 0.02 -7.83 -2.29 -7.77 -2.74 walk Number of HH children age 16+ -1.41548 -2.61 -0.15483 -0.11 -1.4155 cons -0.93 cons 2.32 0.93 0 cons

60 61 Table A.13. Other Home-Based Tour-Mode Choice Model Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 4501 -5206 0.2961 -0.2656 2569 -3211.3 0.2142 -0.266 1373 -1738.6 0.1807 -0.254 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Parking cost utility 0.37911 2.6 0.3791 cons 1.05119 0.03 cons 0.02 0 cons 4.61 0.02 All Path type model log-sum 2.01869 7.78 0.55722 13.18 0.58223 9.32 0.59 0.4 -5.63 -34.56 -5.54 -22.99 walk to transit Constant -4.42008 -1.91 -4.25336 -5.31 1.49021 0.98 7.16 3.76 0.07 0.21 2.55 3.87 walk to transit No cars in HH 4.94579 4.96 2.77448 3.2 6.0858 cons 3.82 cons -2.18 -2.5 1.14 cons hov3 Constant -0.8113 -2.45 -2.40766 -8.5 -2.36988 -6.85 0.13 0.11 -4.83 -5.64 -4.71 -4.5 hov3,hov2 #HH children under age 5 0.59819 3.7 0.5004 2.79 0.59385 3.3 0.52 0.52 -0.6 -0.54 -0.03 -0.02 hov3,hov2 #HH children age 5–15 0.12635 1.76 0.37209 4.12 0.04996 0.47 -3.57 -3.06 3.43 2.72 -1.06 -0.73 hov3,hov2 #HH non-working adults 0.18246 3.11 0.29481 4.19 -0.05443 -0.63 -4.96 -4.03 1.92 1.6 -4.04 -2.73 hov3,hov2 LN(hov path auto distance) 0.22511 3.93 0.20982 4.2 0.33797 5.6 2.56 2.12 -0.27 -0.31 1.97 1.87 hov3 One person HH -3.64495 -8.88 -1.63004 -6.74 -2.07673 -5.7 -1.85 -1.23 4.91 8.33 3.82 4.31 hov3 Two person HH -2.04564 -16.71 -1.57539 -10.1 -1.8144 -8.53 -1.53 -1.12 3.84 3.01 1.89 1.09 hov2 Constant -0.72293 -2.21 -2.10667 -7.87 -2.32123 -6.96 -0.8 -0.64 -4.23 -5.17 -4.89 -4.79 hov3,hov2 No cars in HH -0.92857 -1.86 -1.45624 -3.66 1.17193 1.97 6.61 4.42 -1.06 -1.33 4.2 3.53 hov3,hov2 Cars in HH, but fewer cars than workers -0.11562 -0.4 0.10724 0.24 0 cons -0.24 cons 0.77 0.51 0.4 cons hov2 One person HH -2.12368 -6.53 -1.21047 -6.85 -1.39139 -5.06 -1.02 -0.66 2.81 5.17 2.25 2.66 sov Constant 1.21464 3.36 -0.4115 -1.87 -0.57261 -1.99 -0.73 -0.56 -4.49 -7.38 -4.94 -6.22 sov Cars in HH, but fewer cars than adults -0.87685 -5.29 -0.80327 -7.19 -0.96336 -5.13 -1.43 -0.85 0.44 0.66 -0.52 -0.46 sov HH income less than 25K 0.11453 0.94 0.04135 0.35 0.24034 1.33 1.69 1.1 -0.6 -0.62 1.03 0.7 bike Constant -6.57748 -6.34 -3.97398 -6.04 -4.2289 -6.28 -0.39 -0.38 2.51 3.96 2.26 3.49 bike Male 1.03601 3.11 1.01565 3.11 0.8404 2.26 -0.54 -0.47 -0.06 -0.06 -0.59 -0.53 bike Age over 50 -0.76683 -2.22 -1.19302 -3.79 -0.01419 -0.04 3.74 3 -1.23 -1.35 2.18 1.92 walk Age over 50 -0.36705 -1.6 -0.84513 -5.14 -0.25856 -1.12 3.57 2.55 -2.09 -2.91 0.47 0.47 transit shopping tour -1.37393 -1.73 -0.03041 -0.04 -2.77393 -1.35 -3.55 -1.34 1.7 1.74 -1.77 -0.68 transit origin parcel buffer 1 mixed-use density 1.98545 0.8 0 cons -4.23325 -1.98 cons -1.98 -0.8 cons -2.51 -2.91 transit destination parcel buffer 1 total employment 0.00016 2.5 -0.03635 -1.01 -0.00048 -1.51 1 113.39 -583.57 -1.02 -10.16 -2.01 sov escort stops per tour in the pattern -0.48854 -0.86 0.11684 0.18 1.6076 0.98 2.31 0.91 1.06 0.94 3.69 1.28 sov other stops per tour in the pattern 0.2318 1.81 0.3196 3.01 0.44975 3.06 1.23 0.89 0.69 0.83 1.7 1.48 hov3,hov2 escort stops per tour in the pattern -0.44898 -0.8 -0.0429 -0.07 2.13482 1.29 3.46 1.32 0.72 0.64 4.61 1.56 hov3,hov2 other stops per tour in the pattern 0.33715 2.58 0.44811 4.14 0.48639 3.28 0.35 0.26 0.85 1.03 1.14 1.01 hov3,hov2 shopping tour 0.07281 0.64 0.13645 1.06 0.05768 0.33 -0.61 -0.45 0.56 0.49 -0.13 -0.09 hov3,hov2 meal tour 2.17392 7.09 1.75807 9.3 1.29675 5.69 -2.44 -2.02 -1.36 -2.2 -2.86 -3.85 hov3,hov2 social recreation tour 0.54895 4.03 0.19059 1.37 0.53055 2.77 2.44 1.77 -2.63 -2.58 -0.14 -0.1 bike social recreation tour 0.97577 2.6 2.07246 5.59 1.79883 4.6 -0.74 -0.7 2.92 2.96 2.19 2.11 bike fraction of distance on class 1 bike paths 0.73069 1.84 0.7307 cons 0.7307 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons bike fraction of distance on class 2 bike lanes 0.91913 2.39 0.9191 cons 0.9191 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons (continued on next page)

62 63 Table A.13. Other Home-Based Tour-Mode Choice Model Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 4501 -5206 0.2961 -0.2656 2569 -3211.3 0.2142 -0.266 1373 -1738.6 0.1807 -0.254 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat bike fraction of distance on “gauntlet” links -0.88337 -2.16 -0.8834 cons -0.8834 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons bike origin parcel buffer 2 mixed-use density 2.86896 3.4 1.15129 1.89 0.69326 1.07 -0.75 -0.71 -2.04 -2.82 -2.58 -3.35 bike origin parcel buffer 2 households 0.00081 2.57 -0.00051 -0.95 0.00114 1.5 3.1 2.16 -4.18 -2.47 1.06 0.44 bike destination parcel buffer 2 total employment 0.00006 1.25 -0.00065 -0.42 -0.00008 -0.52 0.37 3.74 -15.56 -0.46 -3 -0.89 bike destination parcel buffer 2 mixed-use density 1.04301 1.21 -0.67979 -1.23 -0.56845 -0.88 0.2 0.17 -2 -3.11 -1.87 -2.5 walk meal tour 1.23828 3.23 -0.96356 -1.77 -0.0601 -0.12 1.66 1.87 -5.75 -4.04 -3.39 -2.69 walk social recreation tour 1.35282 4.68 1.38501 9.47 1.41585 6.32 0.21 0.14 0.11 0.22 0.22 0.28 walk origin parcel buffer 1 households 0.00083 2.61 -0.0001 -0.33 -0.00111 -1.62 -3.36 -1.47 -2.92 -3.11 -6.08 -2.84 walk destination parcel buffer 1 total employment 0.00001 0.03 -0.00041 -1.35 -0.00069 -1.07 -0.91 -0.43 -1.3 -1.39 -2.15 -1.09 all mode nest log-sum 0.7839 8.17 (continued) Table A.14. Work-Based Sub-Tour Mode Choice Model Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 595 -704.6 0.3009 -0.3653 107 -94.1 0.4655 -0.2836 81 -92.4 0.2918 -0.611 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat all Parking cost utility 1.45144 3.26 1.4514 cons 292.13159 1.86 cons 1.85 0 cons 653.33 1.85 all Path type model log-sum 1.30394 4.1 4.16509 2.84 3.57026 3.16 -0.41 -0.53 9 1.95 7.13 2.01 walk to transit Constant -3.49807 -2.96 -4.0361 cons -5 cons cons cons -0.45 cons -1.27 cons hov3 Constant -2.63531 -5.22 -4.34539 -4.36 -5.10516 -2.37 -0.76 -0.35 -3.39 -1.72 -4.89 -1.15 hov2 Constant -1.77451 -3.67 -4.14449 -4.33 -4.20755 -1.98 -0.07 -0.03 -4.9 -2.48 -5.03 -1.14 sov Constant -2.30718 -3.27 7.76793 0.03 -5.08833 -2.22 -0.05 -5.62 14.26 0.04 -3.94 -1.22 sov Income under 25K -0.13557 -0.34 0.66098 0.5 -0.1356 cons -0.6 cons 2.01 0.6 0 cons sov Income 25–50K -0.13244 -0.47 1.18144 1.52 3.87112 2.16 3.46 1.5 4.64 1.69 14.15 2.24 sov sov is mode to work 2.76788 3.29 -9.70172 -0.04 3.75733 1.61 0.05 5.75 -14.81 -0.05 1.18 0.42 sov hov is mode to work 2.03252 2.73 0 cons 0.13916 0.06 cons 0.06 -2.73 cons -2.55 -0.75 bike Constant -4.85669 -4.87 -5.525 cons -5 cons cons cons -0.67 cons -0.14 cons bike Male -0.07611 -0.07 -0.0761 cons 0 cons cons cons 0 cons 0.07 cons bike bike is mode to work 4.25352 4.2 4.2535 cons 4.2535 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons walk to transit walk is mode to work 5 cons 5 cons 5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons hov2,hov3 sov is mode to work -0.23853 -0.62 0 cons 1.18139 0.55 cons 0.55 0.62 cons 3.71 0.66 hov2,hov3 hov is mode to work 1.31878 2.33 11.00842 0.04 0.35342 0.15 -0.04 -4.66 17.14 0.04 -1.71 -0.42 all log-sum coefficient 0.96667 4

64 65 Table A.15. Work-Tour Arrival and Departure Time Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 3328 -17879.5 0.2323 -0.0223 846 -4382.2 0.2592 0.0174 511 -2566 0.2843 0.0501 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat Arrive 3–6 am Constant -2.33947 -14.05 -2.80203 -8.26 -2.05413 -5.78 2.2 2.11 -2.78 -1.36 1.71 0.8 Arrive 6–7 am Constant -0.67106 -6.84 -0.51768 -2.71 -0.607 -2.65 -0.47 -0.39 1.56 0.8 0.65 0.28 Arrive 7–8 am Constant -0.01819 -0.3 0.0353 0.29 -0.13868 -0.92 -1.43 -1.15 0.87 0.44 -1.96 -0.8 Arrive 9–10 am Constant -0.9365 -11.76 -0.47093 -3.16 -0.98884 -5.36 -3.48 -2.81 5.85 3.13 -0.66 -0.28 Arrive 10 am–1 pm Constant -1.77744 -13.48 -1.21123 -5.24 -2.0996 -7.96 -3.85 -3.37 4.29 2.45 -2.44 -1.22 Arrive 1–4 pm Constant -1.86737 -8.42 -1.53276 -4 -2.61612 -6.46 -2.83 -2.67 1.51 0.87 -3.38 -1.85 Arrive 4–7 pm Constant -2.26569 -6.85 -2.49411 -4.41 -3.18197 -5.53 -1.21 -1.19 -0.69 -0.4 -2.77 -1.59 Arrive 7–10 pm Constant -3.16131 -6.44 -2.6398 -3.37 -4.50467 -4.57 -2.38 -1.89 1.06 0.67 -2.74 -1.36 Arrive 10 pm–3 am Constant -4.12095 -5.04 -5 cons -4.121 cons cons cons -1.08 cons 0 cons Depart 3–7 am Constant -1.18601 -2.34 -1.65053 -1.57 -1.186 cons 0.44 cons -0.92 -0.44 0 cons Depart 7–10 am Constant -1.7641 -5.4 -1.48173 -2.43 -0.83676 -1.31 1.06 1.01 0.86 0.46 2.84 1.45 Depart 10 am–1 pm Constant -0.67544 -3.41 -0.63834 -1.68 -0.0177 -0.05 1.63 1.59 0.19 0.1 3.32 1.69 Depart 1–3 pm Constant -0.56921 -4.92 -0.67563 -2.97 -0.45724 -1.8 0.96 0.86 -0.92 -0.47 0.97 0.44 Depart 5–6 pm Constant 0.0364 0.55 0.20036 1.55 0.03169 0.19 -1.31 -1.04 2.47 1.27 -0.07 -0.03 Depart 6–7 pm Constant -0.72643 -6.99 -0.75573 -3.65 -0.92422 -3.7 -0.81 -0.67 -0.28 -0.14 -1.9 -0.79 Depart 7–9 pm Constant -1.83603 -11.42 -1.88039 -5.92 -1.65318 -4.74 0.71 0.65 -0.28 -0.14 1.14 0.52 Depart 9–12 pm Constant -1.98924 -8.04 -1.57247 -3.24 -2.29411 -4.05 -1.49 -1.27 1.68 0.86 -1.23 -0.54 Depart 12–3 am Constant -3.33788 -8.46 -3.10673 -3.87 -3.82442 -4.01 -0.89 -0.75 0.59 0.29 -1.23 -0.51 Duration 0–3 hrs Constant 0.8476 2.83 0.86667 1.44 1.36541 1.71 0.83 0.63 0.06 0.03 1.73 0.65 Duration 3–5 hrs Constant 1.04808 4.62 1.12161 2.38 1.51006 2.32 0.82 0.6 0.32 0.16 2.04 0.71 Duration 5–7 hrs Constant 0.47836 2.74 0.52987 1.37 0.73615 1.3 0.54 0.36 0.29 0.13 1.47 0.46 Duration 7–9 hrs Constant 0.61578 4.79 0.60311 1.9 0.78513 1.58 0.57 0.37 -0.1 -0.04 1.32 0.34 Duration 10–11 hrs Constant -1.01822 -13.79 -1.00429 -6.58 -1.12957 -6.28 -0.82 -0.7 0.19 0.09 -1.51 -0.62 Duration 11–12 hrs Constant -2.11405 -16.76 -1.61497 -6.92 -2.23448 -7.77 -2.66 -2.15 3.96 2.14 -0.95 -0.42 Duration 12–14 hrs Constant -3.34291 -18.05 -3.1971 -8.46 -3.55973 -8.78 -0.96 -0.89 0.79 0.39 -1.17 -0.53 Duration 14–18 hrs Constant -6.02927 -17.13 -5.76419 -8.38 -7.22372 -7.85 -2.12 -1.59 0.75 0.39 -3.39 -1.3 Duration 18–24 hrs Constant -9.49833 -8.49 -10 cons -9.4983 cons cons cons -0.45 cons 0 cons All Arrival shift—part-time worker 0.04004 4.02 0.05778 2.77 0.08364 3.11 1.24 0.96 1.78 0.85 4.37 1.62 All Duration shift—part-time worker -0.02903 -2.29 -0.0825 -3.21 -0.083 -2.28 -0.02 -0.01 -4.22 -2.08 -4.26 -1.49 All Arrival shift—non-working adult under age 65 0.06008 2.37 0.07183 1.82 0.03982 0.63 -0.81 -0.51 0.46 0.3 -0.8 -0.32 All Duration shift—non-working adult under age 65 -0.13634 -3.75 -0.14297 -2.84 -0.3149 -2.99 -3.41 -1.63 -0.18 -0.13 -4.91 -1.69 All Arrival shift—university student 0.10374 6.24 0.18097 2.16 0.14631 1.43 -0.41 -0.34 4.65 0.92 2.56 0.41 All Duration shift—university student 0.01357 0.59 0.11314 0.97 0.12379 0.75 0.09 0.06 4.35 0.85 4.82 0.67 All Arrival shift—driving age student 0.19069 7.19 0.28431 4.5 0.1097 1.25 -2.76 -1.98 3.53 1.48 -3.05 -0.92 All Duration shift—driving age student -0.04766 -1.15 -0.00542 -0.06 -0.24988 -1.69 -2.67 -1.65 1.02 0.46 -4.88 -1.37

66 67 Table A.16. Work-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 3328 -17879.5 0.2323 -0.0223 846 -4382.2 0.2592 0.0174 511 -2566 0.2843 0.0501 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Arrival shift—income 0 to 25K 0.01744 1.53 0.06573 2.65 0.06159 1.53 -0.17 -0.1 4.24 1.94 3.87 1.1 All Duration shift—income 0 to 25K -0.01108 -0.86 0.02412 0.86 0.01969 0.4 -0.16 -0.09 2.74 1.26 2.39 0.63 All Arrival shift—income over 100K -0.00458 -0.26 0.00872 0.35 0.00373 0.12 -0.2 -0.16 0.74 0.54 0.47 0.27 All Duration shift—income over 100K 0.00176 0.12 0.00572 0.28 0.02051 0.8 0.73 0.58 0.27 0.2 1.28 0.73 All Arrival shift—Second or subsequent work tour simulated in the day 1.46221 0.17 1.98128 0.15 9.99568 0.03 0.61 0.03 0.06 0.04 0.99 0.03 All Duration shift—Second or subsequent work tour simulated in the day 0.2443 0.03 0.01274 0 -0.08478 0 -0.01 0 -0.03 -0.02 -0.04 0 All Arrival shift—stops in pattern, patterns with home-based tours only 0.00395 1.08 0.01959 1.86 -0.00643 -0.67 -2.47 -2.72 4.28 1.49 -2.84 -1.08 All Duration shift—stops in pattern, patterns with home-based tours only -0.04584 -11.86 -0.03698 -3.59 -0.07759 -7.4 -3.94 -3.88 2.29 0.86 -8.21 -3.03 All Arrival shift—stops in pattern, patterns with work-based sub-tours -0.00065 -0.19 0.02352 2.3 -0.00369 -0.37 -2.66 -2.75 7.09 2.36 -0.89 -0.31 All Duration shift—stops in pattern, patterns with work-based sub-tours -0.04282 -11.36 -0.0282 -2.71 -0.06425 -6.03 -3.46 -3.38 3.88 1.4 -5.68 -2.01 All Arrival shift—escort stops in the day pattern -0.0143 -2.22 -0.02926 -1.62 -0.01531 -0.69 0.77 0.63 -2.32 -0.83 -0.16 -0.05 All Duration shift—escort stops in the day pattern 0.0451 7.12 0.03342 2.16 0.04946 2.4 1.04 0.78 -1.84 -0.75 0.69 0.21 All Arrival shift—Number of work-based sub-tours in the tour 0.01356 1.2 0.07216 2.52 -0.00473 -0.14 -2.68 -2.28 5.17 2.04 -1.61 -0.54 All Duration shift—Number of work-based sub-tours in the tour 0.16495 14.7 0.1979 6.93 0.15368 5.13 -1.55 -1.48 2.94 1.15 -1 -0.38 Duration less than 9 hrs Full time worker -1.28515 -9.6 -1.10967 -3.43 -1.17633 -2.33 -0.21 -0.13 1.31 0.54 0.81 0.22 Arrive before 7 am Income over $100K -0.47347 -2.58 -0.94627 -3.33 -0.40538 -1.36 1.91 1.82 -2.57 -1.67 0.37 0.23 Depart after 9 pm Income over $100K -0.81108 -2.27 -0.06742 -0.17 -0.2211 -0.38 -0.38 -0.26 2.08 1.82 1.65 1.02 Duration less than 8 hrs First work tour simulated in day, other work tours remaining to simulate 2.09809 8.64 2.94772 4.76 3.02944 2.87 0.13 0.08 3.5 1.37 3.83 0.88 Duration less than 8 hrs Second or subsequent work tour simulated in day 5 cons 5 cons 5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration less than 8 hrs First work tour simulated, other non-work tours only remaining to simulate -0.64055 -5.78 -0.55537 -2.5 -0.35868 -1.25 0.88 0.69 0.77 0.38 2.54 0.99 All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the outbound period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the return period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the outbound period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the return period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, no transit path in period -2.97702 -3.19 -2.977 cons -2.977 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons All Minutes still available to schedule in the arrival period 3.14619 1.37 1.28049 0.39 5 cons 1.14 cons -0.81 -0.57 0.8 cons All Minutes still available to schedule in the departure period 5 cons 5 cons 5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons

68 69 Table A.17. Work-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 3 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 3328 -17879.5 0.2323 -0.0223 846 -4382.2 0.2592 0.0174 511 -2566 0.2843 0.0501 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Time window minutes available before the arrival period, first simulated home-based tour -0.24016 -9.1 -0.2714 -5.53 -0.2787 -5.26 -0.15 -0.14 -1.18 -0.64 -1.46 -0.73 All Time window minutes available after the departure period, first simulated home-based tour -0.24977 -9.37 -0.23815 -4.69 -0.34386 -6.2 -2.08 -1.91 0.44 0.23 -3.53 -1.7 All Time window minutes available before the arrival period, later simulated home-based tour -1.72822 -2.01 -2.29177 -1.37 -10.64107 -0.08 -4.99 -0.06 -0.66 -0.34 -10.38 -0.07 All Time window minutes available after the departure period, later simulated home-based tour 0.0195 0.00 -0.21668 -0.02 -0.39134 0 -0.01 0 -0.03 -0.02 -0.05 0 All Remaining tours to simulate in the day divided by the total time window that would remain -100.45727 -8.82 -86.70972 -3.89 -80.60962 -3.13 0.27 0.24 1.21 0.62 1.74 0.77 All Remaining tours to simulate in the day divided by the largest coherent time window that would remain -23.74796 -4.96 -33.33515 -3.42 -9.1058 -0.86 2.49 2.29 -2 -0.98 3.06 1.38 All Remaining stop purposes to simulate divided by the window that would remain before the arrival period -0.5874 -5.25 -0.28505 -1.53 -1.03602 -2.51 -4.03 -1.82 2.7 1.62 -4.01 -1.09 All Remaining stop purposes to simulate divided by the window that would remain after the depar- ture period -0.99453 -1.85 -10.55279 -2.91 -1.00754 -0.62 2.63 5.9 -17.75 -2.63 -0.02 -0.01 Depart 3–4 pm Constant -0.12591 -1.71 -0.21827 -1.46 0.13308 0.78 2.35 2.06 -1.26 -0.62 3.53 1.52

70 71 Table A.18. School-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 1422 -6449 0.3479 0.0386 155 -639.6 0.4053 0.1328 113 -436.6 0.4488 0.2058 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat Arrive 3–6 am Constant -10 cons -26.0071 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Arrive 6–7 am Constant -3.25373 -15.32 -1.03292 -2.01 -3.2783 -4.93 -4.37 -3.38 10.45 4.32 -0.12 -0.04 Arrive 7–8 am Constant -0.21598 -2.65 0.5874 2.06 -0.61644 -1.94 -4.23 -3.78 9.87 2.82 -4.92 -1.26 Arrive 9–10 am Constant -1.2615 -10.82 -0.89654 -2.44 -1.27458 -2.41 -1.03 -0.72 3.13 0.99 -0.11 -0.02 Arrive 10 am–1 pm Constant -2.25578 -12.25 -2.90739 -4.15 -0.88873 -1.3 2.88 2.95 -3.54 -0.93 7.42 2 Arrive 1–4 pm Constant -2.94294 -8.88 -4.2571 -3.3 -0.84214 -0.67 2.65 2.7 -3.96 -1.02 6.34 1.66 Arrive 4–7 pm Constant -2.04227 -4.49 -2.88131 -1.8 0.62403 0.35 2.19 1.94 -1.85 -0.52 5.86 1.48 Arrive 7–10 pm Constant -3.46744 -5.43 -3.27706 -1.56 -2.13101 -0.84 0.54 0.45 0.3 0.09 2.09 0.53 Arrive 10 pm–3 am Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Depart 3–7 am Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Depart 7–10 am Constant -0.7008 -1.77 -3.68527 -2.97 -4.14047 -2.64 -0.37 -0.29 -7.55 -2.41 -8.7 -2.19 Depart 10 am–1 pm Constant 0.90244 3.76 -0.68983 -0.95 -3.1746 -2.99 -3.44 -2.34 -6.63 -2.2 -16.98 -3.84 Depart 1–3 pm Constant 1.61171 10.31 0.17239 0.4 -0.68088 -1.14 -1.97 -1.43 -9.21 -3.32 -14.67 -3.84 Depart 5–6 pm Constant -0.01054 -0.07 -0.76908 -1.68 -0.08102 -0.14 1.5 1.16 -5.24 -1.65 -0.49 -0.12 Depart 6–7 pm Constant -0.91968 -4.49 -0.79113 -1.42 -1.01719 -0.89 -0.4 -0.2 0.63 0.23 -0.48 -0.09 Depart 7–9 pm Constant -1.48754 -6.07 -1.07332 -1.64 1.64312 2.04 4.15 3.38 1.69 0.63 12.77 3.89 Depart 9–12 pm Constant -2.23021 -6.67 -2.56942 -2.45 2.68146 2.23 5 4.37 -1.01 -0.32 14.68 4.09 Depart 12–3 am Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 0–3 hrs Constant -1.40478 -3.83 1.89984 1.65 -0.12777 -0.09 -1.76 -1.46 9.01 2.87 3.48 0.92 Duration 3–5 hrs Constant -0.89502 -3.2 1.45184 1.57 0.29707 0.27 -1.25 -1.06 8.39 2.54 4.26 1.09 Duration 5–7 hrs Constant -0.63805 -3.12 1.65189 2.39 0.81191 0.99 -1.22 -1.02 11.2 3.32 7.09 1.77 Duration 7–9 hrs Constant -0.16016 -1.08 1.76829 3.36 1.24762 1.99 -0.99 -0.83 13.04 3.67 9.52 2.25 Duration 10–11 hrs Constant -0.74882 -3.78 -0.05121 -0.07 0.16615 0.21 0.31 0.27 3.52 0.98 4.62 1.16 Duration 11–12 hrs Constant -1.76817 -4.86 0.13144 0.17 -3 cons -4.05 cons 5.22 2.46 -3.38 cons Duration 12–14 hrs Constant -3.0607 -5.9 -1.4408 -1.33 -4 cons -2.37 cons 3.13 1.5 -1.81 cons Duration 14–18 hrs Constant -4.2862 -5.22 -1.91115 -1.19 -5 cons -1.92 cons 2.89 1.47 -0.87 cons Duration 18–24 hrs Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons

72 73 Table A.19. School-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 1422 -6449 0.3479 0.0386 155 -639.6 0.4053 0.1328 113 -436.6 0.4488 0.2058 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Arrival shift—part-time worker 0.28932 3.54 -0.22125 -1.4 0.48436 2.87 4.48 4.19 -6.24 -3.24 2.38 1.16 All Duration shift—part-time worker -0.12602 -0.87 -0.37175 -2.84 -0.29494 -1.73 0.59 0.45 -1.7 -1.88 -1.17 -0.99 All Arrival shift—non-working adult under age 65 0.21889 1.92 -0.04775 -0.67 0.08555 0.83 1.86 1.29 -2.34 -3.72 -1.17 -1.29 All Duration shift—non-working adult under age 65 -0.13019 -0.72 -0.55566 -3.09 -0.38472 -2.31 0.95 1.03 -2.34 -2.37 -1.4 -1.53 All Arrival shift—university student 0.16569 8.28 0.06203 0.93 0.19437 3.06 1.99 2.08 -5.18 -1.56 1.43 0.45 All Duration shift—university student -0.07565 -4.06 -0.09405 -1.12 -0.14929 -2.11 -0.66 -0.78 -0.99 -0.22 -3.96 -1.04 All Arrival shift—driving age student -0.06262 -1.8 -0.41185 -3.28 -0.29124 -1.88 0.96 0.78 -10.06 -2.78 -6.59 -1.48 All Duration shift—driving age student 0.05894 2.82 0.00883 0.17 -0.03836 -0.56 -0.9 -0.69 -2.4 -0.96 -4.65 -1.42 All Arrival shift—stops in pattern, patterns with home-based tours only 0.01389 1.67 -0.02898 -0.7 0.04986 1.1 1.9 1.74 -5.14 -1.03 4.31 0.79 All Duration shift—stops in pattern, patterns with home-based tours only -0.03351 -4 -0.06738 -1.98 -0.0068 -0.16 1.78 1.46 -4.04 -1 3.19 0.64 All Arrival shift—remaining stop purposes in pattern, patterns with work-based sub-tours -0.00549 -0.74 0.03179 0.97 0.03503 1.11 0.1 0.1 5.04 1.14 5.48 1.28 All Duration shift—remaining stop purposes in pattern, patterns with work-based sub-tours -0.03619 -4.61 0.00413 0.1 -0.0247 -0.73 -0.67 -0.86 5.13 0.94 1.46 0.34 All Arrival shift—escort stops in the day pattern -0.02127 -1.19 0.00296 0.03 -0.15819 -2.09 -1.89 -2.13 1.35 0.28 -7.64 -1.81 All Duration shift—escort stops in the day pattern 0.03853 2.55 0.11687 1.88 0.0381 0.66 -1.27 -1.36 5.18 1.26 -0.03 -0.01 All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the outbound period 0.25 cons 0.25 cons 0.25 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the return period 0.25 cons 0.25 cons 0.25 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the outbound period 0.25 cons 0.25 cons 0.25 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the return period 0.25 cons 0.25 cons 0.25 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Minutes still available to schedule in the arrival period 4.39849 2.24 4.3985 cons 4.3985 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons All Minutes still available to schedule in the depar- ture period 1.29765 1.11 1.2977 cons 1.2977 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons All Time window minutes available before the arrival period, first simulated home-based tour -0.13713 -4.17 -0.09793 -0.82 -0.36598 -2.78 -2.24 -2.03 1.19 0.33 -6.96 -1.74 All Time window minutes available after the depar- ture period, first simulated home-based tour -0.11773 -4.17 -0.17774 -1.97 0.1557 1.26 3.69 2.71 -2.13 -0.66 9.69 2.22 All Time window minutes available before the arrival period, later simulated home-based tour -0.0809 -2.1 -0.02826 -0.18 -0.08875 -0.52 -0.39 -0.36 1.36 0.34 -0.2 -0.05 All Time window minutes available after the depar- ture period, later simulated home-based tour -0.02026 -0.67 -0.00946 -0.1 0.20929 1.14 2.3 1.19 0.36 0.11 7.62 1.25 (continued on next page)

74 75 Table A.19. School-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 1422 -6449 0.3479 0.0386 155 -639.6 0.4053 0.1328 113 -436.6 0.4488 0.2058 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Remaining tours to simulate in the day divided by the total time window that would remain -88.14783 -6.22 -94.15871 -2.67 -79.37626 -1.43 0.42 0.27 -0.42 -0.17 0.62 0.16 All Remaining stop purposes to simulate divided by the window that would remain before the arrival period -0.51533 -1.96 -1.07745 -0.66 -0.7146 -0.33 0.22 0.17 -2.14 -0.34 -0.76 -0.09 All Remaining stop purposes to simulate divided by the window that would remain after the depar- ture period -1.48342 -2.36 -7.54322 -1.12 -4.24913 -0.43 0.49 0.33 -9.64 -0.9 -4.4 -0.28 Depart 3–4 pm Constant 1.68479 13.54 0.2481 0.77 0.68935 1.73 1.37 1.11 -11.54 -4.45 -8 -2.5 All Arrival shift—full-time worker 0.28553 7.2 0.02581 0.2 0.20168 2.03 1.39 1.77 -6.55 -2.05 -2.11 -0.84 All Duration shift—full-time worker 0.1154 2.49 0.23319 1.38 -0.21527 -1.62 -2.65 -3.38 2.55 0.7 -7.15 -2.49 All Arrival shift—pre-school age (0–4) 0.10499 2.69 0.105 cons 0.105 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons All Duration shift—pre-school age (0–4) 0.15535 5.4 0.1553 cons 0.1553 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons (continued) Table A.20. Other Home-Based-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 5946 -29997.3 0.2166 -0.0729 3006 -15255.6 0.229 -0.0215 1609 -8028.2 0.2385 -0.0347 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat Arrive 3–6 am Constant -4.73828 -17.79 -5.24283 -12.32 -4.64224 -9.97 1.41 1.29 -1.89 -1.19 0.36 0.21 Arrive 6–7 am Constant -2.20312 -13.41 -2.50811 -7.51 -2.02352 -6.48 1.45 1.55 -1.86 -0.91 1.09 0.57 Arrive 7–8 am Constant -0.8424 -10.11 -0.6892 -4.75 -0.71762 -4.57 -0.2 -0.18 1.84 1.06 1.5 0.8 Arrive 9–10 am Constant -0.04143 -0.52 0.30655 2.64 0.01597 0.11 -2.51 -1.97 4.4 3 0.73 0.39 Arrive 10 am–1 pm Constant 0.38184 3.94 0.41157 2.87 0.37599 2.1 -0.25 -0.2 0.31 0.21 -0.06 -0.03 Arrive 1–4 pm Constant 0.43606 3.12 0.41958 2.14 0.18237 0.71 -1.21 -0.92 -0.12 -0.08 -1.82 -0.98 Arrive 4–7 pm Constant 0.741 4.08 0.32472 1.29 0.19246 0.57 -0.52 -0.39 -2.29 -1.65 -3.02 -1.62 Arrive 7–10 pm Constant 0.29207 1.33 -0.36393 -1.17 -0.82744 -1.97 -1.49 -1.1 -2.99 -2.12 -5.11 -2.67 Arrive 10 pm–3 am Constant -1.22734 -4.2 -1.86922 -4.23 -2.84574 -4.46 -2.21 -1.53 -2.19 -1.45 -5.53 -2.53 Depart 3–7 am Constant -0.83847 -2.79 0.14997 0.34 -0.63898 -1.18 -1.8 -1.45 3.29 2.25 0.66 0.37 Depart 7–10 am Constant -0.52239 -2.78 -0.94018 -3.9 -1.10086 -3.14 -0.67 -0.46 -2.22 -1.73 -3.08 -1.65 Depart 10 am–1 pm Constant -0.22383 -1.63 -0.42659 -2.43 -0.6591 -2.61 -1.32 -0.92 -1.47 -1.15 -3.16 -1.72 Depart 1–3 pm Constant 0.0909 0.99 -0.09948 -0.86 -0.19688 -1.2 -0.84 -0.59 -2.08 -1.65 -3.14 -1.75 (continued on next page)

76 77 Table A.20. Other Home-Based-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 5946 -29997.3 0.2166 -0.0729 3006 -15255.6 0.229 -0.0215 1609 -8028.2 0.2385 -0.0347 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat Depart 5–6 pm Constant -0.281 -3.65 -0.09348 -0.89 -0.51334 -3.39 -4.01 -2.78 2.44 1.79 -3.02 -1.54 Depart 6–7 pm Constant -0.4021 -4.53 -0.22574 -1.82 -0.24329 -1.48 -0.14 -0.11 1.99 1.42 1.79 0.96 Depart 7–9 pm Constant -0.26728 -2.52 -0.00069 0 -0.14558 -0.72 -0.99 -0.72 2.52 1.83 1.15 0.6 Depart 9–12 pm Constant -0.34157 -2.1 -0.1922 -0.84 -0.46849 -1.46 -1.21 -0.86 0.92 0.65 -0.78 -0.4 Depart 12–3 am Constant -1.7071 -6.5 -1.90026 -4.32 -1.73715 -3.02 0.37 0.28 -0.74 -0.44 -0.11 -0.05 Duration 0–1 hrs Constant -0.38357 -3.19 -0.38182 -2.52 -0.54801 -2.45 -1.1 -0.74 0.01 0.01 -1.37 -0.73 Duration 1–2 hrs Constant 0.16773 2.24 0.03745 0.37 -0.10891 -0.75 -1.44 -1.01 -1.74 -1.28 -3.69 -1.91 Duration 3–5 hrs Constant -0.52962 -5.88 -0.17726 -1.43 -0.12783 -0.76 0.4 0.29 3.91 2.85 4.46 2.39 Duration 5–7 hrs Constant -1.00849 -5.04 -0.57419 -2.18 -0.76503 -2.09 -0.72 -0.52 2.17 1.65 1.22 0.66 Duration 7–9 hrs Constant -1.18987 -3.79 -0.5942 -1.38 -0.51565 -0.89 0.18 0.14 1.9 1.38 2.15 1.17 Duration 9–12 hrs Constant -1.38769 -3.06 -1.35226 -1.75 -0.51238 -0.6 1.09 0.99 0.08 0.05 1.93 1.03 Duration 12–14 hrs Constant -3.18227 -2.79 -5 cons -0.48375 -0.34 cons 3.2 -1.6 cons 2.37 1.91 Duration 14–18 hrs Constant -1.57538 -1.75 -5 cons -5 cons cons cons -3.81 cons -3.81 cons Duration 18–24 hrs Constant -11.1077 cons -11.1077 cons -11.1077 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Arrival shift—part-time worker 0.00051 0.07 -0.00646 -0.61 -0.01369 -0.95 -0.68 -0.5 -1 -0.65 -2.04 -0.98 All Duration shift—part-time worker -0.01621 -0.72 -0.02162 -0.66 0.00002 0 0.66 0.49 -0.24 -0.16 0.72 0.37 All Arrival shift—non-working adult under age 65 -0.00372 -0.59 0.0041 0.5 -0.02548 -2.21 -3.6 -2.56 1.25 0.95 -3.47 -1.89 All Duration shift—non-working adult under age 65 -0.0142 -0.77 -0.0437 -1.69 -0.00903 -0.28 1.34 1.09 -1.6 -1.14 0.28 0.16 All Arrival shift—university student 0.04342 4.37 0.00145 0.02 -0.00454 -0.12 -0.1 -0.16 -4.22 -0.68 -4.83 -1.31 All Duration shift—university student 0.03845 1.42 0.12807 1.31 -0.00436 -0.04 -1.36 -1.23 3.3 0.92 -1.58 -0.4 All Arrival shift—non-working adult age 65+ -0.02629 -4.34 -0.012 -1.58 -0.04785 -4.21 -4.71 -3.16 2.36 1.88 -3.56 -1.9 All Duration shift—non-working adult age 65+ -0.01945 -1.18 -0.05401 -2.33 -0.02017 -0.68 1.46 1.13 -2.1 -1.49 -0.04 -0.02 All Arrival shift—driving age student 0.05276 3.43 0.05071 2.15 0.11116 3.06 2.57 1.66 -0.13 -0.09 3.79 1.61 All Duration shift—driving age student 0.04145 1.16 0.03523 0.67 0.09229 1.22 1.09 0.75 -0.17 -0.12 1.42 0.67 All Arrival shift—First of multiple tours simulated for same purpose -0.10652 -10.58 -0.09148 -7.39 -0.08155 -4.47 0.8 0.54 1.49 1.22 2.48 1.37 All Duration shift—First of multiple tours simulated for same purpose -0.03547 -0.67 -0.21901 -4.62 -0.08854 -1.04 2.75 1.53 -3.48 -3.87 -1.01 -0.62 (continued)

78 79 Table A.21. Other Home-Based-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 5946 -29997.3 0.2166 -0.0729 3006 -15255.6 0.229 -0.0215 1609 -8028.2 0.2385 -0.0347 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Arrival shift—Second or subsequent tour for same purpose simulated in the day 0.00957 0.6 0.01414 0.66 0.07213 2.32 2.71 1.87 0.29 0.21 3.95 2.01 All Duration shift—Second or subsequent tour for same purpose simulated in the day -0.15892 -4.23 -0.37883 -7.86 -0.42637 -5.74 -0.99 -0.64 -5.85 -4.56 -7.12 -3.6 All Arrival shift—patterns with home-based tours only 0.01327 0.94 0.03398 1.92 0.04404 1.68 0.57 0.38 1.47 1.17 2.19 1.17 All Duration shift—patterns with home-based tours only -0.01047 -0.19 -0.26526 -6.51 0.04087 0.44 7.51 3.31 -4.59 -6.25 0.92 0.55 All Arrival shift—stops in pattern, patterns with home-based tours only -0.00023 -0.09 -0.00638 -2.04 -0.00204 -0.4 1.39 0.86 -2.39 -1.96 -0.7 -0.36 All Duration shift—stops in pattern, patterns with home-based tours only 0.00012 0.02 0.01365 1.8 0.01021 1.1 -0.45 -0.37 2.41 1.79 1.8 1.09 All Arrival shift—stops in pattern, patterns with work-based sub-tours 0.0021 1.61 0.00378 1.74 0.00207 0.69 -0.79 -0.58 1.29 0.77 -0.03 -0.01 All Duration shift—stops in pattern, patterns with work-based sub-tours -0.01041 -2.19 0.01339 1.81 0.00166 0.17 -1.58 -1.18 5.01 3.21 2.54 1.22 All Arrival shift—escort stops in the day pattern -0.00503 -1.48 -0.01644 -2.59 0.00471 0.42 3.33 1.9 -3.35 -1.8 2.86 0.88 All Duration shift—escort stops in the day pattern 0.04512 3.41 0.01099 0.45 0.01704 0.45 0.25 0.16 -2.58 -1.38 -2.12 -0.75 Duration less than 4 hrs Second or subsequent tour simulated in the day 1.07433 6.63 -0.02228 -0.1 -0.27523 -0.98 -1.19 -0.91 -6.76 -5.16 -8.33 -4.83 All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the outbound period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the return period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the outbound period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the return period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, no transit path in period -5 cons -5 cons -5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Minutes still available to schedule in the arrival period 2.36286 10.57 1.43437 7.25 3.53459 4.86 10.62 2.89 -4.15 -4.69 5.24 1.61 All Minutes still available to schedule in the departure period 0.75577 3.73 0.08283 0.43 1.65586 2.49 8.14 2.36 -3.32 -3.48 4.44 1.35 All Time window minutes available before the arrival period, first simulated home-based tour 0.05779 0.92 -0.11183 -4.28 0.25302 2.31 13.95 3.32 -2.69 -6.49 3.09 1.78 All Time window minutes available after the departure period, first simulated home-based tour 0.15927 2.57 0.01792 2.34 0.34536 3.24 42.67 3.07 -2.28 -18.42 3 1.74 All Time window minutes available before the arrival period, later simulated home-based tour -0.01883 -2.47 -0.05073 -5.48 -0.01719 -1.17 3.62 2.28 -4.18 -3.45 0.21 0.11 All Time window minutes available after the departure period, later simulated home-based tour 0.0258 4.24 0.00135 0.19 0.03219 2.75 4.24 2.64 -4.02 -3.36 1.05 0.55 All Remaining tours to simulate in the day divided by the total time window that would remain -183.0939 -6.09 -190.2117 -7.13 -96.23658 -1.78 3.52 1.74 -0.24 -0.27 2.89 1.61 All Remaining tours to simulate in the day divided by the largest coherent time window that would remain -19.73042 -6.77 -11.73476 -3.16 -24.73102 -4.11 -3.5 -2.16 2.74 2.15 -1.72 -0.83 All Remaining stop purposes to simulate divided by the window that would remain before the arrival period -0.08639 -3.22 -0.26236 -4.77 -0.19526 -2.68 1.22 0.92 -6.56 -3.2 -4.06 -1.49 All Remaining stop purposes to simulate divided by the window that would remain after the departure period -0.1358 -3.26 -0.32397 -4.05 -0.142 -1.45 2.27 1.86 -4.51 -2.35 -0.15 -0.06 Depart 3–4 pm Constant 0.42817 5.54 -0.15663 -1.48 0.04529 0.33 1.91 1.46 -7.56 -5.52 -4.95 -2.76

80 81 Table A.22. Other Home-Based-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 3 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 5946 -29997.3 0.2166 -0.0729 3006 -15255.6 0.229 -0.0215 1609 -8028.2 0.2385 -0.0347 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Arrival shift—Child age 5–15 0.02319 2.41 0.04027 2.6 0.01305 0.7 -1.76 -1.46 1.78 1.1 -1.05 -0.55 All Duration shift—Child age 5–15 0.03224 1.48 -0.00862 -0.23 0.08498 2.36 2.49 2.6 -1.88 -1.09 2.43 1.46 All Arrival shift—Child age 0–4 -0.00635 -0.6 -0.0063 cons -0.0063 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons All Duration shift—Child age 0–4 0.04991 2.13 0.0499 cons 0.0499 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons All Arrival shift—escort tour -0.01152 -1.77 0.01328 1.3 -0.03632 -2.44 -4.85 -3.34 3.8 2.42 -3.81 -1.67 All Duration shift—escort tour -0.56634 -10 -0.12331 -2.03 -0.2182 -2.21 -1.56 -0.96 7.82 7.28 6.15 3.52 All Arrival shift—shopping tour 0.02458 3.75 0.01779 2.12 0.00119 0.1 -1.98 -1.35 -1.04 -0.81 -3.57 -1.91 All Duration shift—shopping tour 0.08471 2.5 0.08207 2.17 0.10007 1.75 0.48 0.32 -0.08 -0.07 0.45 0.27 All Arrival shift—meal tour 0.07416 7.84 0.08361 7.01 0.05569 3.44 -2.34 -1.72 1 0.79 -1.95 -1.14 All Duration shift—meal tour 0.03202 0.83 -0.0151 -0.26 0.05945 0.75 1.28 0.94 -1.23 -0.81 0.71 0.35 All Arrival shift—Social/recr. Tour 0.0277 4.34 0.0206 2.65 -0.00065 -0.05 -2.74 -1.75 -1.11 -0.91 -4.44 -2.34 All Duration shift—Social/recr. Tour 0.13123 9.08 0.1432 5.97 0.14963 4.92 0.27 0.21 0.83 0.5 1.27 0.61 All Arrival shift—First simulated tour, other tours in pattern for different purposes 0.02396 1.72 0.0247 1.39 0.05101 1.96 1.48 1.01 0.05 0.04 1.95 1.04 All Duration shift—First simulated tour, other tours in pattern for different purposes 0.06339 1.02 -0.21626 -4.52 0.06109 0.6 5.8 2.72 -4.51 -5.85 -0.04 -0.02 All Arrival shift—2nd or subsequent simulated tour, other tours in pattern for different purposes -0.07494 -5.05 -0.0858 -4.26 -0.04577 -1.59 1.99 1.39 -0.73 -0.54 1.97 1.01 All Duration shift—2nd or subsequent simulated tour, other tours in pattern for different purposes -0.1023 -2.93 -0.31471 -7.58 -0.34329 -5.02 -0.69 -0.42 -6.09 -5.11 -6.91 -3.52 Duration less than 1 hr Escort tour 1.65695 9.45 1.41275 6.62 1.37227 3.95 -0.19 -0.12 -1.39 -1.14 -1.62 -0.82 Duration less than 1 hr Shopping tour 2.86342 12 1.90372 8.67 2.32849 6.19 1.93 1.13 -4.02 -4.37 -2.24 -1.42 Duration less than 1 hr Meal tour 0.09184 0.38 -0.07033 -0.21 0.51851 1.05 1.77 1.2 -0.67 -0.49 1.76 0.87 Duration 1–2 hours Shopping tour 1.8868 9.9 1.30497 7.3 1.58207 5.25 1.55 0.92 -3.05 -3.25 -1.6 -1.01 Duration 1–2 hours Meal tour 0.76901 4.45 0.76698 3.17 1.23472 3.4 1.94 1.29 -0.01 -0.01 2.7 1.28 Arrive before 8 am Shopping tour -1.32565 -3.07 -1.67388 -3.77 -1.23011 -2.45 1 0.88 -0.81 -0.78 0.22 0.19 Arrive before 8 am Meal tour 1.07362 2.98 0.64441 1.25 0 cons -1.25 cons -1.19 -0.83 -2.98 cons Depart after 9 pm Escort tour 0.10531 0.66 -0.17043 -0.53 0.00086 0 0.53 0.35 -1.72 -0.85 -0.65 -0.21 Depart after 9 pm Shopping tour -1.0572 -5.99 -0.94048 -3.43 -0.5401 -1.55 1.46 1.15 0.66 0.43 2.93 1.48 Depart after 9 pm Meal tour -0.66777 -3.86 -0.60847 -2.15 -0.6049 -1.44 0.01 0.01 0.34 0.21 0.36 0.15

82 83 Table A.23. Work-Based Sub-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 587 -2207.1 0.2395 2208.0801 106 -339.1 0.3628 0.1849 83 -275.2 0.3484 0.162 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat Arrive 3–6 am Constant -0.4519 cons -0.4519 cons -2.7619 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Arrive 6–7 am Constant -5 cons -5 cons -5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Arrive 7–8 am Constant -0.2749 cons -1.8841 cons -2.2949 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Arrive 9–10 am Constant -0.4405 cons -0.49237 -0.54 -1.51362 -1.5 -1.12 -1.01 cons -0.06 cons -1.06 Arrive 10 am–1 pm Constant -0.1867 cons 0.73738 1.82 -0.5972 -0.56 -3.29 -1.25 cons 2.28 cons -0.38 Arrive 1–4 pm Constant -1.6032 cons 0 cons -2.28882 -1.91 cons -1.91 cons cons cons -0.57 Arrive 4–7 pm Constant -2.6232 cons -0.44976 -0.45 -2.38496 -1.12 -1.94 -0.91 cons 2.18 cons 0.11 Arrive 7–10 pm Constant -4.4149 cons -16.71 cons -7.4149 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Arrive 10 pm–3 am Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Depart 3–7 am Constant 2.515 cons 2.515 cons 2.515 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Depart 7–10 am Constant 0.047 cons 3.47696 2.52 1.0576 0.58 -1.75 -1.32 cons 2.49 cons 0.55 Depart 10 am–1 pm Constant 0.5978 cons 2.65547 2.91 1.59016 1.02 -1.17 -0.69 cons 2.25 cons 0.64 Depart 1–3 pm Constant 0.622 cons 2.24208 3.02 2.45037 1.64 0.28 0.14 cons 2.18 cons 1.23 Depart 5–6 pm Constant 0.0969 cons 0.0969 cons 0 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Depart 6–7 pm Constant 0.1199 cons 0.1199 cons 0.1199 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Depart 7–9 pm Constant 1.0428 cons 1.0428 cons 1.0428 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Depart 9–12 pm Constant 2.1327 cons 2.1327 cons 2.1327 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Depart 12–3 am Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 0–1 hrs Constant 0.3405 cons 3.28051 3.42 3.84464 2.21 0.59 0.32 cons 3.06 cons 2.02 Duration 1–2 hrs Constant 0.7208 cons 1.92269 2.63 3.07652 1.99 1.58 0.75 cons 1.64 cons 1.52 Duration 3–5 hrs Constant -0.2508 cons -1 cons -1 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 5–7 hrs Constant -5 cons -5 cons -5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 7–9 hrs Constant -5 cons -5 cons -5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 9–12 hrs Constant 0.052 cons 0.052 cons 0.052 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 12–14 hrs Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 14–18 hrs Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons

84 85 Table A.24. Work-Based Sub-Tour Arrival and Departure Times Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 587 -2207.1 0.2395 2208.0801 106 -339.1 0.3628 0.1849 83 -275.2 0.3484 0.162 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Arrival shift—part-time worker 0.0026 cons -0.01737 -0.26 -0.1128 -0.67 -1.41 -0.57 cons -0.29 cons -0.69 All Duration shift—part-time worker 0.1281 cons -0.71597 -1.12 -0.41217 -0.4 0.48 0.29 cons -1.32 cons -0.52 All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the outbound period 0.25 cons 0.25 cons 0.25 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the return period 0.25 cons 0.25 cons 0.25 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the outbound period 0.25 cons 0.25 cons 0.25 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the return period 0.25 cons 0.25 cons 0.25 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Minutes still available to schedule in the arrival period 2 cons -0.09746 -0.16 -0.68225 -0.75 -0.95 -0.64 cons -3.41 cons -2.93 All Minutes still available to schedule in the departure period 2.0366 cons -0.98541 -1.69 0.31175 0.33 2.23 1.37 cons -5.18 cons -1.82 All Time window minutes available before the arrival period, first simulated home-based tour 0.1606 cons 0.10101 1.29 -0.20101 -1.79 -3.85 -2.69 cons -0.76 cons -3.22 All Time window minutes available after the departure period, first simulated home-based tour 0.0665 cons -0.03932 -0.56 -0.10453 -1.13 -0.93 -0.7 cons -1.51 cons -1.84 Depart 3–4 pm Constant 0.622 cons 0.13975 0.17 2.18651 1.47 2.47 1.37 cons -0.58 cons 1.05 All Arrival shift—escort tour 0.1819 cons 0.20995 1.26 0.361 1.91 0.91 0.8 cons 0.17 cons 0.95 All Duration shift—escort tour -1.9103 cons -0.90251 -0.88 -0.90552 -0.87 0 0 cons 0.99 cons 0.96 All Arrival shift—shopping tour 0.0581 cons 0.02667 0.45 0.26796 3.19 4.08 2.87 cons -0.53 cons 2.5 All Duration shift—shopping tour -0.8893 cons 0.16525 0.77 -1.06807 -2.05 -5.76 -2.37 cons 4.93 cons -0.34 All Arrival shift—meal tour 0.0473 cons 0.08715 1.43 0.15338 3.03 1.09 1.31 cons 0.65 cons 2.1 All Duration shift—meal tour -0.3517 cons 0.28328 1.58 -0.03033 -0.12 -1.75 -1.19 cons 3.54 cons 1.22 All Arrival shift—social/recr. tour 0.15 cons -0.04598 -0.64 0.38082 2.44 5.98 2.74 cons -2.74 cons 1.48 All Duration shift—social/recr. tour -0.0377 cons 0.10413 0.31 -0.59679 -1 -2.07 -1.17 cons 0.42 cons -0.93 All Arrival shift—personal business tour 0.0162 cons 0.23573 1.75 0.13426 2.13 -0.75 -1.61 cons 1.63 cons 1.88 All Duration shift—personal business tour -0.2996 cons 0.31202 1.01 -0.37546 -0.9 -2.22 -1.65 cons 1.98 cons -0.18

86 87 Table A.25. Intermediate-Stop Generation and Purpose Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 22879 -20444.2 0.1115 -0.137 7625 -4988.3 0.2834 -0.1457 4370 -3231.8 0.2238 -0.1221 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat no more stops two simulated trips in half tour  1st half tour 0.42649 7.19 0.12878 1.31 0.41268 3.18 2.89 2.18 -5.02 -3.03 -0.23 -0.11 no more stops three simulated trips in half tour  1st half tour 0.5297 6.15 0.16885 1.22 0.39572 2.09 1.64 1.2 -4.19 -2.6 -1.56 -0.71 no more stops four simulated trips in half tour  1st half tour 0.75025 5.78 0.48504 2.4 0.84436 3.11 1.77 1.32 -2.04 -1.31 0.73 0.35 no more stops five simulated trips in half tour  1st half tour 0.75194 3.69 0.4984 1.68 0.97441 2.22 1.6 1.08 -1.24 -0.85 1.09 0.51 no more stops two simulated trips in half tour  2nd half tour 0.75835 15.2 0.55446 4.77 0.57713 4.43 0.2 0.17 -4.09 -1.76 -3.63 -1.39 no more stops three simulated trips in half tour  2nd half tour 0.99548 14.42 0.83042 4.83 0.79623 4.32 -0.2 -0.19 -2.39 -0.96 -2.89 -1.08 no more stops four simulated trips in half tour  2nd half tour 0.95329 9.52 1.05947 3.86 1.3538 4.72 1.07 1.03 1.06 0.39 4 1.4 no more stops five simulated trips in half tour  2nd half tour 1.04284 7.22 1.33401 2.96 2.12827 3.43 1.76 1.28 2.02 0.65 7.52 1.75 no more stops # home-based tours in pattern 0.32698 7.29 0.38971 3.79 0.10611 0.96 -2.76 -2.56 1.4 0.61 -4.93 -1.99 no more stops # tours already simulated -0.04974 -0.71 0.14261 0.93 0.63226 3.56 3.2 2.76 2.73 1.26 9.68 3.84 no more stops not a home-based tour 0.97584 8.92 0.77327 2.3 0.86729 2.5 0.28 0.27 -1.85 -0.6 -0.99 -0.31 no more stops stop is before mandatory destination 0.17428 2.47 0.08664 0.55 0.11918 0.66 0.21 0.18 -1.24 -0.55 -0.78 -0.3 no more stops non-auto tour  IntersectionDensityRatio  LN(Buffer 1 retail, service empl.) 0.10621 4.89 0.38761 5.33 0.11717 1.62 -3.72 -3.74 12.94 3.87 0.5 0.15 no more stops transit tour -0.86773 -5.29 -1.24316 -2.12 -0.23608 -0.3 1.71 1.26 -2.29 -0.64 3.85 0.79 work stop work or school tour -3.35946 -12.22 -1.80163 -3.25 -3.02729 -4.32 -2.21 -1.75 5.67 2.81 1.21 0.47 school stop work or school tour -0.91028 -1.52 -8.40972 -2.07 -2.55124 -1.06 1.44 2.44 -12.53 -1.85 -2.74 -0.68 escort stop work or school tour -1.36681 -6.95 -2.24977 -4.2 -1.8778 -3.16 0.69 0.63 -4.49 -1.65 -2.6 -0.86 personal business stop work or school tour -0.91193 -7.54 -2.36603 -6.13 -2.19351 -4.31 0.45 0.34 -12.03 -3.77 -10.6 -2.52 shopping stop work or school tour -0.51006 -4.56 -1.78191 -8.02 -1.40118 -5.43 1.71 1.48 -11.38 -5.73 -7.97 -3.46 meal stop work tour -2.08553 -12.05 -2.63979 -7.68 -2.49209 -5.79 0.43 0.34 -3.2 -1.61 -2.35 -0.94 social/rec stop work or school tour -0.96266 -6.43 -2.08764 -6.25 -1.44943 -3.67 1.91 1.61 -7.51 -3.37 -3.25 -1.23 no more stops school tour 0.14939 2.56 0.48828 2.11 0.17757 0.96 -1.34 -1.69 5.81 1.46 0.48 0.15 meal stop school tour -1.67372 -7.38 -1.93159 -3.23 -2.55747 -3.78 -1.05 -0.93 -1.14 -0.43 -3.9 -1.31 escort stop escort tour -1.88266 -8.59 -2.65019 -4.51 -2.19915 -3.22 0.77 0.66 -3.5 -1.31 -1.44 -0.46 personal business stop escort tour -1.12018 -7.28 -2.11304 -4.73 -2.1484 -3.57 -0.08 -0.06 -6.46 -2.22 -6.68 -1.71 shopping stop escort tour -0.64615 -4.4 -1.75604 -6.51 -1.3976 -4.34 1.33 1.11 -7.55 -4.12 -5.11 -2.33 meal stop escort tour -2.0029 -8.68 -2.56293 -5.54 -2.54118 -4.33 0.05 0.04 -2.43 -1.21 -2.33 -0.92 social/rec stop escort tour -1.02595 -5.38 -1.58528 -4 -1.59203 -3.1 -0.02 -0.01 -2.94 -1.41 -2.97 -1.1 personal business stop pers. bus. tour -1.15631 -8.4 -2.33676 -5.82 -2.40488 -4.45 -0.17 -0.13 -8.58 -2.94 -9.07 -2.31 shopping stop pers. bus. tour -0.64916 -5.08 -2.29905 -9.55 -1.56665 -5.7 3.04 2.66 -12.91 -6.86 -7.18 -3.34 meal stop pers. bus. tour -2.18128 -10.26 -3.16272 -6.6 -2.90039 -4.97 0.55 0.45 -4.61 -2.05 -3.38 -1.23 social/rec stop pers. bus. tour -1.66243 -7.99 -1.77695 -3.99 -2.59461 -4.62 -1.83 -1.45 -0.55 -0.26 -4.48 -1.66 personal business stop shopping tour -1.23584 -8.77 -2.43835 -6.02 -2.27766 -4.15 0.4 0.29 -8.54 -2.97 -7.39 -1.9 (continued on next page)

88 89 Table A.25. Intermediate-Stop Generation and Purpose Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 22879 -20444.2 0.1115 -0.137 7625 -4988.3 0.2834 -0.1457 4370 -3231.8 0.2238 -0.1221 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat shopping stop shopping tour -0.32343 -2.57 -1.52359 -6.9 -1.19811 -4.59 1.47 1.25 -9.52 -5.43 -6.94 -3.35 meal stop shopping tour -2.32428 -10.04 -3.08128 -7.09 -2.91841 -5.28 0.37 0.29 -3.27 -1.74 -2.57 -1.08 social/rec stop shopping tour -1.65789 -7.62 -1.82438 -4.83 -1.67374 -3.6 0.4 0.32 -0.77 -0.44 -0.07 -0.03 personal business stop meal tour -1.30462 -8.12 -2.17553 -5.18 -2.25232 -4.03 -0.18 -0.14 -5.42 -2.07 -5.9 -1.69 shopping stop meal tour -0.50322 -3.45 -1.98538 -7.61 -1.52359 -5 1.77 1.51 -10.16 -5.68 -6.99 -3.35 meal stop meal tour -4.83327 -7.71 -3.76037 -5.71 -3.1249 -4.15 0.97 0.84 1.71 1.63 2.73 2.27 social/rec stop meal tour -1.52893 -6.91 -1.84646 -3.68 -1.88704 -3.65 -0.08 -0.08 -1.44 -0.63 -1.62 -0.69 (continued)

90 91 Table A.26. Intermediate-Stop Generation and Purpose Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 22879 -20444.2 0.1115 -0.137 7625 -4988.3 0.2834 -0.1457 4370 -3231.8 0.2238 -0.1221 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat personal business stop social/recr. tour -1.34867 -8.98 -2.34313 -5.71 -2.71375 -4.96 -0.9 -0.68 -6.62 -2.42 -9.09 -2.5 shopping stop social/recr. tour -0.55978 -4.17 -1.90826 -8.21 -1.55765 -5.58 1.51 1.26 -10.05 -5.8 -7.44 -3.57 meal stop social/recr. tour -2.12047 -9.64 -2.54245 -6.11 -2.77974 -4.96 -0.57 -0.42 -1.92 -1.01 -3 -1.18 social/rec stop social/recr. tour -1.10856 -6.4 -1.49491 -4.58 -1.39793 -3.32 0.3 0.23 -2.23 -1.18 -1.67 -0.69 work stop 1st half tour 1.0361 6.3 0.41863 1.2 1.00677 2.52 1.69 1.47 -3.75 -1.78 -0.18 -0.07 school stop 1st half tour 0.49618 1.41 4.60198 2.22 1.26771 1.52 -1.61 -4 11.67 1.98 2.19 0.93 escort stop 1st half tour -0.2394 -2.43 1.4819 5.68 1.02893 3.3 -1.74 -1.45 17.46 6.6 12.87 4.06 personal business stop 1st half tour 0.14182 2.19 1.4204 7.98 0.91268 4.24 -2.85 -2.36 19.7 7.18 11.88 3.58 shopping stop 1st half tour -0.66114 -10.25 1.34221 12.27 0.70734 5.47 -5.8 -4.91 31.07 18.31 21.22 10.59 meal stop 1st half tour -0.18745 -1.89 1.07769 5.53 0.65067 2.81 -2.19 -1.84 12.77 6.49 8.46 3.62 social/rec stop 1st half tour -0.29525 -3.07 0.75151 4.01 0.84067 3.56 0.48 0.38 10.89 5.58 11.82 4.8 work stop # of simulated work stops 0.93398 1.84 1.65023 1.27 1.71892 3.23 0.05 0.13 1.41 0.55 1.55 1.48 school stop # of simulated school stops -5 cons -5 cons -5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons escort stop # of simulated escort stops -0.46211 -1.38 0 cons -0.4621 cons cons cons 1.38 cons 0 cons personal business stop # of simulated pers bus stops -0.86144 -3.92 -1.15732 -1.08 -0.8614 cons 0.28 cons -1.35 -0.28 0 cons shopping stop # of simulated shopping stops -1.81255 -4.92 -1.3777 -2.13 -1.89214 -1.77 -0.8 -0.48 1.18 0.67 -0.22 -0.07 meal stop # of simulated meal stops -2.15229 -4.57 -1.92196 -1.81 -2.1523 cons -0.22 cons 0.49 0.22 0 cons social/rec stop # of simulated social/recr. stops -1.64865 -2.78 -0.57004 -0.54 -1.6486 cons -1.02 cons 1.82 1.02 0 cons work stop 1 or more simulated work stops -1.38945 -2.1 -0.1471 -0.1 0 cons 0.1 cons 1.88 0.86 2.1 cons work stop # of remaining tours to be simulated 0.1198 1.41 0.11559 0.68 -0.25228 -1.05 -2.17 -1.53 -0.05 -0.02 -4.39 -1.55 school stop # of remaining tours to be simulated -0.06087 -0.27 0.72708 2.02 0.43016 0.78 -0.83 -0.54 3.46 2.19 2.16 0.89 escort stop # of remaining tours to be simulated 0.06188 1.06 0.33802 2.4 -0.18078 -0.93 -3.68 -2.68 4.72 1.96 -4.15 -1.25 personal business stop # of remaining tours to be simulated -0.10669 -1.88 0.15755 1.12 -0.54478 -2.89 -5 -3.72 4.65 1.88 -7.71 -2.32 shopping stop # of remaining tours to be simulated -0.14998 -2.57 0.04367 0.37 -0.38854 -2.9 -3.69 -3.23 3.31 1.65 -4.08 -1.78 meal stop # of remaining tours to be simulated -0.17909 -2.28 0.03805 0.25 -0.5356 -2.52 -3.77 -2.7 2.77 1.43 -4.54 -1.68 social/rec stop # of remaining tours to be simulated -0.19213 -2.65 -0.19588 -1.17 -0.47651 -2.42 -1.67 -1.42 -0.05 -0.02 -3.92 -1.44 work stop duration of tour time window 0.21578 10.54 0.03962 0.96 0.15684 3.11 2.84 2.32 -8.6 -4.26 -2.88 -1.17 school stop duration of tour time window 0.17361 3.46 0.45209 1.63 0.14851 0.69 -1.1 -1.42 5.55 1.01 -0.5 -0.12 escort stop duration of tour time window 0.01538 1.58 -0.02112 -0.86 0.05327 1.7 3.01 2.37 -3.75 -1.48 3.9 1.21 personal business stop duration of tour time window 0.07501 10.85 0.03405 1.89 0.02613 1.14 -0.44 -0.35 -5.92 -2.28 -7.07 -2.13 shopping stop duration of tour time window 0.07335 10.32 0.04912 4.23 0.03528 2.57 -1.19 -1.01 -3.41 -2.08 -5.36 -2.77 meal stop duration of tour time window 0.09398 8.32 0.05775 2.79 0.04953 1.87 -0.4 -0.31 -3.21 -1.75 -3.94 -1.68 social/rec stop duration of tour time window 0.10968 10.32 0.06537 3.23 0.03023 1.18 -1.74 -1.37 -4.17 -2.19 -7.48 -3.1

92 93 Table A.27. Intermediate-Stop Generation and Purpose Choice Model—Part 3 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 22879 -20444.2 0.1115 -0.137 7625 -4988.3 0.2834 -0.1457 4370 -3231.8 0.2238 -0.1221 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat work stop from9AMto11AM + from11AMto1PM + from1PMto3PM + from3PMto5PM 1.15435 7.93 1.26115 3.81 0.98811 2.83 -0.82 -0.78 0.73 0.32 -1.14 -0.48 school stop from7AMto9AM + from7PMto9PM + from9PMto11PM + from11PMto7AM -0.89256 -1.73 0.60927 0.46 -0.23834 -0.17 -0.63 -0.62 2.91 1.12 1.27 0.48 escort stop from7AMto9AM 0.53133 4.91 0.17482 0.61 0.20999 0.61 0.12 0.1 -3.29 -1.24 -2.97 -0.93 escort stop from9AMto11AM + from11AMto1PM + from1PMto3PM + from3PMto5PM 0.44954 5.03 0.21316 0.82 0.06213 0.21 -0.58 -0.5 -2.65 -0.91 -4.34 -1.29 personal business stop from7AMto9AM + from7PMto9PM + from9PMto11PM + from11PMto7AM -0.40669 -4.25 -0.12282 -0.41 0.55979 1.35 2.25 1.65 2.97 0.94 10.11 2.33 personal business stop from9AMto11AM + from11AMto1PM + from1PMto3PM + from3PMto5PM 0.62764 8.28 0.57209 2.35 1.21628 3.29 2.65 1.74 -0.73 -0.23 7.77 1.59 shopping stop from7AMto9AM + from9PMto11PM + from11PMto7AM -0.61176 -6.37 -0.83874 -4.42 -0.60608 -2.81 1.23 1.08 -2.36 -1.2 0.06 0.03 shopping stop from11AMto1PM + from1PMto3PM + from3PMto5PM 0.29503 5.41 0.28913 3.33 0.61042 5.35 3.7 2.82 -0.11 -0.07 5.78 2.76 meal stop from7AMto9AM + from11PMto7AM -1.1368 -5.49 -0.21706 -0.81 -1.49495 -2.98 -4.78 -2.54 4.44 3.44 -1.73 -0.71 meal stop from11AMto1PM + from1PMto3PM 0.80188 8.59 0.37534 1.99 0.62865 2.73 1.34 1.1 -4.57 -2.26 -1.86 -0.75 meal stop from7PMto9PM 0.53036 3.3 0.1569 0.44 0.25569 0.67 0.28 0.26 -2.32 -1.04 -1.71 -0.72 social/rec stop from7AMto9AM + from11PMto7AM -0.48534 -3.41 -1.29562 -3.08 -1.02842 -2.5 0.63 0.65 -5.69 -1.92 -3.81 -1.32 social/rec stop from11AMto1PM + from1PMto3PM + from3PMto5PM 0.21933 2.56 0.06384 0.36 0.34923 1.6 1.6 1.3 -1.81 -0.87 1.52 0.59 work stop adult Male 0.47838 4.16 0.20701 0.86 0.2685 1 0.26 0.23 -2.36 -1.13 -1.82 -0.78 escort stop adult Female w/children in HH 0.14237 2.08 -0.36203 -1.68 -0.11844 -0.49 1.13 1.01 -7.35 -2.34 -3.8 -1.08 escort stop hov2 Tour 1.16615 7.61 0.74918 1.92 -0.00348 -0.01 -1.93 -1.61 -2.72 -1.07 -7.63 -2.5 escort stop hov3 Tour 1.59405 10.44 0.87496 2.18 0.47023 1.06 -1.01 -0.91 -4.71 -1.79 -7.36 -2.53 personal business stop one Person Household 0.04542 0.63 -0.1286 -0.67 -0.22158 -0.73 -0.48 -0.31 -2.4 -0.9 -3.68 -0.88 personal business stop hov2 Tour 0.14396 2.37 0.23441 1.41 0.10996 0.52 -0.75 -0.59 1.49 0.54 -0.56 -0.16 personal business stop hov3 Tour 0.21876 2.87 0.13865 0.58 0.27629 1.07 0.58 0.53 -1.05 -0.34 0.75 0.22 shopping stop adult Female w/children in HH 0.11427 1.69 -0.02394 -0.16 0.20478 1.38 1.54 1.54 -2.04 -0.93 1.34 0.61 shopping stop hov2 Tour 0.24912 4.2 0.07959 0.86 0.03337 0.29 -0.5 -0.4 -2.86 -1.84 -3.63 -1.85 shopping stop hov3 Tour 0.25694 3.38 -0.24612 -1.61 -0.0193 -0.12 1.49 1.36 -6.61 -3.3 -3.63 -1.66 meal stop one Person Household 0.1253 0.96 0.07126 0.29 0.09306 0.28 0.09 0.07 -0.41 -0.22 -0.25 -0.1 meal stop hov2 Tour 0.51645 4.77 0.414 2.03 0.14633 0.59 -1.31 -1.09 -0.95 -0.5 -3.42 -1.5 meal stop hov3 Tour 0.61578 4.93 0.43594 1.81 0.35185 1.23 -0.35 -0.29 -1.44 -0.75 -2.11 -0.92 meal stop partTimeWorker or retiredAdult or drivingAgeStudent 0.0227 0.21 -0.1297 -0.54 0.18273 0.62 1.3 1.06 -1.44 -0.64 1.51 0.54 meal stop nonworkingAdult or childAge5Through15 or childUnder5 -0.12468 -1.01 -0.28781 -1.03 0.20519 0.66 1.77 1.58 -1.32 -0.59 2.67 1.06 social/rec stop hov2 Tour 0.29394 2.99 0.22403 1.03 -0.27656 -1.05 -2.29 -1.9 -0.71 -0.32 -5.8 -2.17 social/rec stop hov3 Tour 0.35279 3.41 0.57004 2.54 0.55997 2.16 -0.04 -0.04 2.1 0.97 2 0.8 school stop one Simulated Trip in half tour -1.3902 -4.76 0.6383 0.76 0.49352 0.69 -0.17 -0.2 6.94 2.42 6.45 2.64 escort stop one Simulated Trip in half tour 0.31366 4.38 0.65935 3.32 0.5841 2.45 -0.38 -0.32 4.83 1.74 3.78 1.13 meal stop one Simulated Trip in half tour 0.61851 6.63 0.59523 3.17 0.81975 3.5 1.2 0.96 -0.25 -0.12 2.16 0.86

94 95 Table A.28. Intermediate-Stop Destination Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 8018 -12287.9 0.603 0.3932 1487 -2428.5 0.5727 0.4854 1062 -2342.3 0.4165 0.2395 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat sampling adjustment factor 1 cons 1 cons 1 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons ln(traveltime/availableWindow) 1.82314 4.23 0.22757 0.77 4.25642 2.81 13.62 2.66 -3.7 -5.4 5.64 1.61 gtim: generalized time -14.04705 -27.24 -10.27226 -11.92 -11.11201 -7.33 -0.97 -0.55 7.32 4.38 5.69 1.94 gtis: gtim squared 13.70363 10.59 7.01676 5.68 4.80623 1.46 -1.79 -0.67 -5.17 -5.41 -6.88 -2.7 gtic: gtim cubed -5.19458 -6.97 -1.96231 -3.45 -0.94867 -0.61 1.78 0.66 4.34 5.69 5.7 2.75 disc: distance cubed (100s of miles up to .5 cubed) -9.26105 -2.83 -10 cons 0.09923 0.01 cons 1.17 -0.23 cons 2.86 1.09 prxs = travel minutes from stop origin 0.09198 7.89 0.0816 2.47 0.0724 2.19 -0.28 -0.28 -0.89 -0.31 -1.68 -0.59 prxo = travel minutes from tour origin 0.17812 12.37 0.05085 1.25 0.13996 3.24 2.19 2.06 -8.84 -3.12 -2.65 -0.88 HH has LowIncome 0.43208 1.96 0.6091 1.53 1.18916 1.65 1.46 0.81 0.8 0.45 3.44 1.05 HH has 100KPlusIncome -1.08711 -2.79 -0.14573 -0.27 0.54205 0.66 1.3 0.84 2.41 1.77 4.18 1.98 HH has MissingIncome 0.67149 1.15 0.72623 1.27 -0.30497 -0.23 -1.8 -0.79 0.09 0.1 -1.67 -0.75 fkid  gtim -1.07199 -3.28 -0.33615 -0.61 1.1432 1.39 2.69 1.8 2.25 1.34 6.79 2.7 nonwprk tour  gtim -0.43799 -1.79 -0.32356 -0.7 -0.21152 -0.24 0.24 0.13 0.47 0.25 0.92 0.25 notFirst  prxs 0.08036 6.8 0.04658 1.34 0.08844 2.69 1.21 1.27 -2.86 -0.97 0.68 0.25 tour is not HomeBasedTour  prxo -0.17187 -3.16 0.23481 1.33 -0.18421 -0.55 -2.37 -1.26 7.48 2.3 -0.23 -0.04 tour is SchoolPurpose  prxo 0.03778 1.7 0.07949 0.52 0.06456 0.51 -0.1 -0.12 1.88 0.27 1.21 0.21 bman  prxo 0.07647 3.82 0.25243 3.61 0.13805 2.04 -1.64 -1.69 8.79 2.52 3.08 0.91 tour is AnHovMode  prxs 0.03926 3.15 0.03582 0.99 -0.06818 -2.08 -2.86 -3.17 -0.28 -0.09 -8.63 -3.28 tour is AnHovMode  prxo -0.06937 -3.87 0.14325 2.43 -0.1715 -2.8 -5.34 -5.14 11.87 3.61 -5.7 -1.67 tour is AnAutoMode  n134Q -0.00737 -10.39 0.00029 0.22 -0.00236 -1.41 -1.97 -1.59 10.81 5.69 7.07 3 tour is SovMode  ParkingHourlyEmploymentCommercialMixBuffer1( ) -0.34433 -2.76 -47.81963 -2.9 -1.65915 -3.08 2.8 85.7 -380.7 -2.88 -10.54 -2.44 tour is AnAutoMode  ParkingHourlyEmploymentCommercialMixInParcel( ) 1.1504 4.35 -0.39799 -0.17 0 cons 0.17 cons -5.86 -0.67 -4.35 cons tour is not AnAutoMode  gtim 2.99087 2.1 0.10269 0.02 2.60094 0.51 0.6 0.49 -2.03 -0.7 -0.27 -0.08 tour is not AnAutoMode  gtis -4.04482 -1.5 1.46637 0.23 -3.15155 -0.31 -0.72 -0.46 2.04 0.86 0.33 0.09 tour is not AnAutoMode  gtic 1.80088 1.39 -0.60551 -0.24 2.42885 0.56 1.22 0.7 -1.86 -0.97 0.49 0.15 tour IsWalkMode  prxs -0.11135 -1.22 -0.21917 -0.58 0 cons 0.58 cons -1.19 -0.28 1.22 cons not tour IsAnAutoMode  prxo 0.00918 0.17 0.16428 1.12 0.51549 3.04 2.39 2.07 2.89 1.05 9.44 2.98 tour IsBikeMode  prxo -0.15561 -1.79 -0.1556 cons -0.18725 -0.76 cons -0.13 0 cons -0.36 -0.13 tour IsWalkMode  prxo -0.13429 -1.13 -0.14264 -0.63 0 cons 0.63 cons -0.07 -0.04 1.13 cons tour IsTransitMode  walk and transit unavailable on one leg -0.81273 -1.45 1.79006 1.34 -2.0661 -0.42 -2.89 -0.78 4.65 1.95 -2.24 -0.25 tour IsTransitMode  walk and transit unavailable on both legs -3.23707 -3.97 0 cons 0 cons cons cons 3.97 cons 3.97 cons workOrSchool Stop  gtim 2.07294 6.39 0.71213 0.96 2.70621 2.41 2.7 1.78 -4.2 -1.84 1.95 0.56 personal Stop  UniversityStudent  LN (StudentsUniversityBuffer1 + 1) 0.06795 1.64 0.09584 0.45 -1.77911 -0.6 -8.75 -0.63 0.68 0.13 -44.71 -0.62 work Stop  LN (EmploymentTotalBuffer1 + 1) 0.18052 4.71 0.21422 1.89 0.34592 3.36 1.16 1.28 0.88 0.3 4.32 1.6 (continued on next page)

96 97 Table A.28. Intermediate-Stop Destination Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 8018 -12287.9 0.603 0.3932 1487 -2428.5 0.5727 0.4854 1062 -2342.3 0.4165 0.2395 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat work Stop  LN (StudentsK12Buffer1 + 1) -0.04003 -1.61 -0.12808 -1.78 0.0378 0.63 2.31 2.76 -3.54 -1.23 3.13 1.3 escort stop HH with kids  gtim -1.83826 -3.51 -2.69657 -1.84 -8.63773 -3.17 -4.06 -2.18 -1.64 -0.59 -12.97 -2.5 escort stop HH with kids  prxs -0.18325 -6.59 -0.06992 -0.44 -0.1315 -1.09 -0.39 -0.51 4.07 0.72 1.86 0.43 escort stop HH no kids  prxo 0.05356 1.43 -0.08341 -0.44 0.13831 1.47 1.17 2.36 -3.65 -0.72 2.26 0.9 escort stop HH with kids  prxo 0.11486 4.79 0.13428 0.92 -0.21021 -1.51 -2.36 -2.47 0.81 0.13 -13.56 -2.33 escort stop HH with kids  LN (EmploymentIndustrial&Construction Buffer1 + 1) -0.23735 -8.51 0.05373 0.48 -0.18018 -1.97 -2.09 -2.55 10.43 2.61 2.05 0.62 escort stop HH with kids  LN (StudentsK12Buffer1 + 1) 0.22077 9.38 0.17059 2.64 0.28258 4.05 1.73 1.61 -2.13 -0.78 2.63 0.89 escort stop HH no kids  LN (EmploymentTotalBuffer1 + 1) -0.1056 -2.43 -0.13132 -0.87 0.04538 0.31 1.18 1.21 -0.59 -0.17 3.48 1.04 escort stop HH no kids  LN (StudentsK12Buffer1 + 1) 0.07777 2.5 0.02977 0.4 0.02168 0.2 -0.11 -0.07 -1.55 -0.65 -1.81 -0.51 (continued)

98 99 Table A.29. Intermediate-Stop Destination Choice Model—Part 2 Region Difference Variables Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 8018 -12287.9 0.603 0.3932 1487 -2428.5 0.5727 0.4854 1062 -2342.3 0.4165 0.2395 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat pers.business Stop * LN (EmploymentMedicalBuffer1 + 1) 0.12123 6.16 0.22517 2.22 0.41531 6.08 1.87 2.78 5.28 1.02 14.95 4.3 pers.business Stop * LN (EmploymentFoodBuffer1 + 1) 0.1498 5.48 0.17723 2.43 0.13573 1.47 -0.57 -0.45 1 0.38 -0.51 -0.15 pers.business Stop * LN (EmploymentRetailBuffer1 + 1) -0.11689 -3.69 -0.1603 -1.35 -0.22362 -1.99 -0.53 -0.56 -1.37 -0.37 -3.37 -0.95 shopping Stop * gtim -2.14897 -6.79 -1.20482 -3.22 -2.05458 -2.58 -2.27 -1.07 2.98 2.52 0.3 0.12 shoppingStopOnShopTour * prxs -0.07173 -3.33 -0.02624 -0.67 0.03637 0.9 1.59 1.55 2.11 1.16 5.01 2.68 shopping Stop * LN (EmploymentRetailBuffer1 + 1) 0.38017 15.99 0.44985 10.25 0.48393 10.17 0.78 0.72 2.93 1.59 4.37 2.18 meal Stop * gtim -1.5267 -3.35 -0.15607 -0.28 -3.19346 -2.28 -5.49 -2.17 3.01 2.48 -3.66 -1.19 meal Stop * LN (EmploymentFoodBuffer1 + 1) 0.17035 4.41 0.54212 5.91 0.24377 2.58 -3.25 -3.16 9.63 4.05 1.9 0.78 social/recr Stop * gtim 0.8289 2.8 -0.10225 -0.21 -0.46931 -0.57 -0.74 -0.44 -3.15 -1.87 -4.39 -1.57 social/recr Stop * LN (EmploymentFoodBuffer1 + 1) 0.06856 1.67 0.11613 1.32 0.29311 2.77 2.01 1.67 1.16 0.54 5.48 2.12 social/recr Stop * LN (EmploymentIndustrial&ConstructionBuffer1 + 1) -0.21158 -4.35 0.49469 4.1 -0.09091 -0.77 -4.85 -4.99 14.53 5.86 2.48 1.03 social/recr Stop * LN (EmploymentServiceBuffer1 + 1) 0.17753 2.67 -0.12675 -1.17 0.22754 1.48 3.27 2.31 -4.57 -2.81 0.75 0.33 social/recr Stop * LN (EmploymentTotalBuffer1 + 1) 0.57042 7.55 0.21634 3.14 0.26182 1.57 0.66 0.27 -4.69 -5.14 -4.08 -1.85 social/recr Stop * LN (HouseholdsBuffer1 + 1) -0.67778 -12 -0.8094 -6.59 -0.59222 -5.01 1.77 1.84 -2.33 -1.07 1.52 0.72 log size function coefficient (subsequent coefficients are for size variables) 0.18791 17.99 0.13469 23.68 0.16241 18.41 4.87 3.14 -5.1 -9.36 -2.44 -2.89 work Stop * (EmploymentGovernment + Office + Education) 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons work Stop * EmploymentTotal -1.72562 -2.75 0 cons 1.37425 0.13 cons 0.13 2.75 cons 4.93 0.3 child under 15 on school stop * (EmploymentGovernment + Office + Education) -9.33362 -2.51 -30 cons -9.3336 cons cons cons -5.57 cons 0 cons child under 15 on school stop * (StudentsK8 + StudentsHighSchool) 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons driving age child on school stop * (EmploymentGovernment + Office + Education) -5.75428 -1.54 -30 cons -5.7543 cons cons cons -6.51 cons 0 cons driving age child on school stop * (StudentsK8 + StudentsHighSchool) 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons not child driving age or younger, on school stop * ( Employment Government + Office + Educ) -17.01747 -5.67 0 cons -20.66102 -2.36 cons -2.36 5.67 cons -1.21 -0.42 not child driving age or younger, on school stop * StudentsUniversity 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons

100 101 Table A.30. Intermediate-Stop Destination Choice Model—Part 3 Region Difference Variables Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 8018 -12287.9 0.603 0.3932 1487 -2428.5 0.5727 0.4854 1062 -2342.3 0.4165 0.2395 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat escort stop HH with kids * (StudentsK8 + StudentsHighSchool) 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons escort stop HH with kids * EmploymentTotal -3.21687 -4.2 -20.16234 -9.52 -2.75109 -1.18 8.22 7.48 -22.1 -8 0.61 0.2 escort stop HH with kids * Households -30.39025 -13.74 -30 cons -30.3903 cons cons cons 0.18 cons 0 cons escort stop HH no kids * EmploymentTotal 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons escort stop HH no kids * (StudentsK8 + StudentsHighSchool) -7.12515 -1.87 12.78011 3.3 -7.1252 cons -5.14 cons 5.21 5.14 0 cons escort stop HH no kids * Households -30.14553 -13.1 -30 cons -28.95289 -6.65 cons 0.24 0.06 cons 0.52 0.27 pers.business Stop * EmploymentFood -17.6099 -7.9 -30 cons -17.6099 cons cons cons -5.56 cons 0 cons pers.business Stop * (EmploymentIndustrial &Construction) -19.06402 -11.05 -30 cons -15.13727 -4.03 cons 3.95 -6.34 cons 2.28 1.04 pers.business Stop * EmploymentMedical -3.62285 -3.91 4.01899 1.65 -0.65541 -0.36 -1.92 -2.6 8.24 3.15 3.2 1.65 pers.business Stop * (EmploymentGovernment + Office + Education) -13.30079 -13.39 5.12519 1.37 -17.88648 -3.43 -6.16 -4.42 18.55 4.94 -4.62 -0.88 pers.business Stop * EmploymentRetail -0.50241 -1.4 11.94429 5.06 5.02555 2.56 -2.93 -3.52 34.56 5.27 15.35 2.82 pers.business Stop * EmploymentService 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons pers.business Stop * Households -27.87342 -16.12 -30 cons -27.8734 cons cons cons -1.23 cons 0 cons shopping Stop * EmploymentRetail 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons shopping Stop * EmploymentService -18.02249 -12.08 -30 cons -9.29847 -6.8 cons 15.15 -8.03 cons 5.85 6.38 shopping Stop * EmploymentTotal -18.72634 -16.54 -23.76755 -15.59 -15.76702 -11.51 5.25 5.84 -4.45 -3.31 2.61 2.16 shopping Stop * Households -38.21024 -6.67 -30 cons -38.2102 cons cons cons 1.43 cons 0 cons meal Stop * EmploymentFood 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons meal Stop * EmploymentTotal -22.11866 -15.48 -30 cons -21.50977 -8.79 cons 3.47 -5.52 cons 0.43 0.25 meal Stop * Households -38.58772 -6.7 -30 cons -38.5877 cons cons cons 1.49 cons 0 cons social/recr Stop * EmploymentFood -2.97865 -1.43 -30 cons 8.13816 0.93 cons 4.34 -12.95 cons 5.33 1.27 social/recr Stop * EmploymentMedical -30 cons -30 cons -30 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons social/recr Stop * EmploymentService 0 cons 0 cons 0 cons social/recr Stop * EmploymentTotal -12.33962 -6.03 -13.53027 -1.87 -0.18135 -0.02 1.85 1.5 -0.58 -0.16 5.94 1.37 social/recr Stop * OpenSpaceType2Buffer1 > 0 -80 cons -30 cons -30 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons social/recr Stop * Households -1.01534 -0.83 8.18641 1.51 5.14053 0.61 -0.56 -0.36 7.56 1.7 5.06 0.73

102 103 Table A.31. Trip-Level Mode Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 29627 -19653.9 0.4563 -0.8714 9876 -5718.3 0.5162 -1.4856 5741 -3492.5 0.4714 -1.3457 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Parking cost utility 0.95365 2.74 0.9537 cons 210.1176 1.58 cons 1.57 0 cons 600.45 1.57 All Path type model log-sum (for 1-way trip) 2.45567 13.18 1.34078 4.75 1.04904 3.92 -1.03 -1.09 -5.98 -3.95 -7.55 -5.25 walk to transit Constant -0.79145 -1.92 -1.5239 -1.22 2.9202 2.67 3.54 4.06 -1.78 -0.58 9.01 3.39 walk to transit Cars in HH, but fewer cars than adults -0.35055 -0.77 0.49038 0.22 0 cons -0.22 cons 1.85 0.38 0.77 cons hov3 Constant 3.65806 8.2 4.38267 3.7 4.85415 3.97 0.4 0.39 1.62 0.61 2.68 0.98 hov3, hov2 #HH children age 5–15 -0.22423 -7.7 -0.21 -2.16 -0.38994 -4.25 -1.85 -1.96 0.49 0.15 -5.69 -1.8 hov3, hov2 #HH non-working adults -0.00939 -0.21 -0.29497 -2.71 -0.00885 -0.07 2.63 2.31 -6.32 -2.63 0.01 0 hov3 One person HH -1.31282 -6.03 -0.96163 -2.05 -1.0769 -2.28 -0.25 -0.24 1.61 0.75 1.08 0.5 hov3 Two person HH -0.4185 -4.74 -0.37475 -2.18 -0.82355 -3.73 -2.61 -2.03 0.5 0.25 -4.59 -1.83 hov2 One person HH -0.95024 -5.5 -1.18829 -2.88 -0.75631 -2 1.05 1.14 -1.38 -0.58 1.12 0.51 hov2 Constant 2.66399 6.37 3.58325 3.07 3.57214 3.37 -0.01 -0.01 2.2 0.79 2.17 0.86 hov3, hov2 No cars in HH -2.7633 -5.95 -3.89301 -2.64 -2.89278 -1.68 0.68 0.58 -2.43 -0.77 -0.28 -0.08 sov Constant 1.89925 5.44 1.29588 1.55 0.19956 0.33 -1.31 -1.83 -1.73 -0.72 -4.87 -2.83 sov Cars in HH, but fewer cars than adults -0.74065 -6.64 -0.47859 -1.83 -0.62338 -2.21 -0.55 -0.51 2.35 1 1.05 0.42 sov HH income less than 25K -0.38698 -3.05 -1.0204 -2.87 -0.17127 -0.64 2.39 3.15 -4.99 -1.78 1.7 0.8 sov HH income 25K–45K -0.13091 -1.21 -0.49486 -1.81 0.07693 0.34 2.1 2.54 -3.37 -1.33 1.93 0.92 sov Child age 16–17 -0.98552 -4.24 -0.21774 -0.29 -0.67145 -1.02 -0.61 -0.69 3.3 1.03 1.35 0.48 bike Constant -3.34984 -6.9 -4.11532 -3.45 -2.601 -2 1.27 1.16 -1.58 -0.64 1.54 0.58 bike Male 0.72116 3.01 1.74314 2.14 1.21594 1.59 -0.65 -0.69 4.26 1.25 2.06 0.65 bike Age under 35 1.58697 4.85 -0.15166 -0.14 0.64056 0.6 0.73 0.75 -5.32 -1.61 -2.89 -0.89 bike Origin parcel buffer 2 net intersections 0.02375 4 -0.03246 -1.64 -0.01735 -0.72 0.76 0.63 -9.47 -2.84 -6.92 -1.71 walk Age under 35 0.79006 3.47 1.02053 1.35 0.41575 0.57 -0.8 -0.83 1.01 0.3 -1.64 -0.52 walk Origin parcel buffer 1 net intersections 0.02516 6.38 -0.01147 -0.99 -0.00552 -0.51 0.52 0.55 -9.28 -3.18 -7.77 -2.84 walk Origin parcel buffer 1 mixed-use density 0.30945 0.95 0.78005 0.96 0.7412 1.05 -0.05 -0.05 1.45 0.58 1.33 0.61 main tour mode Constant 4.71524 14.09 6.70469 5.62 4.39101 4.67 -1.94 -2.46 5.95 1.67 -0.97 -0.34 main tour mode If only trip on 1st half tour 0.72271 8.31 0.73605 3.89 0.84999 4.25 0.6 0.57 0.15 0.07 1.46 0.64 main tour mode If only trip on 2nd half tour 0.58309 6.35 -0.27317 -1.04 0.40568 1.86 2.59 3.11 -9.32 -3.27 -1.93 -0.81 main tour mode If first of multiple trips on 1st half tour -0.16575 -1.59 -0.25875 -1.1 0.11104 0.47 1.58 1.56 -0.89 -0.4 2.66 1.17 main tour mode If first of multiple trips on 2nd half tour 0.13384 1.44 0.79974 4.33 1.01846 5.03 1.18 1.08 7.15 3.6 9.5 4.36 main tour mode If last of multiple trips on 1st half tour -0.03693 -0.36 -0.26355 -1.15 -0.19498 -0.87 0.3 0.31 -2.19 -0.99 -1.53 -0.71 main tour mode If last of multiple trips on 2nd half tour -0.32011 -3.48 -0.2063 -0.68 0.43133 1.64 2.09 2.43 1.24 0.37 8.16 2.87

104 105 Table A.32. Trip-Level Mode Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 29627 -19653.9 0.4563 -0.8714 9876 -5718.3 0.5162 -1.4856 5741 -3492.5 0.4714 -1.3457 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat hov3 tour mode is walk to transit -3.1281 -5.53 -3.1281 cons -3.1281 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons hov3 tour mode is school bus 2.37732 4.92 2.53236 1.84 0.30362 0.32 -1.62 -2.32 0.32 0.11 -4.29 -2.16 hov2 tour mode is walk to transit -0.99931 -1.99 -2.64617 -1.99 -0.9993 cons 1.24 cons -3.28 -1.24 0 cons hov2 tour mode is school bus 3.31036 6.89 4.1285 3 1.67996 1.81 -1.78 -2.64 1.7 0.59 -3.4 -1.76 hov2 tour mode is hov 3 4.57042 11.47 5.99236 4.58 4.25026 3.39 -1.33 -1.39 3.57 1.09 -0.8 -0.26 sov tour mode is drive to transit -1.6664 cons -1.6664 cons -1.6664 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons sov tour mode is walk to transit -4.47217 -6.09 -0.95958 -0.39 -4.4722 cons -1.43 cons 4.79 1.43 0 cons sov tour mode is hov 3 2.05041 6.58 2.93434 3.44 5.05095 4.23 2.48 1.77 2.84 1.04 9.63 2.51 sov tour mode is hov 2 2.50011 7.6 3.58384 3.97 4.55814 4.08 1.08 0.87 3.3 1.2 6.26 1.84 bike tour mode is walk to transit -0.59113 -1.21 4.44985 3.23 0 cons -3.23 cons 10.28 3.66 1.21 cons bike tour mode is hov 2 -0.01052 -0.03 -0.28819 -0.21 0 cons 0.21 cons -0.77 -0.2 0.03 cons bike tour mode is sov -1.1576 -2.11 -1.1576 cons -1.71483 -1.25 cons -0.41 0 cons -1.01 -0.41 walk work tour 1.59837 7.18 1.01133 1.62 1.71604 2.78 1.13 1.14 -2.64 -0.94 0.53 0.19 walk school tour 1.31318 5.44 0.0741 0.08 3.77612 4.45 3.89 4.36 -5.13 -1.3 10.2 2.9 bike work-based tour -0.39171 -0.48 -0.3917 cons 0 cons cons cons 0 cons 0.48 cons hov2, hov3 work tour -3.39096 -11.53 -5.24259 -5.05 -3.03657 -3.95 2.12 2.87 -6.3 -1.78 1.21 0.46 hov2, hov3 school tour -2.68022 -8.8 -3.27068 -3.09 -1.61751 -2.51 1.56 2.57 -1.94 -0.56 3.49 1.65 hov2, hov3 escort tour -2.82765 -10.71 -4.76541 -4.93 -2.78008 -3.82 2.06 2.73 -7.34 -2.01 0.18 0.07 hov2, hov3 shopping tour 2.24083 6.53 1.69991 2.7 0.34924 0.72 -2.15 -2.78 -1.58 -0.86 -5.51 -3.89 hov2, hov3 meal tour 1.10426 3.71 5.28218 3.03 0.61461 1.05 -2.68 -7.95 14.03 2.4 -1.64 -0.83 hov2, hov3 social/recr tour -0.01941 -0.09 -0.16513 -0.31 -0.91973 -1.91 -1.43 -1.57 -0.68 -0.28 -4.19 -1.87 hov2, hov3 trip from escort stop to work, am peak -3.28437 -8.48 -5.78687 -3.55 -2.68558 -3.14 1.9 3.62 -6.46 -1.54 1.55 0.7 hov2, hov3 trip from work to escort stop, pm peak -2.81411 -7.17 -2.56057 -2.46 -2.85218 -3.23 -0.28 -0.33 0.65 0.24 -0.1 -0.04 hov2, hov3 trip from home to escort stop, am peak 3.23956 10.11 3.72254 4.25 1.93886 3.34 -2.04 -3.07 1.51 0.55 -4.06 -2.24 hov2, hov3 trip from home to escort stop, midday -2.00566 -8.17 -1.83681 -3.3 -1.21929 -2.7 1.11 1.37 0.69 0.3 3.2 1.74 hov2, hov3 trip from home to escort stop, pm peak -1.80811 -7.49 -1.23396 -2.12 -1.09632 -2.26 0.24 0.28 2.38 0.99 2.95 1.47 hov2, hov3 trip from home to escort stop, evening -1.91208 -4.94 -2.76076 -2.31 -2.13014 -2.32 0.53 0.69 -2.19 -0.71 -0.56 -0.24 hov2, hov3 trip from escort stop to home, am peak -3.94979 -10.67 -4.6985 -4.76 -4.56277 -4.24 0.14 0.13 -2.02 -0.76 -1.66 -0.57 hov2, hov3 trip from escort stop to home, midday -0.71345 -2.41 -0.09981 -0.18 -0.44228 -0.85 -0.63 -0.66 2.07 1.14 0.91 0.52 hov2, hov3 trip from escort stop to home, pm peak 0.23362 1.04 0.26207 0.58 0.58699 1.34 0.72 0.74 0.13 0.06 1.57 0.81 hov2, hov3 trip from escort stop to home, evening -1.73842 -5.18 0.33866 0.39 2.13889 1.51 2.07 1.27 6.19 2.39 11.56 2.74 all mode nest log-sum 0.60321 14.53 0.50001 5.74 0.7846 5.04 3.27 1.83 -2.49 -1.19 4.37 1.16

106 107 Table A.33. Intermediate-Stop Departure Time Choice Model—Part 1 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 8977 -21446.3 0.1524 -0.6425 3894 -9252 0.1601 -3.4713 2009 -4833.7 0.1468 -2.6153 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat Arrive 3–6 am Constant—Arrival constants applied for outbound half tour -5.22743 -16.17 -5 cons -6.96268 -4.24 cons -1.2 0.7 cons -5.37 -1.06 Arrive 6–7 am Constant -3.05164 -15.78 -2.63431 -7.25 -1.77551 -3.15 2.36 1.52 2.16 1.15 6.6 2.27 Arrive 7–8 am Constant -1.08938 -9.19 -0.41118 -1.7 -0.80009 -2 -1.61 -0.97 5.72 2.81 2.44 0.72 Arrive 9–10 am Constant 0.64148 5.34 1.55375 5.36 0.84406 2.5 -2.45 -2.1 7.6 3.14 1.69 0.6 Arrive 10 am–1 pm Constant 1.376 9.31 3.65141 10.13 1.84599 4.36 -5.01 -4.26 15.39 6.31 3.18 1.11 Arrive 1–4 pm Constant 2.26673 10.5 5.93945 11.47 2.38396 4.16 -6.87 -6.2 17.02 7.09 0.54 0.2 Arrive 4–7 pm Constant 3.52962 11.93 10.00297 12.39 2.57882 3.1 -9.19 -8.92 21.87 8.02 -3.21 -1.14 Arrive 7–10 pm Constant 3.38518 8.94 9.95463 10.3 1.37568 1.04 -8.88 -6.5 17.35 6.8 -5.31 -1.52 Arrive 10 pm–3 am Constant 3.09654 4.4 3.0965 cons 3.0965 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons Depart 3–7 am Constant—Departure constants applied for return half tour -1.43504 -1.34 -1.435 cons 0 cons cons cons 0 cons 1.34 cons Depart 7–10 am Constant -1.17012 -4.12 4.25953 8.67 -1.53564 -1.81 -11.8 -6.84 19.1 11.05 -1.29 -0.43 Depart 10 am–1 pm Constant -0.77006 -4 4.30295 9.33 -0.45761 -0.68 -10.33 -7.05 26.37 11 1.62 0.46 Depart 1–3 pm Constant -0.7246 -5.3 3.27424 7.79 -0.51482 -0.97 -9.01 -7.16 29.26 9.51 1.53 0.4 Depart 4–5 pm Constant -0.08196 -1.13 1.32203 4.99 0.08793 0.31 -4.66 -4.33 19.36 5.3 2.34 0.6 Depart 6–7 pm Constant -0.48726 -6.24 -1.80816 -5.45 -0.42268 -1.24 4.18 4.07 -16.93 -3.98 0.83 0.19 Depart 7–9 pm Constant -0.74717 -6.54 -3.33085 -8.39 -1.00053 -2.13 5.87 4.95 -22.6 -6.51 -2.22 -0.54 Depart 9–12 pm Constant -1.13209 -6.08 -4.15977 -10.88 -0.82229 -1.3 8.73 5.27 -16.27 -7.92 1.66 0.49 Depart 12–3 am Constant -2.62865 -6.85 -2.6286 cons -2.6286 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons Duration 1–2 hrs Constant -0.94801 -22.18 -2.17881 -22.94 0.9306 6.68 32.73 22.32 -28.79 -12.96 43.95 13.48 Duration 2–3 hrs Constant -1.37748 -16.89 -3.79314 -19.13 2.79685 9.18 33.23 21.63 -29.62 -12.18 51.19 13.7 Duration 3–5 hrs Constant -1.35665 -10.7 -5.36393 -18.45 4.71101 9.59 34.65 20.5 -31.61 -13.78 47.86 12.35 Duration 5–7 hrs Constant -2.14559 -9.27 -8.82194 -8.12 8.14408 7.9 15.61 16.46 -28.85 -6.14 44.47 9.98 Duration 7–9 hrs Constant -2.95704 -6.83 -8.22783 -7.79 14.15852 11.05 21.19 17.47 -12.17 -4.99 39.53 13.36 Duration 9–12 hrs Constant -2.04292 -4.03 -5 cons 18.4878 9.62 cons 12.22 -5.83 cons 40.47 10.68 Duration 12–14 hrs Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 14–18 hrs Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons Duration 18–24 hrs Constant -10 cons -10 cons -10 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons

108 109 Table A.34. Intermediate-Stop Departure Time Choice Model—Part 2 Variables Region Difference Sacramento Tampa Jacksonville Jacksonville vs. Tampa Tampa vs. Sacramento Jacksonville vs. Sacramento Number of observations Final log-likelihood Rho-squared versus 0 coefficients Rho-squared versus constants only 8977 -21446.3 0.1524 -0.6425 3894 -9252 0.1601 -3.4713 2009 -4833.7 0.1468 -2.6153 Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Tampa model Standard errors from Sacramento model Standard errors from Jacksonville model Description Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat Coeff t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat t-stat All Duration shift—non-working adult under age 65 0.10104 4.64 -0.00671 -0.17 0.02637 0.34 0.84 0.42 -4.95 -2.74 -3.43 -0.95 All Duration shift—university student 0.13234 4.85 0.06348 0.51 0.16425 0.91 0.81 0.56 -2.52 -0.55 1.17 0.18 All Duration shift—non-working adult age 65+ 0.10578 5.09 0.00671 0.19 0.10094 1.22 2.63 1.14 -4.77 -2.76 -0.23 -0.06 All Duration shift—driving age student 0.14992 4.09 -0.51292 -3.83 -0.25947 -0.83 1.89 0.81 -18.07 -4.96 -11.16 -1.3 All Duration shift—Child age 5–15 0.19472 7.65 -0.11238 -1.27 0.23197 1.43 3.9 2.13 -12.07 -3.48 1.46 0.23 All Duration shift—Child age 0–4 0.13707 3.89 0.1371 cons 0.1371 cons cons cons 0 cons 0 cons All Auto tours, auto path type log-sum during the period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Transit tours, transit path type log-sum during the period 0.5 cons 0.5 cons 0.5 cons cons cons cons cons cons cons All Minutes still available to schedule in the period 0.32487 11.33 -2.3492 -16.68 0.68924 4.84 21.58 21.35 -93.3 -18.99 12.71 2.56 All Remaining tours to simulate in the day divided by the total time window that would remain -93.62074 -8.56 -653.0773 -9.67 -131.18414 -2.94 7.73 11.68 -51.14 -8.29 -3.43 -0.84 All Remaining stop purposes to simulate divided by the window that would remain in the simulation direction -2.72866 -5.76 -10.68298 -3.93 -9.69806 -2.28 0.36 0.23 -16.78 -2.93 -14.7 -1.64 Depart 3–4 pm Constant -0.33158 -3.35 2.50068 6.96 -0.19695 -0.5 -7.51 -6.79 28.64 7.88 1.36 0.34 All Duration shift—Outbound half of a work tour 0.17439 5.27 -0.06536 -1.15 0.6787 6.63 13.08 7.27 -7.25 -4.22 15.24 4.93 All Duration shift—Return half of a work tour -0.16106 -5.25 0 cons -2.60696 -16.98 cons -16.98 5.25 cons -79.77 -15.93 All Duration shift—Return half of a non-work tour -0.43896 -11.82 0 cons -3.71888 -23.82 cons -23.82 11.82 cons -88.3 -21.01 All Duration shift—Work-based sub-tour 0.03082 0.62 -0.45317 -2.4 -0.67984 -1.98 -1.2 -0.66 -9.73 -2.56 -14.29 -2.07 All Duration shift—Escort tour -0.15799 -6.37 -0.85198 -9.78 1.10502 8.71 22.45 15.43 -28 -7.96 50.96 9.96 All Duration shift—Shopping tour -0.07286 -3.76 -0.63403 -15.39 1.38323 14.81 48.97 21.59 -28.96 -13.62 75.13 15.59 All Duration shift—Meal tour 0.01736 0.72 -0.77345 -14.66 1.31757 11.79 39.64 18.72 -32.66 -14.99 53.69 11.64 All Duration shift—Social/recr. tour 0.20112 9.75 -0.73518 -18.11 1.22246 10.71 48.21 17.15 -45.4 -23.06 49.52 8.95 All Duration shift—Personal business tour 0.00829 0.45 -0.69093 -15.75 1.23196 10.52 43.83 16.42 -37.78 -15.94 66.11 10.45 All Duration shift—School tour 0.23128 5.94 -1.23418 -6.98 0.56937 2.87 10.2 9.1 -37.63 -8.29 8.68 1.71

Next: Appendix B - Summary of Model Calibration Differences »
Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters Get This Book
×
 Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP 2) Report S2-C10A-RW-2: Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters explores the development of regional activity-based modeling systems for these cities.

The report also examines the concept of transferability of parameters as a means to save metropolitan planning organizations from the need to invest in data collection and model estimation, with the goal of making activity-based models practical for a wider market.

The same project that developed this report also produced a report titled Dynamic, Integrated Model System: Jacksonville-Area Application that explores development of a dynamic integrated travel demand model with advanced policy analysis capabilities.

Capacity Project C10A developed a start-up guide for the application of the DaySim activity-based demand model and a TRANSIMS network for Burlington, Vermont, to test linking the demand and network models before transferring the model structure to the larger Jacksonville, Florida, area. The two model applications used in these locations are currently available.

Software Disclaimer: This software is offered as is, without warranty or promise of support of any kind either expressed or implied. Under no circumstance will the National Academy of Sciences or the Transportation Research Board (collectively "TRB") be liable for any loss or damage caused by the installation or operation of this product. TRB makes no representation or warranty of any kind, expressed or implied, in fact or in law, including without limitation, the warranty of merchantability or the warranty of fitness for a particular purpose, and shall not in any case be liable for any consequential or special damages.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!