Long-Term Field Performance of Warm Mix Asphalt Technologies (2017)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

66 Tables C1.1 (a) through (d) summarize the fracture work density, IDT strength, and rutting resistance index (RRI): the significant determinants for transverse crack- ing, wheel-path longitudinal cracking, and rutting, respec- tively, for all the projects in terms of the four climatic zones. The tables present the mean value of each material property and the standard deviation (s), as well as material proper- ties’ comparisons between the HMA and WMA mixtures based on a t-test statistical method with a significance level of 0.05. A P P E N D I X C Summary of Significant Material Properties (a) Wet Freeze Zone Project Mix Type Fracture Work Density IDT Strength Rutting Resistance Index Mean, kPa S Mean, kPa r Mean r H vs. W MD 925 HMA 48.3 13.0 1359 162 9148.6 8870.4Sasobit 44.3 11.7 H=W 1589 179 H=W 15527.3 3550.7 H=W MO Hall St. HMA 51.8 9.9 1841 1158 17850.7 291.0 Sasobit 42.1 8.9 H=W 1908 486 H=W 17773.2 918.5 H=W Evotherm 44.2 3.4 H=W 2222 235 H=W 14925.6 3594.8 H=W Aspha-min 59.6 3.6 H=W 1586 137 H=W 17550.0 376.9 H=W MO Rte. CC HMA 48.2 9.3 1778 207 17558.6 414.7 Evotherm 40.6 8.2 H=W 2455 463 H=W 16462.9 1405.6 H=W MN TH 169 HMA 76.3 1.2 1675 153 3853.9 3207.0 Evotherm 71.3 8.3 H=W 1766 125 H=W 3171.5 1598.5 H=W OH SR 541 HMA 26.3 3.6 2123 55 16952.1 241.2 Sasobit 38.0 6.0 H=W 2136 82 H=W 5726.6 4548.5 H=W Evotherm 42.8 5.4 H=W 1397 587 H=W 4524.4 4101.2 H=W Aspha-min 48.4 10.2 H=W 1909 668 H=W 4645.7 673.8 H>W PA SR 2012 HMA 32.8 5.8 1939 580 6038.2 6033.8 LEA 37.6 1.5 H=W 1796 414 H=W 3425.7 3259.8 H=W Gencor 36.3 3.0 H=W 1707 196 H=W 6551.4 5068.1 H=W VA I-66 HMA 68.8 8.5 2496 193 16668.2 934.3DBG 51.6 6.1 H>W 2273 108 H=W 16911.2 1464.8 H=W IL 147 HMA 37.2 8.6 1787 140 5755.9 1650.6DBG 25.5 2.3 H=W 2496 193 H=W 5755.9 2503.7 H=W PA SR 2006 HMA 44.1 6.5 2625 223 1788.1 1022.3 Sasobit 43.8 8.9 H=W 2551 140 H=W 6880.0 3178.2 H<W Advera 33.6 11.0 H=W 2682 298 H=W 1664.6 378.7 H=W IA US 34 HMA 52.6 11.0 2787 207 7095.1 6677.5 Sasobit 45.7 2.1 H=W 2017 301 H>W 2419.0 855.7 H=W Evotherm 37.9 3.5 H=W 2541 299 H=W 3589.5 1187.7 H=W H vs. WH vs. W Table C1.1. Summary of mixtures’ significant determinants.

67 (continued on next page) (b) Wet No-Freeze Zone Project Mix Type Fracture Work Density IDT Strength Rutting Resistance Index Mean, kPa Mean, kPa r Mean r SC US 178 HMA 40.8 2.6 2794 160 18268.6 468.5 Evotherm 35.8 3.7 H=W 2673 341 H=W 18717.6 180.5 H=W TN SR 46 HMA Danley 48.3 12.1 2406 557 11397.7 5925.0 DBG 28.3 10.7 H>W 2024 159 H=W 13781.7 4500.1 H=W HMA Franklin 20.8 3.1 1351 76 8491.7 5003.0 Sasobit 19.2 3.1 H=W 1966 314 H<W 4303.8 697.9 H=W Evotherm 23.9 7.0 H=W 1654 89 H<W 10602.6 7891.5 H=W Advera 25.5 2.8 H=W 1902 282 H=W 2716.7 4136.5 H=W TX FM 324 HMA 31.2 6.6 2842 265 - NA NA Sasobit 32.9 11.1 H=W 2947 460 H=W NA NA NA Evotherm 34.4 1.2 H=W 3130 818 H=W NA NA NA Rediset 29.2 6.3 H=W 2430 421 H=W NA NA NA Advera 27.3 3.4 H=W 2959 43 H=W NA NA NA LA 116 HMA 49.1 4.4 3564 773 18556.4 337.3Foaming 43.3 12.7 H=W 3671 508 H=W 17541.4 365.2 H>W LA 3191 HMA 72.5 10.2 4028 443 18010.6 339.8Foaming 75.6 18.0 H=W 3877 422 H=W 18391.7 191.4 H=W LA 3121 HMA 55.2 6.3 2702 625 17559.1 392.9 Evotherm 15% RAP 56.1 7.3 H<W 2610 324 H=W 16535.4 346.8 H>W Evotherm 30% RAP 59.8 2.7 H=W 2816 189 H=W 16141.7 656.7 H>W TN SR 125 HMA 52.7 6.9 2406 60 17020.1 75.2 Evotherm 38.3 2.9 H>W 2292 251 H=W 17338.9 571.8 H=W LA US 61 HMA 74.1 10.4 2878 223 18310.1 482.1 Sasobit 79.7 4.9 H=W 3712 398 H<W 18745.4 403.3 H=W Evotherm 50.9 7.6 H>W 2874 368 H=W 18479.9 103.6 H=W S H vs. WH vs. WH vs. W (c) Dry-Freeze Zone Project Mix Type Fracture Work Density IDT StrengthMean, kPa r Mean, kPa r Mean r WA I- 90 HMA 103.5 9.2 2768 649 18077.4 306.0 Sasobit 103.1 22.6 H=W 2726 263 H=W 18127.6 358.1 H=W WA SR 12 HMA 97.2 14.5 2170 281 17548.0 182.5 AquaBlack 71.5 13.2 H=W 2643 493 H=W 17138.2 518.0 H=W CO I-70 HMA 87.4 16.8 1450 488 2055.3 191.7 Sasobit 61.4 8.1 H=W 1279 141 H=W 2565.4 1421.2 H=W Evotherm 117.8 12.7 H=W 1351 372 H=W 769.8 405.6 H>W Advera 113.4 13.6 H=W 1198 203 H=W 1779.1 139.3 H=W NE US 14 HMA 50.2 5.0 1737 138 17950.4 278.1 Advera 52.5 8.9 H=W 1330 75 H>W 12693.2 3588.1 H>W HMA 50.3 14.6 1589 250 17644.0 462.2 Evotherm 42.7 10.1 H=W 1713 331 H=W 16933.4 1220.9 H=W NV HMA 99.5 18.7 2147 154 16668.2 934.3Ultrafoam 105.7 12.7 H=W 1787 140 H>W 16911.2 1464.8 H=W MT I-15 HMA 65.8 5.7 2649 134 12830.2 4813.8 Sasobit 93.2 9.9 H<W 2773 496 H=W 16668.4 811.0 H=W Evotherm 121.1 17.2 H<W 2647 185 H=W 16570.1 1730.6 H=W Foaming 99.9 10.1 H<W 2737 119 H=W 10500.3 6646.1 H=W H vs. WH vs. WH vs. W Rutting Resistance Index Table C1.1. (Continued).

68 (d) Dry No-Freeze Zone Project Mix Type Fracture Work Density IDT Strength Rutting Resistance Index Mean, kPa r Mean, kPa r Mean r TX SH 251 HMA 63.2 12.7 3568 223 17439.0 1202.2 DBG 65.2 10.7 H=W 3373 153 H=W 17439.0 4479.6 H=W TX SH 71 HMA 38.0 8.7 2303 252 19212.6 - Evotherm 33.7 2.4 H=W 2505 204 H=W 19133.9 - H=W CA HVS 3a HMA 57.1 3.1 3201 210 12126.0 - Gencor 50.1 8.1 H=W 2993 499 H=W 8740.2 - H>W Evotherm 41.7 0.7 H>W 2930 71 H=W 11889.8 - H=W Cecabase 66.4 14.1 H=W 3674 192 H=W 11811.0 - H=W CA HVS 3b HMA 29.3 5.1 2318 166 13661.4 - Sasobit 50.0 5.7 H<W 2455 89 H=W 15669.3 - H<W Advera 31.9 4.9 H=W 2293 164 H=W 14566.9 - H=W DBG 32.5 2.2 H=W 2211 258 H=W 12362.2 - H=W Rediset 38.3 3.9 H=W 2042 411 H=W 15748.0 H>W Note: “-” indicates that data are not available. H vs. WH vs. WH vs. W Table C1.1. (Continued).