Public Participation Strategies for Transit (2011)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

49 Antrim, A., “BART Lessons & Strategies: Putting the Web, Social Media and Developer Community to Work for Transit,” 2010 [Online]. Available: http://trilliumtransit. com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/BART%20More %20Riders%20article.pdf [accessed June 27, 2010]. Bailey, K., T. Grossardt, and J. Brumm, “Enhancing Public Involvement Through High Technology,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 16–17. Bailey, K. and T. Grossardt, “Better Visioning for Transit System Development: A Framework for the Improvement of Visualization and its Successful Application,” presented at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Jan. 11–15, 2004, Washington, D.C. Bair, J., “AC Transit Cuts a Model for Public Involvement,” In Oakland Blog, Nov. 25, 2009 [Online]. Available: http:// www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/inoakland/detail?&entry_ id=52362 [accessed Dec. 11, 2009]. Bell, M., “Successful, Substantive Community Participation: Los Angeles Neighborhood Initiative Model,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 30–31. Black, L., J. Leighter, and J. Gastil, “Communicating Trust, Community, and Process in Public Meetings: A Reflection on How Close Attention to Communication Can Con- tribute to the Future of Public Participation,” The Inter- national Journal of Public Participation, Vol. 3, No. 2, 2009, pp. 143–159. Blair, J., “AC Transit Cuts a Model for Public Input,” In Oakland Blog, Nov. 25, 2009 [Online]. Available: www.sfgate.com. Booth, C. and T. Richardson, “Placing the Public in Inte- grated Transportation Planning,” Transport Policy, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2001, pp. 141–149. Brick-Turin, A. and M.O. Daily, “Suburban Fixed Rail Tran- sit Planning in Northern Virginia,” presented at the 8th TRB Conference on the Application of Transportation Planning Methods, Apr. 22–26, 2001, Corpus Christi, Tex. Brisk, D. and J. Beckim, “Positive Feedback in the High Desert: Community Outreach in Rural Arizona,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 22–24. Butcher, D., “Orange County Transit Agency SMS Program to Reduce Call-Center Costs,” Mobile Marketer, Dec. 3, 2009. Byrd, L. and S. David, “Public Involvement in Long-Range Transportation Planning: Benchmarking Study Identifies Best Practices,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 6–7. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)/National Envi- ronmental Policy Act (NEPA), Transportation Decision- making: Public Involvement and its Role in Project Devel- opment, Washington, D.C., n.d. Jandt, F., “A Tale of Two Cities,” MassTransitMag.com, Apr. 23, 2009. Khademian, A., S. Kikuchi, B. Offenbacker, P. Coelus, and T, Sanchez, Enhancing Public Participation in Regional Public Transportation Planning, Report FTA-VA-26- 1010-2009.1, Federal Transit Administration, Washing- ton, D.C., 2009. Keister, M.S., “Measuring Up to Environmental Justice,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 32–33. Keister, M.S. and D. Moreno, “Cutting-edge Visualization Tools: Graphic Simulations That Stimulate Project Under- standing and Decision Making,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 9–15. Kuehn, D., “Measuring the Value and Impact of Agency Com- munication with the Public,” In Conference Proceedings 44: U.S. and International Approaches to Performance Mea- surement, K. Turnbull, Rapporteur, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007, pp. 123–132. Mansfield, B., “‘Any Time, Anywhere, with Anybody’”: Agency’s Public Involvement Mantra Pays Off,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 20–21. Matley, T.M., “Effective Public Involvement in Transporta- tion: A Primer for Practitioners,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 4–7. “Metrolink Takes Closer Look at Cutting Routes,” Ventura County Star, Feb. 26, 2010. Radow, L. and C. Winters, “Rural Transit Performance Measurement,” 2010 [Online]. Available: http://www.ctaa. org/ebmodules/webarticles/articlefiles/Rural_Transit_ Performance_Measurement.pdf [accessed June 27, 2010]. Rhindress, M., F. Lynch, S. Bregman, R. Reichman, N. Coopersmith, and J. Dunning, Understanding How to Motivate Communities to Support and Ride Public Trans- portation, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. RTAP National Transit Resource Center, “Getting Started— Creating a Vision & Strategy for Community Transit,” Technical Assistance Brief, 2001, p. 21. Rue, H., “Public Involvement Best Practices: Link- ing Land Use and Transportation,” Terrain.org: A Jour- nal of the Built & Natural Environments, Vol. 17, 2005, pp. 148–155. Schwartz, M., Building Credibility with Customers and Stake- holders, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2006, 27 pp. Simpson, D.R., “Citizen-Generated Design Plans,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, p. 8. “Social Media in Transit,” Inside PBS Blog, viewed Mar. 11, 2010. South, L.J., “Public Involvement and the Organizational Landscape: State Departments of Transportation Undergo Culture Shift,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, pp. 18–24. BIBLIOGRAPHY

Stewart, J.M.P. and A.J. Sinclair, “Meaningful Public Partici- pation in Environmental Assessment: Perspectives from Canadian Participants, Proponents, and Government,” Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Manage- ment, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2007, pp. 161–183. Wagner, N., Planning and Implementing the First Public Transit System in Charlotte County, FL, presented at 50 the Eighth National Conference on Transportation Plan- ning for Small and Medium-Sized Communities, Trans- portation Research Board, Cincinnati, Ohio, Sep. 18–20, 2002. Walfoort, N., “Louisville Transit Outreach: Building Con- sensus, Defusing Controversy,” TR News, No. 220, 2002, p. 34.