Transferability of Activity-Based Model Parameters (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

110 a p p E N D I x B Summary of Model Calibration Differences Table B.1. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Usual-Work-Location Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA Full-time worker has one-way drive distance in 0–3.5 miles band -4.153 -3.642 3 NA Full-time worker has one-way drive distance in 3.5–10 miles band -0.644 -0.491 3 NA Full-time worker has one-way drive distance in >10 miles band -0.732 -1.008 3 NA Part-time worker  LN (1 + one-way drive distance) -2.626 -3.103 3 NA Not full- or part-time worker  LN (1 + one-way drive distance) -3.465 -3.745 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 33.9% Note: Number of variables in the model = 73; number of variables that were calibrated = 5.

111 Table B.2. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Auto Ownership Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) 0 autos household has 1 Driver -3.690 -2.371 3 2 autos household has 1 Driver -1.892 -2.188 3 3 autos household has 1 Driver -3.018 -4.319 3 4+ autos household has 1 Driver -4.485 -4.485 3 0 autos household has 2 Drivers -4.429 -4.392 3 1 auto household has 2 Drivers -1.639 -0.837 3 3 autos household has 2 Drivers -1.398 -2.359 3 4+ autos household has 2 Drivers -2.229 -3.569 3 0 autos household has 3 Drivers -3.825 -3.224 3 1 auto household has 3 Drivers -1.370 -0.769 3 2 autos household has 3 Drivers -0.364 0.237 3 4+ autos household has 3 Drivers -0.516 -0.933 3 0 autos household has 4 or more Drivers -5.133 -4.652 3 1 auto household has 4 or more Drivers -1.818 -1.337 3 2 autos household has 4 or more Drivers -1.109 -0.628 3 3 autos household has 4 or more Drivers -1.093 -0.611 3 0 autos household has 0–15K Income 2.072 0.549 3 1 auto household has 0–15K Income 0.607 0.179 3 3 autos household has 0–15K Income -0.715 0.434 3 4+ autos household has 0–15K Income -1.436 0.080 3 0 autos household has 50–75K Income -1.453 -4.289 3 1 auto household has 50–75K Income -1.093 -0.677 3 3 autos household has 50–75K Income 0.141 0.206 3 4+ autos household has 50–75K Income 0.189 0.273 3 0 autos household has 75K and plus Income -0.585 -3.608 3 1 auto household has 75K and plus Income -1.006 -1.511 3 3 autos household has 75K and plus Income 0.226 0.977 3 4+ autos household has 75K and plus Income 0.343 0.946 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 83.5% Note: Number of variables in the model = 60; number of variables that were calibrated = 28.

112 Table B.3. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Individual Person-Day Pattern Model—Part 1 Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA work tour constant 0.594 0.729 3 NA work stop constant 2.261 2.272 3 NA work purpose  person is part-time worker -0.677 -1.420 3 NA work purpose  person is university student -1.229 -2.399 3 NA work purpose  person is student age 16+ -1.887 -2.002 3 NA work purpose  person is full-time worker 0.000 0.000 3 NA school tour constant -0.861 -0.858 3 NA school stop constant -0.786 -0.288 3 NA school purpose  person is university student 1.008 -0.115 3 NA school purpose  person is student age 16+ 2.089 1.104 3 NA school purpose  person is student age 5–15 2.176 1.193 3 NA school purpose  person is full-time worker 0.000 0.000 3 NA escort tour constant -3.407 -3.633 3 NA escort stop constant -1.468 -0.213 3 NA escort purpose  person is part-time worker 0.000 -0.577 3 NA escort purpose  person is retired adult -0.747 -1.277 3 NA escort purpose  person is non-working adult 0.000 -0.116 3 NA escort purpose  person is university student 0.000 -1.889 3 NA escort purpose  person is student age 16+ 0.000 -1.136 3 NA escort purpose  person is student age 5–15 0.000 -0.582 3 NA escort purpose  person is full-time worker 0.000 -0.192 3 NA personal business tour constant -2.398 -1.166 3 NA personal business stop constant 1.762 0.482 3 NA personal business purpose  person is part-time worker 0.193 0.009 3 NA personal business purpose  person is retired adult 0.525 -0.229 3 NA personal business purpose  person is non-working adult 0.413 -0.161 3 NA personal business purpose  person is university student 0.000 -2.094 3 NA personal business purpose  person is student age 16+ -0.280 -0.938 3 NA personal business purpose  person is student age 5–15 -0.445 -0.413 3 NA personal business purpose  person is full-time worker 0.000 0.000 3 NA shopping tour constant -2.889 -1.356 3 NA shopping stop constant 1.200 2.555 3 NA shopping purpose  person is part-time worker 0.058 -0.818 3 NA shopping purpose  person is retired adult 0.204 -0.459 3 NA shopping purpose  person is non-working adult 0.461 -0.570 3 Note: Number of variables in the model = 350; number of variables that were calibrated = 57.

113 Table B.4. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Individual Person-Day Pattern Model—Part 2 Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA shopping purpose  person is university student 0.222 -1.600 3 NA shopping purpose  person is student age 16+ -0.474 -1.629 3 NA shopping purpose  person is student age 5–15 -0.559 -2.647 3 NA shopping purpose  person is full-time worker 0.000 -0.861 3 NA meal tour constant -3.143 -1.830 3 NA meal stop constant 0.468 0.966 3 NA meal purpose  person is part-time worker -0.259 -1.028 3 NA meal purpose  person is retired adult 0.000 -0.689 3 NA meal purpose  person is non-working adult 0.000 -0.685 3 NA meal purpose  person is university student 0.000 -0.576 3 NA meal purpose  person is student age 16+ -0.432 -1.340 3 NA meal purpose  person is student age 5–15 -0.762 -0.815 3 NA meal purpose  person is full-time worker 0.000 -0.739 3 NA social or recreational tour constant -2.296 -0.242 3 NA social or recreational stop constant 1.044 1.118 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is part-time worker 0.000 -0.177 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is retired adult 0.000 -0.807 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is non-working adult 0.000 -0.676 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is university student 0.000 -0.674 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is student age 16+ 0.000 -0.214 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is student age 5–15 0.328 -0.577 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is full-time worker -0.221 -0.484 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 75.1% Note: Number of variables in the model = 350; number of variables that were calibrated = 57.

114 Table B.5. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Work–Based Sub–Tour Generation Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA work stop -0.226 -1.134 3 NA school stop -2.189 -2.702 3 NA escort stop -3.136 -3.633 3 NA personal business stop -1.400 -2.223 3 NA shopping stop -1.796 -1.772 3 NA meal stop -0.271 -0.491 3 NA social or recreational stop -1.730 -1.581 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 33.3% Note: Number of variables in the model = 15; number of variables that were calibrated = 7. Table B.6. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Exact Number of Person Tours—Part 1 Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA 2+ work tours  person is full-time worker -0.074 0.421 3 NA 2+ work tours  person is part-time worker 0.000 0.707 3 NA 2+ work tours  person is retired adult 0.000 0.000 3 NA 2+ work tours  person is non-working adult 0.000 0.000 3 NA 2+ work tours  person is university student 0.000 -3.908 3 NA 2+ work tours  person is student age 16+ 0.000 -4.454 3 NA 2+ school tours  person is full-time worker 0.000 0.000 3 NA 2+ school tours  person is part-time worker -10.000 -10.000 3 NA 2+ school tours  person is non-working adult 0.000 0.000 3 NA 2+ school tours  person is university student 1.297 -0.358 3 NA 2+ school tours  person is student age 16+ 0.730 0.561 3 NA 2+ school tours  person is student age 5–15 0.000 0.000 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is full-time worker 0.000 -1.266 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is part-time worker 0.000 0.691 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is retired adult 0.000 0.000 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is non-working adult 0.392 0.367 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is university student 0.000 -5.643 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is student age 16+ 0.000 -5.291 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is student age 5–15 0.000 -2.452 3 NA 2+ personal business tours  person is full-time worker 0.000 -0.444 3 NA 2+ personal business tours  person is part-time worker 0.000 -0.211 3 Note: Number of variables in the model = 295; number of variables that were calibrated = 47.

115 Table B.7. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Exact Number of Person Tours—Part 2 Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA 2+ meal tours  person is full-time worker -10.000 -10.000 3 NA 2+ meal tours  person is part-time worker -10.000 -10.000 3 NA 2+ meal tours  person is retired adult 0.000 -0.941 3 NA 2+ meal tours  person is non-working adult 0.000 -3.750 3 NA 2+ meal tours  person is university student -10.000 -10.000 3 NA 2+ meal tours  person is student age 16+ -10.000 -10.000 3 NA 2+ meal tours  person is student age 5–15 -10.000 -10.000 3 NA 2+ social or recreational tours  person is full-time worker 0.000 1.362 3 NA 2+ social or recreational tours  person is part-time worker 0.000 0.550 3 NA 2+ social or recreational tours  person is retired adult 0.000 0.623 3 NA 2+ social or recreational tours  person is non-working adult 0.000 0.000 3 NA 2+ social or recreational tours  person is university student 0.000 -4.463 3 NA 2+ social or recreational tours  person is student age 16+ 0.000 -0.244 3 NA 2+ social or recreational tours  person is student age 5–15 0.000 0.657 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 50.3% Note: Number of variables in the model = 295; number of variables that were calibrated = 47. NA 2+ personal business tours  person is retired adult 0.000 -1.148 3 NA 2+ personal business tours  person is non-working adult 0.000 0.288 3 NA 2+ personal business tours  person is university student 0.000 -4.981 3 NA 2+ personal business tours  person is student age 16+ 0.418 -4.660 3 NA 2+ personal business tours  person is student age 5–15 -0.731 -0.731 3 NA 2+ shopping tours  person is full-time worker 0.339 0.339 3 NA 2+ shopping tours  person is part-time worker 0.000 -0.983 3 NA 2+ shopping tours  person is retired adult 0.000 0.082 3 NA 2+ shopping tours  person is non-working adult 0.000 0.268 3 NA 2+ shopping tours  person is university student 0.000 0.000 3 NA 2+ shopping tours  person is student age 16+ 0.000 0.116 3 NA 2+ shopping tours  person is student age 5–15 -1.112 -0.211 3 Table B.6. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Exact Number of Person Tours—Part 1 (continued) Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%)

116 Table B.8. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Intermediate-Stop Generation Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA work stop  work/school tour -3.359 -3.304 3 NA school stop  work/school tour -0.910 -0.855 3 NA escort stop  work/school tour -1.367 -1.215 3 NA personal business stop  work/school tour -0.912 -0.949 3 NA shopping stop  work/school tour -0.510 -0.096 3 NA meal stop  work tour -2.086 -1.772 3 NA social or recreational stop  work/school tour -0.963 -0.766 3 NA no more stops  school tour 0.149 0.080 3 NA meal stop  school tour -1.674 -1.331 3 NA escort stop  escort tour -1.883 -1.545 3 NA personal business stop  escort tour -1.120 -0.972 3 NA shopping stop  escort tour -0.646 -0.047 3 NA meal stop  escort tour -2.003 -1.490 3 NA social or recreational stop  escort tour -1.026 -0.644 3 NA personal business stop  personal business tour -1.156 -1.248 3 NA shopping stop  personal business tour -0.649 -0.290 3 NA meal stop  personal business tour -2.181 -1.908 3 NA social or recreational stop  personal business tour -1.662 -1.521 3 NA personal business stop  shopping tour -1.236 -0.903 3 NA shopping stop  shopping tour -0.323 0.460 3 NA meal stop  shopping tour -2.324 -1.627 3 NA social or recreational stop  shopping tour -1.658 -1.092 3 NA personal business stop  meal tour -1.305 -0.657 3 NA shopping stop  meal tour -0.503 0.596 3 NA meal stop  meal tour -4.833 -3.820 3 NA social or recreational stop  meal tour -1.529 -0.648 3 NA personal business stop  social or recreational tour -1.349 -0.876 3 NA shopping stop  social or recreational tour -0.560 0.364 3 NA meal stop  social or recreational tour -2.120 -1.283 3 NA social or recreational stop  social or recreational tour -1.109 -0.403 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 64.3% Note: Number of variables in the model = 106; number of variables that were calibrated = 30.

117 Table B.9. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Nonmandatory-Tour Destination Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA escort tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -10.572 -8.678 3 NA escort tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -3.553 -2.987 3 NA escort tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -2.287 -2.961 3 NA personal business tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -11.879 -7.510 3 NA personal business tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -3.261 -1.832 3 NA personal business tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -1.814 -3.520 3 NA personal business tour  distance from origin in >10 miles band -0.440 -2.633 3 NA shopping tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -9.372 -9.172 3 NA shopping tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -7.002 -6.853 3 NA shopping tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -2.097 -1.918 3 NA shopping tour  distance from origin in >10 miles band -0.268 -1.291 3 NA meal tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -15.744 -15.437 3 NA meal tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -5.065 -4.741 3 NA meal tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -2.192 -1.993 3 NA meal tour  distance from origin in >10 miles band -0.381 -1.464 3 NA social or recreational tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -14.078 -12.591 3 NA social or recreational tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -3.771 -3.209 3 NA social or recreational tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -1.768 -2.613 3 NA social or recreational tour  distance from origin in >10 miles band -0.233 -1.309 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 515.6% Note: Number of variables in the model = 101; number of variables that were calibrated = 19.

118 Table B.10. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Tour-Mode Choice Model and Work–Based Sub–Tour Mode Choice Model Alternative Variable/ Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) Tour-mode choice model (tour purpose: work)a Drive–Transit Drive–Transit -1.604 -1.604 3 Walk–Transit Walk–Transit -1.918 -1.918 3 Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -0.970 -0.970 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -0.437 -0.296 3 Drive Alone Drive Alone 2.200 2.185 3 Bike Bike -9.572 -9.572 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 2.8% Tour-mode choice model (tour purpose: school)b School Bus School Bus -1.194 -0.046 3 Walk–Transit Walk–Transit -3.891 -2.885 3 Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -0.436 -0.016 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -1.076 -0.801 3 Drive Alone Drive Alone 1.215 2.558 3 Bike Bike -3.514 -2.509 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 154.8% Tour-mode choice model (tour purpose: escort)c Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -2.180 -4.136 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -1.302 -3.506 3 Bike Bike -10.000 -11.927 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 86.8% Tour-mode choice model (tour purpose: other home-based tours)d Walk–Transit Walk–Transit -4.420 -6.351 3 Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -0.811 -2.857 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -0.723 -3.234 3 Drive Alone Drive Alone 1.215 -1.522 3 Bike Bike -6.577 -6.952 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 77.8% Work–based sub–tour mode choice modele Walk–Transit Walk–Transit -3.498 -4.036 3 Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -2.635 -4.015 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -1.775 -4.122 3 Drive Alone Drive Alone -2.307 -2.703 3 Bike Bike -4.857 -5.525 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 57.7% a Number of variables in the model = 36; number of variables that were calibrated = 6. b Number of variables in the model = 42; number of variables that were calibrated = 6. c Number of variables in the model = 15; number of variables that were calibrated = 3. d Number of variables in the model = 45; number of variables that were calibrated = 5. e Number of variables in the model = 17; number of variables that were calibrated = 5.

119 Table B.11. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Tour-Time-of-Day Choice Model for Home-Based Work and School Tours Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) Tour-time-of-day choice model (tour purpose: work)a tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 -2.339 -3.245 3 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 -0.671 -0.892 3 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 -0.018 -0.018 3 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 0.000 -0.111 3 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 -0.936 -0.745 3 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 -1.777 -1.346 3 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 -1.867 -1.180 3 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 -2.266 -3.226 3 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 -3.161 -4.098 3 tour arrival time 22:00–23:59 tour arrival time 22:00–23:59 -4.121 -4.121 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 38.6% Tour-time-of-day choice model (tour purpose: school)b tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 -10.000 -16.007 3 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 -3.254 -4.843 3 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 -0.216 0.396 3 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 0.000 0.042 3 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 -1.261 -0.232 3 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 -2.256 -2.207 3 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 -2.943 -2.649 3 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 -2.042 -0.361 3 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 -3.467 -3.467 3 tour arrival time 22:00–23:59 tour arrival time 22:00–23:59 -10.000 -10.000 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 92.4% a Number of variables in the model = 74; number of variables that were calibrated = 10. b Number of variables in the model = 68; number of variables that were calibrated = 10.

120 Table B.12. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Time-of-Day Choice Model for Other Home-Based Tours and Work-Based Sub-Tours Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) Tour-time-of-day choice model (tour purpose: other home-based tour)a tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 -4.738 -4.738 3 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 -2.203 -2.203 3 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 -0.842 -0.842 3 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 0.000 0.000 3 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 -0.041 0.238 3 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 0.382 0.241 3 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 0.436 0.330 3 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 0.741 1.055 3 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 0.292 0.134 3 tour arrival time 22:00–23:59 tour arrival time 22:00–23:59 -1.227 -1.227 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 10.7% Work–based sub–tour time-of-day choice modelb tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 -0.452 -0.452 3 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 -5.000 -5.000 3 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 -0.275 -1.884 3 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 0.000 -8.236 3 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 -0.441 -4.745 3 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 -0.187 0.502 3 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 -1.603 -0.959 3 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 -2.623 -2.595 3 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 -4.415 -16.710 3 tour arrival time 22:00–23:59 tour arrival time 22:00–23:59 -10.000 -10.000 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 57.1% a Number of variables in the model = 95; number of variables that were calibrated = 10. b Number of variables in the model = 50; number of variables that were calibrated = 10.

121 Table B.13. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Tampa Model Coefficients: Trip-Time-of-Day Choice Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Tampa Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) arrival time 03:00–05:59 arrival time 03:00–05:59 -5.227 -5.506 3 arrival time 06:00–06:59 arrival time 06:00–06:59 -3.052 -3.052 3 arrival time 07:00–07:59 arrival time 07:00–07:59 -1.089 -1.089 3 arrival time 08:00–08:59 arrival time 08:00–08:59 0.000 0.000 3 arrival time 09:00–09:59 arrival time 09:00–09:59 0.641 0.641 3 arrival time 10:00–12:59 arrival time 10:00–12:59 1.376 1.549 3 arrival time 13:00–15:59 arrival time 13:00–15:59 2.267 2.346 3 arrival time 16:00–18:59 arrival time 16:00–18:59 3.530 3.530 3 arrival time 19:00–21:59 arrival time 19:00–21:59 3.385 3.385 3 arrival time 22:00–25:59 arrival time 22:00–25:59 3.097 3.097 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 5.1% Note: Number of variables in the model = 55; number of variables that were calibrated = 10. Table B.14. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Usual-Work-Location Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA LN(1 + one-way drive distance) 0.000 0.100 3 NA Full-time worker has one-way drive distance in 0–3.5 miles band -4.153 -4.313 3 NA Full-time worker has one-way drive distance in 3.5–10 miles band -0.644 -0.194 3 NA Full-time worker has one-way drive distance in >10 miles band -0.732 -0.672 3 NA Part-time worker  LN(1 + one-way drive distance) -2.626 -2.306 3 NA Not full- or part-time worker  LN(1 + one-way drive distance) -3.465 -3.475 3 NA LN(1 + accessibility to service sector employment) -0.165 -0.445 3 NA Work in same county as home 0.000 1.000 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 36.7% Note: Number of variables in the model = 73; number of variables that were calibrated = 9.

122 Table B.15. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Auto-Ownership Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) 0 autos household has 1 Driver -3.690 -2.670 3 2 autos household has 1 Driver -1.892 -1.892 3 3 autos household has 1 Driver -3.018 -4.148 3 4+ autos household has 1 Driver -4.485 -5.182 3 0 autos household has 2 Drivers -4.429 -2.749 3 1 auto household has 2 Drivers -1.639 -0.979 3 3 autos household has 2 Drivers -1.398 -1.858 3 4+ autos household has 2 Drivers -2.229 -3.269 3 0 autos household has 3 Drivers -3.825 -2.074 3 1 auto household has 3 Drivers -1.370 -0.590 3 2 autos household has 3 Drivers -0.364 0.228 3 4+ autos household has 3 Drivers -0.516 -0.906 3 0 autos household has 4 or more Drivers -5.133 -1.773 3 1 auto household has 4 or more Drivers -1.818 -1.298 3 2 autos household has 4 or more Drivers -1.109 -0.319 3 3 autos household has 4 or more Drivers -1.093 -0.363 3 0 autos household has 0–15K Income 2.072 2.062 3 1 auto household has 0–15K Income 0.607 0.597 3 3 autos household has 0–15K Income -0.715 -1.005 3 4+ autos household has 0–15K Income -1.436 -1.046 3 0 autos household has 50–75K Income -1.453 -0.693 3 1 auto household has 50–75K Income -1.093 -0.553 3 3 autos household has 50–75K Income 0.141 0.111 3 4+ autos household has 50–75K Income 0.189 -0.059 3 0 autos household has 75K and plus Income -0.585 -1.154 3 1 auto household has 75K and plus Income -1.006 -1.266 3 3 autos household has 75K and plus Income 0.226 0.516 3 4+ autos household has 75K and plus Income 0.343 0.453 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 182.3% Note: Number of variables in the model = 60; number of variables that were calibrated = 28.

123 Table B.16. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Individual Person-Day Pattern Model—Part 1 Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA work tour constant 0.594 0.398 3 NA work stop constant 2.261 2.361 3 NA work purpose  person is part-time worker -0.677 -1.059 3 NA work purpose  person is university student -1.229 -1.839 3 NA school tour constant -0.861 -1.004 3 NA school stop constant -0.786 -1.006 3 NA school purpose  person is university student 1.008 1.480 3 NA school purpose  person is student age 16+ 2.089 1.196 3 NA school purpose  person is student age 5–15 2.176 1.503 3 NA escort tour constant -3.407 -3.651 3 NA escort stop constant -1.468 -0.868 3 NA escort purpose  person is part-time worker 0.000 0.687 3 NA escort purpose  person is retired adult -0.747 -0.996 3 NA escort purpose  person is non-working adult 0.000 -0.044 3 NA escort purpose  person is university student 0.000 1.163 3 NA escort purpose  person is student age 16+ 0.000 -2.130 3 NA escort purpose  person is student age 5–15 0.000 -0.407 3 NA personal business tour constant -2.398 -1.267 3 NA personal business stop constant 1.762 0.192 3 NA personal business purpose  person is part-time worker 0.193 0.279 3 NA personal business purpose  person is retired adult 0.525 0.205 3 NA personal business purpose  person is non-working adult 0.413 0.161 3 NA personal business purpose  person is university student 0.000 -0.245 3 NA personal business purpose  person is student age 16+ -0.280 -0.226 3 NA personal business purpose  person is student age 5–15 -0.445 0.153 3 Note: Number of variables in the model = 350; number of variables that were calibrated = 48.

124 Table B.17. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Individual Person-Day Pattern Model—Part 2 Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA shopping tour constant -2.889 -1.099 3 NA shopping stop constant 1.200 2.580 3 NA shopping purpose  person is part-time worker 0.058 0.016 3 NA shopping purpose  person is retired adult 0.204 -0.399 3 NA shopping purpose  person is non-working adult 0.461 -0.493 3 NA shopping purpose  person is university student 0.222 0.511 3 NA shopping purpose  person is student age 16+ -0.474 -2.335 3 NA shopping purpose  person is student age 5–15 -0.559 -2.286 3 NA meal tour constant -3.143 -2.014 3 NA meal stop constant 0.468 0.628 3 NA meal purpose  person is part-time worker -0.259 0.966 3 NA meal purpose  person is retired adult 0.000 0.013 3 NA meal purpose  person is non-working adult 0.000 -0.172 3 NA meal purpose  person is university student 0.000 -2.336 3 NA meal purpose  person is student age 16+ -0.432 -2.285 3 NA social or recreational tour constant -2.296 -0.086 3 NA social or recreational stop constant 1.044 0.804 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is part-time worker 0.000 -1.050 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is retired adult 0.000 -0.477 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is non-working adult 0.000 0.030 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is university student 0.000 -0.740 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is student age 16+ 0.000 -0.024 3 NA social or recreational purpose  person is student age 5–15 0.328 0.278 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 85.4% Note: Number of variables in the model = 350; number of variables that were calibrated = 48.

125 Table B.18. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Work-Based Sub-Tour Generation Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA work stop -0.226 -1.886 3 NA school stop -2.189 -2.569 3 NA escort stop -3.136 -3.809 3 NA personal business stop -1.400 -1.751 3 NA shopping stop -1.796 -2.155 3 NA meal stop -0.271 -0.425 3 NA social or recreational stop -1.730 -2.130 3 NA no more stops 1.575 2.975 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 71.7% Note: Number of variables in the model = 15; number of variables that were calibrated = 8. Table B.19. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Exact Number of Person Tours Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA 2+ work tours  person is university student 0.000 1.660 3 NA 2+ work tours  person is student age 16+ 0.000 1.560 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is retired adult 0.000 -0.420 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is non-working adult 0.392 -0.392 3 NA 2+ escort tours  person is university student 0.000 2.120 3 NA 2+ personal business tours  person is part- time worker 0.000 -1.340 3 NA 2+ shopping tours  person is student age 5–15 -1.112 1.042 3 NA 2+ social or recreational tours  person is part- time worker 0.000 0.860 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 324.5% Note: Number of variables in the model = 295; number of variables that were calibrated = 8.

126 Table B.20. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Intermediate-Stop Generation Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA Origin to destination half tour has one intermediate stop 0.426 -0.576 3 NA Origin to destination half tour has two intermediate stops 0.530 -0.480 3 NA Origin to destination half tour has three intermediate stops 0.750 -0.250 3 NA Origin to destination half tour has four intermediate stops 0.752 -0.252 3 NA Destination to origin half tour has one intermediate stop 0.758 -0.248 3 NA Destination to origin half tour has two intermediate stops 0.995 0.005 3 NA Destination to origin half tour has three intermediate stops 0.953 0.053 3 NA Destination to origin half tour has four intermediate stops 1.043 0.043 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 62.8% Note: Number of variables in the model = 106; number of variables that were calibrated = 8.

127 Table B.21. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Nonmandatory-Tour Destination Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) NA escort tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -10.572 -9.007 3 NA escort tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -3.553 -3.053 3 NA escort tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -2.287 -5.237 3 NA personal business tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -11.879 -10.879 3 NA personal business tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -3.261 -2.261 3 NA personal business tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -1.814 -2.314 3 NA personal business tour  distance from origin in >10 miles band -0.440 -0.150 3 NA shopping tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -9.372 -8.372 3 NA shopping tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -7.002 -7.502 3 NA shopping tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -2.097 -2.697 3 NA shopping tour  distance from origin in >10 miles band -0.268 -2.278 3 NA meal tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -15.744 -14.244 3 NA meal tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -2.192 -2.692 3 NA meal tour  distance from origin in >10 miles band -0.381 -2.881 3 NA social or recreational tour  distance from origin in 0–1 mile band -14.078 -13.078 3 NA social or recreational tour  distance from origin in 1–3.5 miles band -3.771 -2.771 3 NA social or recreational tour  distance from origin in 3.5–10 miles band -1.768 -1.928 3 NA social or recreational tour  distance from origin in >10 miles band -0.233 -1.613 3 NA escort tour  require crossing a river 0.000 -0.800 3 NA personal business tour  require crossing a river 0.000 -0.800 3 NA shopping tour  require crossing a river 0.000 -0.800 3 NA meal tour  require crossing a river 0.000 -0.800 3 NA social or recreational tour  require crossing a river 0.000 -0.800 3 NA destination is located in the home county 0.000 1.000 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 110.7% Note: Number of variables in the model = 101; number of variables that were calibrated = 24.

128 Table B.22. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Home-Based Work, School, and Escort Tour-Mode Choice Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) Tour-mode choice model (tour purpose: work)a Walk-Transit Walk-Transit -1.918 -2.118 3 Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -0.970 -0.440 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -0.437 0.127 3 Drive Alone Drive Alone 2.200 2.698 3 Transit Transit mode  intersection density at the destination 0.110 0.011 3 Transit Transit mode  accessibility to total employment 0.981 0.000 3 Drive Alone Presence of other stops in the tour -0.318 -0.032 3 Bike Bike mode  accessibility to total employment 0.153 0.000 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 43.4% Tour-mode choice model (tour purpose: school)b School bus School bus -1.194 -0.014 3 Walk-Transit Walk-Transit -3.891 -4.891 3 Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -0.436 -0.140 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -1.076 -1.086 3 Drive Alone Drive Alone 1.215 1.785 3 Walk Walk mode  university student -0.738 -0.007 3 Bike Bike mode  accessibility to total employment 0.177 0.000 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 75.0% Tour-mode choice model (tour purpose: escort)c Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -2.180 -1.400 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -1.302 -0.582 3 Drive Alone Drive Alone -10.000 -9.330 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 106.3% a Number of variables in the model = 36; number of variables that were calibrated = 8. b Number of variables in the model = 42; number of variables that were calibrated = 7. c Number of variables in the model = 15; number of variables that were calibrated = 3.

129 Table B.23. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Other-Tour-Mode Choice Model and Work-Based Sub-Tour-Mode Choice Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) Tour-mode choice model (tour purpose: other home-based tours)a Walk-Transit Walk-Transit -4.420 0.140 3 Walk-Transit Walk-Transit mode  no cars in household 4.946 2.901 3 Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -0.811 -1.481 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -0.723 -1.583 3 Shared Ride Shared Ride  no cars in household -0.929 -0.669 3 Drive-Transit Drive-Transit 1.215 0.425 3 Bike Bike -6.577 -5.477 3 Bike Bike mode  male 1.036 2.026 3 Transit Transit mode  origin is located in a mixed land use parcel 1.985 1.345 3 Transit Transit mode  accessibility to total employment 0.156 0.000 3 Shared Ride Shopping tour  Shared Ride 0.728 0.073 3 Shared Ride Meal tour  Shared Ride 2.174 1.174 3 Bike Bike mode  accessibility to other residence 0.810 0.001 3 Bike Bike mode  accessibility to total employment 0.564 0.000 3 Walk Meal tour  walk 1.238 3.288 3 Walk Social recreation tour  walk 1.353 3.343 3 Walk Walk mode  accessibility to other residence 0.834 0.002 3 Walk Walk mode  accessibility to total employment 0.109 0.000 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 653.0% Work-based sub-tour-mode choice modelb Shared Ride 3+ Shared Ride 3+ -2.635 -2.575 3 Shared Ride 2 Shared Ride 2 -1.775 -1.825 3 Drive Alone Drive Alone -2.307 -2.802 3 Drive Alone Traveled to work by drive alone 2.768 2.778 3 Drive Alone Traveled to work by shared ride 2.033 1.843 3 Bike Bike mode  male -0.761 -0.076 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 27.8% a Number of variables in the model = 45; number of variables that were calibrated = 18. b Number of variables in the model = 17; number of variables that were calibrated = 6.

130 Table B.24. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Tour-Time-of-Day Choice Model for Home-Based Work Tours Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 -2.339 -3.219 3 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 -0.671 -0.441 3 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 -0.182 -0.202 3 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 0.000 -0.690 3 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 -0.936 -0.546 3 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 -1.777 -2.097 3 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 -1.867 -1.297 3 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 -2.266 -1.956 3 tour departure time 03:00–06:59 tour departure time 03:00–06:59 -1.186 -3.826 3 tour departure time 10:00–12:59 tour departure time 10:00–12:59 -0.675 -0.585 3 tour departure time 13:00–14:59 tour departure time 13:00–14:59 -0.569 -0.339 3 tour departure time 17:00–17:59 tour departure time 17:00–17:59 0.364 -0.214 3 tour departure time 18:00–18:59 tour departure time 18:00–18:59 -0.726 -1.276 3 tour departure time 19:00–20:59 tour departure time 19:00–20:59 -1.836 -1.286 3 duration 7 to 8 hours duration 7 to 8 hours 0.616 0.866 3 duration 9 hours duration 9 hours 0.000 0.290 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 42.1% Note: Number of variables in the model = 74; number of variables that were calibrated = 16. Table B.25. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Tour-Time-of-Day Choice Model for Home-Based School Tours Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 tour arrival time 06:00–06:59 -3.254 -2.064 3 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 -0.216 -0.436 3 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 tour arrival time 09:00–09:59 -1.261 -1.341 3 tour departure time 13:00–15:59 tour departure time 13:00–15:59 -2.943 -2.673 3 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 -2.042 -1.792 3 tour departure time 07:00–09:59 tour departure time 07:00–09:59 -0.701 -1.408 3 tour departure time 10:00–12:59 tour departure time 10:00–12:59 0.902 -0.152 3 tour departure time 13:00–14:59 tour departure time 13:00–14:59 1.612 2.308 3 tour departure time 17:00–17:59 tour departure time 17:00–17:59 -0.105 -0.665 3 tour departure time 18:00–18:59 tour departure time 18:00–18:59 -0.920 -2.270 3 tour departure time 21:00–23:59 tour departure time 21:00–23:59 -2.230 -1.420 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 70.3% Note: Number of variables in the model = 68; number of variables that were calibrated = 11.

131 Table B.26. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Tour-Time-of-Day Choice Model for Home-Based Other and Work-Based Sub-Tours Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) Tour-time-of-day choice model (tour purpose: other home-based tour)a tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 0.292 -0.032 3 tour departure time 17:00–17:59 tour departure time 17:00–17:59 -0.281 -0.251 3 tour departure time 18:00–18:59 tour departure time 18:00–18:59 -0.402 -0.232 3 tour departure time 19:00–20:59 tour departure time 19:00–20:59 -0.267 -0.057 3 tour departure time 21:00–23:59 tour departure time 21:00–23:59 -0.342 -0.302 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 15.3% Work-based sub-tour time-of-day choice modelb tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 tour arrival time 03:00–05:59 -0.452 -2.762 3 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 tour arrival time 07:00–07:59 -0.275 -2.295 3 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 tour arrival time 08:00–08:59 0.000 -1.650 3 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 tour arrival time 10:00–12:59 -0.187 0.897 3 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 tour arrival time 13:00–15:59 -1.603 -0.803 3 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 tour arrival time 16:00–18:59 -2.623 -4.973 3 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 tour arrival time 19:00–21:59 -4.415 -7.415 3 tour departure time 07:00–09:59 tour departure time 07:00–09:59 0.470 0.047 3 tour departure time 10:00–12:59 tour departure time 10:00–12:59 0.598 1.058 3 tour departure time 13:00–14:59 tour departure time 13:00–14:59 0.622 1.322 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 95.5% a Number of variables in the model = 95; number of variables that were calibrated = 5. b Number of variables in the model = 50; number of variables that were calibrated = 10. Table B.27. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Trip-Mode Choice Model Alternative Variable/ Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) Walk-transit Walk-transit -0.791 1.201 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 633.7% Note: Number of variables in the model = 65; number of variables that were calibrated = 1.

132 Table B.28. Comparison Between Sacramento and Calibrated Jacksonville Model Coefficients: Trip-Time-of-Day Choice Model Alternative Variable/Interaction Term SACOG Jacksonville Absolute Percentage Logit Difference (APLD) Low (APLD <– 20%) Medium (20% < APLD <– 50%) High (APLD > 50%) arrival time 03:00–05:59 arrival time 03:00–05:59 -5.227 -5.587 3 arrival time 06:00–06:59 arrival time 06:00–06:59 -3.052 -4.042 3 arrival time 07:00–07:59 arrival time 07:00–07:59 -1.089 -2.349 3 arrival time 08:00–08:59 arrival time 08:00–08:59 0.000 0.000 3 arrival time 09:00–09:59 arrival time 09:00–09:59 0.641 0.751 3 arrival time 10:00–12:59 arrival time 10:00–12:59 1.376 2.196 3 arrival time 13:00–15:59 arrival time 13:00–15:59 2.267 2.897 3 arrival time 16:00–18:59 arrival time 16:00–18:59 3.530 3.390 3 departure time 03:00–06:59 departure time 03:00–06:59 -1.435 -1.665 3 departure time 07:00–09:59 departure time 07:00–09:59 -1.170 0.360 3 departure time 10:00–12:59 departure time 10:00–12:59 -0.770 0.350 3 departure time 13:00–14:59 departure time 13:00–14:59 -0.725 0.045 3 departure time 16:00–16:59 departure time 16:00–16:59 -0.820 -0.440 3 departure time 17:00–17:59 departure time 17:00–17:59 0.000 0.000 3 departure time 18:00–18:59 departure time 18:00–18:59 -0.487 -0.927 3 departure time 19:00–20:59 departure time 19:00–20:59 -0.747 -1.287 3 departure time 21:00–23:59 departure time 21:00–23:59 -1.132 -2.572 3 Overall mean APLD across variables 77.0% Note: Number of variables in the model = 55; number of variables that were calibrated = 17.