National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 4 Plenary Conclusion
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Onshore Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development: Induced Seismicity and Innovations in Managing Risk–Day 2: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25083.
×

References

Chang, K.W. and P. Segall. 2016. Injection induced seismicity on basement faults including poroelastic stressing. Journal of Geophysical Research 121: doi:10.1002/2015JB012561.

Deng, K., Y. Liu, and R.M. Harrington. 2016. Poroelastic stress triggering of the December 2013 Crooked Lake, Alberta, induced seismicity sequence. Geophysical Research Letters 43:8482-8491.

Ellsworth, W.L. 2013. Injection-induced earthquakes. Science 341, DOI: 10.1126/science.1225942.

Elsworth, D., C.J. Spiers, and A.R. Niemeijer. 2016. Understanding induced seismicity. Science 354(6318):1380-1381. doi: 10.1126/science.aal2584.

Frahbod, A.M., H. Kao, D.M. Walker, and J.F. Cassidy. 2015. Investigation of regional seismicity before and after hydraulic fracturing in the Horn River Basin, northeast British Columbia. Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences 52(2):112-122. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjes-2014-0162.

Friberg, P.A., G.M. Besana-Ostman, and I. Dricker. 2014. Characterization of an earthquake sequence triggered by hydraulic fracturing in Harrison County, Ohio. Seismological Research Letters 85, DOI: 10.1785/0220140127.

Frohlich, C.F., C. Hayward, B. Stump, and E. Potter. 2011. The Dallas-Fort Worth earthquake sequence: October 2008 through May 2009. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 101(1):327-340.

Horton, S. 2012. Disposal of hydrofracking waste fluid by injection into subsurface aquifers triggers earthquake swarm in central Arkansas with potential for damaging earthquake. Seismological Research Letters 83: 250-260. DOI: 10.1785/gssrl.83.2.250.

Kim, W.-Y. 2013. Induced seismicity associated with fluid injection into a deep well in Youngstown, Ohio. Journal of Geophysical Research 118(7):3506-3518. DOI: 10.1002/jgrb.50247.

Langenbruch, C. and M.D. Zoback. 2016. How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates? Science Advances 2, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1601542.

McGarr, A. and A.J. Barbour. 2017. Wastewater disposal and the earthquake sequences during 2016 near Fairview, Pawnee, and Cushing, Oklahoma. Geophysical Research Letters 44: 9330-9336. https://doi/org/10.1002/2017GL075258.

McGarr, A., B. Bekins, N. Burkardt, J. Dewey, P. Earle, W. Ellsworth, S. Ge, S. Hickman, A. Holland, E. Majer, J. Rubinstein, and A. Sheehan. 2015. Coping with earthquakes induced by fluid injection. Science 347(6224):830-831.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2017. Flowback and produced waters: Opportunities and challenges for innovation: Proceedings of a workshop. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

NRC (National Research Council). 2010. Management and effects of coalbed methane produced water in the western United States. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

NRC. 2013. Induced seismicity potential in energy technologies. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Onshore Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development: Induced Seismicity and Innovations in Managing Risk–Day 2: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25083.
×

Petersen, M.D., C.S. Mueller, M.P. Moshchetti, S.M. Hoover, A.L. Llenos, W.L. Ellsworth, A.J. Michael, J.L. Rubinstein, A.F. McGarr, and K.S. Rukstales. 2016. Seismic-hazard forecast for 2016 including induced and natural earthquakes in the central and eastern United States. Seismological Research Letters 87(6):1327-1341. doi:10.1785/0220160072.

Skoumal, R.J., M.R. Brudzinksi, and B.S. Currie. 2015. Earthquakes induced by hydraulic fracturing in Poland Township, Ohio. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 105(1):189-197. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1785/0120140168.

Snee, J.-E.L., and M.D. Zoback. 2016. State of stress in Texas: Implications for induced seismicity. Geophysical Research Letters 43(19):10,208-10,214. DOI: 10.1002/2016GL070974.

Walsh, F.R., III and M.D. Zoback. 2015. Oklahoma’s recent earthquakes and saltwater disposal. Science Advances 1, DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500195.

Walsh, F.R., III and M.D. Zoback. 2016. Probabilistic assessment of potential fault slip related to injection-induced earthquakes: Application to north-central Oklahoma, USA. Geology 44(12):991-994. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1130/G38275.1.

Weingarten, M., S. Ge, J.W. Godt, B.A. Bekins, and J.L. Rubinstein. 2015. High-rate injection is associated with the increase in U.S. mid-continent seismicity. Science 348(6241): 1336-1340. DOI: 10.1126/science.aab1345.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Onshore Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development: Induced Seismicity and Innovations in Managing Risk–Day 2: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25083.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Onshore Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development: Induced Seismicity and Innovations in Managing Risk–Day 2: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25083.
×
Page 34
Next: Appendix A: Workshop Agenda »
Onshore Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development: Induced Seismicity and Innovations in Managing Risk–Day 2: Proceedings of a Workshop Get This Book
×
 Onshore Unconventional Hydrocarbon Development: Induced Seismicity and Innovations in Managing Risk–Day 2: Proceedings of a Workshop
Buy Ebook | $14.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Oil and gas well completion and stimulation technologies to develop unconventional hydrocarbon resources in the United States have evolved over the past several decades, particularly in relation to the development of shale oil and shale gas. Shale oil and shale gas resources and the technology associated with their production are often termed "unconventional" because the oil and gas trapped inside the shale or other low-permeability rock formation cannot be extracted using conventional technologies. Since about 2005, the application of these technologies to fields in the U.S. have helped produce natural gas and oil in volumes that allowed the country to reduce its crude oil imports by more than 50% and to become a net natural gas exporter. The regional and national economic and energy advances gained through production and use of these resources have been accompanied, however, by rapid expansion of the infrastructure associated with the development of these fields and public concern over the impacts to surface- and groundwater, air, land, and communities where the resources are extracted.

A workshop on December 1 and 2, 2016 at the National Academy of Sciences in Washington, DC, explored the management of risk related to the development of onshore unconventional oil and gas resources such as shale oil and shale gas. The second part of the workshop, on December 2, addressed issues associated with induced seismicity and managing the risk of induced seismic events associated with development of oil and gas fields. This publication summarizes the presentations and discussions from this second day of the workshop.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!