National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 7 Paths Forward
Suggested Citation:"8 Workshop Synopsis." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Transitioning Toward Sustainability: Advancing the Scientific Foundation: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23533.
×

8

Workshop Synopsis

This workshop brought together leading scientists in the field of sustainability science to further the discussion on sustainability indicators and metrics, models for supporting decision making, and opportunities to inform decision making. The workshop’s overarching objectives were to reflect on the last 15 years since Our Common Journey was released and identify advances, knowledge gaps, and barriers to progress in

  • Sustainability indicators,
  • Models for supporting decisions,
  • Frameworks for environmental decision making, and
  • Efforts needed to address the range of needs and opportunities related to sustainability.

Indicators were discussed throughout the workshop. In her opening remarks, Pamela Matson said much progress has been made in developing metrics and indicators. For example, indicators are increasingly integrative and indicator systems better help decision makers understand trade-offs and gain a fuller understanding of coupled social-environmental systems. In many research areas, however, there is a drive to create new indicators while not giving enough attention to how indicators relate to other indicators. Instead of collecting data on new indicators, some participants said it would be more useful to map existing indicators against ongoing efforts. Others commented that there exists a multitude of metrics for sustainability, yet an individual decision maker can only handle a few at any one time. Paring down the number of indicators to fewer of the most useful ones may better facilitate decision making.

Participants discussed models extensively, and integrated assessment modeling (IAM) in particular, noting that such models have improved the relevance of integrated assessments by incorporating more governance, land, water, and food capabilities into assessments. There is a need, however, some said, to continue addressing gaps in understanding various systemic linkages, feedbacks, and uncertainties in models. Additionally, despite progress made in integrating human and physical earth systems in assessments, there is a lack of social indicators such as equity, connectedness, culture, and health. Participants discussed remaining barriers to IAMs and other models, such as large scale ones not being used regularly for decision making and having a limited set of topics and focus. Models often have a single focus on the effect of a single intervention, and a number of participants observed that ecology and socials systems, except for economics, are often missing from models.

Suggested Citation:"8 Workshop Synopsis." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Transitioning Toward Sustainability: Advancing the Scientific Foundation: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23533.
×

Several frameworks for environmental decision making were presented during the workshop, including the World Health Organization’s operational framework that helps decision makers build better climate-resilient health systems. Urban systems over the last 15 years have been an increasingly research-intense area for indicator and framework development. Many participants noted that observations and models of urban systems, however, lack sophistication compared to models of climate systems that have progressed not only spatially but also in complexity. Urban research needs to progress from models that only analyze interactions within a city to a global model that incorporates global hinterlands and feedbacks across multiple levels. In the urban context, participants discussed shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) as a framework for considering development and progress toward sustainability. Frameworks were also discussed as a key component to transitioning to sustainable food systems. As some participants noted, that is important to model issues in agriculture and food systems in an integrated biophysical-social framework. Regardless of the sustainability topic, participants said that indicator and model development efforts need to be done in the context of a sustainability framework focused on people, equity, and long-term thinking.

Although many participants provided examples of progress made on sustainability indicators and metrics, models for supporting decision making, and opportunities to inform decision making, there were many remaining research gaps identified that would need to be filled in order to address the range of needs and opportunities related to sustainability. For example, well-being was discussed throughout the workshop as a key component to sustainability. It was noted by some, however, that although aiming for human well-being is a notable goal, it does not translate easily into quantifiable information for scientists and decision makers to use. There was ensuing discussion on how future research should focus on different metrics and indicators of well-being, along with the importance of interdisciplinary research and of engaging and clearly communicating research efforts and results to non-technical audiences and policy makers.

Suggested Citation:"8 Workshop Synopsis." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Transitioning Toward Sustainability: Advancing the Scientific Foundation: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23533.
×
Page 53
Suggested Citation:"8 Workshop Synopsis." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2016. Transitioning Toward Sustainability: Advancing the Scientific Foundation: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/23533.
×
Page 54
Next: Appendix A: Workshop Agenda »
Transitioning Toward Sustainability: Advancing the Scientific Foundation: Proceedings of a Workshop Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $48.00 Buy Ebook | $38.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 1999 the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine released a landmark report, Our Common Journey: A Transition toward Sustainability, which attempted to “reinvigorate the essential strategic connections between scientific research, technological development, and societies’ efforts to achieve environmentally sustainable improvements in human well-being.”1 The report emphasized the need for place-based and systems approaches to sustainability, proposed a research strategy for using scientific and technical knowledge to better inform the field, and highlighted a number of priorities for actions that could contribute to a sustainable future.

The past 15 years have brought significant advances in observational and predictive capabilities for a range of natural and social systems, as well as development of other tools and approaches useful for sustainability planning. In addition, other frameworks for environmental decision making, such as those that focus on climate adaptation or resilience, have become increasingly prominent. A careful consideration of how these other approaches might intersect with sustainability is warranted, particularly in that they may affect similar resources or rely on similar underlying scientific data and models.

To further the discussion on these outstanding issues, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine convened a workshop on January 14–15, 2016. Participants discussed progress in sustainability science during the last 15 years, potential opportunities for advancing the research and use of scientific knowledge to support a transition toward sustainability, and challenges specifically related to establishing indicators and observations to support sustainability research and practice. This report summarizes the presentations and discussions from the workshop.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!