Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
165 Chapter 1. Introduction and Suggested Strategies 1. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, Public law 101-336, July 26, 1990. 2. Hershey, Cheryl L., et. al, Accessible Public Transportation in the United States: Twenty Years After Passage of the ADA, 12th International Conference on Mobility and Transport for Elderly and Disabled Persons, June 2010. 3. TranSystems, et. al, TCRP Project B-40, âStrategy Guide to Enable and Promote the Use of Fixed-Route Transit by People with Disabilities, Final Research Report,â Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014. (Available online on the TRB website: http://apps.trb.org/cmsfeed/ TRBNetProjectDisplay.asp?ProjectID=3083.) Chapter 4. Operating Accessible and Usable Fixed-Route Transit Services 4. Nelson\Nygaard, Status Report on the Use of Wheelchair and Other Mobility Devices on Public and Private Transportation, Easter Seals Project ACTION, Washington, D.C., 2008. 5. Cross, D., Wheelchair Access: Improvements, Standards and Challenges, presented at APTA Bus and Para- transit Conference, May 2006, Orange County, CA, 2006. 6. Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF), Topic Guides on ADA Transportation: Stop Announce- ments, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2010. 7. Planners Collaborative, Review of Route Identification and Stop Announcements, Toledo Regional Transit Authority, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011. Chapter 5. Accessible Bus Stops and Pedestrian Infrastructure 8. American Public Transportation Association, 2012 Public Transportation Fact Book, Washington, D.C., September 2012. 9. City of Tucson Department of Transportation, Transit Services Division, ADA Bus Stop Accessibility Study Report, October 2009. 10. Arlington County, Virginia, Americans with Disabilities Act Evaluation Study, prepared for the Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments by KFH Group, Inc., 2012. 11. Pedestrian to Transit Accessibility Prioritization, prepared for Prince Georgeâs County, Maryland, and Metro- politan Washington Council of Governments by KFH Group, Inc., August 2012. 12. Maui County Bus Stops, prepared for Maui Bus, County of Maui, Hawaii, by KFH Group, Inc., 2008. 13. Accessibility Pathway Analysis for the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authorityâs MetroAccess Customers, prepared for the Washington Metropolitan Transit Authority and Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments by KFH Group, Inc., 2008. 14. Montgomery County Bus Stop Facility Inventory and Assessment, Final Report, prepared for Montgomery County Public Works Department, by the KFH Group, Inc., 2005. 15. Americans with Disabilities Accessibility Assessment, prepared for Corpus Christi Regional Transportation Authority by the KFH Group, Inc., in association with D. Cross Consulting, D. Walter Architect, and Coastal Bend Center for Independent Living, March 2007. References
166 Strategy Guide to Enable and Promote the Use of Fixed-Route Transit by People with Disabilities 16. Enhanced Mobility for Seniors and Individuals with Disabilities: Proposed Circular, Federal Register, Vol. 78, No. 133, July 11, 2013. 17. LaBonty, G. and Beveridge, C., Increasing Accessibility in Communities through the Community Develop- ment Block Grant Program, Paper presented at the APTA Bus and Paratransit Committee, 2003. 18. Lowenherz, F., âBellevueâs ADA Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Compliance Program,â Washington State LTP News, Issue 103, Winter 2010; and Quiroga, C., NCHRP Project 20-07, Task 249, âAsset Management Approaches to ADA Compliance,â Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 19. Salgado-Tamayo, L., Comparison of Capital Costs for Fixed-Route Bus Stop Improvements to Paratransit Operating Cost, Maryland Transit Administration, Maryland Department of Transportation as reported in Equipment and Maintenance, Topic Guide 1, DREDF, 2010. 20. Goodwill, J. and H. Carapella, Creative Ways to Manage Paratransit Costs, Final Report, Prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation Research Center by National Center For Transit Research, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, 2008. 21. Accessible Pathways to Bus Stops and Transit Facilities: A Process Guide, prepared for Easter Seals Project ACTION by Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2009. Chapter 6. Marketing, Public Information, Trip Planning, and Travel Training 22. Easter Seals Project ACTION, Stories of Changed Lives: The Personal Impact of Transportation Access, July 2003. 23. Easter Seals Project ACTION, You Can Really Go Places, June 2002. 24. Bus Riding Made Easy brochure, Intercity Transit, Olympia, Washington. 25. Access Guide, San Francisco Muni, San Francisco, CA. 26. Biernbaum, Lee, Rainville, Lydia, Spiro, Arlen, Multimodal Trip Planner System: Final Evaluation Report, FTA-MA-ITS-2011.1, U.S. Department of Transportation, John A. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, MA, May 2011. 27. Kim, Julia, The Road to Independence: Youth with Disabilities Transportation Roundtable, National Easter Seal Society, Washington D.C., May 2010. 28. Project ACTION, Helping Schools Meet the Transportation Needs of Students with Disabilities, National Easter Seal Society, Washington D.C., June 2009. 29. Project ACTION, The National Dialogue, Transportation and Research Forum on Accessible Community Transportation, National Easter Seal Society, Washington D.C., April 2004. 30. Jenkins, Janet, Transportation for Older Adults, Transportation Planning, Volume 32, Issue 1, American Plan- ning Association, Chicago, IL, February 2002. 31. Feeley, Cecilia, Evaluating the Transportation Needs and Accessibility Issues for Adults on the Autism Spectrum in New Jersey, Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2010. 32. Wolf-Branigan, Karen and Wolf-Branigan, Michael, A Travel Training Cost Benefit Model for People with Disabilities, Public Transportation Agencies and Communities, ITS Monash, June 2010. 33. Wolf-Branigan, Karen, Wolf-Branigan, Michael, Welch, Kevin, and Culver, J.D., Applying a Travel Training CostâBenefit Model for People with Disabilities, Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2011. 34. Travel Training Options Help Take the Pressure off Paratransit Services, Metro Magazine, Volume 107, Number 6, American Public Transportation Association, Washington D.C., June 2011. 35. Wolf-Branigan, Karen and Wolf-Branigan, Michael, The Emerging Field of Travel Training Services: A Systems Perspective, Journal of Public Transportation, Volume 11, Number 3, Center for Urban Transpor- tation Research, 2008. 36. Rubbell, J., âPublic Transit 101: A Powerful Partnership,â American Public Transit Association, Washington, D.C., May 2005. 37. Project ACTION, Helping Schools Meet the Transportation Needs of Students with Disabilities, National Easter Seal Society, Washington D.C., June 2009. 38. Paddeau, Dennis, The MATT Bus: Teaching Seniors to Ride Public Transit, American Public Transportation Association, Washington D.C., May 2005. 39. Kachmar, Betty, Travel Training in Indiana, American Public Transportation Association, Washington D.C., May 2005. 40. Shaheen, Susan, Allen, Denise, and Liu, Judy, Public Transit Training: Mechanism to Increase Ridership among Older Adults, Report 09-3805, Presented at 88th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington D.C., 2009.
References 167 41. Babka, Rhianna, Cooper, Jill, and Ragland, David, Evaluation of Urban Travel Training for Older Adults, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2110, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2009, pp. 149â154. 42. Ketola, N. and Chia, D., Assessment of ADA Research and Development Needs, U.S.DOT, Washington, D.C., 1997. 43. Chia, D., TCRP Synthesis 74: Policies and Practices for Effectively and Efficiently Meeting ADA Paratransit Demand, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 44. Easter Seals Project ACTION, Innovative Practices in Paratransit Services, Washington, D.C., 2002. Chapter 7. Fare Incentive Programs 45. EG&G Dynatrend, TCRP Report 9: Transit Operations for Individuals with Disabilities, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995. 46. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates, Inc., Transit Sustainability Project: Paratransit Final report, Metro- politan Transit Commission, San Francisco, CA, 2012. 47. TranSystems Corp., ADA Paratransit Eligibility Determination Processes and Information Obtained From Selected Transit Agencies, Final Report, Valley Metro, Phoenix, AZ, 2009. Chapter 8. Alternative Transit Service Designs 48. DREDF, Accessible Transportation Services for All, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2014. 49. Koffman, D., TCRP Synthesis 53, Operational Experiences with Flexible Transit Services, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004. 50. Weiner, R., TCRP Synthesis 76, Integration of Paratransit and Fixed-Route Transit Services, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 51. Volinski, J. M., Connor, M., McLaughlin, J., Kopp, C., Ryus, P., Pittman, D., TCRP Report 116, Guidebook for Evaluating, Selecting, and Implementing Suburban Transit Services, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., 2006. 52. Becker, A. and Teal, R. Next-Generation General Public Demand Responsive Transportation. Presented at the 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011. 53. Federal Transit Administration, FY2013 Triennial Review Workshop Workbook, http://www.fta.dot.gov/ 5-24_0700_Grantee_Handbook.pdf Chapter 9. ADA Paratransit Eligibility Determinations 54. Weiner, R., TCRP Synthesis 30: ADA Paratransit Eligibility Certification Practices, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998. 55. TranSystems Corp., Determining ADA Paratransit Eligibility: An Approach, Guidance and Training Materials, Easter Seals Project ACTION, Washington, D.C., 2003. 56. Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund (DREDF), Topic Guides on ADA Transportation: Eligibility for ADA Paratransit, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2010. 57. TCRP Research Results Digest 107: Developing Partnerships Between Transportation Agencies and the Dis- ability and Underrepresented Communities, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., April 2013. 58. National Transit Institute, Comprehensive ADA Paratransit Eligibility, Participant Workbook, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ, 2010. 59. TranSystems, Corp., Review of the RTA ADA Paratransit Eligibility Certification Program, Final Report, Regional Transportation Authority, Chicago, IL, 2011. 60. Koffman, D., Lewis, D., Chia, D., Burkhardt, J., Bradley, M., TCRP Report 119: Improving ADA Complementary Paratransit Demand Estimation, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007.