Manager’s Guide to the Integrated Ecological Framework (2014)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

49 Brown, J. W. 2006. Eco-Logical: An Ecosystem Approach to Developing Infrastructure Projects. U.S. Department of Transportation, Cambridge, Mass. Cambridge Systematics. 2011. A Practitioner’s Handbook: Optimizing Conservation and Improving Mitigation Through the Use of Progressive Approaches. NCHRP Project 25-25, Task 67 Final Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washing- ton, D.C. Doss, C., and S. Taff. 1996. The Infl uence of Wetland Type and Wetland Proximity on Resi- dential Property Values. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 10: 261–270. Drechsler, M., and F. Watzold. 2009. Applying Tradable Permits to Biodiversity Conserva- tion: Effects of Space-Dependent Conservation Benefi ts and Cost Heterogeneity on Habitat Allocation. Ecological Economics, 68(4): 1083–1092. Engel, S., S. Pagiola, and S. Wunder. 2008. Designing Payments for Environmental Services in Theory and Practice: An Overview of the Issues. Ecological Economics, 65(4): 663–674. Environmental Law Institute. 2007. Mitigation of Impacts to Fish and Wildlife Habitat: Estimating Costs and Identifying Opportunities. Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C. Greenspace Alliance and Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission (DVRPC). 2011. Return on Environment: The Economic Value of Protected Open Space in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Philadelphia, Pa. Groves, C. R. 2003. Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioners Guide to Planning for Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, D.C. Institute for Natural Resources, NatureServe, Parametrix, and CH2M Hill. 2012. SHRP 2 Report S2-C06-RW-2: An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 2. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washing- ton, D.C. Kareiva, P., and M. Marvier. 2011. What Is Conservation Science? BioScience, 62(11): REFERENCES

50 MANAGER’S GUIDE TO THE INTEGRATED ECOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK 962–969. Kramer, Elizabeth A., and Steven Carpenedo. 2009. A Statewide Approach for Identifying Potential Areas for Wetland Restoration and Mitigation Banking in Georgia: An Ecosystem Function Approach. Proc., 2009 Georgia Water Resources Conference, University of Geor- gia, Athens, Ga. Louis Berger & Associates, Inc. with the BSC Group. 1997. Costs for Wetland Creation and Restoration Projects in the Glaciated Northeast. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region I, Boston, Mass. Mahan, B., S. Polasky, and R. Adams. 2000. Valuing Urban Wetlands: A Property Price Ap- proach. Land Economics, 76(1): 100–113. Mitsch, W. J., and J. G. Gosselink. 2000. The Value of Wetlands: Importance of Scale and Landscape Setting. Ecological Economics, 35(1): 25–33. Murcia, C. 1995. Edge Effects in Fragmented Forests: Implications for Conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 10(2): 58–62. National Research Council. 1992. Restoration of Aquatic Systems: Science, Technology, and Public Policy. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. Ruhl, J. B., and R. J. Gregg. 2001. Integrating Ecosystem Services into Environmental Law: A Case Study of Wetlands Mitigation Banking. Stanford Environmental Law Journal, 20: 365–392. Schwartz, M. W. 1999. Choosing the Appropriate Scale of Reserves for Conservation. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30: 83–108. Shepard, R. B. 2005. Quantifying Environmental Impact Assessments Using Fuzzy Logic. Springer, New York, p. 27. University of California, Davis Road Ecology Center. 2013. SHRP 2 Capacity Project C21C: California Pilot Test of the Ecological Approaches to Environmental Protection Developed in Capacity Research Projects C06A and C06B. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. 2008. Compensatory Mitigation for Losses of Aquatic Resources, Final Rule. Federal Register, Vol. 73, No. 70, pp. 19594–19705. (Codi- fied at 40 CFR Part 230) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2003. Guidance for the Establishment, Use, and Operation of Conservation Banks. Federal Register, Vol. 68, No. 89, p. 24753. Venner Consulting and URS Corporation. 2013. SHRP 2 Capacity Project C06A Prepubli- cation Draft: An Ecological Approach to Integrating Conservation and Highway Planning, Volume 1. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Wainger, L., and M. Mazzotta. 2009. Proposed framework for quantifying ecosystem services and their economic benefits—Guidance for creating ecological endpoints. U.S. EPA Ecosystem Services Research Program Working Paper Series #2. Young, A. 1993. Guidelines for Land Use Planning, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. Zedler, J. B. 2003. Wetlands at Your Service: Reducing Impacts of Agriculture at the Water- shed Scale. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(2): 65–72.