National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 6 Recommendations
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

References

AGI (American Geosciences Institute). 2018. Critical Minerals. Available at https://www.americangeosciences.org/critical-issues/critical-minerals.

Aleidan, A., Kwak, H., Muller, H., and Zhou, X. 2016. Residual Oil Zone: Paleo Oil Characterization and Fundamental Analysis. Presented at SPE Improved Oil Recovery Conference, Tulsa, Oklahoma, April 11, 2016. doi:10.2118/179545-PA.

Alley, W. M., and Alley, R. Too hot to touch: the problem of high-level nuclear waste. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2013.

Allred, B. W., Smith, K. D., Twidwell, D., Haggerty, J. H., Running, S. W., Naugle, D. E., and Fuhlendorf, S.D. 2015. Ecosystem services lost to oil and gas in North America. Science 348(6233):401. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa4785.

Arango, S. O. 2013. Canada drops out of race to tap methane hydrates. CBC News. Available at: http://www.cbc.ca/news/technology/canada-drops-out-of-race-to-tapmethane-hydrates-1.1358966.

Augustine, C. 2016. Updates to enhanced geothermal system resource potential estimate NREL/CP-6A20-68520. Proceedings of the Geothermal Resources Council Annual Meeting (GRC 2016), October 23–26, 2016, Sacramento, California, pp. 673–677. External Note: See NREL/CP-6A20-66428.

Ayling, B. F., Blankenship, D. A., Sullivan, P., Kennedy, M., Majer, E., Villavert, M., Sonnenthal, E., Tang, J., Dobson, P., Hinz, N., Faulds, J., Hammond, W., Mlawsky, E., Blake, K., Riedman, A., Sabin, A., Lazaro, M., Akerley, J., Nordquist, J. Sophy, M., Siler, D. L., Kaven, J. O., Phelps, G., Hickman, S., Glen, J., Williams, C., Robertson-Tait, A., Hackett, L., Pettitt, W., Riahi, A., Blanksman D., Damjanac, B., Hazzard, J., Eneva, M., Witter, J., Queen, J., Fortuna, M. 2018. Phase 2 update for the Fallon FORGE site, Nevada, USA. Proceedings of the 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, February 12–14th 2018. SGP-TR-213. Available at: https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2018/Ayling.pdf.

Bean, R. 2017. How Companies Say They’re Using Big Data. Harvard Business Review, April 28, 2017. Available at https://hbr.org/2017/04/how-companies-say-theyre-using-big-data.

Beisner, K. R., Paretti, N., Tillman, F., David L. Naftz, D. L., Bills, D., Walton-Day, K., and Gallegos, T. J. 2017. Geochemistry and hydrology of perched groundwater springs: assessing elevated uranium concentrations at Pigeon Spring relative to nearby Pigeon Mine, Arizona (USA), Hydrology Journal 25(2). doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-016-1494-8.

Belmont, E. L., Davidson, F. T., Glazer, Y. R., Beagle, E. A, and Webber, M. E. 2017. Accounting for water formation from hydrocarbon fuel combustion in life cycle analyses. Environmental Research Letters 12(9). doi: https://doi.org/10.1088/17489326/aa8390.

Bergfeld, D., Lewicki, J. L., Evans, W. C., Hunt, A. G., Revesz, K., and Huebner, M. 2014. Geochemical investigation of the hydrothermal system on Akutan Island, Alaska, July

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

2012: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2013–5231, 20 p. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20135231.

Blankenship, D., Akerley, J., Blake, K., Calvin, W., Faulds, J. E., Glen, J., Hickman, S., Hinz, N., Kaven, O., Lazaro, L., Meade, D., Kennedy, M., Phelps, G., Sabin, A., Schoenball, M., Silar, D., Robertson-Tait, A., and William, C.. 2016. Frontier Observatory for Research in Geothermal Energy: Phase 1 Topical Report Fallon, NV SAND2016-8929. U.S. Department of Energy. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2016/09/f33/Fallon%20Topical%20Report_20168929_Sept2016_1.pdf

Blondes, M. S., Gans, K. D., Rowan, E. L., Thorsden, J. J., Reidy, M. E., Engle, M. A., Kharaka, Y. F., and Thomas, B. F. 2016. U.S. Geological Survey National Produced Waters Geochemical Database v2.2 (provisional).

Biewick, L. R. H., and Jones, N. R. 2012. Energy map of southwestern Wyoming, Part A—Coal and wind. U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 683, 18 p. pamphlet, 5 pls. Available at https://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/683/.

Biewick, L. R. H., Jones, N. R., and Wilson, A. B. 2013. Energy map of southwestern Wyoming—Energy data archived, organized, integrated, and accessible. U.S. Geological Survey General Information Product 145, 21 slides.

Biewick, L. R. H., and Wilson, A. B. 2014. Energy map of southwestern Wyoming, Part B—Oil and gas, oil shale, uranium, and solar. U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 843, 20 p., 4 pls. doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds843. ISSN 2327-638X (online).

Boswell, R. 2007. Resource potential of methane hydrate coming into focus. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 56: 9–13.

Boswell, R., Collett, T., Anderson, B., and Hunter, R., eds. 2011. Scientific results of the BPXA- USDOE-USGS Mount Elbert gas hydrate stratigraphic test well, Alaska North Slope. Journal of Marine and Petroleum Geology 28(2).

BP. 2017. Energy Outlook 2017 Edition. British Petroleum.

Bragg, L. J., Oman, J. K., Tewalt, S. J., Oman, C. L., Rega, N. H., Washington, P. M., and Finkelman, R. B. 1998. U.S. Geological Survey coal quality database (COALQUAL), version 2.0. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 97–134 (CD-ROM).

Burns, E. R., Ingebritsen, S. E., Manga, M., and Williams, C. F. 2016. Evaluating geothermal and hydrogeologic controls on regional groundwater temperature distribution. Water Resources Research 52: 1-17.

Burwell, S. M., VanRoekel, S., Park, T., Mancini, D. J. 2013. Open Data Policy—Managing Information as an Asset. Executive Office of the President. Available at: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/omb/memoranda/2013/m-13-13.pdf.

Cama, T. 2017. House Panel Votes to Advance Yucca Mountain Nuclear Waste Project. The Hill. Available at: http://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/339837-house-panel-votes-to-advance-yucca-mountain-nuclear-waste-project.

CCST (California Council on Science and Technology). 2018. “Long-Term Viability of Underground Natural Gas Storage in California: An Independent Review of Scientific and Technical Information,” Available at: https://ccst.us/publications/2018/2018NGS.php.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Cecil, C. B., and Edgar, N. T., eds. 2003. Climate Controls on Stratigraphy: Society of Economic Paleontologists and Mineralogists Special Publication 77, 275 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.2110/pec.03.77.

CH2MHill. 2015. U.S. Onshore Unconventional Exploration and Production Water Management Case Studies Prepared for the Energy Water Initiative”. Available at: https://www.anadarko.com/content/documents/apc/Responsibility/EWI_Case_Studies_Report.pdf.

Charpentier, R. R., and Cook, T. A. 2010. Improved USGS methodology for assessing continuous petroleum resources, version 2.0. U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 547, 22 p. and program. Revised November 2012.

Chong, Z. R., Yang, S. H., Babu, P., Linga, P., and Li, X. S. 2016. Review of natural gas hydrates as an energy resource: prospects and challenges. Applied Energy 62:1633–1652.

Clark, C. E., Harto, C. B., and Sullivan, J. L. 2011. Water Use in the Development and Operation of Geothermal Power Plants. Argonne National Laboratory ANL/EVS/R-10/5, 74 p.

Collett, T. 2004. Gas Hydrates as a Future Energy Resource. Geotimes. Available at: http://www.geotimes.org/nov04/feature_futurehydrates.html.

Collett, T., Johnson, A., Knapp, C., and Boswell, R. 2009. Natural Gas Hydrates—Energy Resource Potential and Associated Geologic Hazards. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 89, 781 p.

Collett, T., and Boswell, R., eds. 2012. Resource and hazard implications of gas hydrates in the Northern Gulf of Mexico: Results of the 2009 Joint Industry Project Leg II Drilling Expedition. Journal of Marine and Petroleum Geology 34(1).

Cozzarelli, I. M., Skalak, K. J., Kent, D. B., Engle, M. A., Benthem, A., Mumford, A. C., Haase, K., Farag, A., Harper, D., Nagel, S. C., Iwanowicz, L. R., Orem, W. H., Akob, D. M., Jaeschke, J. B., Galloway, J., Kohler, M., Stoliker, D. L., and Jolly, G. D. 2017. Environmental signatures and effects of an oil and gas wastewater spill in the Williston Basin, North Dakota. Science of the Total Environment 579:1781–1793. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.11.157.

Craddock, W. H. and Kylander-Clark, A. R. 2013. U-Pb ages of detrital zircons from the Tertiary Mississippi River Delta in central Louisiana: Insights into sediment provenance. Geosphere 9(6): pp.1832–1851.

Dallimore, S., and Collett, T., eds. 2005. Scientific Results from the Mallik 2002 Gas Hydrate Production Research Well Program, MacKenzie Delta, Northwest Territories, Canada. Geoscience Canada Bulletin 585.

Diffendorfer, J. E., Beston, J. A., Merrill, M. D., Stanton, J. C., Corum, M. D., Loss, S. R., Thogmartin, W. E., Johnson, D. H., Erickson, R. A., and Heist, K. W. 2015. Preliminary methodology to assess the national and regional impact of U.S. wind energy development on birds and bats. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5066, 40 p. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/sir20155066.

DOE (Department of Energy). 2006. An Interagency Roadmap for Methane Hydrate Research and Development, U.S. Department of Energy. Available at: https://netl.doe.gov/research/oil-and-gas/methane-hydrates/interagency.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

DOE. 2012. Vast Energy Resources in Residual Oil Zones, FW Study Says. Available at: https://energy.gov/fe/articles/vast-energy-resource-residual-oil-zones-fe-study-says.

DOE. 2015. Quadrennial Technology Review: An assessment of energy technologies and research opportunities. Ch.1: Energy Challenges. September 2015. Available at: https://energy.gov/under-secretary-science-and-energy/quadrennial-technology-review-2015-omnibus.

DOE. 2016. 2016 Renewable Energy Data Book. Available at: https://energy.gov/eere/analysis/downloads/2016-renewable-energy-data-book.

DOE. 2017. Advanced Reader Technologies. Available at: https://www.energy.gov/ne/nuclear-reactor-technologies/advanced-reactor-technologies.

DOE. 2018. Methane Hydrates and Climate Change. Available at: https://energy.gov/fe/methane-hydrates-and-climate-change.

Dyer, J. H., Gregersen, H. B., and Christensen, C. M. 2009. “The Innovator’s DNA.” Harvard business review 87(12): 60–67.

East, J. A. 2013. Coal Fields of the Conterminous United States-National Coal Resource Assessment updated version. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2012-1205, scale 1:5,000,000.

EIA (Energy Information Administration). 2013. US economy and electricity demand growth are linked, but relationship is changing. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=10491#.

EIA. 2016. Electric Power Annual 2016. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/electricity/annual/pdf/epa.pdf.

EIA. 2017a. International Energy Outlook 2017, U.S. Energy Information Administration, September 14, 2017. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/archive/ieo17/pdf/0484(2017).pdf/.

EIA. 2017b. Annual Energy Outlook 2017 with Projections to 2050, U.S. Energy Information Administration. January 5, 2017. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/0383(2017).pdf.

EIA. 2017c. Annual Coal Report 2016. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/coal/annual/pdf/acr.pdf/.

EIA. 2017d. 2016 Uranium Annual Marketing Report, June 2017. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/uranium/marketing/pdf/2016umar.pdf.

EIA. 2018. Annual Energy Outlook 2018 with projections to 2050. Available at: https://www.eia.gov/outlooks/aeo/pdf/AEO2018.pdf.

Engle, M. A. and Rowan, E. L. 2014. Geochemical evolution of produced waters from hydraulic fracturing of the Marcellus Shale, northern Appalachian Basin: A multivariate compositional data analysis approach. International Journal of Coal Geology 126(1): 45–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coal.2013.11.010.

Engle, M. A., Reyes, F. R., Varonka, M. S., Orem, W. H., Ma, L., Ianno, A. J., Schell, T. M., Xu, P., and Carroll, K. C. 2016. Geochemistry of formation waters from the Wolfcamp and “Cline” shales: Insights into brine origin, reservoir connectivity, and fluid flow in the Permian Basin, USA. Chemical Geology 425(1): 76–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemgeo.2016.01.025.

Enomoto, C. B., Coleman, J. L., Jr., Swezey, C. S., Niemeyer, P. W., and Dulong, F. T. 2015. Geochemical and mineralogical sampling of the Devonian shales in the Broadtop

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

synclinorium, Appalachian basin, in Virginia, West Virginia, Maryland, and Pennsylvania. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015‒1061, 32 p., 5 pls., 1 appendix. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151061.

Esmaeilirad, N., Terry, C., Kennedy, H., Prior, A., and Carlson, K. 2016. Recycling Fracturing Flowback Water for Use in Hydraulic Fracturing: Influence of Organic Matter on Stability of Carboxyl-Methyl-Cellulose-Based Fracturing Fluids. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi: 1 0.2118/179723-PA.

The Energy Policy and Conservation Act (EPCA) of 2000. Pub.L.106-469 §604 amend. 2005.

Epstein, H., Wald, J., and Smillie, J. 2007. Undermined promise: reclamation and enforcement of the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act. New York: Natural Resources Defense Council, Western Organization of Resource Councils, 29 p.

ExxonMobil. 2014. Unconventional Resources Development: Managing the Risks. Available at: http://cdn.exxonmobil.com/~/media/global/files/energy-and-environment/unconventional_resources_development_risk_management_report.pdf.

ExxonMobile. 2017. 2017 Outlook for Energy: a View to 2040. Available at: https://corporate.exxonmobil.com/~/media/global/files/outlook-for-energy/2017/2017-outlook-for-energy.pdf.

Farrar, C., DeAngelo, J., Clor, L., Murphy, F., Williams, C., Grubb, F., and Hurwitz, S. 2010. Temperature data from wells in Long Valley Caldera, California, U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 523.

Faulds, J. E., Coolbaugh, M. F., Hinz, N. H., Sadowski, A., Shevenell, L. A., McConville, E., Craig, J., and Siler, D. L. 2017. Progress Report on the Nevada Play Fairway Project: Integrated Geological, Geochemical, and Geophysical Analyses of Possible New Geothermal Systems in the Great Basin Region. Proceedings, 42nd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 13–15, 2017 SGP-TR-212. Available at: https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/db/IGAstandard/record_detail.php?id=27895.

Ferrero, R. C., Kolak, J. J., Bills, D. J., Bowen, Z. H., Cordier, D. J., Gallegos, T. J., Hein, J. R., Kelley, K. D., Nelson, P. H., Nuccio, V. F., Schmidt, J. M., and Seal, R. R. 2013. U.S. Geological Survey Energy and Minerals Science Strategy—A Resource Lifecycle Approach Circular 1383-D.

Flores, R. M., ed. 2008. Microbes, methanogenesis, and microbial gas in coal. International Journal of Coal Geology 76(1–2): 1–186.

Forson, C., Steely, A., Cladouhos, T., Swyer, M., Davatzes, N., Anderson, M., Ritzinger, B., Glen, J., Peacock, J., Schermerhorn, W., Burns, E., and Stelling, P. 2017. Gerthermal Play-Fairway Analysis of Washington State Prospect: Phase 2 Technical Report. Natural Resources. Available at: https://gdr.openei.org/files/994/washington_playfairway_phase2_technical_report%20%281%29.pdf.

Freyman, M. 2014. Hydraulic Fracturing & Water Stress: Water Demand by the Numbers: Shareholder, Lender & Operator Guide to Water Sourcing. CERES Report. Available at: www.ceres.org.

Fu, Q., Horvath, S., Potter, E., Roberts, F., Tinker, S., Ikonnikova, S., Fisher, W., and Yan, J. 2015. Log-derived thickness and porosity of the Barnett Shale, Forth Worth basin, Texas: implications for assessment of gas shale resources. AAPG Bulletin 99:119–141.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Gallegos, T. J., Varela, B. A., Haines, S. S., and Engle, M. A. 2015. Hydraulic fracturing water use variability in the United States and potential environmental implications. Water Resources Research 51: 5839–5845. doi:10.1002/2015WR017278.

Gaswirth, S. B. 2017. Assessment of continuous oil resources in the Wolfcamp shale of the Midland Basin, Permian Basin Province, Texas, 2016. U.S. Geological Survey Open File-Report 2017–1013, 14 p.

Gaswirth, S. B. 2017. USGS National and Global Petroleum Assessment. Presented at the 2nd Meeting of the Committee on Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey’s Energy Resources Program, Lakewood, CO, October 16, 2017.

GEA (Geothermal Energy Association). 2016. 2016 Annual U.S. & Global Geothermal Power Production Report. Available at: http://geo-energy.org/reports/2016/2016%20Annual%20US%20Global%20Geothermal%20Power%20Production.pdf.

Greenfield and Graedel. 2013. The omnivorous diet of modern technology. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 74: 1–7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2013.02.010.

GWPC and IOGCC. 2017. Potential Injection-Induced Seismicity Associated with Oil and Gas Development. Available at: http://www.gwpc.org/sites/default/files/finalprimerweb.pdf.

Guidroz, W. 2017. Energy Resources Program: Program Overview for National Academies. Presented at the 1st Meeting of the Committee on Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey’s Energy Resources Program, Washington, DC, September 5, 2017.

Haghshenas, A., and Nasr-El-Din, H. A. 2014. Effect of Dissolved Solids on Reuse of Produced Water in Hydraulic Fracturing Jobs. Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/169408-MS.

Haines, S. S., Varela, B., Hawkins, S., Gianoutsos, N., and Tennyson, M. 2017a. USGS Assessment of Water and Proppant Requirements and Water Production Associated with Undiscovered Petroleum in the Bakken and Three Forks Formations. Unconventional Resources Technology Conference (URTEC).

Haines, S. S., Varela, B. A., Hawkins, S. J., Gianoutsos, N. J., Thamke, J. N., Engle, M. A., Tennyson, M. E., Schenk, C. J., Gaswirth, S. B., Marra, K. R., Kinney, S. A., Mercier, T. J., and Martinez, C. D. 2017b. Assessment of water and proppant quantities associated with petroleum production from the Bakken and Three Forks Formations, Williston Basin Province, Montana and North Dakota, 2016: U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2017–3044, 4 p.

Haines, S. S., Hart, P. E., Collett, T. S., Shedd, W. W., Frye, M., Weimer, P., Boswell, R. 2017c. High- resolution seismic characterization of the gas and gas hydrate system at Green Canyon 955. Gulf of Mexico, USA. Marine and Petroleum Geology 82(4): 220–237.

Hall, S. M. USGS. Personal communication. December 7, 2017.

Hall, S. M. 2018, MS Excel File describing groundwater quality for historic in situ recovery (ISR) uranium mines in Texas. https://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/uranium/tabular/TX_ISR_Final.xlsx.

Hall, S. M., Mihalasky, M. J., and Van Gosen, B. S. 2017. Assessment of undiscovered resources in calcrete uranium deposits, Southern High Plains region of Texas, New

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Mexico, and Oklahoma, 2017, Fact Sheet 2017-3078, https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20173078.

Hammes, U., Eastwood, R., McDaid, G., Vankov, E., Gherabati, S. A., Smye, K., Shultz, J., Potter, E., Ikonnikova, S., and Tinker, S. 2016. Regional assessment of the Eagle Ford Group of South Texas, USA: Insights from lithology, pore volume, water saturation, organic richness, and productivity correlations. Interpretation 4(1):SC125–SC150. doi: 10.1190/int-2015-0099.1.

Han, L., Hole, J. A., Stock, J. M., Fuis, G. S., Williams, C. F., Delph, J. R., Davenport, K. K., and Livers, A. J. 2016. Seismic imaging of the metamorphism of young sediment into new crystalline crust in the actively rifting Imperial Valley, California. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 17:4566–4584.

Harto, C., Schroeder, J., Martino, L., Horner, R., and Clark, C. 2013. Geothermal Energy: the Energy-Water Nexus. Proceedings, 38th Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering Stanford University, Stanford, California, February 11-13, 2013 SGP-TR-198. Available at: https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2013/Harto.pdf.

Harto, C. B., Schroeder, J. N., Horner, R. M., Patton, T. L., Durham, L. A., Murphy, D. J., and Clark, C. E. 2014. Water Use in Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS): Geology of U.S. Stimulation project, Water Costs, and Alternative Water Source Policies. Argonne National Laboratory. ANL/EVA- 14/14, 74 p.

Higley, D. K., compiler. 2014. Petroleum systems and assessment of undiscovered oil and gas in the Anadarko Basin Province, Colorado, Kansas, Oklahoma, and Texas—USGS Province 58. U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS–69–EE, 327 p., 8 pls. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds69EE.

Hilaire, J., Bauer, N., and Brecha, R. 2015. Boom or bust? Mapping out the known unknowns of global shale gas production potential. Energy Economics 49:581–587.

Hincks, T., Aspinall, W., Cooke, R., Gernon, T. 2018. Oklahoma’s induced seismicity strongly linked to wastewater injection depth. Science. doi: 10.1126/science.aap7911.

Hogarth, R., Holl, H., and McMahon, A. 2013. Production, Injection and Closed-Loop Testing at Habanero EGS Project, Proceedings, 35th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, Rotorua. Available at: http://www.geothermal-energy.org/pdf/IGAstandard/NZGW/2013/Hogarth_Final.pdf.

IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency). 2017. Power Reactor Information System. Available at. https://pris.iaea.org/pris/.

IAEA. 2018. Status and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management. Available at: https://www-pub.iaea.org/MTCD/Publications/PDF/P1799_web.pdf.

IEA (International Energy Agency). 2016. World Energy Outlook, November 16, 2016. Available at: https://www.iea.org/newsroom/news/2016/november/world-energyoutlook-2016.html.

IEA. 2017. World Energy Outlook 2017. Available at: https://www.iea.org/weo2017/.

Ikonnikova, S., and Gülen, G. 2015. Impact of low prices on shale gas production strategies. Energy Journal 36.

Ikonnikova, S., Browning, J., Gülen, G., Smye, K., and Tinker, S. 2015. Factors influencing shale gas production forecasting: Empirical studies of Barnett, Fayetteville, Haynesville, and Marcellus Shale plays. The Quarterly Journal of the

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

IAEE’s Energy Economics Education Foundation 4(1):19–35. doi: 10.5547/2160-5890.4.1.siko.

Ikonnikova, S., Vankov, E., Gülen, G., and Browning, J. 2016. Understanding Shale Resource Production: What are the Key Variables? SPE/IAEE Hydrocarbon Economics and Evaluation Proceedings, SPE-179984.

Ikonnikova, S. A., Male, F., Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., and McDaid, G. 2017. Projecting the Water Footprint Associated with Shale Resource Production: Eagle Ford Shale Case Study. Environmental Science & Technology 51(24):14453–14461.

Jamali, A., Ettehadtavakkol, A., Watson, M., and Zeinuddin, O. 2017. Depressurizing Permian Basin San Andres Residual Oil Zones: A Feasibility Study. SPE Liquids-Rich Basins Conference-North America. Society of Petroleum Engineers.

Johnson, J. W., Nitao, J. J., and Morris, J. P. 2005. Reactive transport modeling of caprock integrity during natural and engineered CO2 storage. Carbon dioxide capture for storage in deep geologic formations, vol 2. London: Elsevier.

Kabuth, A., Dahmke, A., Beyer, C., Bilke, L., Dethlefsen, F., Dietrich, P., Duttmann, R., Ebert, M., Feeser, V., Görke, U-J., Köber, R., Rabbel, W., Schanz, T., Schäfer, D., Würdemann, H., and Bauer, S. 2017. Energy storage in the geological subsurface: dimensioning, risk analysis and spatial planning: the ANGUS+ project. Environmental Earth Sciences 76:23. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-0166319-5.

Kaufman, G. M. 2018. Properties of Sums of Geological Random Variables. Handbook of Mathematical Geosciences, pp. 105-115. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Keranen, K. M., Weingarten, M., Abers, G. A., Bekins, B. A., and Ge, S. 2014. Sharp increase in central Oklahoma seismicity since 2008 induced by massive wastewater injection. Science 345(6195): 448–451.

Klein, G. 2017. USGS reports new American uranium potential and a new uranium “species.” Resource Clips. Available at: http://resourceclips.com/2017/11/18/dualdiscovery.

Kline, D., Heimiller, D., and Cowlin, S. 2008. A GIS Method for Developing Wind Supply Curves. Available at: https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy08osti/43053.pdf.

Koelbel, T., and Genter, A. 2017. “Enhanced Geothermal Systems: The Soultz-sous-Forêts Project.” Towards 100% Renewable Energy. Springer Proceedings in Energy. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.

Kolker, A. 2016. Mercury in U.S. coal—Priorities for new U.S. Geological Survey studies. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2016–1033, 21 p.

Kondash, A., and Vengosh, A. 2015. Water Footprint of Hydraulic Fracturing. Environmental Science & Technology Letters 2(10):276–280. doi: 10.1021/acs.estlett. 5b00211.

Langenbruch, C., and Zoback, M. D. 2016. How will induced seismicity in Oklahoma respond to decreased saltwater injection rates? Science Advances 2(11).

Laurenzi, I. J., and Jersey G. R. 2013. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption of Marcellus Shale gas. Environmental Science & Technology 47(9):4896–4903.

Law, B. E. 2002. Basin-centered gas systems. AAPG bulletin 86(11):1891–1919.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Lee, J. 2017. Shale is Confounding Everybody, but Never Mind. Bloomberg Gadfly . Available at https://www.bloomberg.com/gadfly/articles/2017-11-26/opec-has-no-idea-what-s-going-on-with-shale-but-never-mind.

Lewan, M. D., Warden, A., Dias, R. F., Lowry, Z. K., Hannah, T. L., Lillis, P. G., Kokaly, R. F., Hoefen, T. M., Swayze, G. A., Mills, C. T., and Harris, S. H. 2014. Asphaltene content and composition as a measure of Deepwater Horizon oil spill losses within the first 80 days. Organic Geochemistry 75:54–60.

Liden, T., Clark, B. G., Hildenbrand, Z. L., and Schug, K. A. 2017. Unconventional Oil and Gas Production: Waste Management and the Water Cycle. Pp. 17-45 in Advances in Chemical Pollution, Environmental Management and Protection, Volume 1. London: Elsevier.

Litynski, J., Plasynski, S., Spangler, L., Finley, R., Steadman, E., Ball, D., Nemeth, K., McPherson, B., and Myer, L. 2009. U.S. Department of Energy’s Regional Carbon Sequestration Partnership Program: Overview. Energy Procedia 1:3959–3967. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Brian_Mcpherson2/publication/222512695_US_Department_of_Energy’s_Regional_Carbon_Sequestration_Partnership_Program_Overview/links/57430c6608ae9ace8418c077.pdf.

LLNL (Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory). 2016. Estimated U.S. Energy Consumption in 2016: 9/3 Quads. Available at: https://flowcharts.llnl.gov/content/assets/images/energy/us/Energy_US_2016.png.

Lopez, A., Roberts, B., Heimiller, D., Blair, N., and Porro, G. 2012. U.S. Renewable Energy Technical Potentials: A GIS-Based Analysis. NREL/TP-6A20-51946.

Luppens, J. A., Scott, D. C., Haacke, J. E, Osmonson, L. M., and Pierce, P. E. 2015. Coal geology and assessment of coal resources and reserves in the Powder River Basin, Wyoming and Montana. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1809, 218 p. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/pp1809.

Magoon, L. B., and Dow, W. G., eds. 1994. The Petroleum System—From Source to Trap. Tulsa, OK: American Association of Petroleum Geologists. 644 p.

Marra, K. R. 2017. U.S. Geological Survey input-data forms for the assessment of the Spraberry Formation of the Midland Basin, Permian Basin Province, Texas, 2017. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017-1117, 46 p.

Marra, K. R., Gaswirth, S. B., Schenk, C. J., Leathers-Miller, H. M., Klett, T. R., Mercier, T. J., Le, P. A., Tennyson, M. E., Finn, T. M., Hawkins, S. J., and Brownfield, M. E. 2017. Assessment of Undiscovered Continuous and Conventional Oil Resources in the Spraberry Formation of the Midland Basin, Permian Basin Province, Texas, 2017. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2017- 3029, 2 p.

Maupin, M. A., Kenny, J. F., Hutson, S. S., Lovelace, J. K., Barber, N. L., and Linsey, K. S. 2014. Estimated use of water in the United States in 2010. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1405, 56 p. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/cir1405.

McGlade C., Speirs, J., and Sorrell, S. 2013. Methods of estimating shale gas resources – comparison, evaluation, and implications. Energy 59:116–125.

McGrail, B. P., Cabe, J., Davidson, C., Knudsen, F. S., Bacon, D., Bearden, M., Chamness, M., Horner, J., Reidel, S., Schaef, T., Spane, F., and Thorne, P. 2013. Techno-economic Performance Evaluation of Compressed Air Energy Storage in the Pacific

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Northwest. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory: Report 22235-FL. Available at: https://caes.pnnl.gov/pdf/PNNL-22235-FL.pdf.

McMahon, B., Mackay, B., and Mirakyan, A. 2015. First 100% reuse of Bakken produced water in hybrid treatments using inexpensive polysaccharide gelling agents. Society of Petroleum Engineers, SPE-173783-MS. doi: 10.2118/173783-MS.

Meinert, L. D., Robinson, G. R., and Nassar, N. T. 2016. Mineral resources: Reserves, peak production and the future. Resources 5(1):14. doi: 10.3390/resources50100014.

Mihalasky, M. J., Hall, S. M., Hammarstrom, J. M., Tureck, K. R., Hannon M. T., Breit, G. N., Zielinski, R. A., and Elliott, B. 2015. Assessment of undiscovered sandstone-hosted uranium resources in the Texas Coastal Plain. U.S. Geological Survey 2015 Fact Sheet 2015-3069. Available at: https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20153069.

Mills, T., and Humphreys, B. 2013. Habanero Pilot Project—Australia’s First EGS Power Plant. Proceedings, 35th New Zealand Geothermal Workshop, Rotorua. Available at: http://www.geothermal-energy.org/pdf/IGAstandard/NZGW/2013/Mills_Final.pdf.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT). 2006. The Future of Geothermal Energy Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century. INL/EXT0611746. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Available at: http://www1.eere.energy.gov/geothermal/future_geothermal.html.

MIT. 2016. Food, Water, Energy and Climate Outlook: Perspectives from 2016. Massachusetts Institute of Technology joint program on the science and policy of global change. Available at: https://globalchange.mit.edu/sites/default/files/newsletters/files/2016-JP-Outlook.pdf.

Montgomery, J. B., and O’Sullivan, F. M. 2017. Spatial variability of tight oil well productivity and the impact of technology. Applied Energy 195:344–355. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.03.038.

Naftz, D., and Walton-Day, K. 2016. Establishing a pre-mining geochemical baseline at a uranium mine near Grand Canyon National Park, USA. Geoderma Regional 7(1):76–92. doi:10.1016/j.geodrs.2016.01.004.

Nuclear Energy Agency (NEA). 2016. Impacts of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident on Nuclear Development Policies. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Available at: http://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2017/7212-impacts-fukushima-policies.pdf.

NEA. 2017. Nuclear Energy Data. OECD Nuclear Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.oecd-nea.org/ndd/pubs/2017/7365-ned-2017.pdf.

NEI (Nuclear Energy Institute). 2017a. Environment: Emissions Prevented, Carbon Dioxide Emissions Avoided. Available at: https://www.nei.org/Knowledge-Center/Nuclear-Statistics/Environment-Emissions-Prevented.

NEI. 2017b. Dominion to Renew North Anna Operating License for 20 More Years. Available at: https://www.nei.org/News-Media/News/News-Archives/2017/Dominion-to-Renew-North-Anna-Operating-License-for?feed=News.

Nichols, K., Sawyer, J., Bruening, J., Halldorson, B., and Madhavan, K. 2017. Development of a Large Scale Water Recycling Program for the Delaware Basin, New Mexico. Society of Petroleum Engineering. SPE-186086-MS, 12 p.

NRC (National Research Council). 1999. Meeting U.S. Energy Resource Needs: The Energy Resources Program of the U.S. Geological Survey. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

NRC. 2013. Induced Seismicity Potential in Energy Technologies. National Research Council, Washington, DC: National Academy Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.17226/13355.

NRC. 2017. Radioactive Waste. United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Available at: https://www.nrc.gov/waste.html.

Oakleaf, J., Kenedy, C. M., Baruch-Mordo, S., and Kiesecker, J. M. 2017. “Geography of Risk.” Energy Sprawl SolutionsL Balancing Global Development and Conservation. Kiesecker, J. M., and Naughle, D. E., eds. Island Press: Washington, DC.

Oetjen, K., Giddings, C. G. S., McLaughlin, M., Nell, M., Blotevogel, J., Helbling, D. E., Mueller, D., and Higgins, C. P. 2017. Emerging analytical methods for the characterization and quantification of organic contaminants in flowback and produced water. Trends in Environmental Analytical Chemistry, 15(Supplement C): 12–23.

OCC (Oklahoma Corporation Commission). 2016. Media Advisory - Regional Earthquake Response Plan for Western Oklahoma. Available at http://www.occeweb.com/News/2016/02-16-16WesternRegionalPlan.pdf.

Olea, R. A. and Coleman Jr., J. L. 2014. A Synoptic Examination of Causes of Land Loss in Southern Louisiana as Related to the Exploitation of Subsurface Geologic Resources. Journal of Coastal Research: 30(5). doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-13-00046.1.

Olea, R. A. 2017. Carbon dioxide enhanced oil recovery performance according to the literature. Three approaches for estimating recovery factors in carbon dioxide enhanced oil recover.: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2017-5062, D1-D21. doi: https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20175062D.

Orem, W., Tatu, C., Varonka, M., Lerch, H., Bates, A., Engle, M., Crosby, L., and McIntosh, J. 2014. Organic substances in produced and formation water from unconventional natural gas extraction in coal and shale. International Journal of Coal Geology 126:20–31.

Ostroff, J., 2017. US uranium producers plagued by low prices, scant utility purchasing. Available at: https://www.platts.com/videos/2017/october/us-nuclear-uranium-production-prices-101717.

Palmer, C. A., Oman, C. L., Park, A. J., and Luppens, J. A. 2015. The U.S. Geological Survey coal quality (COALQUAL) database version 3.0. U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 975, 43 p. with appendixes. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ds975.

Parshall, J. and Zborowski, M. 2018. Notes (February 2018). Society of Petroleum Engineers. doi:10.2118/0218-0022-JPT.

Paxton, S. T., Pitman, J. K., Kinney, S. A., Gianoutsos, N. J., Pearson, O. N., Whidden, K. J., Dubiel, R. F., Schenk, C. J., Burke, L. A., Klett, T. R., Leathers-Miller, H. M., Mercier, T. J., Haines, S. S., Varela, B. A., Le, P. A., Finn, T. M., Gaswirth, S. B., Hawkins, S. J., Marra, K. R., and Tennyson, M. E. 2017. Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources in the Haynesville Formation, U.S. Gulf Coast, 2016. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2017-3016. doi: https://doi.org/10.3133/fs20173016.

Perry, R., 2017. Secretary of Energy letter to direct the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to issue grid resiliency rules. Department of Energy. Available at: https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2017/09/f37/Secretary%20Rick%20Perry%27s%20Letter%20to%20the%20Federal%20Energy%20Regulatory%20Commission.pdf.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Petzet, A. 2012. “DOE sees vast energy resource in residual oil zones.” Oil and Gas Journal. September 7, 2012. Available at: http://www.ogj.com/articles/2012/07/doe-sees-vast-energy-resource-in-residual-oil-zones.html.

Pink, D. H. 2006. A whole new mind: Why right-brainers will rule the future. Penguin: New York, NY.

PRIS. 2018. Power Reactor Information System, International Atomic Energy Agency. Available at: https://www.iaea.org/pris/.

Raimi, D. 2017. The Fracking Debate: The Risks, Benefits, and Uncertainties of the Shale Revolution. Columbia University Press: New York, NY.

REN21 (Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century). 2017. 2017 Renewables Global Status Report. Available at: http://www.ren21.net/gsr-2017/.

RFA (Renewable Fuels Association). 2017. Building Partnerships | Growing Markets: 2017 Ethanol Industry Outlook. Available at: http://www.ethanolrfa.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Ethanol-Industry-Outlook-2017.pdf.

Rohrbacher, T. J., Luppens, J. A., Osmonson, L. M., Scott, D. C., and Freeman, P. A. 2005. An external peer review of the U.S. Geological Survey Energy Resource Program’s economically recoverable coal resources assessment methodology—report and comments. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1076, 25 p.

Rotelli, F., Blunt, M. J., De Simoni, M., Dovera, L., Rotondi, M., and Lamberti, A. 2017. CO2 Injection in Carbonate Reservoirs: Combining EOR and CO2 Storage. Offshore Mediterranean Conference.

Rubinstein, J. L. and Mahani, A. B. 2015. Myths and Facts on Wastewater Injection, Hydraulic Fracturing, Enhanced Oil Recovery, and Induced Seismicity. Seismological Research Letters 86 (4): 1060–1067. doi: https://doi.org/10.1785/0220150067.

Ruppert, L. F., and Ryder, R. T., eds. 2014. Coal and petroleum resources in the Appalachian basin; Distribution, geologic framework, and geochemical character. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1708, 42 chapters separately paginated.

Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., and Nicot, J. P. 2014. Will water scarcity in semiarid regions limit hydraulic fracturing of shale plays? Environmental Research Letters 9(12). DOI 10.1088/1748- 9326/9/12/124011.

Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Male, F., and Hove, M. 2016. Managing the Increasing Water Footprint of Hydraulic Fracturing in the Bakken Play, United States. Environmental Science & Technology 50(18): 10273–10281.

Scanlon, B. R., Reedy, R. C., Male, F., and Walsh, M. 2017. Water Issues Related to Transitioning from Conventional to Unconventional Oil Production in the Permian Basin, Environmental Science & Technology, 51(18), 10903-10912.

Schenk, C., Pollastro, R. M., Cook, T. A., Pawlewicz, M. J., Klett, T. R., Charpentier, R. R., and Cook, H. E. 2007. Assessment of undiscovered oil and gas resources of the Permian Basin Province of West Texas and Southeast New Mexico. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2007-3115.

Schmoker, J. W.1999. U.S. Geological Survey assessment model for continuous (unconventional) oil and gas accumulations—The “FORSPAN” model: U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 2168, 9 p. Available at http://geology.cr.usgs.gov/pub/bulletins/b2168/.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Schmoker, J. W. 2005. “U.S. Geological Survey Assessment Concepts for Continuous Petroleum Accumulations.” Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the Southwestern Wyoming Province, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah. U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D. Available at: https://certmapper.cr.usgs.gov/data/noga00/natl/text/CH_13.pdf.

Schmoker, J. W., and Klett, T. R. 2005. “U.S. Geological survey Assessment Concepts for Conventional Petroleum Accumulations.” Petroleum Systems and Geologic Assessment of Oil and Gas in the Southwestern Wyoming Province, Wyoming, Colorado, and Utah. U.S. Geological Survey Digital Data Series DDS-69-D. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/dds/dds-069/dds-069-d/REPORTS/69_D_CH_19.pdf.

Schulte, R. H., Critelli Jr., N., Holst, K., and Huff, G. 2012. Lessons from Iowa: Development of a 270 Megawatt Compressed Air Energy Storage Project in Midwest Independent System Operator, A Study for the DOE Energy Storage Systems Program, SAND2012-0388. Available at: http://energystorage.org/system/files/resources/lessonsfromiowa_summaryreport.pdf.

Ruppel, C. D. 2018. Gas hydrate in nature. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2017-3080. Available at: https://pubs.er.usgs.gov/publication/fs20173080.

Schroeder, J. N., Harto, C. B., Horner, R. M., and Clark, C. E. 2014. Geothermal Water Use: Life Cycle Water Consumption, Water Resource Assessment, and Water Policy Framework. Argonne National Laboratory ANL/EVA-14/2, 44 p. Available at: http://www.evs.anl.gov/downloads/ANL-EVS-14-2.pdf.

Selinus, O., Finkelman, R. B., and Centeno, J. A., eds. 2010. Medical Geology: A Regional Synthesis. Springer: Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Schindler, M, Baumgärtner, J., Gandy, T., Hauffe, P., Hettkamp, T., Menzel, H., Penzkofer, P, Texa, D., Tischner, T., and Wahl, G. 2010. Successful Hydraulic Stimulations Techniques for Electric Power Production in the Upper Rhine Graben, Central Europe. Proceedings of the World Geothermal Congress 2010. Bali, Indonesia, April 25–29, 2010. Available at: https://www.geothermal-energy.org/pdf/IGAstandard/WGC/2010/3163.pdf.

Sharp, P. A., and Langer, R. 2011. Promoting convergence in biomedical science. Science, 333(6042), pp.527. doi: 10.1126/science.1205008.

Shelton, J. L., McIntosh, J. C., Warwick, P. D. and Yi, A. L. Z. 2014. Fate of injected CO2 in the Wilcox Group, Louisiana, Gulf Coast Basin: Chemical and isotopic tracers of microbial–brine–rock–CO2 interactions. Applied geochemistry 51: 55–169.

Siler, D. L., Hinz, N. H., Faulds, J. E., Ayling, B., Blake, K., Tiedeman, A., Sabin, A., Blakenship, D., Kennedy, M., Rhodes, G., Sophy, M. J., Glen, J. M. G., Phelps, G. A., Fortuna, M., Queen J., and Witter, J. B. 2018. The Geologic and Structural Framework of the Fallon FORGE site. Proceedings of the 43rd Workshop on Geothermal Reservoir Engineering, Stanford University, February 12–14th 2018. SGP-TR-213. Available at: https://pangea.stanford.edu/ERE/pdf/IGAstandard/SGW/2018/Siler.pdf.

Smith, M. 2017. Here’s why the US uranium industry is in jeopardy. Available at: https://www.seeker.com/heres-why-the-us-nuclear-industry-is-in-jeopardy-2282838778.html.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Smith, S. M., 2006. History of the National Uranium Resource Evaluation Hydrogeochemical and Stream Sediment Reconnaissance Program. Available at:https://pubs.usgs.gov/of/1997/ofr-97-0492/nurehist.htm.

Spalding, D., and Fox, L. 2014. “Challenges of Methane Hydrates.” Oil and Gas Financial Journal. May 4, 2014.

Spencer, C. W. 1989. Review of characteristics of low-permeability gas reservoirs in western United States. AAPG Bulletin 73(5):613–629.

TAMEST (The Academy of Medicine, Engineering and Science of Texas). 2017. Environmental and Community Impacts of Shale Development in Texas. Austin, TX: The Academy of Medicine, Engineering and Science of Texas. doi: 10.25238/TAMESTstf.6.2017. Available at: http://tamest.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Final-Shale-Task-Force-Report.pdf.

Taron, J., Ingebritsen, S. E., Hickman, S., and Williams, C. F. 2017. “Dynamics of permeability evolution in stimulated geothermal reservoir.” Crustal Permeability. John Wiley and Sons: Oxford, United Kingdom, p. 363-373.

Tester, J. W., Anderson, B., Batchelor, A., Blackwell, D., DiPippo, R., Drake, E., Garnish, J., Livesay, B., Moore, M. C., Nichols, K., Petty, S., Toksoz, N., Veatch, R., Augustine, C., Baria, R., Murphy, E., Negraru, P., and Richards, M. 2006. The future of geothermal energy: Impact of enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st century: Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Department of Energy Report and Idaho National Laboratory. INL/EXT-06-11746. 374 p.

Trainor, A. M., McDonald, R. I., Fargione, J. 2016. Energy Sprawl Is the Largest Driver of Land Use Change in the United States. PLoS ONE 11(9):e0162269. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0162269.

Triezenberg, P. J., Hart, P. E., and Childs, J. R. 2016. National Archive of Marine Seismic Surveys (NAMSS): A USGS data website of marine seismic reflection data within the U.S. Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). U.S. Geological Survey Data Release. doi: 10.5066/F7930R7P.

Trippi, M. H. and Belkin, H. E., comps. 2015. USGS compilation of geographic information system (GIS) data representing coal mines and coal-bearing areas of Mongolia: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2015-1144, 24 p. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20151144.

Trippi, M. H., Belkin, H. E., Dai, S., Tewalt, S. J. and Chou, C. J., comps. 2015. USGS compilation of geographic information system (GIS) data representing coal mines and coal-bearing areas in China): U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2014-1219, 140 p. Available at: https://dx.doi.org/10.3133/ofr20141219.

USGS (U.S. Gelogical Survey). 2013. Geological Survey Geologic Carbon Dioxide Storage Resources Assessment Team. National assessment of geologic carbon dioxide storage resources— Results (ver. 1.1, September 2013). U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1386, 41 p. Available at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1386. (Supersedes ver. 1.0, released June 26, 2013.)

USGS. 1978. Assessment of Geothermal Resources of the United States—1978. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/1979/0790/report.pdf.

USGS. 2018. USGS Data Management - Data Release/Embargo. Available at: https://www2.usgs.gov/datamanagement/share/datarelease.php.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Vedachalam, N., Srinivasalu, S., Rajendran, G., Ramadass, G. A., and Atmanand, M. A. 2015. Review of unconventional hydrocarbon resources in major energy consuming countries and efforts in realizing natural gas hydrates as a future energy source. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering 26: 163–175.

Veil, J. 2015. U.S. Produced Water Volumes and Management Practices in 2012. Report prepared for the Groundwater Protection Council. April 2015.

Volcovici, V. 2018. “Senate Environment Panel Chief Backs Probe into Uranium Imports.” Reuters. Available at: https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-uranium/senate-environment-panel-chief-backs-probe-into-uranium-imports-idUSKBN1F72BI.

Warwick, P. D. 2017. Geologic assessment of undiscovered conventional oil and gas resources in the lower Paleogene Midway and Wilcox Groups, and the Carrizo Sand of the Claiborne Group, of the northern Gulf Coast region. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2017–1111, 67 p. doi: https://doi.org/10.3133/ofr20171111.

Warwick, P. D., Aubourg, C. E., Suitt, S. E., Podwysocki, S. M., and Schultz, A., C. 2011. “Coal resources for part of the Wilcox Group (Paleocene through Eocene), Central Texas.” Geologic assessment of Coal in the Gulf of Mexico coastal plain, USA. AAPG Discovery Series no. 14/AAPG Studies in Geology, no. 62, p. 192–259.

WEC. 2016. World Energy Scenarios 2016: The Grand Transition. World Energy Council Report.

Weijermars, R. 2015. “Shale Gas Technology Innovation Rate Impact on Economic Base Case – Scenario Model Benchmarks.” Applied Energy 139: 398–407.

Weingarten, M., Ge, S., Godt, J. W., Bekins, B. A., and Rubinstein, J. L. 2015. “High-Rate Injection Is Associated with the Increase in U.S. Mid-Continent Seismicity.” Science 6241 2015:1336.

Whitfield, S. 2017. “Permian, Bakken Operators Face Produced Water Challenges.” Journal of Petroleum Technology. Published electronically June 1, 2017. Available at: https://www.spe.org/en/jpt/jpt-article-detail/?art=2982.

Williams, C. F., Reed, M. J., and Mariner, R. H. 2008a. A review of methods applied by the U.S. Geological Survey in the assessment of identified geothermal resources. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1296, 27 p.

Williams, C. F., Reed, M. J., Mariner, R. H., DeAngelo, J., Galanis Jr., S. P. 2008b, Assessment of moderate- and high-temperature geothermal resources of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Fact Sheet 2008-3082, 4 p. Available at: https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2008/3082/.

WNA (World Nuclear Association). 2018. “Plans for New Reactors Worldwide.” Available at: http://www.world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide.aspx.

WNN (World Nuclear News). 2017. “Pakistan, China agree to build Chashma5.” WNN World Nuclear News. Published electronically November 23, 2017. Available at: http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/NN-Pakistan-China-agree-to-build-Chashma-52311177.html.

WNN. 2018. “US Uranium Producers Call for ‘Level Playing Field’.” WNN World Nuclear News. Published electronically January 17, 2018. Available at: http://www.world-nuclear-news.org/UF-US-uranium-producers-call-for-level-playing-field-1701188.html.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×

Wolaver, B. D., Pierre, J. P., Ikonnikova, S. A., Andrews, J. R., McDaid, G., Ryberg, W. A., Hibbitts, T. J., Labay, B. J., and LaDuc, T. J. 2018. An Improved Approach for Forecasting E cological Impacts from Future Drilling in Unconventional Shale Oil and Gas Plays. Environmental Management 62(2): 323-333. doi:10.1007/s00267-0181042-5.

Xu, T., Zheng, L., and Tian, H. 2011. Reactive Transport Modeling for Co 2 Geological Sequestration. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering 78(3): 765–777. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2011.09.005.

Zoback, M. D., and Gorelick, S. M. 2012. Earthquake triggering and large-scale geologic storage of carbon dioxide. Proceedings of the National Academies of Sciences of the United States of America 109(26):10164–10168.

Zoback, M. D., and Gorelick, S. M. 2015. To prevent earthquake triggering, pressure changes due to CO2 injection need to be limited. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(33): E4510.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 113
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 114
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 115
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 116
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 117
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 118
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 119
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 120
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 121
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 122
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 123
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 124
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 125
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 126
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 127
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25141.
×
Page 128
Next: Appendix A Committee Biographies »
Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program Get This Book
×
Buy Paperback | $70.00 Buy Ebook | $54.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Reliable, affordable, and technically recoverable energy is central to the nation's economic and social vitality. The United States is both a major consumer of geologically based energy resources from around the world and - increasingly of late - a developer of its own energy resources. Understanding the national and global availability of those resources as well as the environmental impacts of their development is essential for strategic decision making related to the nation's energy mix. The U.S. Geological Survey Energy Resources Program is charged with providing unbiased and publicly available national- and regional-scale assessments of the location, quantity, and quality of geologically based energy resources and with undertaking research related to their development.

At the request of the Energy Resources Program (ERP), this publication considers the nation's geologically based energy resource challenges in the context of current national and international energy outlooks. Future Directions for the U.S. Geological Survey's Energy Resources Program examines how ERP activities and products address those challenges and align with the needs federal and nonfederal consumers of ERP products. This study contains recommendations to develop ERP products over the next 10-15 years that will most effectively inform both USGS energy research priorities and the energy needs and priorities of the U.S. government.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!