National Academies Press: OpenBook
Page i
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Sag Vertical Curve Design Criteria for Headlight Sight Distance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22637.
×
Page R1
Page ii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Sag Vertical Curve Design Criteria for Headlight Sight Distance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22637.
×
Page R2
Page iii
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Sag Vertical Curve Design Criteria for Headlight Sight Distance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22637.
×
Page R3
Page iv
Suggested Citation:"Front Matter." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2013. Sag Vertical Curve Design Criteria for Headlight Sight Distance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/22637.
×
Page R4

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT This work was sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), in cooperation with the Federal Highway Administration, and was conducted in the National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP), which is administered by the Transportation Research Board (TRB) of the National Academies. COPYRIGHT INFORMATION Authors herein are responsible for the authenticity of their materials and for obtaining written permissions from publishers or persons who own the copyright to any previously published or copyrighted material used herein. Cooperative Research Programs (CRP) grants permission to reproduce material in this publication for classroom and not-for-profit purposes. Permission is given with the understanding that none of the material will be used to imply TRB, AASHTO, FAA, FHWA, FMCSA, FTA, Transit Development Corporation, or AOC endorsement of a particular product, method, or practice. It is expected that those reproducing the material in this document for educational and not-for-profit uses will give appropriate acknowledgment of the source of any reprinted or reproduced material. For other uses of the material, request permission from CRP. DISCLAIMER The opinions and conclusions expressed or implied in this report are those of the researchers who performed the research. They are not necessarily those of the Transportation Research Board, the National Research Council, or the program sponsors. The information contained in this document was taken directly from the submission of the author(s). This material has not been edited by TRB.

The National Academy of Sciences is a private, nonprofit, self-perpetuating society of distinguished scholars engaged in scientific and engineering research, dedicated to the furtherance of science and technology and to their use for the general welfare. On the authority of the charter granted to it by the Congress in 1863, the Academy has a mandate that requires it to advise the federal government on scientific and technical matters. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone is president of the National Academy of Sciences. The National Academy of Engineering was established in 1964, under the charter of the National Academy of Sciences, as a parallel organization of outstanding engineers. It is autonomous in its administration and in the selection of its members, sharing with the National Academy of Sciences the responsibility for advising the federal government. The National Academy of Engineering also sponsors engineering programs aimed at meeting national needs, encourages education and research, and recognizes the superior achievements of engineers. Dr. Charles M. Vest is president of the National Academy of Engineering. The Institute of Medicine was established in 1970 by the National Academy of Sciences to secure the services of eminent members of appropriate professions in the examination of policy matters pertaining to the health of the public. The Institute acts under the responsibility given to the National Academy of Sciences by its congressional charter to be an adviser to the federal government and, on its own initiative, to identify issues of medical care, research, and education. Dr. Harvey V. Fineberg is president of the Institute of Medicine. The National Research Council was organized by the National Academy of Sciences in 1916 to associate the broad community of science and technology with the Academy’s purposes of furthering knowledge and advising the federal government. Functioning in accordance with general policies determined by the Academy, the Council has become the principal operating agency of both the National Academy of Sciences and the National Academy of Engineering in providing services to the government, the public, and the scientific and engineering communities. The Council is administered jointly by both Academies and the Institute of Medicine. Dr. Ralph J. Cicerone and Dr. Charles M. Vest are chair and vice chair, respectively, of the National Research Council. The Transportation Research Board is one of six major divisions of the National Research Council. The mission of the Transporta- tion Research Board is to provide leadership in transportation innovation and progress through research and information exchange, conducted within a setting that is objective, interdisciplinary, and multimodal. The Board’s varied activities annually engage about 7,000 engineers, scientists, and other transportation researchers and practitioners from the public and private sectors and academia, all of whom contribute their expertise in the public interest. The program is supported by state transportation departments, federal agencies including the component administrations of the U.S. Department of Transportation, and other organizations and individu- als interested in the development of transportation. www.TRB.org www.national-academies.org

iv CONTENTS AUTHOR ACKNOWLEDGMENTS........................................................................................ vii ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................ viii CHAPTER 1 Introduction ........................................................................................................... 1 Research Objective ...................................................................................................... 1 CHAPTER 2 Review of Current AASHTO Methodologies ..................................................... 2 CHAPTER 3 Review of Headlamp Design ................................................................................. 5 Evolution of Headlamp Design .................................................................................... 5 Comparison to Stopping Sight Distance .................................................................... 12 Summary .................................................................................................................... 15 CHAPTER 4 Practitioner Survey Results ................................................................................ 16 Domestic Standards ................................................................................................... 16 Question 1 .................................................................................................................. 19 Question 2 .................................................................................................................. 19 Question 3 .................................................................................................................. 22 Question 4 .................................................................................................................. 23 Question 8 .................................................................................................................. 34 Question 9 .................................................................................................................. 35 Question 10 ................................................................................................................ 36 Question 11 ................................................................................................................ 36 International Standards ............................................................................................. 38 New Zealand .............................................................................................................. 39 United Kingdom ......................................................................................................... 42 Australia .................................................................................................................... 44 Spain .......................................................................................................................... 46 Canada ....................................................................................................................... 47 Others ........................................................................................................................ 47 Summary .................................................................................................................... 48 CHAPTER 5 Potential Changes to the AASHTO Policy ........................................................ 51 Solution 1: Extend Sag Curve Length ........................................................................ 51 Solution A.1: Increase Deceleration Rate ................................................................. 53 Solution A.2 : Decrease Design Speed ...................................................................... 54 Issues for the Potential Guideline Recommendations ............................................... 55 CHAPTER 6 Visibility Experiments ......................................................................................... 56 Smart Road Study ...................................................................................................... 56 Smart Road Experimental Design ............................................................................. 56 Independent Variables ............................................................................................... 57 Dependent Variables ................................................................................................. 57 Participants ................................................................................................................ 58

v Facilities and Equipment ........................................................................................... 59 Smart Road Experimental Method ............................................................................. 64 Smart Road Study Results ............................................................................................ 67 Analysis of Headlamps .............................................................................................. 67 Analysis of Headlamp Light Sources and Beam Patterns ......................................... 71 Smart Road Study Discussion .................................................................................... 74 Public Road Experimental Design ............................................................................... 75 Independent Variables ............................................................................................... 75 Dependent Variables ................................................................................................. 75 Participants ................................................................................................................ 76 Facilities and Equipment ........................................................................................... 77 Public Road Experimental Method ............................................................................ 80 Public Road Study Results ........................................................................................... 81 Public Road Study Discussion ................................................................................... 83 CHAPTER 7 Discussion on AASHTO Guidelines ................................................................... 86 Solution 1: Extend Sag Curve Length ........................................................................ 86 Solution 2: Increase Deceleration Rate ..................................................................... 87 Solution 3: Decrease Design Speed ........................................................................... 88 Discussion of the Appropriateness of SSD ................................................................ 89 CHAPTER 8 Conclusions and Recommendations .................................................................. 91 Conclusions .................................................................................................................. 91 Recommendations ........................................................................................................ 91 REFERENCES ............................................................................................................................ 92 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ................................................................................... 94 APPENDIX A Practitioner Survey ......................................................................................... A-1 APPENDIX B State Road Design Manuals and Technical Specifications .......................... B-1

Next: Report Contents »
Sag Vertical Curve Design Criteria for Headlight Sight Distance Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 198: Sag Vertical Curve Design Criteria for Headlight Sight Distance reviews the current methodologies used in the design of sag vertical curves and changes in headlamp technologies. The report also highlights potential changes to the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) design guide as a result of these reviews.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!