Use of Taxis in Public Transportation for People with Disabilities and Older Adults (2016)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

64 REFERENCES 1. DREDF, The Collaborative, KFH Group, and TranSystems Corporation, Accessible Transit Services for All, sponsored by the Office of Research, Federal Transit Administration, Demonstration and Innovation, U.S. Department of Trans- portation, Washington, D.C., Dec. 2014. 2. Gilbert, G. and R. Samuels, The Taxicab: An Urban Transportation Survivor, The University of North Caro- lina Press, Chapel Hill and London, 1982. 3. Cooper, J., R. Mundy, and J. Nelson, Taxi! Urban Econo- mies and the Social and Transport Impacts of the Taxicab, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd., Surrey, England, 2010. 4. Gilbert, G., T. Cook, A. Nalevanko, and L. Everett-Lee, TCRP Report 75: The Role of the Private-for-Hire Vehicle Industry in Public Transit, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002. 5. Mundy, R., Using Independent Contractor Drivers, con- ducted for the Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Founda- tion, at the Center for Transportation Studies, University of Missouri–St. Louis, 2005. 6. Mundy, R. and G. Tiwari, Benefits of a Full Service Taxicab Company to the Community and Consumers, conducted for the Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Foundation, at the Center for Transportation Studies, University of Missouri–St. Louis, 2006. 7. City of Portland Revenue Bureau, Office of Manage- ment and Finance, Preliminary Findings—Taxi Driver Labor Market Study: Long Hours, Low Wages, Portland, Ore., Jan. 2012. 8. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates with Total Con- tract Solutions under subcontract to ICF International, NCHRP Research Results Digest 366: Local and State Partnerships with Taxicab Companies, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012. 9. KFH Group, Inc., Urbitran Associates, Inc., McCollom Management Consulting, Inc., and Cambridge Systemat- ics, Inc., TCRP Report 124: Guidebook for Measuring, Assessing, and Improving Performance of Demand- Response Transportation, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 10. Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates in association with TWJ Consulting and RLS and Associates, TCRP Report 121: Toolkit for Integrating Non-Dedicated Vehicles in Paratransit Service, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2007. 11. Chia, D., TCRP Synthesis 74: Policies and Practices for Effectively and Efficiently Meeting ADA Paratransit Demand, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2008. 12. Westat, J.E. Burkhardt, J. Dohery, J.M. Rubino, and J. Yum, A Survey on the Use of Taxis in Paratransit Pro- grams, Easter Seals Project ACTION, Washington, D.C., 2009. 13. Dalton, D. and K. Wolf-Branigan, Moving Forward Together: A Workbook for Initiating and Increasing Acces- sible Taxi Services in Your Community, Easter Seals Project ACTION, Washington, D.C., 2005. 14. “Incentives for Accessible Taxicabs,” Easter Seals Project ACTION, Washington, D.C., Vol. 26, No. 1, UPDATE Summer 2014. 15. Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Foundation, Assess- ing the Full Cost of Implementing an Accessible Taxi- cab Program, prepared under the direction of R. Mundy et al., Center for Transportation Studies, University of Missouri–Saint Louis, 2010. 16. Taxicab, Limousine & Paratransit Association with KFH Group, Inc. and J.M. Rubino Consulting, Private Trans- portation Operators at the Table: A Guide to Participat- ing in the Transportation Planning Process, prepared for the Office of Planning and Environment, Federal Transit Administration, Washington, D.C., 2011. 17. Aarhaug, J., Taxis as Urban Transport, Institute of Transport Economics, Oslo, Norway, 2014. 18. Welch, W. and C. Dubost, “Taxis That Save You Money in ADA Paratransit,” San Mateo County Transit District, San Carlos, Calif., 2003. 19. Ritter, A., A. Straight, and E. Evans, Understanding Senior Transportation: Report and Analysis of a Survey of Consumers Age 50+, Public Policy Institute, AARP, Washington, D.C., 2002. 20. Adams-Price, C., Aging in Place: Intermodal Transporta- tion and Options for Meeting the Unmet Transportation Needs of Nonmetropolitan Older Adults, Department of Psychology and National Strategic Planning and Analysis Center, Mississippi State University, Starkville, 2013. 21. “San Francisco Cab Drivers Are Uber’s Latest Pickup,” J.P. Mangalindan, Fortune, Jan. 15, 2014 [Online]. Available: http://fortune.com/2014/01/15/san-francisco- cab-drivers-are-ubers-latest-pickup/. 22. Rayle, L., S. Shaheen, N. Chan, D. Dai, and R. Cervero, “App-Based, On-Demand Ride Services: Comparing Taxi and Ridesourcing Trips and User Characteristics in San Francisco,” University of California Transportation Center, Berkeley, Aug. 2014. 23. Said, C., “As Uber, Lyft, Sidecar Grow, So Do Concerns of Disabled,” SF Gate, Feb. 25, 2014 [Online]. Avail- able: http://www.sfgate.com/news/article/As-Uber- Lyft-Sidecar-grow-so-do-concerns-of-5240889.php# photo-5893905. 24. Arlington County’s insurance requirements for taxi com- panies: $100,000 injury to one person, $300,000 injury to 2 or more persons, $50,000 property damage. 25. Policy Analysis Report, “Impact of Transportation Network Companies in San Francisco,” prepared for the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, June 9, 2014.