National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Conclusions
Page 52
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Investment Prioritization Methods for Low-Volume Roads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25142.
×
Page 52
Page 51
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Investment Prioritization Methods for Low-Volume Roads. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25142.
×
Page 51

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

59 A P P E N D I X A Survey Questionnaire

58 Investment Prioritization Methods for Low-Volume Roads Pennsylvania State Conservation Commission (2014). Dirt, Gravel, and Low Volume Road Maintenance Program Administrative Manual. Available: http://www.dirtandgravel.psu.edu/sites/default/files/PA%20Program%20 Resources/Program%20Specific%20Resources/Administrative%20Guidance%20Manual/Administrative_ Manual_Dec_2014.pdf. Pinard, M. I., Ellis, S. D., Eriksson, C.-H., Johansen, R., Toole, T., Berger, R., Gumbie, M. E., Lotter, H. J. S., and Quimby, A. R. (2003). Guideline on Low-Volume Sealed Roads, Southern African Development Community, Botswana. Available: https://www.ssatp.org/sites/ssatp/files/pdfs/Toolkits/LVSR-Guideline-FullText[1]_0.pdf. Proctor, G., and Zimmerman, K. (2016). Defining Cross-Asset Decision Making: A Discussion Paper. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Available: https://www. tam-portal.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Cross-Asset-Allocation.pdf. Rall, J., Wheet, A., Farber, N. J., and Reed, J. B. (2011). Transportation Governance and Finance: A 50-State Review of State Legislatures and Departments of Transportation, National Conference of State Legislatures and AASHTO Center for Excellence in Project Finance, Washington, D.C. Available: http://www.financing transportation.org/pdf/50_State_Review_State_Legislatures_Departments_Transportation.pdf. Robert, W. E., and Gurenich, D. I. (2008). “Modeling Approach of the National Bridge Investment Analysis System,” Transportation Research E-Circular E-C128, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Available: http://onlinepubs.trb.org/onlinepubs/circulars/ec128.pdf. South Carolina DOT (2017a). Engineering Directive 65: Non-Federal Aid Secondary Pavement Improvement Project Prioritization Process. Available: http://info2.scdot.org/ED/ED/ED-65.pdf. South Carolina DOT (2017b). Engineering Directive 69: Non-NHS Bridge Replacement Project Prioritization Process. http://info2.scdot.org/ED/ED/ED-69.pdf. South Carolina DOT (2017c). Engineering Directive 70: Load Restricted Bridge Replacement Project Prioritization Process. http://info2.scdot.org/ED/ED/ED-70.pdf. SSATP (2013). Module 2: Planning, Design, Appraisal and Implementation, “Rural Road Economic Appraisal Methodology,” Rural Transport Training Materials, African Transport Policy Program. http://www.ssatp.org/ sites/ssatp/files/rural_transport/RTTM-en/Module%202%202013/Session%202.3/PM%202-3a.pdf. Steyn, W. J. vd M., Nokes, B., du Plessis, L., Agacer, R., Burmas, N., and Popescu, L. (2015). “Evaluation of the Effect of Rural Road Condition on Agricultural Produce Transportation,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2473, pp. 33–41. Available: http://trrjournalonline.trb.org/ doi/10.3141/2473-04. Texas DOT (Updated 2017). “Farm/Ranch to Market Facts,” Tx DOT Expressway. Available: https://www.dot. state.tx.us/tpp/hwy/fmfacts.htm. The World Bank (2005). “Notes on the Economic Evaluation of Transport Projects: Low Volume Rural Roads,” Transport Note No. TRN-21, The World Bank, Washington, D.C. Available: http://siteresources.worldbank. org/INTTRANSPORT/Resources/336291-1227561426235/5611053-1231943010251/trn-21EENote2.pdf. The World Bank (2008). “HDM-4 Economic Analysis Concepts,” The World Bank, Washington, D.C. Available: https://www.scribd.com/presentation/312210834/04HDM-4EconomicAnalysisConcepts2008-10-22. Uremovich, A. L. (2007). “Treatment of Historic Bridge on Low-Volume Local Road,” Design Memorandum No. 07-05, Indiana Department of Transportation, Indianapolis. Available: http://www.in.gov/dot/div/ contracts/standards/memos/deleted/2007/0705-pc.pdf. Wisconsin DOT (2010). Evaluating and Ranking Highway Major Projects from an Economic Development Perspective. http://www.tredis.com/images/pdf-docs/panel_workshop/transportation%20planning%20 workshop%20-%20widot.pdf. Yu, J. (2015). Development of Holding Strategies for Deteriorated Low-Volume Roads and Evaluation of Performance of Iowa Test Sections. PhD Dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames. Available: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/cgi/ viewcontent.cgi?article=5906&context=etd. Zimmerman, K. A. (2017). NCHRP Synthesis 501: Pavement Management Systems: Putting Data to Work, Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Available: http://nap.edu/24682. Zimmerman, K. A., and Wolters, A. S. (2004). Local Road Surfacing Criteria. Study SD2002-10, Final Report. South Dakota Department of Transportation, Office of Research, Pierre. Available: http://sddot.com/business/ research/projects/docs/sd200210_Final_Report.pdf. Zopounidis, C., and Doumpos, M., eds. (2017). Multiple Criteria Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering. Springer.

Next: Appendix A - Survey Questionnaire »
Investment Prioritization Methods for Low-Volume Roads Get This Book
×
 Investment Prioritization Methods for Low-Volume Roads
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Synthesis 521: Investment Prioritization Methods for Low-Volume Roads documents current practices used by transportation agencies to make investment decisions about low-volume roads.

Current transportation asset management practices for low-volume roads typically use asset condition, traffic, and safety metrics to prioritize investment decisions for preservation, maintenance, repair, and replacement projects. However, these metrics do not fully measure the significant value for the wider economy and society that low-volume roads can provide.

This publication also addresses the challenges that decision makers may face to communicate the value of such investments to stakeholders in an era of limited funds and constantly changing demands on the transportation system.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!