Cooperative Agreements for Corridor Management (2004)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

37 APPENDIX B Sample Agreements Between Government Agencies RESOLUTION (BENTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA)

38 Resolution (Benton County) continued

39 CORRIDOR PRESERVATION AGREEMENT (UTAH DOT/WASATCH COUNTY)

40 Corridor Preservation Agreement (Utah DOT/Wasatch County) continued

41 Corridor Preservation Agreement (Utah DOT/Wasatch County) continued

42 INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT (COLORADO DOT) INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT AMONG ADAMS COUNTY, THE CITY OF BRIGHTON, THE CITY OF COMMERCE CITY, THE TOWN OF EATON, THE CITY OF FORT LUPTON, THE TOWN OF GILCREST, THE CITY OF GREELEY, THE TOWN OF LASALLE, THE TOWN OF PLATTEVILLE, WELD COUNTY, AND THE STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION

43 Intergovernmental Agreement (Colorado DOT) continued

44 Intergovernmental Agreement (Colorado DOT) continued

45 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MANITOBA, CANADA)

46 Memorandum of Understanding (Manitoba) continued

47 Memorandum of Understanding (Manitoba) continued

48 Memorandum of Understanding (Manitoba) continued

49 Memorandum of Understanding (Manitoba) continued

50 Memorandum of Understanding (Manitoba) continued,

51 MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (SOUTH DAKOTA DOT)

52 Memorandum of Understanding (South Dakota DOT) continued

53 CORRIDOR MASTER PLAN (IOWA DOT) Staff Action: S-2004-0453 Corridor Master Plan U.S. 6 Corridor Dallas County, Iowa Agreement No: 2003-16-085 T his U.S. 6 Corridor Master Plan, hereinafter referred to as the “Plan, is entered into by and between the Iowa Department of Transportation, hereinafter referred to as the “DOT,” the City of Clive, Iowa, hereinafter referred to as “Clive,” the City of Urbandale, Iowa, hereinafter referred to as “Urbandale” and the City of Waukee, Iowa, hereinafter referred to as “Waukee. WHEREAS, the purpose of this plan is to define parameters for transportation management, access management, land use and development characteristics along the U.S. 6 highway corridor within the limits defined. The designated corridor extends from Interstate 35/80 (I-35/80) on the east extending westerly to the west corporation limits of Waukee. WHEREAS, it is not the purpose of this Plan to identify specific projects, rather, its purpose is to establish guidelines which shall promote safe and efficient traffic flow and which shall enhance and sustain economic development along the corridor. The Cities shall be able to use this Plan as a tool for managing economic development along U.S. 6. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED as follows: The general standard for management of the U.S. 6 Corridor are as follow: A. PLANNING Future fully directional access to U.S. 6 shall be limited to public road connections at ¼ mile spacing (see Exhibit “A” attached). Other direct accesses to U.S. 6 may be authorized as right in right out only. All other access shall be provided from other public roads. Remaining U.S. 6 frontage shall be access controlled. Access connections along U.S. 6 may be required to have appropriate acceleration and deceleration lanes, tapers and other appropriate geometric features to insure that the impacts of the adjoining development are fully mitigated. Fully directional access connections may also include appropriate left turn storage where necessary. Access road concepts shall be initiated in the platting stage of each industrial/retail development activity. Access roads which are constructed shall be offset from the U.S. 6 centerline. All traffic signal construction, within the defined corridor, must conform to 800 meter (½ mile) spacing requirements as shown on Exhibit “A” attached.

54 Corridor Master Plan (Iowa DOT) continued OPERATIONS Existing access connections may be required to have appropriate acceleration and deceleration lanes, tapers and other appropriate geometric features to insure that the impacts of the adjoining development to U.S. 6 are fully mitigated. Fully directional access connections may also include appropriate left turn storage where necessary. Additional access control may be obtained where necessary. The general parameters for implementation of the U.S. 6 Corridor Master Plan. It is understood that this Plan may be appended, amended or vacated by the written agreement of all signatory parties. It is further understood that this Agreement and all contracts entered into under the provisions of this Agreement are binding upon the DOT and the Cities as defined herein. The Cities agree to adopt all necessary ordinances and/or resolutions and to take such legal steps as may be required to give full effect to the terms of this Plan. The DOT and the Cities, as defined herein, will meet on an annual basis to review and evaluate this Plan. The DOT will coordinate this meeting by determining the date and location along with gathering input from the Cities for preparation of the agenda. No third parties beneficiaries, are intended to be created by this Agreement, nor do the parties herein authorize anyone not a party to this Agreement to maintain a suit for damages pursuant to the terms of provisions of this Agreement.

55 Corridor Master Plan (Iowa DOT) continued

56 Corridor Master Plan (Iowa DOT) continued

57 Corridor Master Plan (Iowa DOT) continued

58 Corridor Master Plan (Iowa DOT) continued

59 Corridor Master Plan (Iowa DOT) continued

60 STATE ROAD 7 PARTNERSHIP (FLORIDA)

61 State Road 7 Partnership (Florida) (continued)

62 State Road 7 Partnership (Florida) (continued)

63 State Road 7 Partnership (Florida) (continued)