Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.
1.0 Project Objectives The National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Project 17-18(8), Comprehensive Human Factors Guidelines for Road Systems, concerned the initial development of a new resource document for highway designers, traffic engineers, and other practitioners. The purpose of the planned Human Factors Guidelines (HFG) document, as stated in the project Statement of Work, is âto provide the best factual information and insight on road usersâ characteristics, in a useful CD-ROM format, to facilitate safe roadway design and operational decisions.â The impetus behind this project was the recognition that current design references have limitations in providing the practitioner with adequate guidance for incorporating road user needs and capabilities when dealing with design and operational issues. These limitations may be of various sorts. Design guidelines may represent minimum requirements that are not always appropriate over the full range of roadway users or applications. Guidance may not be based on adequate human factors data. Guidance documents may not offer sufficient explanation so that practitioners can make effective use of behavioral factors. Conflicting requirements or unusual conditions may make it difficult to comply with ideal design parameters and require some basis for a compromise. Design practice may be driven by concerns about cost and compliance, without a basis for also incorporating safety benefits through user-centered design. Because of such limitations to current design guides, it would be beneficial to provide human factors guidelines to assist the practitioner in identifying and addressing human-centered safety concerns in roadway design and operations. The HFG meets this need. The HFG is seen as complement to other primary design guides, such as the AASHTO Geometric Design Guide (AASHTO, 2001) and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD; FHWA, 2003). The HFG is seen as a collaborative, evolving document that is expected to be the product of many contributing authors over a period of years. The document may continue to expand, and be refined, over subsequent versions. The development and growth of the Highway Capacity Manual (Transportation Research Board, 2000) provides a successful model for this type of approach. The objective of NCHRP 17-18(8) was to lay the groundwork for a first edition of the HFG. The project developed recommendations for the content, format, organization, and capabilities of the HFG. It developed an outline of the document and a detailed work plan for the effort required to produce a first edition. As part of this effort, a draft Introduction and one sample chapter were written. Subsequent development of the complete HFG itself was not part of this project. 5