Public Participation Strategies for Transit (2011)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

47 Aparicio, A., “Assessing Public Involvement Effectiveness in Long-Term Planning,” presented at the 86th Annual Meet- ing of the Transportation Research Board, Jan. 21–25, 2007, Washington, D.C. Bailey, K., T. Grossardt, and M. Pride-Wells, “Community Design of a Light Rail Transit-oriented Development Using Casewise Visual Evaluation (CAVE),” Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2007, pp. 235–254. Baker, B.C., “Laketran Audit Clean; Ridership, Sales Down,” News-Herald, June 29, 2009 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.news-herald.com/articles/2009/06/24/ news/nh1078286.txt. Barnes, G. and P. Langworthy, Increasing the Value of Public Involvement in Transportation Project Planning, Research Services Section, Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2004a. Barnes, G. and P. Langworthy, “Understanding and Manag- ing Conflict in Transportation Project Public Involve- ment,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board No. 1895, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004b, pp. 102–107. Bates, T.B. and D.J. Wahl, “We Can’t Hear You!: San Diego’s Techniques for Getting Balanced Community Input in Major Investment Studies,” Transportation Research Record 1571, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 197–207. Bickerstaff, K. and G. Walker, “Participatory Local Gover- nance and Transport Planning,” Environment and Plan- ning A, Vol. 33, No. 3, 2001, pp. 431–451. Bradham, D., “Crowdsourcing the Public Participation Process for Planning Projects,” Planning Theory, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2009, pp. 242–262. Bradham, D., T. Sanchez, and K. Bartholomew, “Crowd- sourcing Public Participation in Transit Planning: Prelim- inary Results from the Next Stop Design Case,” 2007 [Online]. Available: http://pressamp.trb.org/compendium/ 508/81797BFFDA77.pdf. Cairns, S., J. Greig, and M. Wachs, Environmental Justice & Transportation: A Citizen’s Handbook, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Berkeley, 2003. Childress, B., How Transit Agencies Can Improve the Public Involvement Process to Deliver Better Transportation Solu- tions, Master’s thesis, Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose State University, San Jose, Calif., 2008, unpublished. Clements, B., “St. Paul Steps up Outreach Planning for Light Rail,” Mass Transit, July 8, 2008 [Online]. Avail- able: www.masstransitmag.com. Corburn, J., “Bringing Local Knowledge into Environmental Decision Making: Improving Urban Planning for Com- munities at Risk,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 22, No. 4, 2003, pp. 420–433. Eirikis, D. and M. Eirikis, “Friending Transit: How Public Transit Agencies Are Using Social Media to Expand Their Reach and Improve Their Image,” Mass Transit, Vol. 36, No. 1, 2010, p. 32. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), Americans with Disabilities, 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www. fhwa.dot.gov/reports/pittd/ada.htm [accessed on June 17, 2010]. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Final Rule on Statewide Planning and Metropolitan Planning, 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613, Issued Oct. 22, 1993. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/Federal Transit Administration (FTA), Final Rule on Statewide Planning and Metropolitan Planning, 23 CFR Part 450 and 49 CFR Part 613, Issued Feb. 14, 2007. Florida Department of Transportation and National Center for Transit Research (U.S.), Community Impact Assess- ment and Environmental Justice for Transit Agencies: A Reference, National Center for Transit Research, Center for Urban Transportation Research, University of South Florida, Tampa, 2002. Hanna, K.S., “The Paradox of Participation and the Hidden Role of Information: A Case Study,” Journal of the Amer- ican Planning Association, Vol. 66, 2000, pp. 398–410. Hull, K., TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 85: Effective Use of Citizen Advisory Committees for Transit Planning and Operations, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010, 71 pp. IAP2, Spectrum of Public Participation, International Asso- ciation for Public Participation, Thornton, Colo., 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.iap2.org/displaycommon. cfm?an=5. Innes, J.E. and D.E. Booher, Public Participation in Plan- ning: New Strategies for the 21st Century, Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of Califor- nia, Berkeley, 2000. Jackson, M.C., “Public Involvement in Transportation: Collab- orating with the Customers,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, p. 3. Keever, D., G. Frankoski, and J. Lynott, “In the Possibilities Are the Solutions: Assessment and Implications of the Public-Involvement Process During the Environmental Impact Study of the Woodrow Wilson Bridge,” Transpor- tation Research Record 1685, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 135–143. “Laketran Avoids More Pain,” News-Herald, Mar. 2, 2009 [Online]. Available: http://www.news-herald.com/articles/ 2009/03/02/opinion/doc49a86095d5cb1363500502.txt Leighter, J., L. Black, L. Cockett, and L. Jarmon, “The Prac- tice of Public Meetings: Introduction to the Special Issues,” The International Journal of Public Participation, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 1–13. REFERENCES

McGray, D., “TECHNOLOGY–iGov—How Geeks Are Opening up Government on the Web,” The Atlantic Monthly, 2009, p. 36. Morris, W., K. Robertson, and J. Spinks, “Utilizing Informa- tion Technology in Innovative Marketing Approaches for Public Transportation,” Research and Special Programs Administration, Department of Transportation, Tallahas- see, Fla., 2010, 40 pp. NuStats, Public Involvement on Transit Studies: State of the Practice—Topline Report of Key Findings, 2009. O’Connor, R., M. Schwartz, J. Schaad, and D. Boyd, State of the Practice: White Paper on Public Involvement, Com- mittee on Public Involvement in Transportation, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000. Porter, C., “These Agencies Get It: When It Comes to Inte- grating Transportation and Land Use, the Winners Are . . . Planning,” Vol. 5, 2005, pp. 41–45. Robinson, G., Filling the Gap: Environmental Justice in Transportation Toolkit, Task I-3B Case Study Work Group, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., July 2007, 13 pp. Rowe, G. and L. Frewer, “Public Participation Methods: A Framework for Evaluation,” Science, Technology, & Human Values, Vol. 25, No. 1, 2000, pp. 3–29. Schaller, B., TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 63: On- Board and Intercept Transit Survey Techniques, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, 99 pp. Spitz, G., F. Niles, and T. Adler, TCRP Synthesis of Transit Practice 69: Web-Based Survey Techniques, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, 112 pp. Springer, N., “Listen Up!,” Planning, May 2007, pp. 30–34. Steins, C., “A Parallel Universe: What the Virtual World Can do for Planning,” Urban Insight, 2007 [Online]. Avail- able:http://www.urbaninsight.com/articles/2ndlife0307. html [accessed Jan. 7, 2010]. Stich, B. and K. Eagle, “Planning to Include the Public: Trans- portation Policy Implementation with Effective Citizen 48 Involvement,” Public Works Management Policy, Vol. 94, 2005, pp. 319–340. Streetsblog, “Using Social Media to Fix Transit That Fails,” Mar. 9, 2010. Szyliowicz, J.S., “Measuring the Effectiveness of Public Involvement Approaches,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 35–38. Transportation Funding and Reform Commission, “Address- ing Pennsylvania’s Transportation Funding Crisis: Final Report,” Nov. 2006 [Online]. Available: ftp://ftp.dot.state. pa.us/public/pdf/STCTAC/TFRC/Reports/TFRC%20Final %20Report.pdf. United We Ride, “Mobility Management,” n.d. [Online]. Available: http://www.unitedweride.gov/Mobility_ Management_Brochure.pdf. U.S.DOT, Department of Transportation Order to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low- Income Populations, Federal Register, Vol. 62 (72), 1997. U.S.DOT, Transportation Capacity Planning Building, “Pub- lic Involvement and the Hiawatha Light Rail Transit Design-Build Project,” The Metropolitan Council and Partner Agencies, Washington, D.C., 2010. Van Herzele, A., “Local Knowledge in Action: Valuing Non- professional Reasoning in the Planning Process,” Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 24, No. 2, 2004, pp. 197–212. Von Hippel, E., Democratizing Innovation, MIT Press, Cam- bridge, Mass., 2005. Ward, B.G., Case Studies in Environmental Justice and Pub- lic Transit Title VI Reporting, National Center for Transit Research, Center for Urban Transportation Research, Uni- versity of South Florida, Tampa. Weeks, J.L., “Public Involvement by Minorities and Low- Income Populations: Removing the Mystery,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 25–29. Zmud, M. and J. Sabala, Online Jams: A Tool for Public Engagement, presented at the Eleventh National Conference on Transportation Planning for Small and Medium-Sized Communities, Transportation Research Board, Portland, Ore., Sep. 17–19, 2008.