National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 10 Conclusions & Recommendations
Page 235
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Bridge Superstructure Tolerance to Total and Differential Foundation Movements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25041.
×
Page 235
Page 236
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Bridge Superstructure Tolerance to Total and Differential Foundation Movements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25041.
×
Page 236
Page 237
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Bridge Superstructure Tolerance to Total and Differential Foundation Movements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25041.
×
Page 237

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

NCHRP Project 12-103 235 References 1. Aktan, A.E., Catbas, F.N., Kijewski-Correa, T. (2013). Structural Identification of Constructed Systems. American Society of Civil Engineers. Reston, Virginia 2. Barker, R. M., J. M. Duncan, K. B. Rojiani, P. S. K. Ooi, C. K. Tan, and S. G. Kim. (1991). Manuals for the Design of Bridge Foundations. NCHRP Report 343. Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC. 3. Berti, Michael A. (2015). Verification of RAMPS Software for Design of Steel Girders. Master’s Thesis, University of Delaware, 2015. 4. Briaud, J. L., James, R. W., & Hoffman, S. B. (1997). Settlement of Bridge Approaches:(the Bump at the End of the Bridge) (Vol. 234). Transportation Research Board. 5. Chakravarti I.M., Laha R.G., and Roy J. (1967). Handbook of Methods of Applied Statistics, Vol. I, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 392-394. 6. DiMillio, A. F. (1982). Performance of Highway Bridge Abutments Supported by Spread Footings on Compacted Fill, FHWA/RD-81/184 (NTIS PB83-201822). FHWA Staff Study. 7. FHWA. (2016). Post-Tensioned Box Girder Design Manual. USDOT Federal Highway Administration, https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/concrete/hif15016.pdf (Feb 2017) 8. Grover, R. A. (1978). Movement of Bridge Abutments and Settlements of Approach Pavements in Ohio. Transportation Research Record 678, Washington, D.C. 9. James, R. W., Zhang, H., Zollinger, D. G., Thompson, L. J., Bruner, R. F., & Xin, D. (1990). A study of bridge approach roughness, Texas Transportation Institute 10. Long, J., Olson, S., Stark, T., & Samara, E. (1998). Differential movement at embankment- bridge structure interface in Illinois. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, (1633), 53-60.

NCHRP Project 12-103 236 11. Masceri, David M. (2015). Examination of Bridge Performance through the Extension of Simulation Modeling and Structural Identification to Large Populations of Structures. PhD Diss., Drexel University, 2015. 12. Mathworks. (2016). https://www.mathworks.com/help/optim/ug/fmincon.html (Feb. 2017) 13. McKay, M.D.; Beckman, R.J.; Conover, W.J. (1979). A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics. American Statistical Association. 14. Moulton, L. K., H. V. S. GangaRao, and G. T. Halverson. (1985). Tolerable Movement Criteria for Highway Bridges, FHWA/RD-85/107. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC. 15. Puppala, A. J., Saride, S., Archeewa, E., Hoyos, L. R., & Nazarian, S. (2009). Recommendations for design, construction, and maintenance of bridge approach slabs: Synthesis report. Rep. No. FHWA/TX-09/6022, 1. USDOT Federal Highway Administration. 16. Samtani and Kulicki. (2016). Incorporation of Foundation Deformations in AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Process. Second Strategic Highway Research Program (SHRP2) 17. Stark, T. D., Olson, S. M., & Long, J. H. (1995). Differential movement at the embankment/structure interface-mitigation and rehabilitation. Final report, No. Project IAB- H1, FY 93. 18. Tan, C. K., & Duncan, J. M. (1991). Settlement of footings on sands—accuracy and reliability. In Geotechnical Engineering Congress—1991: (pp. 446-455). American Society of Civil Engineers. 19. VDOT. (2005). Pre-stressed Concrete Bulb-Ts General Information. Volume 5 – Part 2, Virginia Dept. of Transportation 20. Wahls, H. E. (1990). Design and construction of bridge approaches (Vol. 159). Transportation Research Board. 21. Wahls, H.E. (1983). Shallow Foundations for Highway Structures - NCHRP Report 107, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C.

NCHRP Project 12-103 237 22. Walkinshaw, J. L. (1978). Survey of Bridge Movements in the Western United States. Transportation Research Record 678: Tolerable Movements of Bridge Foundations, Sand Drains, K-Test, Slopes, and Culverts, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 6–12

Next: Appendices »
Bridge Superstructure Tolerance to Total and Differential Foundation Movements Get This Book
×
 Bridge Superstructure Tolerance to Total and Differential Foundation Movements
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Highway Cooperative Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 245: Bridge Superstructure Tolerance to Total and Differential Foundation Movements develops an understanding of the levels of support movements that bridges may tolerate before exceeding strength or service limit states. This research explores analytical procedures to objectively determine the acceptable levels of bridge foundation movements based upon superstructure tolerance considering American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) strength and service limit states (Phase II). The report also proposes revisions to the AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications that provide rational guidance for foundation movement limits that shall include vertical and rotational movements (Phase III and IV).

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!