Airport Ground Access Mode Choice Models (2008)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

96 The following tables (B1–B6) summarize the responses to the survey questions by type of responding organization. Where more than one individual responded from a given organization, their responses have generally been combined in the following statistics. For ease of refer- ence, the question numbers in the tables generally follow the numbering in the Airport Authority survey questionnaire. The corresponding questions may have different numbers in the questionnaires for other types of organizations owing to the addition of questions specific to each type of organization. The two questions that were specific to metropolitan planning organizations are numbered with their original num- ber in the relevant questionnaire. APPENDIX B Summary of Survey Results Airport Authorities MPOs State/Fed Government Consulting Firms Research Total Percent Survey Responses (organizations) 32 24 19 23 7 105 Q.1: Number reporting ground access studies 21 8 2 20 6 57 54% Number of studies identified 24 11 7 43 10 95 Unduplicated 85 Q2: Number reporting mode choice model use 8 5 2 13 6 34 60%a Number of studies identified 12 7 7 23 9 58 Unduplicated 52 Q3: Study reports available on web 1 2 0 0 2 5 15% b Notes: a) Percent of organizations reporting ground access studies b) Percent of organizations reporting use of mode choice models TABLE B1 AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS STUDIES

Airport Authorities MPOs State/Fed Government Consulting Firms Research Total Percent Number reporting mode choice model use 8 5 2 13 6 34 Q.4: Source of air passenger survey data Model development Other purposes Don’t know 6 4 0 2 3 0 1 2 0 9 10 0 5 4 0 23 23 0 Of those using models 68% 68% Q.5: Survey reports available on web 1 0 0 2 2 5 15% Q.7: Reasons m odeling not used (where not) Number reporting Not required Not reliable enough Too difficult to use Lack of guidance Decided by others Don’t know 12 8 - - - 2 2 3 1 2 1 2 - - all reported model use 7 6 - - 2 - 1 all reported model use 22 15 2 1 4 2 3 Of those not using models 68% 9% 5% 18% 9% 14% TABLE B2 AIRPORT ACCESS MODE CHOICE MODEL DEVELOPMENT AND USE Airport Authorities MPOs State/Fed Government Consulting Firms Research Total Percent Number reporting mode choice model use 8 5 2 13 6 34 Q.6 Assessment of current state of practice Adequate for needs Not reliable enough Too complex to use Too costly to use 7 1 - 2 5 - - - - 1 1 1 5 6 2 5 2 4 - 2 19 12 3 10 56% 35% 9% 29% Airport Authorities MPOs Total Percent Survey responses to question 31 24 55 Q.8 Prior studies using mode choice modeling Yes No Not sure 4 15 12 5 14 5 9 29 17 16% 53% 31% TABLE B3 CURRENT STATE OF PRACTICE WITH AIRPORT ACCESS MODE CHOICE MODELS TABLE B4 STUDIES INVOLVING AIRPORT ACCESS MODE CHOICE MODELS PRIOR TO LAST TEN YEARS

98 Airport Authorities MPOs State/Fed Government Consulting Firms Research Total Percent Survey responses (organizations) 32 24 19 23 7 105 Q.9: Number reporting airport choice studies 13 2 6 14 2 37 35% Number of studies identified 11 4 3 13 3 34 Unduplicated 32 Q10: Number reporting mode choice model use 5 1 1 6 2 15 41% Number of studies identified 4 3 1 5 3 16 Unduplicated 16 Note: Some respondents reported involvement in airport choice studies or use of mode choice models but did not identify specific studies TABLE B5 STUDIES OF AIR PASSENGER AIRPORT CHOICE MPOs Percent Number responding to Question 3 (MPO performed study using airport access mode choice model) 5 Q.3 (MPO) Type of model used Special purpose airport access model Adapted special-generator model Adapted general urban travel model Used general urban travel model 4 1 — 1 (a) 80% 20% 20% Number responding to Question 10 (all MPO respondents) 24 Q.10 (MPO) How airport trips are modeled in general regional travel modeling process Special-generator sub-model for air passengers Model air passengers as home-based non-work trips Model air passengers as non-home-based non-work trips Special-generator sub-model for airport employees Model airport employees as regular journey-to-work trips Do not consider airport trips in modeling process Other Don’t know 15 6 5 5 12 — 2 1 (b) 65% 26% 22% 22% 52% 9% Notes: a) Multiple responses allowed b) Percent excludes “Don’t know” response TABLE B6 MODELING AIRPORT ACCESS TRIPS IN REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING

99 AIRPORT GROUND ACCESS STUDIES IDENTIFIED BY SURVEY RESPONDENTS Studies Involving Airport Access Mode Choice Modeling Sponsor Study Atlanta Regional Commission Regional Travel Demand Model Update Bay Area Rapid Transit District Oakland Airport Connector EIR/EIS Chicago DOT/Chicago Transit Authority Chicago Airport Express Study Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport Curbside Assignment Study Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport DFW Zonal Activity Forecasts Federal Aviation Administration New England Regional Airport System Plan Federal Transit Administration Rail Access to Honolulu International Airport Federal Transit Administration Rail Access to Minn.–St. Paul Int’l Airport Federal Transit Administration Rail Access to New York Kennedy Int’l. Airport Federal Transit Administration Washington–Dulles Access Study Greater Orlando Aviation Authority Analysis of Terminal Curbside Roadways Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta Int’l. Airport Terminal Planning—Phases I–III Lower Manhattan Development Corp. JFK to Lower Manhattan Transit Access Study Massachusetts Port Authority Boston Logan AITC Environmental Assessment Massachusetts Port Authority Logan Express Analysis Massachusetts Port Authority Logan Airport Environmental Status and Planning Report Massachusetts Port Authority Surface Access Study of Boston Area Airports Metro–Portland, Oregon Airport Max (Red Line) Analysis Miami–Dade County Transit Airport Access Study New York MTA/NYC Transit LaGuardia Access Study North Central Texas Council of Govts. DFW Rail Access Implementation Plan Port Authority of NY & NJ Regional Air Service Demand Study Port of Seattle SEA-TAC Comprehensive Development Plan Joint Transportation Study Sacramento Regional Transit District Sacramento Airport Light Rail Extension Study San José International Airport Airport Transit Connector Southern California Assoc. of Govts. 1998 Regional Transportation Plan Southern California Assoc. of Govts. 2001 Regional Transportation Plan Southern California Assoc. of Govts. 2004 Regional Transportation Plan Southern California Assoc. of Govts. Regional Airport Demand Model Unspecified O’Hare Commuter Rail Market Assessment Privately Funded Studies Denver East Corridor Rail Group, LLC Denver Airtrain Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. Biannual Syndicated Air Traveler Surveys Canada Aéroports de Montréal Navette du Centre-ville à l’Aéroport Montréal–Trudeau/Volet: Passagers Greater Toronto Airports Authority Toronto Pearson International Airport Air Rail Link Revenue and Ridership Study United Kingdom BAA, Plc Heathrow Airport Surface Access Model (2003) BAA, Plc Heathrow Airport Surface Access Model (2004–current) Scottish Executive Rail Links to Glasgow and Edinburgh Airports

100 High Speed Rail and Maglev Studies Involving Mode Choice Modeling Sponsor Study California High-Speed Rail Authority Bay Area/California High-Speed Rail Ridership and Revenue Forecasting Study Florida Department of Transportation Florida High Speed Rail Study Maryland Department of Transportation Baltimore to Washington Maglev Study Pennsylvania Dept. of Transportation Pittsburgh Maglev Study University Research Involving Airport Access Mode Choice Modeling University Study University of California, Berkeley Planning for Improved Intermodal Connectivity at California Airports University of Virginia Feasibility of Offsite Terminals in Landside Access International City University of Hong Kong Ground Access Mode Choices at Hong Kong International Airport Imperial College, London Airport, Airline, and Access Choice in SF Bay Area Imperial College, London Airport, Airline, and Access Choice in Greater London National Technical University of Athens Access Mode Choice for Relocated Airports National Technical University of Athens Demand and Mode Choice in Access to Airports National Technical University of Athens Parking Capacity Requirements for Relocated Airports University Research Involving Airport Ground Access Analysis University Study Virginia Transportation Research Council Evaluating Improvements in Landside Access for Airports Other Airport Ground Access Studies Sponsor Study Anchorage International Airport Airport Roadway Traffic Analysis E-470 Public Highway Authority Denver E-470 (Tollroad) Airport Forecasts Dallas Area Rapid Transit Application of the North Central Texas Council of Governments Regional Travel Demand Model to the planning for the Northwest Corridor light rail transit line National Aeronautics and Space Administration Civil tilt rotor studies Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta Int’l. Airport CONRAC Study Houston Intercontinental Airport Master Plan I-95 Corridor Coalition Airport Ground Access Study Indianapolis Metropolitan Planning Organization Intermodal Freight Study Jacksonville Aviation Authority Jacksonville International Airport Master Plan 2002 Los Angeles World Airports LAX Advanced Planning Los Angeles World Airports LAX Master Plan EIS/EIR Los Angeles World Airports Ontario International Airport Master Plan—Phase 2 Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority North Area Road Landside VISSIM Simulation Metropolitan Washington Council of Governments Washington/Baltimore Region Access Forecast Update Puget Sound Regional Council Regional Airport Ground Access Plan (2004) Raleigh–Durham Airport Authority (with Triangle Transit Authority) Airport Rail Link Study Reno–Tahoe Airport Authority Terminal Area Master Plan Reno–Tahoe Airport Authority Terminal Programming Study (underway) Sacramento County Airport System Sacramento International Airport Master Plan Update San Diego Regional Airport Authority San Diego International Airport Master Plan San Diego Regional Airport Authority San Diego Int’l. Airport Terminal 2 Expansion San José International Airport Terminal Area Improvement Program

101 Sponsor Study Southern California Assoc. of Govts. 2007 Regional Transportation Plan (underway) Tampa International Airport Airport Master Plan Updates West Virginia Public Port Authority Western West Virginia Regional Airport Feasibility Study Canada Greater Toronto Airports Authority Toronto Pearson International Airport New Terminal Groundside Design Ottawa Macdonald–Cartier International 2006 survey of key attributes of modal choice Airport Authority AIRPORT CHOICE STUDIES IDENTIFIED BY SURVEY RESPONDENTS Studies Involving Airport Access Mode Choice Modeling Sponsor Study Federal Aviation Administration New England Regional Airport System Plan Federal Transit Administration Washington–Dulles Access Study New York State Dept. of Transportation Stewart Airport Access Analysis Port Authority of NY & NJ Regional Air Service Demand Study Resource Systems Group, Inc. Biannual Syndicated Air Traveler Surveys Sacramento County Airport System Sacramento International Airport Master Plan Update San Diego Association of Governments Maglev Study, Phase 1 Southern California Assoc. of Govts. 1998 Regional Transportation Plan Southern California Assoc. of Govts. 2001 Regional Transportation Plan Southern California Assoc. of Govts. 2004 Regional Transportation Plan Southern California Assoc. of Govts. Regional Airport Demand Model Unspecified High Speed Rail Access to Third Chicago Airport Canada Greater Toronto Airports Authority Air Traveller Choice in Southern Ontario University Research Involving Airport Choice and Access Mode Modeling University Study Imperial College, London Airport, airline, and access choice in SF Bay Area Imperial College, London Airport, airline, and access choice in Greater London Imperial College, London Stated preference studies of airport choice Other Airport Choice Studies Sponsor Study Anchorage International Airport Airport Master Plan Update 2002 Hartsfield–Jackson Atlanta Int’l. Airport CONRAC Study Jacksonville Aviation Authority Jacksonville International Airport Master Plan 2002 Los Angeles World Airports LAX Advanced Planning Los Angeles World Airports LAX Master Plan Los Angeles World Airports Remote Terminal Market Analysis for LAX Massachusetts Port Authority Hanscom Airport Environmental Status and Planning Report Minnesota DOT Office of Aeronautics State of Minnesota Leakage Study North Central Texas Council of Govts. DFW Rail Access Implementation Plan Reno–Tahoe Airport Authority 2005 Catchment Area Survey Southern California Assoc. of Govts. 2007 Regional Transportation Plan (underway) Tampa International Airport Air service development market studies Tampa International Airport International Market Study, March 2006