National Academies Press: OpenBook

Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1 (2018)

Chapter: Appendix C: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings

« Previous: Appendix B: Statement of Task
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25093.
×

Appendix C

Presentations at the Committee’s Information-Gathering Meetings

Public Meeting #1: Washington, DC, December 12-13, 2017

Invited Presentations

  • Congressional Perspectives on the Tasking, Jonathan Epstein, professional staff member, Senate Committee on Armed Services
  • Overview of the U.S. Department of Energy’s Environmental Management (DOE-EM) Program and Perspective on the Committee’s Tasking, Betsy Connell, Director, EM Regulatory, Intergovernmental, and Stakeholder Affairs
  • DOE’s Office of River Protection (DOE-ORP): Program Scope and Status, Delmar Noyes, Assistant Manager Waste Immobilization and Treatment Plant Start-Up, Commissioning, and Integration, DOE-ORP
  • Presentations by members of the Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) Team, led by the Savannah River National Laboratory (SRNL), Bill Bates, project leader, SRNL, with Michael Stone, SRNL, and Thomas Brouns, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • Perspective Regarding Congressional Interests About Cleanup at the Hanford Site, David Bearden, Congressional Research Service
  • Perspective from the U.S. Government Accountability Office’s Reports on Treatment Options for Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Site, David Trimble and Nathan Anderson, U.S. Government Accountability Office
  • Independent Assessment of Challenges Concerning Cleanup at the Hanford Site, Robert Alvarez, Senior Scholar, Institute of Policy Studies

Public Comments

  • John Greeves, independent consultant
  • Suzanne Dahl, Washington State Department of Ecology
  • Geoff Fettus, Natural Resources Defense Council
  • Ian Pegg, Vitreous State Laboratory, The Catholic University of America

Public Meeting #2: Richland, Washington, February 28-March 1, 2018

Invited Presentations

  • Introductory Remarks on DOE-ORP, Jon Peschong, DOE-ORP

Presentations by Washington River Protection System’s contractors

  • Introduction, Jason Vitali
  • Hanford Low Activity Waste Historical Overview, Dave Swanberg
  • System Plan 8 Baseline Case Supplemental Low-Activity Waste (SLAW) Sizing, Jeremy Belsher
  • History of SLAW Treatment Reviews, Dave Swanberg
  • History of SLAW Cost Comparison, Dave Swanberg
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25093.
×
  • Advanced Glass Program, John Vienna
  • Immobilized Low-Activity Waste (ILAW) Glass Testing Program Status, Elvie Brown
  • Overview of the 2017 Integrated Disposal Facility (IDF) Performance Assessment for LAW, Pat Lee
  • Radioactive Waste Test Bed Initiative, Stephanie Doll
  • Cementitious Waste Form Formulation and Testing Status, Dave Swanberg

FFRDC Team’s presentations

  • Introduction to Study and Lines of Inquiry Table and Schedule Overview, Bill Bates (SRNL)
  • Process Flowsheet Overview and Feed Vector Overview, Michael Stone (SRNL)
  • Baseline and Vit Flowsheets and Preliminary Technical Readiness Levels (TRLs), Alex Cozzi (SRNL)
  • Grout Flowsheets and Waste Forms and Preliminary TRLs, George Guthrie (Los Alamos National Laboratory)
  • Steam Reforming and Waste Forms and Preliminary TRLs, Nicholas Soelberg (Idaho National Laboratory)
  • Technologies Considered and Not Included, Thomas Brouns (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory)
  • Disposal Facilities Overview, Waste Acceptance Criteria, and Transportation, John Cochran (Sandia National Laboratories)
  • Analytic Approach to Risk, Thomas Brouns
  • Cost Estimating Methodology, Frank Sinclair (SRNL)
  • Wrap Up, Bill Bates

Stakeholders’ Presentations

  • Alex Smith, Washington State Department of Ecology
  • Dave Bartus, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Regional Office
  • Ken Niles, State of Oregon Department of Energy
  • Susan Leckband, Chair, Hanford Advisory Board
  • David Reeploeg, Vice President, Tri-Cities Development Economic Council (TRIDEC)
  • Pam Larsen, President, Hanford Communities
  • Matthew Johnson, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR)

Public Comments

  • Paul Flaherty, CHC Consulting LLC, who made an oral presentation and submitted a written comment on behalf of Knauf Insulation
  • Vince Panesko, retired from the Hanford Site
  • Don Alexander, retired from DOE

Submitted Written Comments at the Public Meeting

  • John Vienna, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
  • John Williford, Chrysalis Technology Group, Ltd.
  • Tom Carpenter, Hanford Challenge

Darryl Siemer, a consulting scientist who is retired from the Idaho National Laboratory, submitted a number of comments via e-mail to the National Academies.

Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25093.
×
Page 33
Suggested Citation:"Appendix C: Presentations at the Committee's Information-Gathering Meetings." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25093.
×
Page 34
Next: Appendix D: Biographical Sketches of the Committee »
Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1 Get This Book
×
 Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1
Buy Ebook | $14.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 1943, as part of the Manhattan Project, the Hanford Nuclear Reservation was established with the mission to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons. During 45 years of operations, the Hanford Site produced about 67 metric tonnes of plutonium—approximately two-thirds of the nation's stockpile. Production processes generated radioactive and other hazardous wastes and resulted in airborne, surface, subsurface, and groundwater contamination. Presently, 177 underground tanks contain collectively about 210 million liters (about 56 million gallons) of waste. The chemically complex and diverse waste is difficult to manage and dispose of safely.

Section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 calls for a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) to conduct an analysis of approaches for treating the portion of low-activity waste (LAW) at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation intended for supplemental treatment. The first of four, this report reviews the analysis carried out by the FFRDC. It evaluates the technical quality and completeness of the methods used to conduct the risk, cost benefit, schedule, and regulatory compliance assessments and their implementations; waste conditioning and supplemental treatment approaches considered in the assessments; and other key information and data used in the assessments.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!