National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: 5 The Analytic Hierarchy Process and Expert Elicitation
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25236.
×

References

DOE (U.S. Department of Energy). 2011. Radioactive Waste Management Manual, DOE M 435.1-1, Change 2.

DOE. 2012. Final Tank Closure and Waste Management Environmental Impact Statement for the Hanford Site, Richland, Washington, DOE/EIS-0391, November 2012.

DOE-EM (U.S. Department of Energy’s Office of Environmental Management). 2015. EM’s Office of River Protection Completes Waste Retrieval in Another Hanford Tank, December 29, 2015.

GAO (U.S. Government Accountability Office). 2017. Nuclear Waste: Opportunities Exist to Reduce Risks and Costs by Evaluating Different Waste Treatment Approaches at Hanford, Report to Congressional Addressees, GAO-17-306, May 2017.

Lutze, W., and R.C. Ewing, editors. 1988. Radioactive Waste Forms for the Future. North Holland, Amsterdam, Netherlands. Elsevier Science Publishers.

NASEM (National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine). 2018. Review of the Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #1. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

NRC (National Research Council). 2011. Waste Forms Technology and Performance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

ORP (Office of River Protection). 2017. River Protection Project System Plan, Revision 8, ORP-11242. Prepared for the U.S. Department of Energy’s Assistant Secretary for Environmental Management, October 2017.

Peterson, R.A., E.C. Buck, J. Chun, R.C. Daniel, D.L. Herting, E.S. Ilton, G.J. Lumetta, and S.B. Clark. 2018. Review of the Scientific Understanding of Radioactive Waste at the U.S. DOE Hanford Site. Environmental Science and Technology 52(2):381-396.

Saaty, T.L. 2008. Decision making with the analytical hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1(1).

Schepens, R. 2003. 03-ED-091, U.S. Department of Energy, June 12, 2003. Letter to Michael A. Wilson, Program Manager, State of Washington, Department of Ecology.

WCS (Waste Control Specialists). 2011. Updated Performance Assessment for the Low-Level Waste Facility. Submitted to Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Waste Control Specialists, LLC, October 17, 2011.

WRPS (Washington River Protection Solutions). 2018. The Tanks. Available at https://wrpstoc.com/tank-operations/the-tanks.

Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Review of the Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #2. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25236.
×
Page 39
Next: Appendix A Section 3134 of the Fiscal Year 2017 National Defense Authorization Act »
Review of the Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #2 Get This Book
×
 Review of the Draft Analysis of Supplemental Treatment Approaches of Low-Activity Waste at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation: Review #2
Buy Paperback | $40.00 Buy Ebook | $32.99
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

In 1943, as part of the Manhattan Project, the Hanford Nuclear Reservation was established with the mission to produce plutonium for nuclear weapons. During 45 years of operations, the Hanford Site produced about 67 metric tonnes of plutonium—approximately two-thirds of the nation’s stockpile. Production processes generated radioactive and other hazardous wastes and resulted in airborne, surface, subsurface, and groundwater contamination. Presently, 177 underground tanks contain collectively about 210 million liters (about 56 million gallons) of waste. The chemically complex and diverse waste is difficult to manage and dispose of safely.

Section 3134 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017 calls for a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) to conduct an analysis of approaches for treating the portion of low-activity waste (LAW) at the Hanford Nuclear Reservation intended for supplemental treatment. The second of four, this report reviews the results of the assessments, including the formulation and presentation of conclusions and the characterization and treatment of uncertainties.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    Switch between the Original Pages, where you can read the report as it appeared in print, and Text Pages for the web version, where you can highlight and search the text.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  9. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!