Design Guide for Low-Speed Multimodal Roadways (2018)

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

265 AARP and the National Complete Streets Coalition. 2015. Evaluating Complete Streets Projects: A Guide for Prac- titioners. AARP, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.smartgrowthamerica.org/app/legacy/documents/ evaluating-complete-streets-projects.pdf. AASHTO. 2004a. A Guide for Achieving Flexibility in Highway Design. American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2004b. Guide for the Planning, Design and Operation of Pedestrian Facilities. American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2005. A Guide to Accommodating Utilities Within Highway Right-of-Way, 4th Ed. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2010. Highway Safety Manual (HSM), with 2014 supplement. American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2011a. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 6th Ed. (The Green Book). American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2011b. Roadside Design Guide. American Association of State Highways and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2014a. Guide for Geometric Design of Transit Facilities on Highways and Streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AASHTO. 2014b. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. AREMA. n.d. Communications & Signals Manual. Website. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association, Lanham, MD. Online: http://www.arema.org/AREMA_MBRR/Store/C_S_TOC.aspx. AREMA. 2017. Communications and Signal Manual. American Railway Engineering and Maintenance of Way Association, Lanham, MD. Bonneson, J. A., and M.D. Fontaine. 2001. NCHRP Report 457: Evaluating Intersection Improvements: An Engineering Study Guide. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Byszeski, S. 2003. Street Pedestrian Crossing Sign Test. City of Redmond, Redmond, WA. Cambridge Systematics, Inc. and High Street Consulting Group. NCHRP Report 660: Transportation Performance Management: Insight from Practitioners. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2010. Cascade Bicycle Club. 2011. “Multimodal Level of Service in King County: A Guide to Incorporating All Modes of Transportation into Local Jurisdictions’ Roadway Performance Measurements.” PowerPoint presentation created by the Cascade Bicycle Club for the Seattle and King County Department of Health and Human Services and Public Health, Seattle, WA. CATS. 2003. SmartCode v9 and Manual. Center for Applied Transect Studies Website: www.transect.org/codes. html. City of Charlotte. 2007a. Multimodal LOS Standards for Signalized Intersections. City of Charlotte, Charlotte, NC. City of Charlotte. 2007b. Urban Street Design Guidelines. Adopted by Charlotte City Council (October 22, 2007), Charlotte, N.C. Online: http://charlottenc.gov/Transportation/PlansProjects/Documents/USDG%20Full%20 Document.pdf. City of Fort Collins. 1997. Multimodal Transportation Level of Service Manual. Colorado Transportation Plan- ning, Fort Collins, CO. City of Phoenix. n.d. 3rd&5thavenues. Website. Street Transportation Department, City of Phoenix, Phoenix, AZ. Online: http://3rdand5thave.com/project-info/. References and Bibliography

266 Design Guide for Low-Speed Multimodal Roadways CMF Clearinghouse. n.d. Crash Modification Factor (CMF) Clearinghouse. Web page funded by the Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Online: www.cmfclearinghouse.org. CUTR. 2013. Landscaping of Highway Medians at Intersections. Report prepared for the Florida Department of Transportation by the Center for Urban Transportation Research, Tampa, FL. Dixon, K. H., et al. 2008a. Determining Effective Roadway Design Treatments for Transitioning From Rural Areas to Urban Areas on State Highways. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, OR. Dixon, K. H., et al. 2008b. NCHRP Report 612: Safe and Aesthetic Design of Urban Roadside Treatments. Trans- portation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Donnell, E. T., et al. 2009. FHWA-SA-10-001. FHWA Speed Concepts: Informational Guide. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation. Online: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/speedmgt/ref_mats/ fhwasa10001/. Dowling, R., et al. 2008. NCHRP Report 616: Multimodal Level of Service Analysis for Urban Streets. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C. Dowling, R., et al. 2016. NCHRP Report 825: Planning and Preliminary Engineering Applications Guide to the Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Eccles, K. A., and H. S. Levinson. 2007. TCRP Report 117: Design, Operation, and Safety of At-Grade Crossings of Exclusive Busways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. ECMT. 2006. Speed Management. European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Germany. ETSC. 1995. Reducing Traffic Injuries Resulting from Excess and Inappropriate Speed. European Transport Safety Council, Brussels, Belgium. Fehr and Peers. n.d. Multimodal Level of Service Toolkit. Fehr and Peers (Corporate Office), Walnut Creek, CA. Online: http://asap.fehrandpeers.com/mmlos/. FHWA. n.d.a. “Bicycles and Pedestrians” Web page on PlanWorks Application. Website: www.fhwaapps.fhwa.dot. gov/planworks/Application/Show/17. FHWA. n.d.b. Context Sensitive Solutions, “Charlotte, NC – Urban Street Design Guidelines,” Web page: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/css/case_studies/charlotte/. FHWA. n.d.c. Every Day Counts, An Innovation Partnership with States. Website: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ innovation/everydaycounts/everydaycounts_overview.pdf. FHWA. n.d.d. “Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System” and “Bicycle Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System.” Web pages on PEDBIKESAFE Website: www.pedbikesafe.org. FHWA. n.d.e. “Performance-Based Planning Focus Area” Web page: https://www.planning.dot.gov/focus_ performance.asp. FHWA. 1997. Flexibility in Highway Design. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 1998. Older Driver Highway Design Handbook. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/97135/ rs1.cfm. FHWA. 2001a. An Analysis of Factors Contributing to “Walking Along Roadway” Crashes: Research Study and Guidelines for Sidewalks and Walkways. Report No. FHWA-RD-01-101. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C. FHWA. 2001b. Decision Support Guide for the Installation of Shoulder and Center Line Rumble Strips on Non- Freeways. FHWA-SA-16-115. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington D.C. FHWA. 2001c. Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part I, A Review of Existing Guidelines. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2001d. Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part II, Best Practices Guide. Federal Highway Adminis- tration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2002. Pedestrian Facilities Users Guide: Providing Safety and Mobility. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2003. Interactive Highway Safety Design Model (IHSDM). Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2004. Characteristics of Emerging Road and Trail Users and Their Safety. FHWA-HRT-04-104. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2005. Safety Effects of Marked versus Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations: Final Report and Recommended Guidelines. FHWA-HRT-04-100. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2006a. Evaluation of Safety, Design, and Operation of Shared-Use Paths, Final Report. FHWA-HRT-05-137. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/pedbike/05137/. FHWA. 2006b. Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation. FHWA- HRT-05-133. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

References and Bibliography 267 FHWA. 2006c. Shared Use Path Level of Use Calculator. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/research/safety/ pedbike/05138/. FHWA. 2007a. Desktop Reference for Crash Reduction Factors. FHWA-SA-07-015. Federal Highway Administra- tion, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2007b. Railroad-Highway Grade Crossing Handbook. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2008. ACTION: Consideration and Implementation of Proven Safety Countermeasures. Memorandum. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2009a. Context-Sensitive Solutions Primer. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2009b. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices, 2009 Ed. (with Revision Numbers 1 and 2 incorpo- rated May 2012). Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: http://mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/. FHWA. 2009c. Speed Concepts: Informational Guide. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2010a. Advancing Metropolitan Planning for Operations: An Objectives-Driven, Performance-Based Approach – A Guidebook. Office of Operations, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/publications/fhwahop10026/. FHWA. 2010b. Effects of Yellow Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacons on Yielding at Multilane Uncontrolled Crosswalks. FHWA-HRT-10-043. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2010c. Evaluation of Lane Reduction “Road Diet” Measures on Crashes. FHWA-HRT-10-053, Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2011. Livability in Transportation Guidebook: Planning Approaches that Promote Livability. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ livability/case_studies/guidebook/livabilitygb10.pdf. FHWA. 2012a. Guidance Memorandum on Promoting the Implementation of Proven Safety Countermeasures. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2012b. Speed Management: A Manual for Local Rural Road Owners. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2013a. Bicycle and Pedestrian Facility Design Flexibility. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2013b. Highway Functional Classification: Concepts, Criteria and Procedures. Federal Highway Adminis- tration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2013c. Pedestrian Safety Guide for Transit Agencies. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2013d. Performance Based Planning and Programming Guidebook. Federal Highway Administra- tion, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/ performance_based_planning/pbpp_guidebook/. FHWA. 2013e. Safety Benefits of Raised Medians and Pedestrian Refuge Areas. FHWA Safety Program, FHWA- SA-10-020. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2014a. Engineering Countermeasures for Reducing Speeds: A Desktop Reference of Potential Effectiveness. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2014b. Engineering Speed Management Countermeasures: A Desktop Reference of Potential Effectiveness in Reducing Crashes. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2014c. Handbook for Designing Roadways for the Aging Population. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2014d. Highway Design Handbook for Older Drivers and Pedestrians. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2014e. “HSM Overview Fact Sheet.” Web page. Federal Highway Administration. U.S. Department of Transportation. Online: https://safety.fhwa.dot.gov/hsm/factsheet/. FHWA. 2014f. Road Diet Informational Guide. FHWA-SA-14-028. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2015a. A Resident’s Guide for Creating Safe and Walkable Communities. FHWA-SA-07-016. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2015b. Information: Relationship between Design Speed and Posted Speed. Guidance Memorandum, October 7, 2015. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/design/standards/151007.cfm. FHWA. 2015c. Memorandum: Relationship between Design Speed and Posted Speed. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.

268 Design Guide for Low-Speed Multimodal Roadways FHWA. 2015d. Public Involvement Techniques for Transportation Decision-making. FHWA-HEP-15-044. Federal Transportation Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/planning/public_involvement/publications/pi_techniques/. FHWA. 2015e. Road Diet Desk Reference. FHWA-SA-15-046. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2015f. Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide. Publication Number: FHWA-HEP-15-025. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https:// www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/bicycle_pedestrian/publications/separated_bikelane_pdg/page00.cfm. FHWA. 2015g. Separated Bike Lane Planning and Design Guide. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Depart- ment of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016a. Achieving Multimodal Networks: Applying Design Flexibility and Reducing Conflicts. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016b. Applying Performance Based Practical Design Methods to Complete Streets—A Primer on Employing Performance-Based Practical Design and Transportation Systems Management and Operations to Enhance the Design of Complete Streets. FHWA-HOP-16-059, Report No. 18112. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016c. Guidebook for Developing Pedestrian and Bicycle Performance Measures. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016d. Integrating Speed Management within Roadway Departure, Intersections, and Pedestrian and Bicyclist Safety Focus Areas. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016e. Small Town and Rural Multimodal Networks. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2017. State of the Practice for Shoulder and Center Line Rumble Strip Implementation on Non-Freeway Facilities. FHWA-HRT-17-026. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Fitzpatrick, K., et al. 2001. Evaluation of Pedestrian and Bicycle Engineering Countermeasures: Rectangular Rapid- Flashing Beacons, HAWKs, Sharrows, Crosswalk Markings, and the Development of an Evaluation Methods Report. FHWA-HRT-11-039. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C. Fitzpatrick, K., et al. 2003. NCHRP Report 504: Design Speed, Operating Speed, and Posted Speed Practices. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Fitzpatrick, K., et al. 2006. TCRP Report 112/NCHRP Report 562: Improving Pedestrian Safety at Unsignalized Crossings. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Fitzpatrick, K., et al. 2015a. TCRP Report 17: Integration of Light Rail Transit into City Streets. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Fitzpatrick, K., et al. 2015b. TCRP Report 175: Guidebook on Pedestrian Crossings of Public Transit Rail Services. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Fitzpatrick, K., et al. 2015c. TCRP Web-Only Document 63: Treatments Used at Pedestrian Crossings of Public Transit Rail Services. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Online: www.trb.org/Main/Blurbs/172337.aspx. Fitzpatrick, K., et al. 2016. NCHRP Report 745: Left-Turn Accommodations at Unsignalized Intersections. Trans- portation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Flagstaff MPO. 2009. Flagstaff Pathways 2030 Regional Transportation Plan. Flagstaff Metropolitan Planning Organization, Flagstaff, AZ. Florida DOT. 1999. Florida Pedestrian Planning and Design Handbook. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL. Florida DOT. 2013. Quality/Level of Service Handbook. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL. Forbes, G. 2011. NCHRP Synthesis Report 412: Speed Reduction Techniques for Rural High-to-Low Speed Transi- tions. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Furth, P. G., et al. 2010. “Parking Lane Widths and Bicycle Operating Space.” Transportation Research Record 2190, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Gattis, J. L. et al. 2010. NCHRP Report 659: Guide for the Geometric Design of Driveways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Hallmark, S. L., et al. 2007. Evaluation of Gateway and Low-Cost Traffic-Calming Treatments for Major Routes in Small Rural Communities. Center for Transportation Research and Education, Iowa State University, Ames, IA. Harkey, D.L., et al. 2010. NCHRP Web-Only Document 150: Accessible Pedestrian Signals: A Guide to Best Practices (Workshop Edition). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Harwood, D. W. 1990. NCHRP Report 330: Effective Utilization of Street Width on Urban Arterials. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Harwood, D. W., et al. 2016. NCHRP Report 783: Evaluation of the 13 Controlling Criteria for Geometric Design. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. ITE. 1998. Design and Safety of Pedestrian Facilities. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C.

References and Bibliography 269 ITE. 1999. Traffic Calming: State of the Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. ITE. 2004. Promoting Sustainable Transportation Through Site Design: An ITE Proposed Recommended Practice. IBE Group, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. ITE. 2009a. Traffic Control Devices Handbook, 2nd Ed. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. ITE. 2009b. Urban Street Geometric Design Handbook. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. ITE. 2010a. Designing Walkable Urban Thoroughfares: A Context Sensitive Approach. An ITE Recommended Practice. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. ITE. 2010b. “HPE’s Walkability Index: Quantifying the Pedestrian Experience.” In: Compendium of Technical Papers, ITE 2010 Technical Conference and Exhibit (Savannah, Georgia, March 2010). Institute of Trans- portation Engineers, Washington, D.C. ITE. 2016. Recommended Design Guidelines to Accommodate Pedestrians and Bicycles in Interchanges. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Washington, D.C. Kimley-Horn and Assoc. 2004. Bus Stop Safety and Design Guidelines. Prepared for Orange County Transportation Authority, Orange County, CA. Online: https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/bus_stop_safety_design_guidelines_ kimley.pdf. Kittelson and Associates, Inc., et al. 2003. TCRP Report 100: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 2d Ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Kittelson and Associates, Inc., et al. 2013. TCRP Report 165: Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual, 3d Ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Korve, H. W., et al. 1996. TCRP Report 17: Integration of Light Rail Transit into City Streets. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. Limpert, R. 1994. Motor Vehicle Accident Reconstruction and Cause Analysis, 4th Ed. The Michie Company, Charlottesville, VA. LTSA. 2002. Guidelines for Urban-Rural Speed Thresholds—RTS15. Land Transport Safety Authority, Wellington, NZ. Lynott, J. et al. 2009. Planning Complete Streets for an Aging America. AARP Public Policy Institute, AARP, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.aarp.org/home-garden/livable-communities/info-08-2009/ Planning_Complete_Streets_for_an_Aging_America.html Markowitz, F., and S. Sciortino. 2006. Pedestrian Countdown Signals: Experience with an Extensive Pilot Evalu- ation. ITE Journal, 76, No. 1. Available online: http://www.bikewalk.org/2006conference/vconference/ presentations/PedestrianandBicycleTrafficSignalIssuesandDirections2.pdf. Massachusetts Highway Department. 2006. Project Development and Design Guide. Massachusetts Department of Transportation, Boston, MA. Online: http://www.massdot.state.ma.us/highway/DoingBusinessWithUs/ ManualsPublicationsForms/ProjectDevelopmentDesignGuide.aspx. Massengale, J. 2015. “To Stop Pedestrian Deaths NYC Must Change How it Builds Streets.” Web page on Citylimits.org Website: https://citylimits.org/2015/12/22/to-stop-pedestrian-deaths-we-have-to-change- the-way-we-build-our-streets/. Middleton, S. 2015a. Final Report of the Peer Exchange on “Cross-Modal Project Prioritization” (December 16–17 2014, Raleigh, NC). Online: https://www.planning.dot.gov/Peer/NorthCarolina/NCDOT_cross- modal_12-16-14.pdf. Middleton, S. 2015b. Final Report of the Peer Exchange on “Establishing and Integrating Performance Measures” (April 27–28, 2015, Dimondale, MI). FHWA-HEP-15-052; DOT-VNTSC-FHWA 15-18. Online: https:// planning.dot.gov/Peer/michigan/Dimondale_04-27-15_Perf_Measures.pdf. MTI. 2012. Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity. MTI Report 11-19. Mineta Transportation Institute, San Jose, California, 2012. NACTO. 2013. Urban Street Design Guide. National Association of City Transportation Officials, New York. Online: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-street-design-guide/. NACTO. 2014. Urban Bikeway Design Guide. National Association of City Transportation Officials, New York. Online: https://nacto.org/publication/urban-bikeway-design-guide/. NACTO. 2016. Transit Street Design Guide. National Association of City Transportation Officials, New York. Online: https://nacto.org/publication/transit-street-design-guide/. NADO. 2011. Transportation Project Prioritization and Performance-based Planning Efforts in Rural and Small Metropolitan Regions. National Association of Development Organizations, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.nado.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/RPOprioritization.pdf. NCUTLO. 2000. Uniform Vehicle Code. National Committee on Uniform Traffic Laws and Ordinances, Sun City West, AZ. Neuman, T. R., et al. 2002. NCHRP Report 480: A Guide to Best Practices for Achieving Context Sensitive Solutions. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Neuman, T. R., et al. 2004. NCHRP Report 500: Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan, Volume 3: A Guide for Addressing Collisions with Trees in Hazardous Locations. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C.

270 Design Guide for Low-Speed Multimodal Roadways Neuman, T. R., et al. 2017. NCHRP Research Report 839: A Performance-Based Highway Geometric Design Process. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017. NHTSA. 2015. Traffic Safety Facts: 2015 Data, Large Trucks. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov. North Carolina DOT. 2012. North Carolina Complete Streets Planning and Design Guidelines. North Carolina Board of Transportation, North Carolina Department of Transportation. Online: http://www.pedbikeinfo. org/pdf/PlanDesign_SamplePlans_CS_NCDOT2012.pdf. NRA. 2005. Guidelines on Traffic Calming for Towns and Villages on National Routes (REV B). National Roads Authority, Dublin, Ireland. Oregon DOT. 1999. Main Street . . . When a Highway Runs Through It: A Handbook for Oregon Communities. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, OR. Oregon DOT. 2016. Analysis Procedures Manual (APM). Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, Oregon, 2016. Parker, T. L. 2012. NCHRP Legal Research Digest 57: Tort Liability Defense Practices for Design Flexibility. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. PBIC. n.d. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information. Website. Pedestrian and Bicycle Information Center, University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, Chapel Hill, NC. Online: http://www.pedbikeinfo.org/. People for Bikes. 2015. U.S. Bicycling Participation Benchmarking Report: Measuring How America Rides. Boulder, CO. Online: https://peopleforbikes.org/resources/u-s-bicycling-participation-benchmarking- report/. Petritsch, T. A., et al. 2008. Pedestrian Level-of-Service Model for Arterials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2073, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Potts, I., et al. 2006. NCHRP Project 03-72, “Lane Widths, Channelized Right Turns, and Right-Turn Deceleration Lanes in Urban and Suburban Areas,” Contractor’s Final Reports, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Potts, I., D. Harwood, and K. Richard. 2007. Relationship of Lane Width to Safety for Urban and Suburban Arterials. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2023. Transporta- tion Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Rahman, Z., et al. 2017. Assessment of the Impact of Lane Width on Arterial Crashes. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, 10(3). DOI: 10.1080/19439962.2017.1281366. Ray, B. L., et al. 2008. NCHRP Report 613: Guidelines for Selection of Speed Reduction Treatments at High-Speed Intersections. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Ray, B. L., et al. 2011. NCHRP Report 687: Guidance for Ramp and Interchange Spacing. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Ray, B. L., et al. 2014. NCHRP Report 785: Performance-Based Analysis of Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014. Roadway Safety Foundation et al. n.d. The Clearinghouse for Older Road User Safety (ChORUS). Website: www. roadsafeseniors.org. Rodegerdts, L., et al. 2010. NCHRP Report 672: Roundabouts: An Informational Guide, 2d. ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Rosales, J. 2006. Road Diet Handbook: Setting Trends for Livable Streets. Parsons Brinckerhoff, New York, NY. Ryus, P., et al. 2016. TCRP Report 183: A Guidebook on Transit-Supportive Roadway Strategies. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. SFDPH. 2009. Bicycle Environmental Quality Index (BEQI): Draft Report (June 2009). Program on Health, Equity and Sustainability Environmental Health Section, San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA. SFDPH. 2012. Pedestrian Environmental Quality Index: Street Auditor’s Training Manual. Program on Health, Equity, and Sustainability. San Francisco Department of Public Health, San Francisco, CA. Online: https:// merritt.cdlib.org/d/ark:%252F13030%252Fm5m630hw/1/producer%252F892135664.pdf. Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. 2007a. Bicycle Level of Service: Applied Model. Sprinkle Consulting, Inc., Tampa, FL. Sprinkle Consulting, Inc. 2007b. Pedestrian Level of Service Model. Sprinkle Consulting, Inc., Tampa, FL. Stamatiadis, N., et al. 2014. Transition Zone Design. Research Report KTC-13-14/SPR 431-12-1F. Kentucky Transportation Center, Lexington, KY. Stamatiadis, N., et al. 2017. An Expanded Functional Classification System for Highways and Streets. Pre-publication draft of NCHRP Research Report 855. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. Torbic, D. J., et al. 2009. NCHRP Report 641: Guidance for the Design and Application of Shoulder and Centerline Rumble Strips. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Torbic, D. J., et al. 2012. NCHRP Report 737: Design Guidance for High-Speed to Low-Speed Transition Zones for Rural Highways. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.

References and Bibliography 271 Torbic, D. J., et al. 2014. NCHRP Report 766: Recommended Bicycle Lane Widths for Various Roadway Characteristics. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. TRB. 2004. Transportation Research E-Circular E-C067: Context-Sensitive Design Around the Country: Some Examples. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. TRB. 2010. Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. TRB. 2016a. Access Management Manual, 2d Ed. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. TRB. 2016b. Highway Capacity Manual, 6th Ed.: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis (HCM). Transpor- tation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. TriMet. 2010. Bus Stops Guidelines. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon, Portland, OR. Online: https://nacto.org/docs/usdg/bus_stop_guidelines_trimet.pdf. TSP•2. 2016. “Highway Capacity Manual, Sixth Edition: A Guide for Multimodal Mobility Analysis” Web page on TSP 2 AASHTO Pavement Preservation (November 23, 2016) Website: https://tsp2pavement.pavementpreservation. org/2016/11/23/highway-capacity-manual-sixth-edition-a-guide-for-multimodal-mobility-analysis/. TTI and CH2M-Hill. 2012. NCHRP Project 17-45, “Safety Prediction Methodology and Analysis Tool for Freeways and Interchanges,” Contractor’s Final Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. TTI et al. 1996. TCRP Report 19: Guidelines for the Location and Design of Bus Stops. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C. U.S. Access Board. 2002. Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG). United States Access Board, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and-standards/buildings-and- sites/about-the-ada-standards/background/adaag. U.S. Access Board. 2005. Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way. United States Access Board, Washington, D.C. U.S. Access Board. 2010. ADA Standards for Accessible Design. United States Access Board, Washington, D.C. U.S. Access Board. 2011. Proposed Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way (PROWAG). United States Access Board, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.access-board.gov/guidelines-and- standards/streets-sidewalks/public-rights-of-way/proposed-rights-of-way-guidelines. U.S. Access Board. 2013. Accessibility Guidelines for Pedestrian Facilities in the Public Right-of-Way; Shared-Use Paths. United States Access Board, Washington, D.C. U.S. DOJ. 2010a. 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design (2010 ADA Standards). U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.ada.gov/2010ADAstandards_index.htm. U.S. DOJ and U.S.DOT. 2013. Department of Justice/Department of Transportation Joint Technical Assistance on the Title II of the Americans with Disabilities Act Requirements to Provide Curb Ramps when Streets, Roads, or Highways are Altered through Resurfacing. U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.ada.gov/doj-fhwa-ta.htm#_ftnref4. U.S.DOT. 1999. Design Guidance Accommodating Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: A Recommended Approach. Policy Statement Integrating Bicycling and Walking into Transportation Infrastructure. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. U.S.DOT. 2006. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Standards for Transportation Facilities. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.access-board.gov/attachments/article/1417/ ADAdotstandards.pdf. U.S.DOT. 2009. National Household Travel Survey. Federal Highway Administration. U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Online: https://nhts.ornl.gov/. U.S.DOT. 2010. U.S. Department of Transportation Policy Statement on Bicycle and Pedestrian Accommodation Regulations and Recommendations. Guidance document (March 2010). Online: https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ environment/bicycle_pedestrian/guidance/policy_accom.cfm. U.S. EPA. 2008. Managing Wet Weather with Green Infrastructure Municipal Handbook: Green Streets. EPA-833-F-08-009. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. U.S. EPA. 2011. Guide to Sustainable Transportation Performance Measures. EPA 231-K-10-004. U.S. Environ- mental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C. Online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/201401/ documents/sustainable_transpo_performance.pdf. Van Houten, R. 1988. “The Effects of Advance Stop Lines and Sign Prompts on Pedestrian Safety in a Crosswalk on a Multilane Highway.” Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, Vol. 21, No. 3 (Fall 1998). Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, Inc., Lawrence, KS. Waldheim, N., Wemple, E., and J. Fish. 2015. Applying Safety Data and Analysis to Performance Based Transporta- tion Planning. FHWA-SA-15-089. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C. Zegeer, C. V., et al. 2002. Safety Effects of Marked vs Unmarked Crosswalks at Uncontrolled Locations, Execu- tive Summary and Recommended Guidelines. FHWA-RD-01-075. Federal Highway Administration, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.