National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 7 - Summary, Findings, and Recommendations for Future Research
Page 99
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Performance-Related Specifications for Pavement Preservation Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24945.
×
Page 99
Page 100
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Performance-Related Specifications for Pavement Preservation Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24945.
×
Page 100
Page 101
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2017. Performance-Related Specifications for Pavement Preservation Treatments. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/24945.
×
Page 101

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

99 AASHTO (2010) “Accepting Pavement Ride Quality When Measured Using Inertial Profiling Systems,” AASHTO R 54-10. Adams, J., and Y. R. Kim (2011) Development of a New Chip Seal Mix Design Method, NCDOT HWY-2008-04. Anderson, R. M., et al. (2014) “Optimal Timing of Preventive Maintenance for Addressing Environmental Aging in Hot-Mix Asphalt Pavements,” Department of Transportation, Research Services & Library MN/RC 2014-45. ARA, Inc. (2009) NCHRP Project 1-40B, “Local Calibration Guidance for the Recommended Guide for Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures,” Final NCHRP Report. ASTM (2015) “D4695-03 Standard Guide for General Pavement Deflection Measurements.” Biel, T. D., and H. Lee (1997) Performance Study of Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Joint Sealants, Journal of Transportation Engineering, vol. 123, pp. 398–404, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(1997)123:5(398). Burati, J., et al. (2003) Optimal Procedures for Quality Assurance Specifications, FHWA-RD-02-09. Burati, J., et al. (2004) Evaluation of Procedures for Quality Assurance Specifications, FHWA-HRT-04-046 Chatti, K., and D. Lee (2002) Development of New Profile-Based Truck Dynamic Load Index, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1806, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 149–159. Chatti, K., et al. (2001) “Development of Roughness Thresholds for the Preventive Maintenance Action Aimed at Reducing Dynamic Loads,” Michigan Department of Transportation, RC-1396. Chatti, K., et al. (2009) “The Effect of Michigan Multi-Axle Trucks on Pavement Distress,” Michigan State Uni- versity RC-1504. Cho, D., et al. (2011) Determining Optimum Acceptance Sample Size, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2228, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 61–69. D’Angelo, J. A., and R. N. Dongre (2007) Creep and Recovery, Public Roads, vol. 70, pp. 24–30. Darter, M., et al. (1985) NCHRP Report 281: Joint Repair Methods for Portland Cement Concrete Pavements, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Eli Cuelho, R. M., and M. Akin (2006) “Preventive Maintenance Treatments of Flexible Pavements: A Synthesis of Highway Practice,” Montana Department of Transportation. Epps, J. A., et al. (2002) NCHRP Report 455: Recommended Performance-Related Specification for Hot-Mix Asphalt Construction: Results of the WesTrack Project, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Evans, L. D., et al. (1999) “Materials and Procedures for Repair of Joint Seals in Portland Cement Concrete Pave- ments - Manual of Practice,” FHWA-RD-99-146. FHWA (1999) TechBrief: Resealing Concrete Pavement Joints, FHWA-RD-99-137. FHWA (2003) “Construction Inspection Checklist #06 Joint Sealing Portland Cement Concrete Pavements,” FHWA-IF-03-00.3. FHWA (2014) “Highway Performance Monitoring System Field Manual,” Office of Highway Policy Information, OMB Control No. 2125-0028. Freund, R. J., et al. (2010) Statistical Methods, 3rd ed. London, UK: Academic Press, An Imprint of Elsevier. Fugro Consultants, Inc., and Arizona State University (2011) NCHRP Report 704: A Performance-Related Specifi- cation for Hot-Mixed Asphalt, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Gharaibeh, N., et al. (2010) Determining Optimum Sample Size for Percent-Within-Limits Specifications, Trans- portation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2151, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 77–83. References

100 Performance-Related Specifications for Pavement Preservation Treatments Gransberg, D. (2010) NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 411: Microsurfacing, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Gransberg, D., and D. James (2005) NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 342: Chip Seal Best Practices, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Haider, S., and M. Dwaikat (2012) Estimating Optimum Timings for Treatments on Flexible Pavements with Surface Rutting, Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 139, pp. 485–493, https://doi.org/10.1061/ (ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000525. Haider, S., and M. Dwaikat (2011) Estimating Optimum Timing for Preventive Maintenance Treatment to Miti- gate Pavement Roughness, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2235, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 43–53. Hall, J. W., et al. (2009) NCHRP Report 634: Texturing of Concrete Pavements, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Henry, J. (2000) NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 291: Evaluation of Pavement Friction Characteristics, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Henry, J., et al. (2000) Determination of the International Friction Index using the Circular Track Meter and the Dynamic Friction Tester, Proceedings of SURF 2000. Hiller, J. E., and N. Buch (2004) Assessment of Retrofit Dowel Benefits in Cracked Portland Cement Concrete Pavements, Journal of Constructed Facilities, https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0887-3828(2004)18:1(29). Hughes, C. (1996) NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 232: Variability in Highway Pavement Construction, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Hughes, C. S. (2005) NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 346: State Construction Quality Assurance Programs, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Im, J. H. (2013) “Performance Evaluation of Chip Seals for High Volume Roads Using Polymer-Modified Emul- sions and Optimized Construction Procedures, Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University. Kim, Y. R., and J. H. Im (2015) “Extending the use of chip seals to high volume roads by using polymer-modified emulsions and optimized construction procedures,” North Carolina Department of Transportation, Raleigh, NC. FHWA/NC/2011-03. Kim, Y. R., et al. (2017) NCHRP Report. 837: Performance-Related Specifications for Emulsified Asphaltic Binders Used in Preservation Surface Treatments, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Kogler, R., et al. (2008) Transportation System Preservation Research, Development, and Implementation Roadmap. FHWA. Lawson, W. D., et al. (2007) “Maintenance Solutions for Bleeding and Flushed Pavements Surfaced with a Seal Coat or Surface Treatment,” Texas Department of Transportation Research and Technology Implementation Office 0-5230-1. Lee, D., et al. (2002) Development of Roughness Thresholds for Preventive Maintenance Action Aimed at Reduc- ing Dynamic Loads, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1816, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 26–33. Lee, J. (2007) “Performance-Based Evaluation of Asphalt Surface Treatments Using the Third Scale Model Mobile Loading Simulator,” Ph.D. Dissertation, North Carolina State University. Lee, J. and Y. R. Kim (2009) Performance-Based Uniformity Coefficient of Chip Seal Aggregate, Transporta- tion Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2108, pp. 53–60, https://doi.org/ 10.3141/2108-06. Lee, J. and Y. R. Kim (2008) Quantifying the Benefits of Improved Rolling of Chip Seals, FHWA/NC/2006-63. McHattie, R. L. (2001) “Asphalt surface treatment guide,” Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facil- ities, FHWA-AK-RD-01-03. McLeod, N. W. (1971) “A General Method of Design for Seal Coats and Surface Treatments,” Association of Asphalt Pavement Technology, pp. 537–628. Merritt, D. K., et al. (2015) Best Practices for Achieving and Measuring Pavement Smoothness, A Synthesis of State-of-Practice, FHWA/LA.14/550. Montgomery, D. C. (2013) Introduction to Statistical Quality Control, 7th ed.: John Wiley & Sons. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2012). NCHRP Research Results Digest 371: Quality- Related Pay Adjustment Factors for Pavements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. https://doi. org/10.17226/22656. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2001). NCHRP Research Results Digest 254: Assessing Pavement Layer Condition Using Deflection Data. Transportation Research Board of The National Academies, Washington, DC. North Carolina Department of Transportation (2012) “NCDOT Standard Specifications for Roads and Structures.” Perera, R. W., et al. (1998) “Investigation of Development of Pavement Roughness,” FHWA, FHWA-RD-97-147.

References 101 Peshkin, D. G., et al. (2004) NCHRP Report 523: Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Peshkin, D., and T. Hoerner (2005) “Pavement Preservation: Practices, Research Plans, and Initiatives,” Contrac- tor’s Final Report for NCHRP Project 20-07, Task 184. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download? doi=10.1.1.129.5584&rep1&type=pdf. Peshkin, D., et al. (2011) Guidelines for the Preservation of High-Traffic-Volume Roadways, SHRP2-S2-R26-RR-2. Pierce, L. M., et al. (2003) Ten-Year Performance of Dowel-Bar Retrofit: Application, Performance, and Lessons Learned, Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1853, Transporta- tion Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 83–91, https://doi.org/10.3141/1853-10. Rada, G. R., et al. (2013) NCHRP Report 747: Guide for Conducting Forensic Investigations of Highway Pave- ments, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, https://doi.org/ 10.17226/22507. Rajaei, M., et al. (2014) Establishment of Relationship Between Pavement Surface Friction and Mixture Design Properties, Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2457, Trans- portation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, pp. 114–120, https://doi.org/ 10.3141/2457-12. Santero, N., et al. (2009) “Life Cycle Cost Analysis of Dowel Bar Retrofit,” presented at National Conference on Preservation, Repair, and Rehabilitation of Concrete, St. Louis, MO, pp. 183–205. Scott, S., et al. (2014a) Performance Specifications for Rapid Highway Renewal, S2-R07-RR-1, https://doi.org/ 10.17226/22560. Scott, S., et al. (2014b) “Framework for Performance Specifications, Guide for Specification Writers,” SHRP-2, Washington, DC, S2-R07-RR-3. Smith, G. (1998) NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 263: State DOT Management Techniques for Materials and Construction Acceptance, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Smith, K., and A. Romine (1999) “LTPP Pavement Maintenance Materials: SHRP Crack Treatment Experiment,” Final Report, ERES Consultants, Inc., Federal Highway Administration, Turner Fairbank Hwy Research Center, FHWA-RD-99-143. Smith, K. L., et al. (1999) “LTPP Pavement Maintenance Materials: SPS-4 Supplemental Joint Seal Experiment, Final Report,” FHWA, FHWA-RD-99-151. Tenison, J., and D. Hanson (2009) NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 388: Pre-Overlay Treatment of Existing Pavement, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Tighe, S., and D. Gransberg (2011) NCHRP Research Results Digest 365: Sustainable Pavement Maintenance Practices, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Transit New Zealand (2005) “Chipsealing in New Zealand,” Wellington, New Zealand, https://www.nzta.govt.nz/ assets/resources/chipsealing-new-zealand-manual/docs/00-forward-contents-and-preface.pdf. TRB Committee on Management of Quality Assurance (2002) Transportation Research E-Circular E-C037: Glossary of Highway Quality Assurance Terms, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. Weed, R. M. (1996) Quality Assurance Software for the Personal Computer FHWA Demonstration Project 89, Quality Management, FHWA-SA-96-026, New Jersey Department of Transportation. Willenbrock, J. H., and P. A. Kopac (1978) Development of a Highway Construction Acceptance Plan, Transporta- tion Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, pp. 16–22. Wu, Z., et al. (2010) “Performance Evaluation of Various Rehabilitation and Preservation Treatments, ” FHWA- HIF-10-020. Yildirim, Y., et al. (2010) “Service Life of Crack Sealants,” presented at First International Conference on Pave- ment Preservation.

Next: Abbreviations, Acronyms, Initialisms, and Symbols »
Performance-Related Specifications for Pavement Preservation Treatments Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research Report 857: Performance-Related Specifications for Pavement Preservation Treatments presents guidelines for use in preparing performance-related specifications (PRS) for pavement preservation treatments and, if desired, determining pay adjustment factors. Although PRS have been used for the construction of pavements, their use for pavement preservation treatments has been limited. These guidelines will help highway agencies develop and incorporate PRS in preservation treatment contracts, specify an optimum level of quality that represents a balance of costs and performance, and, if desired, establish quality-related pay adjustment factors.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!