National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Appendix A: Statement of Task
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letter of Request." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of NASA's Planetary Science Division. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24759.
×
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letter of Request." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of NASA's Planetary Science Division. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24759.
×

images

National Aeronautics and Space Administration

Headquarters

Washington, DC 20546-0001

AUG 13 2015

SMD/Astrophysics Division

Reply to Attn of:

National Research Council

Dr. David Spergel

Chair, Space Studies Board

500 5th Street NW

Washington, DC 20001

Dear Dr. Spergel:

The 2010 SSB report, An Enabling Foundation for NASA’s Earth and Space Science Missions, stated that the Research and Analysis (R&A) programs of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) Science Mission Directorate (SMD) divisions, including the Planetary Science Division (PSD), comprise a key element of NASA’s mission-enabling activities. The report recommended, in part: “NASA should ensure that SMD mission-enabling activities are linked to the strategic goals of the agency and of SMD and that they are structured so as to: encompass the range and scope of activities needed to support those strategic goals; provide the broad knowledge base that is the context necessary to inteipreting data from spaceflight missions and defining new spaceflight missions; maximize the scientific return from all spaceflight missions; supply a continuous flow of new technical capabilities and scientific understanding from mission enabling activities into new spaceflight missions; and enable the healthy scientific and technical workforce needed to conduct NASA’s space and Earth science program.“

From 2011 to 2013, PSD undertook a process of community discussion and analysis leading to the restructuring of its R&A programs, in response to file above recommendation from the Enabling Foundation report. This process considered input from the Planetary Science Subcommittee of the NASA Advisory Council’s Science Committee and input from other U.S. Government stakeholders. The restructured program was announced in late 2013, and initially implemented in the Research Opportunities in Space and Earth Sciences (ROSES) 2014 solicitation. Implementation has continued in the currently open ROSES 2015 solicitation.

It would be very helpful if the NRC were to convene an ad-hoc committee to examine the program elements of the PSD R&A programs, as they currently exist following restructuring, for their consistency with past NRC advice. In conducting its review the committee would address the following questions:

  1. Are the PSD R&A program elements appropriately linked to, and do they encompass the range and scope of activities needed to support, the NASA Strategic Objective for Planetary Science and the Planetary Science Division Science Goals, as articulated in the 2014 NASA Science Plan?
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letter of Request." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of NASA's Planetary Science Division. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24759.
×
  1. Are the PSD R&A program elements appropriately structured to develop the broad base of knowledge and broad range of activities needed both to enable new spaceflight missions and to interpret and maximize the scientific return from existing missions?

The review should not examine the PSD programs as they were prior to the restructuring nor examine the strategic science goals and objectives of PSD, SMD, or NASA. The review should operate from the premise that the science goals of PSD are themselves intrinsically linked with the strategic goals of SMD and NASA; hence linkage with PSD goals implies linkage with SMD and NASA goals. Also the NRC should conduct its review in the context of the current budgetary realities which have differed from projections assumed prior to the release of the most recent planetary science decadal survey.

PSD would be able to provide, at your request, informational briefings and reference materials on the SMD and PSD strategic goals, the R&A program elements, and statistical data on proposals submitted and selected. We request that a report from the Board expressing its findings and suggestions be submitted in December 2016.

I would like to request that the NRC submit a plan for execution of the proposed review by the Space Studies Board. Once agreement on the scope, cost, and schedule of the proposed study has been achieved, the Contracting Officer will issue a task order for implementation.

We look forward to having the Board’s inputs to this vital activity. SMD’s point of contact for this study will be Dr. Thomas Statler, who can be reached at (202) 358-0272 or by email at Thomas.S.Statler@nasa.gov, if any questions arise.

Sincerely,

images

John M. Grunsfeld

Associate Administrator for Sceince Mission Directorate

Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letter of Request." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of NASA's Planetary Science Division. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24759.
×
Page 45
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letter of Request." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of NASA's Planetary Science Division. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24759.
×
Page 46
Suggested Citation:"Appendix B: Letter of Request." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of NASA's Planetary Science Division. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24759.
×
Page 47
Next: Appendix C: Center Leads and Analysis Group Comments »
Review of the Restructured Research and Analysis Programs of NASA's Planetary Science Division Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $65.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

The Research and Analysis (R&A) program managed by NASA’s Planetary Science Division (PSD), supports a broad range of planetary science activities, including the analysis of data from past and current spacecraft; laboratory research; theoretical, modeling, and computational studies; geological and astrobiological fieldwork in planetary analog environments on Earth; geological mapping of planetary bodies; analysis of data from Earth- and space-based telescopes; and development of flight instruments and technology needed for future planetary science missions. The primary role of the PSD R&A program is to address NASA’s strategic objective for planetary science and PSD’s science goals.

Recently, PSD reorganized the R&A program to provide better alignment with the strategic goals for planetary sciences. The major changes in the R&A program involved consolidating a number of prior program elements, many of which were organized by subdiscipline, into a smaller number of thematic core research program elements. Despite numerous efforts by PSD to communicate the rationale for the reorganization and articulate clearly the new processes, there has been significant resistance from the planetary science community and concerns in some sectors regarding the major realignment of funding priorities.

Review of NASA’s Planetary Science Division’s Restructured Research and Analysis Programs examines the new R&A program and determines if it appropriately aligns with the agency’s strategic goals, supports existing flight programs, and enables future missions. This report explores whether any specific research areas or subdisciplinary groups that are critical to NASA’s strategic objectives for planetary science and PSD’s science goals are not supported appropriately in the current program or have been inadvertently disenfranchised through the reorganization.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!