National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 7. Conclusions and Future Research
Page 183
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Developing an Expanded Functional Classification System for More Flexibility in Geometric Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25178.
×
Page 183
Page 184
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Developing an Expanded Functional Classification System for More Flexibility in Geometric Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25178.
×
Page 184
Page 185
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Developing an Expanded Functional Classification System for More Flexibility in Geometric Design. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25178.
×
Page 185

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

183 References American Association of State Highway Officials. (1964). A Guide for Functional Highway Classification. American Association of State Highway Officials (AASHO), National Association of Counties (NACO), National Association of County Engineers (NACE). Washington D.C. American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials. (2004a). A Guide for Achieving Flexibility in Highway Design. Washington, D.C. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2004b). Guide for the Planning, Design and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities. AASHTO, Washington, D.C. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2011). A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. AASHTO, Washington, D.C. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2010). Highway Safety Manual; 1st Edition. AASHTO, Washington, D.C. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2012). Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. AASHTO, Washington, D.C. American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials. (2014). A Guide for Geometric Design of Transit Facilities on Highways and Streets. Washington, D.C. Aubarch, L. (2009). Towards a Functional Classification Replacement. PedShed. Retrieved from: http://pedshed.net/?p=227 (accessed May 2015) Australian Road Research Board (ARRB). (1979). Urban Road Classification and Local Street Function. ARRB Internal Report AIR 1074-2, Sydney, Australia. AustRoads. (2006). Guide to Road Design. AustRoads Project No. TP1046, AustRoads Publication No. AGRD02/06, Sydney, Australia. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). (2014). Retrieved from: www.dot.ca.gov/hq/ LandArch/mainstreet/main_street_3rd_edition.pdf (accessed May 2016) Connecticut Department of Transportation. (2003). Highway Design Manual, Chapter 6, Section 6-1.0. Hartford, CT. Donnell, E., Hines, S., Mahoney, D., Porter, R., & McGee, H. (2009). Speed Concepts: Informational Guide, FHWA-SA-10-001. Washington, DC. Duany Plater-Zyberk & Company. (2003). SmartCode 9.2. Retrieved from: http://www.smartcode central.org (accessed May 2016) Federal Highway Administration. (1982). Highway Functional Classification: A Management Tool. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. Federal Highway Administration. (1992). Selecting Roadway Treatments to Accommodate Bicycles. FHWA-RD-92-073, U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C.

184 Federal Highway Administration. (1997). Flexibility in Highway Design. FHWA-PD-97-062, Washington, D.C. Federal Highway Administration. (2010a). Guidance for the Functional Classification of Highways (Updated). Memorandum, Washington, D.C. Federal Highway Administration. (2010b). Livability in Transportation Guidebook. FHWA-HEP-10- 028, Washington, D.C. Federal Highway Administration. (2013). Highway Functional Classification: Concepts, Criteria, and Procedures. FHWA-PL-13-026, Washington, D.C. Hall, R. (2003). Reengineering the suburban DNA. Proceedings from ITE Technical Meeting, Ft. Lauderdale, FL. Idaho DOT. (2009). Technical Report 5: Highway System Classification. Boise, ID. Institute of Transportation Engineers. (2010). Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. Kirk, A., Hartman, D., & Stamatiadis, N. (2010). Context Sensitive Solutions: A Manual For Practitioners. Academy for Community Transportation Innovation, University of Kentucky. Kane, R.M. (2003). Air Transportation: 1903-2003, 14th Edition. Keuper, D. (November 2010). The Context-Sensitive State Design Manual. ITE Journal. Marshall, S., Jones, P., & Plowright, I. (2004). A Framework for Classification and Assessment of Arterial Systems. University of Westminster, UK. Missouri Department of Transportation. (2007). Practical Design. Jefferson City, MO. National Association of City Transportation Officials. (2011). Urban Bikeway Design Guide. NACTO, New York, NY. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. (2002). 2002 National Survey of Pedestrian and Bicyclist Attitudes and Behaviors - Highlights Report. Washington, DC. New Jersey Department of Transportation and Pennsylvania Department of Transportation. (2008). Smart Transportation Guidebook: Planning and Designing Highways and Streets that Support Livable Communities. Delaware Valley Regional Planning Commission, Philadelphia, PA. Smart Growth America 2015. Retrieved from: http://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/documents /m2d2-revising-the-vermont-state-standards.pdf (accessed May 2016). Reed, S., & Baker, S. (2010). Street Design: Part 1—Complete Streets. FHWA-HRT-10-005, Vol 74, No. 1. Stamatiadis, N. (2005). Context Sensitive Design: Issues with Design Elements. ASCE Transportation Journal, 131(5), 374-378.

185 Stamatiadis, N. & Hartman D. (2011). Context Sensitive Solutions vs. Practical Solutions: What Are the Differences? Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Record 2262, pp 173-180. Stamatiadis, N., Kirk, A., Hartman, D., and Pigman, J. Quantifying the Benefits of Context Sensitive Solutions, NCHRP 642, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. 2009. Stamatiadis, N., Kirk, A., Hartman, D., & Pigman, J. (2008). Practical Solutions Concepts for Planning and Designing Roadways in Kentucky. Kentucky Transportation Research Center Report KTC-08-30. College of Engineering, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY. Taylor, T., Finch, J., & Najaran, M. (2002). Beyond Functional Classification – A Context Sensitive Approach. Proceedings ITE Technical Meeting, Philadelphia, PA. Torbic, D. et al. (2010). Design Guidance for High-Speed to Low-Speed Transition Zones for Rural Highways. NCHRP Report 737, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Board. (2010). Highway Capacity Manual. Washington, DC. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. (1974). Highway Functional Classification: Concepts, Criteria, and Procedures. Washington, D.C. Vermont Agency of Transportation. (1997). Vermont State Design Standards. Vermont Agency of Transportation, Montpelier, VT.

Next: Appendix A »
Developing an Expanded Functional Classification System for More Flexibility in Geometric Design Get This Book
×
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Web-Only Document 230: Developing an Expanded Functional Classification System for More Flexibility in Geometric Design, which documents the methodology of NCHRP Research Report 855: An Expanded Functional Classification System for Highways and Streets builds upon preliminary engineering of a design project, including developing the purpose and need.

In particular, NCHRP Web-Only Document 230 provides additional contexts beyond urban and rural, facilitates accommodation of modes other than personal vehicles and adds overlays for transit and freight.

Two case studies illustrating an application of the expanded system to actual projects are included.

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!