References for Part II
All URL addresses valid as of April 2017. Please note that, as of February 2017, U.S. Office of Management and Budget documents previously on the main whitehouse.gov site were relocated to an archived site. Wherever possible, a citation is provided to a stable site such as federalregister.gov.
Childs, J. H., R. King, and A. C. Fobia (2015). Confidence in US federal statistical agencies. Survey Practice 8(4). Available: http://www.surveypractice.org/index.php/SurveyPractice/article/view/314/html_38.
European Statistical System Committee (2011). European Statistics Code of Practice for the National and Community Statistical Authorities. Luxembourg: Eurostat. Available: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-manuals-and-guidelines/-/KS-32-11-955.
Martin, M. E. (1981). Statistical practice in bureaucracies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 76(373), 1–8. Available: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01621459.1981.10477593.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2016). Reducing Respondent Burden in the American Community Survey: Proceedings of a Workshop. T.J. Plewes, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/23639.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017). Innovations in Federal Statistics Using New Data Sources While Respecting Privacy. Panel on Improving Federal Statistics for Policy and Social Science Research Using Multiple Data Sources and State-of-the-Art Estimation Methods, R.M. Groves and B.A. Harris-Kojetin, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/24652.
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research (1978). The Belmont Report: Ethical Principles and Guidelines
for the Protection of Human Subjects of Research. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Government Printing Office. Available: http://archive.org/details/belmontreporteth00unit.
National Research Council (1993). The Future of the Survey of Income and Program Participation. Panel to Evaluate the Survey of Income and Program Participation, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/2072.
National Research Council (1995). Modernizing the U.S. Census. Panel on Census Requirements in the Year 2000 Census and Beyond, B. Edmonston and C. Schultze, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/4805.
National Research Council (2004). The 2000 Census: Counting Under Adversity. Panel to Review the 2000 Census, C.F. Citro, D.L. Cork, and J.L. Norwood, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/10907.
National Research Council (2007). Using the American Community Survey: Benefits and Challenges. Panel on the Functionality and Usability of Data from the American Community Survey, C.F. Citro and G. Kalton, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/11901.
National Research Council (2009). Ensuring the Quality, Credibility, and Relevance of U.S. Justice Statistics. Panel to Review the Programs of the Bureau of Justice Statistics, R.M. Groves and D.L. Cork, eds. Committee on National Statistics and Committee on Law and Justice. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/12671.
National Research Council (2013a). Benefits, Burdens, and Prospects of the American Community Survey: Summary of a Workshop. D.L. Cork, rapporteur. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18259.
National Research Council (2013b). Nonresponse in Social Science Surveys: A Research Agenda. Panel on a Research Agenda for the Future of Social Science Data Collection, R. Tourangeau and T.J. Plewes, eds. Committee on National Statistics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. Available: https://doi.org/10.17226/18293.
Norwood, J. L. (1975). Should those who produce statistics analyze them? How far should analysis go? An American view. Bulletin of the International Statistical Institute [Proceedings of the 40th Session] 46, 420–432.
Ryten, J. (1990). Statistical organization criteria for inter-country comparisons and their application to Canada. Journal of Official Statistics 6(3), 319–332. Available: http://www.jos.nu/Articles/abstract.asp?article=63319.
Triplett, J. (1991). The federal statistical system’s response to emerging data needs. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement 17(3–4), 155–201. Available: http://content.iosPress.com/articles/journal-of-economic-and-social-measurement/jem17-3-4-03.
United Nations Statistical Commission (2014, March 3). Fundamental Principles of Official Statistics. New York: United Nations. Endorsed by the General Assembly as Resolution A/RES/68/261. Available: http://unstats.un.org/unsd/dnss/gp/FP-New-E.pdf.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2014a). Guidance for providing and using administrative data for statistical purposes. OMB Memorandum M-14-06. Available: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2014/m-14-06.pdf.
U.S. Office of Management and Budget (2014b). Statistical Policy Directive No. 1: Fundamental responsibilities of federal statistical agencies and recognized statistical units. 79 Federal Register 71609 (December 2, 2014). Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2014-28326.