National Academies Press: OpenBook

Handbook for Predicting Stream Meander Migration and Supporting Software (2004)

Chapter: Chapter 3 - Screening and Classification of Meandering Streams

« Previous: Chapter 2 - Background
Page 14
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 3 - Screening and Classification of Meandering Streams." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2004. Handbook for Predicting Stream Meander Migration and Supporting Software. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23346.
×
Page 14
Page 15
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 3 - Screening and Classification of Meandering Streams." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2004. Handbook for Predicting Stream Meander Migration and Supporting Software. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23346.
×
Page 15
Page 16
Suggested Citation:"Chapter 3 - Screening and Classification of Meandering Streams." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2004. Handbook for Predicting Stream Meander Migration and Supporting Software. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23346.
×
Page 16

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

3.1 INTRODUCTION Initial screening is performed to determine whether a channel is straight, meandering, anabranched, or braided. The methodology presented here applies only to meander- ing channels; braided and anabranched streams are screened out. The planform characteristics of meandering streams are classified using a form of the Brice (1975) method that has been modified in the Handbook to cover the geomor- phic stream types that users will likely encounter in the field. Secondary screening is then applied to identify sta- ble meanders based on the degree of channel width unifor- mity. This allows the hydraulic engineer to screen out stable meanders that generally pose little or no threat through lateral migration. 3.2 INITIAL SCREENING Alluvial streams can be classified according to their patterns as single-thread, braided, or anastomosing (see Figure 3.1). The appearance of the stream when viewed on aerial photo- graphs is used to screen out braided and anastomosing chan- nels, which are beyond the scope of the methodologies presented in the Handbook. Only channels identified as meandering will be analyzed beyond the initial screening. 3.3 MEANDER CLASSIFICATION A number of morphological classification schemes for allu- vial rivers were evaluated (Brice, 1975; Schumm, 1977; Schumm and Meyer, 1979; Schumm, 1981; Montgomery and Buffington, 1997; Rosgen, 1994). The utility of different meth- ods was investigated with the aim of producing a classification system that has the following attributes: • It is simple and directly applicable to the meanders encountered in the field. • The classification provides a rational basis for screening out stable and highly unstable patterns. • It is in pictorial format, requiring only a map, aerial pho- tograph, or visual inspection to apply. • Its application does not require field data (e.g., sediment sampling). • It requires minimal training and/or instruction for end users. 14 Based on these criteria, the Brice (1975) method was found to be the most appropriate. However, using the Brice classes to stratify the large data set used in developing the methodology to predict channel migration under NCHRP Project 24-16 revealed that not all the channel classes that Brice identified would commonly be encountered by hydraulic engineers work- ing in the field. Hence, a modified Brice (1975) method was developed. This consists of nine channel categories that were optimized for use in bend classification and secondary screen- ing for meander migration prediction, as shown in Figure 3.2. 3.4 SECONDARY SCREENING Before predicting migration rates for selected bends along a meandering stream, it is necessary to identify whether mean- dering is stable or active. The method employed for this pur- pose is that of Brice (1982), who was able to discriminate qual- itatively between stable and laterally active channels on the basis of the degree of width variability along the course of the stream. Through extensive historical documentation and field observations of streams, he discovered that channels that do not vary significantly in width are either static or relatively sta- ble, whereas channels that are wider at bends migrate actively. In Brice’s study, highly sinuous, equal-width streams were the most stable, equal-width streams of lower sinuosity were slightly active, and wider-at-bend streams had the highest migration rates. Testing Brice’s hypothesis against the larger database assembled for NCHRP Project 24-16 validated this screening procedure. As a result, secondary screening of meandering channels using the Brice width-variability criterion can be used to differentiate between stable meandering streams and chan- nels with actively migrating bends. Bends of stable mean- dering streams can be considered sufficiently stable that bend migration is unlikely to pose a threat to bridges or highway structures; no further analysis of these streams is required. In the modified classification scheme (see Figure 3.2), equal-width rivers in classes B1 and G1 are static or relatively stable and are screened out on this basis. Equal-width, deep, or incised channels of Class A are also screened out. Class A channels may not migrate because they are deeply inset into geologically competent materials such as bedrock, or they may be actively cutting through erodible materials but not migrating laterally to any significant degree. Class F streams are compound channels with a “wandering” low-water channel, wide bars, and back channels. Wandering CHAPTER 3 SCREENING AND CLASSIFICATION OF MEANDERING STREAMS

15 streams feature lateral activity that is sporadic and spatially disorganized. Lateral migration in such situations is highly unpredictable, and wandering streams should be screened out as potentially so unstable and unpredictable that further eval- uation would not be likely to produce a meaningful prediction of meander migration. Migration rates for meander bends on rivers classified as any of the remaining categories (B2, C, D, E, and G2) are amenable to prediction by photogrammetric comparison techniques (see Chapters 5 and 7). Illustrated examples of the application of the classification and screening techniques are presented in Chapter 8. Figure 3.1. Alluvial channel pattern classification. Degree of anabranching pertains to anastomosing channels. SOURCE: Thorne, 1997 (modified from Brice, 1975)

16 Figure 3.2. Modified Brice classification of meandering channels. MODIFIED BRICE CLASSIFICATION SCREEN A SINGLE PHASE, EQUIWIDTH CHANNEL INCISED OR DEEP B1 SINGLE PHASE, EQUIWIDTH CHANNEL B2 SINGLE PHASE, WIDER AT BENDS, NO BARS C SINGLE PHASE, WIDER AT BENDS WITH POINT BARS D SINGLE PHASE, WIDER AT BENDS WITH POINT BARS, CHUTES COMMON E SINGLE PHASE, IRREGULAR WIDTH VARIATION F TWO PHASE UNDERFIT, LOW-WATER SINUOSITY (WANDERING) G1 TWO PHASE, BIMODAL BANKFULL SINUOSITY, EQUIWIDTH G2 TWO PHASE, BIMODAL BANKFULL SINUOSITY, WIDER AT BENDS WITH POINT BARS * * * * NOTE: WHERE SCREEN = * , CLASS FALLS OUT DUE TO IMPLICATIONS OF CONSIDERABLE STABILITY OR EXCESSIVE INSTABILITY

Next: Chapter 4 - Photogrammetry »
Handbook for Predicting Stream Meander Migration and Supporting Software Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Report 533: Handbook for Predicting Stream Meander Migration describes the application of a stream prediction methodology and provides illustrated examples for applying the methodology. The handbook includes NCHRP CD-ROM 48 that contains an ArcView-based data logger and channel migration predictor.

TRB’s National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web Document 67: Methodology for Predicting Channel Migration documents and presents the results of a study to develop NCHRP Report 533: Handbook for Predicting Stream Meander Migration, a stand-alone handbook for predicting stream meander migration using aerial photographs and maps. A companion product to NCHRP Web Document 67 is NCHRP CD 49: Archived River Meander Bend Database, a four-CD-ROM set that contains a database of 141 meander sites containing 1,503 meander bends on 89 rivers in the United States.

A summary of NCHRP Report 533 that was published in a November-December 2004 issue of the TR News is available.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!