National Academies Press: OpenBook
« Previous: Chapter 5 - Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations for Future Research
Page 40
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Quantifying the Effects of Preservation Treatments on Pavement Performance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25298.
×
Page 40
Page 41
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Quantifying the Effects of Preservation Treatments on Pavement Performance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25298.
×
Page 41
Page 42
Suggested Citation:"References." National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2018. Quantifying the Effects of Preservation Treatments on Pavement Performance. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press. doi: 10.17226/25298.
×
Page 42

Below is the uncorrected machine-read text of this chapter, intended to provide our own search engines and external engines with highly rich, chapter-representative searchable text of each book. Because it is UNCORRECTED material, please consider the following text as a useful but insufficient proxy for the authoritative book pages.

40 AASHTO. 1999. Research Protocols for Pavement Preservation, AASHTO Lead States’ Work Plan. American Association of State Highway Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C. Amekudzi, A., and M. Meyer. 2011. Best Practices in Selecting Performance Measures and Standards for Effective Asset Management. Georgia Department of Transportation Office of Materials and Research, Forest Park, GA. Applied Pavement Technology, Inc. 2015. NCHRP Report 810: Consideration of Preservation in Pavement Design and Analysis Procedures. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Bryce, J., G. Flintsch, S. Katicha, B. Diefenderfer. 2013. Enhancing network-level decision making through the use of a structural capacity index. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2366. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington, D.C., pp. 64–70. Cambridge Systematics, Boston Strategies International, Gordon Proctor and Associates, and M. Markow. 2010. NCHRP Report 666: Target-Setting Methods and Data Management to Support Performance-Based Resource Allocation by Transportation Agencies. Final Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Acad- emies, Washington, D.C. Cambridge Systematics, Inc., PB Consult, and Texas Transportation Institute. 2006. NCHRP Report 551: Perfor- mance Measures and Targets for Transportation Asset Management. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C. Carroll, R. J., D. Ruppert, L. A. Stefanski, and C. M. Crainiceanu. 2006. Measurement Error in Nonlinear Models. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, FL. Carvalho, R., M. Ayres, H. Shirazi, O. Selezneva, and M. Darter. 2011. Impact of Design Features on Pavement Response and Performance in Rehabilitated Flexible and Rigid Pavements. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-HRT-10-066, Washington, D.C. CFR. 2016. Asset Management Plans. Federal Register, Vol. 81, No. 105, Part 515. Code of Federal Regulations. Washington, D.C., pp. 73263–73267. Chou, E., H. Pulugurta, and D. Datta. 2008. Pavement Forecasting Models. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA/OH-2008/3. Washington, DC. Corley-Lay, J. 2014. “Pavement Performance Measures: How States See Good/Fair/Poor.” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2431, pp. 1–5. Washington, D.C. de Leon Izeppi, E., S. Katicha, G. Flintsch, R. McCarthy, K. McGhee. 2016. Continuous Friction Measurement Equipment as a Tool for Improving Crash Rate Prediction: A Pilot Study. Virginia Transportation Research Council. Charlottesville, VA. FHWA. 2014. Highway Performance Monitoring System Field Manual. Federal Highway Administration Office of Highway Policy Information. Washington, D.C. FHWA. 2016. Information: Guidance on Highway Preservation and Maintenance. Federal Highway Administra- tion Associate Administrator for Infrastructure. Washington, D.C. Available at https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ preservation/memos/160225.cfm as of April 9, 2017. George, K.P. 2000. MDOT Pavement Management System Prediction Models and Feedback System Final Report. Federal Highway Administration and University of Mississippi, Report No. FWHA/MS-DOT-RD-00-119. Washington, D.C. Giuffre, W. 2010. Evaluation of Highway Performance Measures for a Multi-State Corridor-A Pilot Study. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-HIF-10-015. Washington, D.C. Grant, M., J. D’Ignazio, A. Bond, and A. McKeeman. 2013. Performance Based Planning and Programming Guidebook. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-HEP-13-041, Washington, D.C. Hajj, E., L. Loria, P. E. Sebaaly, C. M. Borroel, and P. Leiva. 2011. Optimum Time for Application of Slurry Seal to Asphalt Concrete Pavements. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board. No. 2235. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies. Washington, D.C., pp. 66–81. References

References 41 Heckel, L., and Y. Ouyang. 2007. Update of Condition Rating Survey (CRS) Calculation/Prediction Models- Final Report. Federal Highway Administration and Illinois Center for Transportation, Report No. FHWA- ICT-07-012. Washington, D.C. Ivan, J., N. Ravishanker, E. Jackson, B. Aronov, and S. Guo. 2012. A Statistical Analysis of the Effect of Wet-Pavement Friction on Highway Traffic Safety. Journal of Transportation Safety and Security, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 116–136. Labi, S., G. Lamptey, and S.-H. Kong. 2007. Effectiveness of Microsurfacing Treatments. Journal of Transportation Engineering. Vol. 133, pp. 298–307. Luhr, D., C. Kinne, J. Uhlmeyer, and J.P. Mahoney. 2010. “What We Don’t Know About Pavement Preservation.” Conference Proceedings from the First International Conference on Pavement Preservation. Newport Beach, CA, pp. 611–627. Mamlouk, M., and M. Dosa. 2014. Verification of effectiveness of chip seal as a pavement preventive maintenance treatment using LTPP data. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, vol. 15, no. 10, pp. 879–888. McGhee, K. 2002. Development and Implementation of Pavement Condition Indices for the Virginia Department of Transportation. Virginia Department of Transportation, Richmond, VA. Mills, L., N. Attoh-Okine, and S. McNeil. 2012. “Developing Pavement Performance Models for Delaware.” Presented at the 91st Annual Conference of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C. Ong, G.P., T. E. Nantung, and K.C. Sinha. Indiana Pavement Preservation Program. 2010. Joint Transportation Research Program, Indiana Department of Transportation and Purdue University, Report No. FHWA/IN/ JTRP-2010-14. West Lafayette. Proctor, G.D., S. Varma and S. Varnedoe. 2012. Asset Sustainability Index: A Proposed Measure for Long-Term Performance. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-HEP-12-046. Washington, D.C. Rada, G.R., B.A. Visintine, J. Bryce, S. Thyagarajan, and G.E. Elkins. 2016. Application and Validation of Remaining Service Interval Framework for Pavements. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-HRT-16-053. Washington, D.C. Roads Liaison Group. 2005. Guidance Document for Highway Infrastructure Asset Valuation. UK Department of Transport. London. Rydholm, T.C. and, D.R. Luhr. 2014. “Modeling and Analyzing Budget Constrained Pavement Preservation Strategies.” Presented at the 93rd Annual Conference of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C. Simpson, A., G. Rada, B. Visintine, J. Groeger, and J. Guerre. 2013. Improving FHWA’s Ability to Assess Highway Infrastructure Health: Development of Next Generation Pavement Performance Measures. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-HIF-13-042, Washington, D.C. Speir, R., T. Puzin, R. Barcena, and P. Desaraju. 2009. Development of Friction Improvement Policies and Guidelines for the Maryland State Highway Administration. Maryland State Highway Administration, Baltimore, MD. State of Queensland. 2013. Financial Management (Sustainability) Guidelines 2013. Queensland Department of Infrastructure. Brisbane. Tan, S., and D. Cheng. 2012. “A Case Study: Using A Performance-based Approach to Integrate Pavement Preser- vation into Pavement Management System.” Presented at the 91st Annual Conference of the Transportation Research Board. Washington, D.C. Topp, S. 2014. “Measuring Pavement Performance: European Perspective.” Presented at the 93rd Annual Con- ference of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. 2015. Natural Resources Management Gateway. Online at http://corpslakes.usace. army.mil/employees/faqs.cfm?Id=perf-measure (As of August 12, 2015). Wu, Z., J.L. Groeger, A.L. Simpson, and R.G. Hicks. 2010. Performance Evaluation of Various Rehabilitation and Preservation Treatments. Federal Highway Administration, Report No. FHWA-HIF-10-020. Washington, D.C. Wyoming DOT. 2014. Pavement Management System Manual. Wyoming Department of Transportation. Cheyenne, WY. Zietsman, J., T. Ramani, J. Potter, V. Reeder, and J. DeFlorio. 2011. NCHRP Report 708: A Guidebook for Sustain- ability Performance Measurement for Transportation Agencies. Final Report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C.

Next: Attachment - Guide for Pavement Preservation Performance Measures »
Quantifying the Effects of Preservation Treatments on Pavement Performance Get This Book
×
 Quantifying the Effects of Preservation Treatments on Pavement Performance
MyNAP members save 10% online.
Login or Register to save!
Download Free PDF

TRB's National Cooperative Highway Research Program (NCHRP) Research Report 858: Quantifying the Effects of Preservation Treatments on Pavement Performance presents a proposed framework that uses performance measures to quantify the changes in pavement performance in terms of condition, service life, and life-cycle costs. Pavement preservation provides a means for maintaining and improving the functional condition of an existing highway system and slowing deterioration. Additionally, the guide identifies alternate performance measures and describes a process for assessing their appropriateness for use in quantifying the effects of preservation treatments on pavement performance. Incorporating these measures in asset management systems would provide a means for selecting the appropriate preservation treatments and optimizing the allocation of resources.

READ FREE ONLINE

  1. ×

    Welcome to OpenBook!

    You're looking at OpenBook, NAP.edu's online reading room since 1999. Based on feedback from you, our users, we've made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

    Do you want to take a quick tour of the OpenBook's features?

    No Thanks Take a Tour »
  2. ×

    Show this book's table of contents, where you can jump to any chapter by name.

    « Back Next »
  3. ×

    ...or use these buttons to go back to the previous chapter or skip to the next one.

    « Back Next »
  4. ×

    Jump up to the previous page or down to the next one. Also, you can type in a page number and press Enter to go directly to that page in the book.

    « Back Next »
  5. ×

    To search the entire text of this book, type in your search term here and press Enter.

    « Back Next »
  6. ×

    Share a link to this book page on your preferred social network or via email.

    « Back Next »
  7. ×

    View our suggested citation for this chapter.

    « Back Next »
  8. ×

    Ready to take your reading offline? Click here to buy this book in print or download it as a free PDF, if available.

    « Back Next »
Stay Connected!