National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Wrap-Up
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×

But she also cautioned against the “dissemination of technology without adequate evidence, validation, and training.”

Schilsky offered several scenarios that could be considered to improve patient access to expertise and technologies in oncologic imaging and pathology. These scenarios included the following:

  • Building a specialized workforce, potentially by creating an integrative medical specialty in diagnostic oncology, that trains individuals in pathology, radiology, cancer biology, and new computational methods involved in these fields;
  • Supporting a less specialized workforce through the use of clinical decision support tools and clinical pathways, facilitated by advances in AI and machine learning; and
  • Expanding capacity in community care settings and promoting access to oncologic expertise through programs such as Project ECHO.

“It may be some combination of these activities that is the optimal strategy, and it is unlikely that any one particular strategy will work best in every clinical venue,” Schilsky noted. He added that the primary challenges in improving cancer diagnosis and care are primarily cultural and organizational, rather than technological: “It’s rare in so many areas of medicine that technology is the actual barrier to implementation. It’s almost always a cultural or organizational barrier, and we need to think about overcoming those barriers.” He also pointed out that “much of what we do in medicine is determined by our payment models, and a lot of patient support services in oncology are typically not well reimbursed, even though they are essential to delivering high-quality care to cancer patients.” Hricak agreed, and said the next steps are to operationalize and support these strategies to improve cancer diagnosis and care.

REFERENCES

AACR (American Association for Cancer Research) Project GENIE Consortium. 2017. AACR Project GENIE: Powering precision medicine through an international consortium. Cancer Discovery 7(8):818–831.

Arora, S., C. M. A. Geppert, S. Kalishman, D. Dion, F. Pullara, B. Bjeletich, G. Simpson, D. C. Alverson, L. B. Moore, D. Kuhl, and J. V. Scaletti. 2007. Academic health center management of chronic diseases through knowledge networks: Project ECHO. Academic Medicine 82(2):10.1097/ACM.1090b1013e31802d31808f31868.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×

Arora, S., K. Thornton, G. Murata, P. Deming, S. Kalishman, D. Dion, B. Parish, T. Burke, W. Pak, J. Dunkelberg, M. Kistin, J. Brown, S. Jenkusky, M. Komaromy, and C. Qualls. 2011. Outcomes of treatment for hepatitis C virus infection by primary care providers. New England Journal of Medicine 364(23):2199–2207.

ASCO (American Society of Clinical Oncology). 2017. The state of cancer care in America, 2017: A report by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. Journal of Oncology Practice 13(4):e353–e394.

Basch, E., A. M. Deal, A. C. Dueck, H. I. Scher, M. G. Kris, C. Hudis, and D. Schrag. 2017. Overall survival results of a trial assessing patient-reported outcomes for symptom monitoring during routine cancer treatment. JAMA 318(2):197–198.

Bates, D. W., G. J. Kuperman, S. Wang, T. Gandhi, A. Kittler, L. Volk, C. Spurr, R. Khorasani, M. Tanasijevic, and B. Middleton. 2003. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: Making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 10(6):523–530.

Bejnordi, B. E., M. Veta, P. Johannes van Diest, et al. 2017. Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer. JAMA 318(22):2199–2210.

Bluth, E. I., S. Bansal, and C. E. Bender. 2017. The 2017 ACR commission on human resources workforce survey. Journal of the American College of Radiology 14(12):1613–1619.

Coffey, K., D. D’Alessio, D. M. Keating, and E. A. Morris. 2017. Second-opinion review of breast imaging at a cancer center: Is it worthwhile? American Journal of Roentgenology 208(6):1386–1391.

Corrias, G., S. Huicochea Castellanos, R. Merkow, R. Langan, V. Balachandran, M. Ragucci, G. Carollo, M. Mancini, L. Saba, and L. Mannelli. 2018. Does second reader opinion affect patient management in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma? Academic Radiology 25(7):825–832.

Daly, B., R. T. Zon, R. D. Page, S. B. Edge, G. H. Lyman, S. R. Green, D. S. Wollins, and L. D. Bosserman. 2018. Oncology clinical pathways: Charting the landscape of pathway providers. Journal of Oncology Practice 14(3):e194–e200.

Dzau, V. J., G. S. Ginsburg, A. Chopra, D. Goldman, E. D. Green, D. G. B. Leonard, M. McClellan, A. Plump, S. F. Terry, and K. R. Yamamoto. 2016. Realizing the full potential of precision medicine in health and health care: A vital direction for health and health care. https://nam.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Realizing-the-Full-Potential-of-Precision-Medicine-in-Health-and-Health-Care.pdf (accessed June 18, 2018).

Elmore, J. G., G. M. Longton, P. A. Carney, B. M. Geller, T. Onega, A. N. Tosteson, H. D. Nelson, M. S. Pepe, K. H. Allison, S. J. Schnitt, F. P. O’Malley, and D. L. Weaver. 2015. Diagnostic concordance among pathologists interpreting breast biopsy specimens. JAMA 313(11):1122–1132.

Forsman, R. W. 1996. Why is the laboratory an afterthought for managed care organizations? Clinical Chemistry 42(5):813.

Frable, W. J. 2006. Surgical pathology—second reviews, institutional reviews, audits, and correlations: What’s out there? Error or diagnostic variation? Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 130(5):620–625.

Harris, T. J. R., and F. McCormick. 2010. The molecular pathology of cancer. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology 7:251.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×

Hartman, D. J., L. Pantanowitz, J. S. McHugh, A. L. Piccoli, M. J. O’Leary, and G. R. Lauro. 2017. Enterprise implementation of digital pathology: Feasibility, challenges, and opportunities. Journal of Digital Imaging 30(5):555–560.

Hartzler, A., C. A. McCarty, L. V. Rasmussen, M. S. Williams, M. Brilliant, E. A. Bowton, E. W. Clayton, W. A. Faucett, K. Ferryman, J. R. Field, S. M. Fullerton, C. R. Horowitz, B. A. Koenig, J. B. McCormick, J. D. Ralston, S. C. Sanderson, M. E. Smith, and S. B. Trinidad. 2013. Stakeholder engagement: A key component of integrating genomic information into electronic health records. Genetics in Medicine 15(10):792–801.

Hatzoglou, V., A. M. Omuro, S. Haque, Y. Khakoo, I. Ganly, J. H. Oh, A. Shukla-Dave, R. Fatovic, J. Gaal, and A. I. Holodny. 2016. Second-opinion interpretations of neuroimaging studies by oncologic neuroradiologists can help reduce errors in cancer care. Cancer 122(17):2708–2714.

He, K., X. Zhang, S. Ren, J. Sun, and IEEE (Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers) International Conference on Computer Vision. 2015. Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1502.01852.pdf (accessed May 4, 2018).

Health Care Payment Learning & Action Network. 2017. Alternative payment model (APM) framework. http://hcp-lan.org/workproducts/apm-refresh-whitepaper-final.pdf (accessed May 4, 2018).

HIMSS (Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society). 2018. What is interoperability?http://www.himss.org/library/interoperability-standards/what-is (accessed May 2, 2018).

Horvat, J. V., D. D. D’Alessio, B. Bernard-Davila, D. F. Martinez, and E. A. Morris. 2018. Second opinion interpretation of breast ultrasound images—is it worth another look? Clinical Imaging 52:79–87.

Hughes, K. S., E. P. Ambinder, G. P. Hess, P. P. Yu, E. V. Bernstam, M. J. Routbort, J. R. Clemenceau, J. T. Hamm, P. G. Febbo, S. M. Domchek, J. L. Chen, and J. L. Warner. 2017. Identifying health information technology needs of oncologists to facilitate the adoption of genomic medicine: Recommendations from the 2016 American Society of Clinical Oncology Omics and Precision Oncology Workshop. Journal of Clinical Oncology 35(27):3153–3159.

IOM (Institute of Medicine). 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

IOM. 2013a. Best care at lower cost: The path to continuously learning health care in America. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

IOM. 2013b. Delivering high-quality cancer care: Charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

IOM. 2015. Genomics-enabled learning health care systems: Gathering and using genomic information to improve patient care and research: Workshop summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Ip, I. K., A. S. Raja, S. E. Seltzer, A. A. Gawande, K. E. Joynt, and R. Khorasani. 2015. Use of public data to target variation in providers’ use of CT and MR imaging among Medicare beneficiaries. Radiology 275(3):718–724.

Jha, S., and E. J. Topol. 2016. Adapting to artificial intelligence: Radiologists and pathologists as information specialists. JAMA 316(22):2353–2354.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×

Johnson, R. L. 2014. The American Board of Pathology’s Maintenance of Certification program update. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 138(4):512–517.

Khorasani, R., K. Hentel, J. Darer, C. Langlotz, I. K. Ip, S. Manaker, J. Cardella, R. Min, and S. Seltzer. 2014. Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support for imaging: Enabling evidence-based practice to improve quality and reduce waste. American Journal of Roentgenology 203(5):945–951.

Korfiatis, P., T. L. Kline, L. Coufalova, D. H. Lachance, I. F. Parney, R. E. Carter, J. C. Buckner, and B. J. Erickson. 2016. MRI texture features as biomarkers to predict MGMT methylation status in glioblastomas. Medical Physics 43(6):2835–2844.

Krajewski, K. M., S. A. Howard, A. B. Shinagare, A. D. Van den Abbeele, and F. M. Fennessy. 2017. Cancer imaging fellowship training: Utility and added value in the modern era. Journal of the American College of Radiology 14(10):1345–1348.

Kumar, V., Y. Gu, S. Basu, A. Berglund, S. A. Eschrich, M. B. Schabath, K. Forster, H. J. W. L. Aerts, A. Dekker, D. Fenstermacher, D. B. Goldgof, L. O. Hall, P. Lambin, Y. Balagurunathan, R. A. Gatenby, and R. J. Gillies. 2012. QIN “radiomics: The process and the challenges.” Magnetic Resonance Imaging 30(9):1234–1248.

Lakhman, Y., M. D’Anastasi, M. Miccò, C. Scelzo, H. A. Vargas, S. Nougaret, R. E. Sosa, D. Chi, N. R. Abu-Rustum, H. Hricak, and E. Sala. 2016. Second-opinion interpretations of gynecologic oncologic MRI examinations by sub-specialized radiologists influence patient care. European Radiology 26(7):2089–2098.

Larson, D. B., M. C. Chen, M. P. Lungren, S. S. Halabi, N. V. Stence, and C. P. Langlotz. 2017. Performance of a deep-learning neural network model in assessing skeletal maturity on pediatric hand radiographs. Radiology 287(1):313–322.

Lawal, A. K., T. Rotter, L. Kinsman, A. Machotta, U. Ronellenfitsch, S. D. Scott, D. Goodridge, C. Plishka, and G. Groot. 2016. What is a clinical pathway? Refinement of an operational definition to identify clinical pathway studies for a Cochrane systematic review. BMC Medicine 14(1):35.

Lorenzen, J., A. K. Finck-Wedel, B. Lisboa, and G. Adam. 2012. Second opinion assessment in diagnostic mammography at a breast cancer centre. Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 72(8):734–739.

Louis, D. N., G. K. Gerber, J. M. Baron, L. Bry, A. S. Dighe, G. Getz, J. M. Higgins, F. C. Kuo, W. J. Lane, J. S. Michaelson, L. P. Le, C. H. Mermel, J. R. Gilbertson, and J. A. Golden. 2014. Computational pathology: An emerging definition. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 138(9):1133–1138.

Louis, D. N., M. Feldman, A. B. Carter, A. S. Dighe, J. D. Pfeifer, L. Bry, J. S. Almeida, J. Saltz, J. Braun, J. E. Tomaszewski, J. R. Gilbertson, J. H. Sinard, G. K. Gerber, S. J. Galli, J. A. Golden, and M. J. Becich. 2016. Computational pathology: A path ahead. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 140(1):41–50.

Lowy, D. R., and F. S. Collins. 2016. Aiming high—changing the trajectory for cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 374(20):1901–1904.

Lysack, J. T., M. Hoy, M. E. Hudon, S. C. Nakoneshny, S. P. Chandarana, T. W. Matthews, and J. C. Dort. 2013. Impact of neuroradiologist second opinion on staging and management of head and neck cancer. Journal of Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery 42(1):39.

Manion, E., M. B. Cohen, and J. Weydert. 2008. Mandatory second opinion in surgical pathology referral material: Clinical consequences of major disagreements. The American Journal of Surgical Pathology 32(5):732–737.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×

Mathias, P. C., P. Tarczy-Hornoch, and B. H. Shirts. 2016. Modeling the costs of clinical decision support for genomic precision medicine. AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings 2016:60–64.

McCloskey, C. B., R. E. Domen, R. M. Conran, R. D. Hoffman, M. D. Post, M. D. Brissette, D. A. Gratzinger, P. M. Raciti, D. A. Cohen, C. A. Roberts, A. M. Rojiani, C. S. Kong, J. E. G. Peterson, K. Johnson, S. Plath, and S. Z.-E. Powell. 2017. Entrustable professional activities for pathology: Recommendations from the College of American Pathologists Graduate Medical Education Committee. Academic Pathology 4:2374289517714283.

Miksad, R. A., and A. P. Abernethy. 2018. Harnessing the power of real-world evidence (RWE): A checklist to ensure regulatory-grade data quality. Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics 103(2):202–205.

Mullerad, M., H. Hricak, L. Wang, H.-N. Chen, M. W. Kattan, and P. T. Scardino. 2004. Prostate cancer: Detection of extracapsular extension by genitourinary and general body radiologists at MR imaging. Radiology 232(1):140–146.

Nakhleh, R. E., V. Nosé, C. Colasacco, L. A. Fatheree, T. J. Lillemoe, D. C. McCrory, F. A. Meier, C. N. Otis, S. R. Owens, S. S. Raab, R. R. Turner, C. B. Ventura, and A. A. Renshaw. 2015. Interpretive diagnostic error reduction in surgical pathology and cytology: Guideline from the College of American Pathologists Pathology and Laboratory Quality Center and the Association of Directors of Anatomic and Surgical Pathology. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 140(1):29–40.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2015. Improving diagnosis in health care. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NASEM. 2016. Biomarker tests for molecularly targeted therapies: Key to unlocking precision medicine. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

Noseworthy, J., J. Madara, D. Cosgrove, M. Edgeworth, E. Ellison, S. Krevans, P. Rothman, K. Sowers, S. Strongwater, D. Torchiana, and D. Harrison. 2017. Physician burnout is a public health crisis: A message to our fellow health care CEOs. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20170328.059397/full (accessed May 1, 2018).

Osheroff, J. A., J. M. Teich, B. Middleton, E. B. Steen, A. Wright, and D. E. Detmer. 2007. A roadmap for national action on clinical decision support. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 14(2):141–145.

Powell, D. E., and C. Carraccio. 2018. Toward competency-based medical education. New England Journal of Medicine 378(1):3–5.

Rajpurkar, P., J. Irvin, K. Zhu, B. Yang, H. Mehta, T. Duan, D. Ding, A. Bagul, C. Langlotz, K. Shpanskaya, M. P. Lungren, and A. Y. Ng. 2017. Chexnet: Radiologist-level pneumonia detection on chest X-rays with deep learning. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1711.05225.pdf (accessed May 4, 2018).

Rhoads, K. F., J. Cullen, V. Ngo Justine, and M. Wren Sherry. 2011. Racial and ethnic differences in lymph node examination after colon cancer resection do not completely explain disparities in mortality. Cancer 118(2):469–477.

Rotter, T., L. Kinsman, E. James, A. Machotta, and E. W. Steyerberg. 2012. The quality of the evidence base for clinical pathway effectiveness: Room for improvement in the design of evaluation trials. BMC Medical Research Methodology 12:80.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×

Seegmiller, A. C., A. S. Kim, C. A. Mosse, M. A. Levy, M. A. Thompson, M. K. Kressin, M. H. Jagasia, S. A. Strickland, N. M. Reddy, E. R. Marx, K. J. Sinkfield, H. N. Pollard, W. D. Plummer, W. D. Dupont, E. K. Shultz, R. S. Dittus, W. W. Stead, S. A. Santoro, and M. M. Zutter. 2013. Optimizing personalized bone marrow testing using an evidence-based, interdisciplinary team approach. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 140(5):643–650.

Seegmiller, A. C., A. S. Kim, C. A. Mosse, A. C. Shaver, M. A. Thompson, S. Li, D. R. Head, and M. M. Zutter. 2016. Data-driven iterative refinement of bone marrow testing protocols leads to progressive improvement in cytogenetic and molecular test utilization. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 146(5):585–593.

Shirts, B. H., A. V. Gundlapalli, and B. Jackson. 2009. Pilot study of linking web-based supplemental interpretive information to laboratory test reports. American Journal of Clinical Pathology 132(6):818–823.

Spivey, T. L., K. A. Carlson, I. Janssen, T. R. Witt, P. Jokich, and A. Madrigrano. 2015. Breast imaging second opinions impact surgical management. Annals of Surgical Oncology 22(7):2359–2364.

Stern, C., T. Boehm, B. Seifert, and N. Kawel-Boehm. 2018. Subspecialized radiological reporting expedites turnaround time of radiology reports and increases productivity. Fortschr Röntgenstr 190(7):623–629.

ten Cate, O. 2005. Entrustability of professional activities and competency-based training. Medical Education 39(12):1176–1177.

ten Cate, O. 2013. Nuts and bolts of entrustable professional activities. Journal of Graduate Medical Education 5(1):157–158.

Van den Abbeele, A. D., K. M. Krajewski, S. H. Tirumani, F. M. Fennessy, P. J. DiPiro, Q.-D. Nguyen, G. J. Harris, H. A. Jacene, G. Lefever, and N. H. Ramaiya. 2016. Cancer imaging at the crossroads of precision medicine: Perspective from an academic imaging department in a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Journal of the American College of Radiology 13(4):365–371.

Van der Sijs, H., J. Aarts, A. Vulto, and M. Berg. 2006. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 13(2):138–147.

Volynskaya, Z., H. Chow, A. Evans, A. Wolff, C. Lagmay-Traya, and S. L. Asa. 2017. Integrated pathology informatics enables high-quality personalized and precision medicine: Digital pathology and beyond. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 142(3):369–382.

Warner, J. L., S. K. Jain, and M. A. Levy. 2016. Integrating cancer genomic data into electronic health records. Genome Medicine 8(1):113.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×

Wilkinson, M. D., M. Dumontier, I. J. Aalbersberg, G. Appleton, M. Axton, A. Baak, N. Blomberg, J.-W. Boiten, L. B. da Silva Santos, P. E. Bourne, J. Bouwman, A. J. Brookes, T. Clark, M. Crosas, I. Dillo, O. Dumon, S. Edmunds, C. T. Evelo, R. Finkers, A. Gonzalez-Beltran, A. J. G. Gray, P. Groth, C. Goble, J. S. Grethe, J. Heringa, P. A. C. ’t Hoen, R. Hooft, T. Kuhn, R. Kok, J. Kok, S. J. Lusher, M. E. Martone, A. Mons, A. L. Packer, B. Persson, P. Rocca-Serra, M. Roos, R. van Schaik, S.-A. Sansone, E. Schultes, T. Sengstag, T. Slater, G. Strawn, M. A. Swertz, M. Thompson, J. van der Lei, E. van Mulligen, J. Velterop, A. Waagmeester, P. Wittenburg, K. Wolstencroft, J. Zhao, and B. Mons. 2016. The fair guiding principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Scientific Data 3:160018.

Zaharchuk, G., E. Gong, M. Wintermark, D. Rubin, and C. P. Langlotz. 2018. Deep learning in neuroradiology. American Journal of Neuroradiology. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A5543. Epub ahead of print.

Zon, R. T., S. B. Edge, R. D. Page, J. N. Frame, G. H. Lyman, J. L. Omel, D. S. Wollins, S. R. Green, and L. D. Bosserman. 2017. American Society of Clinical Oncology criteria for high-quality clinical pathways in oncology. Journal of Oncology Practice 13(3):207–210.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×
Page 58
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×
Page 59
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×
Page 60
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×
Page 61
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×
Page 62
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×
Page 63
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25163.
×
Page 64
Next: Appendix A: Statement of Task »
Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop Get This Book
×
 Improving Cancer Diagnosis and Care: Patient Access to Oncologic Imaging and Pathology Expertise and Technologies: Proceedings of a Workshop
Buy Paperback | $55.00 Buy Ebook | $44.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

Rapid advances in cancer research, the development of new and more sophisticated approaches to diagnostic testing, and the growth in targeted cancer therapies are transforming the landscape of cancer diagnosis and care. These innovations have contributed to improved outcomes for patients with cancer, but they have also increased the complexity involved in diagnosis and subsequent care decisions.

To examine opportunities to improve cancer diagnosis and care, the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine developed a two-workshop series. The first workshop, held on February 12–13, 2018, in Washington, DC, focused on potential strategies to ensure that patients have access to appropriate expertise and technologies in oncologic pathology and imaging to inform their cancer diagnosis and treatment planning, as well as assessment of treatment response and surveillance. This publication chronicles the presentations and discussions at the workshop.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!